This topic is locked from further discussion.
Anyway, it really doesn't matter. If the game was exlusive to PS3, Xbox fanboys like you would bash it like you did before it came to Xbox. Now you just think it is better on your console.
This link was debunked months ago. I myself found a screenshot comparison ON THAT VERY WEBSITE for PS3/360 and they each looked equivalent to posters on this forum's satisfaction.
Moreover, other comparisons have been found....a full video on that website was featured, no visible differences. All from the demo.
No review of the full game on the net has YET stated any discrepency in terms of visuals, other than this on IGN: PS3 version has less screen tearing (minor complaint) and shorter loading times (install).
You CANNOT prove the legitimacy of these screens....no one can. No, a watermark proclaiming that one side is running on PS3 and the other is running on 360 DOES NOT count. Two screenshot comparisons with totally different outcomes from the same footage should be more than enough proof that this screenshot comparison cannot be taken as legitimate unless proven otherwise, running contrary to EVERY review posed for the game thus far.
And I have yet to see an account of gamers on this forum with actual footage or a direct comparison proclaiming one to be better than the other with evidence to back up their claim....there is speculation, to be sure, and there always is and always will be.
I'll take IGN on this one.
This link was debunked months ago. I myself found a screenshot comparison ON THAT VERY WEBSITE for PS3/360 and they each looked equivalent to posters on this forum's satisfaction.
Moreover, other comparisons have been found....a full video on that website was featured, no visible differences. All from the demo.
No review of the full game on the net has YET stated any discrepency in terms of visuals, other than this on IGN: PS3 version has less screen tearing (minor complaint) and shorter loading times (install).
You CANNOT prove the legitimacy of these screens....no one can. No, a watermark proclaiming that one side is running on PS3 and the other is running on 360 DOES NOT count. Two screenshot comparisons with totally different outcomes from the same footage should be more than enough proof that this screenshot comparison cannot be taken as legitimate unless proven otherwise, running contrary to EVERY review posed for the game thus far.
And I have yet to see an account of gamers on this forum with actual footage or a direct comparison proclaiming one to be better than the other with evidence to back up their claim....there is speculation, to be sure, and there always is and always will be.
I'll take IGN on this one.
BobHipJames
I was thinking that they could have been modified... Here it is.
Like you, I'm also with the reviewers, not the fanboys.
Anyway, it really doesn't matter. If the game was exlusive to PS3, Xbox fanboys like you would bash it like you did before it came to Xbox. Now you just think it is better on your console.
X_CAPCOM_X
:lol:And cows said they were betrayed and wouldn't ever buy it. They even went as far as to make a ton of petitions boycotting DMC4 and Capcom. Silly cows, DMC4 is for everyone.
Even if it were an inferior port (which it's not) the PS3's controller would still be far better for it. Gameplay>graphics anyone?Lazy_Boy88
^That is your opinion, of course. An opinion can't be factual. We all have our personal preferences.
The IGN review already said that in the end if you look at every nook and crany the PS3 version does look better,but not by a high margin.
The IGN review already said that in the end if you look at every nook and crany the PS3 version does look better,but not by a high margin.
finalfantasy94
Looks better, loads faster
yup, it's the better version
But it has better load times (fact), and a better controller (opinion).Udsen
23 min load time before you play (fact), takes up 5 gigs of harddrive space (fact)
I love the lemmings and the way their trying to state that DMC4 looks better on 360. Hasn't nearly every review said otherwise?
Minutely better visuals with slightly shorter load times on the....wait for it......PS3 lmao. Why the need to continue making threads your never going to win?
How can anyone who doesn't have vaseline smeared on their retinas say the PS3 version looks better? It uses a horrible blend effect to reduce aliasing.
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/4697/dmc46iy1.gif
speedsix
I guess IGN and Gametrailers must have had vaseline smeared across their eyes when they said the PS3 version looked slightly better. Sorry lems you lose!
[QUOTE="speedsix"]How can anyone who doesn't have vaseline smeared on their retinas say the PS3 version looks better? It uses a horrible blend effect to reduce aliasing.
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/4697/dmc46iy1.gif
I_Helios_I
I guess IGN and Gametrailers must have had vaseline smeared across their eyes when they said the PS3 version looked slightly better. Sorry lems you lose!
true true
ign tends to be very generous with their scores
if gametrailers agrees as well, i'd buy it as legit
[QUOTE="X_CAPCOM_X"]Anyway, it really doesn't matter. If the game was exlusive to PS3, Xbox fanboys like you would bash it like you did before it came to Xbox. Now you just think it is better on your console.
BioShockOwnz
:lol:And cows said they were betrayed and wouldn't ever buy it. They even went as far as to make a ton of petitions boycotting DMC4 and Capcom. Silly cows, DMC4 is for everyone.
So you're saying all cows did this.Where does it say that on IGN, I can only find this bit (they even misuse the term 'render passing')
"Nor is it in the visual department, because visual issues are virtually negligible. For example, the 360 has some harder edges to some characters during cutscenes, and a little more screen tearing than the PS3 at times. The PS3 can be a wee bit darker during some scenes, though. Both systems show off a certain amount of render passing that pops into focus on sweeping vista shots, but they occur at the same time on each system and are quickly dismissed. However, observing these differences will only come via frame-by-frame analysis of each game side-by-side."
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"]Even if it were an inferior port (which it's not) the PS3's controller would still be far better for it. Gameplay>graphics anyone?BioShockOwnz
^That is your opinion, of course. An opinion can't be factual. We all have our personal preferences.
That's pretty much a fact for this one. I mean sure there are those who would disagree....
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"]Even if it were an inferior port (which it's not) the PS3's controller would still be far better for it. Gameplay>graphics anyone?SOedipus
^That is your opinion, of course. An opinion can't be factual. We all have our personal preferences.
That's pretty much a fact for this one. I mean sure there are those who would disagree....
Nope, not a fact at all. It's all personal preference.
[QUOTE="TheOwnerOner"][QUOTE="Udsen"]But it has better load times (fact), and a better controller (opinion).Udsen
23 min load time before you play (fact), takes up 5 gigs of harddrive space (fact)
21 minutes and 4.9 gb
LOGIC D-NYED
My install time was only 17 minutes it may be because I have a 7200 RPM HDD in my PS3 though
First it was "We don't need DMC we have NG" then it was "MGS4 is coming to 360" now it's "Your old exclusive that we didn't care about looks better on our console"
Who cares ? Enjoy the game and buy it for whatever console you want. Xbox has it now so just be happy and enjoy.
[QUOTE="Udsen"][QUOTE="TheOwnerOner"][QUOTE="Udsen"]But it has better load times (fact), and a better controller (opinion).I_Helios_I
23 min load time before you play (fact), takes up 5 gigs of harddrive space (fact)
21 minutes and 4.9 gb
LOGIC D-NYED
My install time was only 17 minutes it may be because I have a 7200 RPM HDD in my PS3 though
Yep, that could be it. I made hot chocolate while waiting.
[QUOTE="Udsen"]But it has better load times (fact), and a better controller (opinion).TheOwnerOner
23 min load time before you play (fact), takes up 5 gigs of harddrive space (fact)
5gigs/40gigs=1/8 of harddrive
5gigs/60gigs=1/12 of harddrive
5gigs/80gigs= 1/16 of harddrive
Wow so much space is gone now. What shall I do with over 70+% of harddrive space left?!
[QUOTE="I_Helios_I"][QUOTE="Udsen"][QUOTE="TheOwnerOner"][QUOTE="Udsen"]But it has better load times (fact), and a better controller (opinion).Udsen
23 min load time before you play (fact), takes up 5 gigs of harddrive space (fact)
21 minutes and 4.9 gb
LOGIC D-NYED
My install time was only 17 minutes it may be because I have a 7200 RPM HDD in my PS3 though
Yep, that could be it. I made hot chocolate while waiting.
lol hot chocolate is awesome! I turn into a hardcore gaming fiend during the winter months since I'm too damn lazy to go to the gym and go hiking lol. Next month I'm out of the gaming mode and it's back to looking forward to winter and catching up on all the titles of the spring and summer!
[QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"]Even if it were an inferior port (which it's not) the PS3's controller would still be far better for it. Gameplay>graphics anyone?BioShockOwnz
^That is your opinion, of course. An opinion can't be factual. We all have our personal preferences.
That's pretty much a fact for this one. I mean sure there are those who would disagree....
Nope, not a fact at all. It's all personal preference.
Nope, fact :P
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"]Even if it were an inferior port (which it's not) the PS3's controller would still be far better for it. Gameplay>graphics anyone?SOedipus
^That is your opinion, of course. An opinion can't be factual. We all have our personal preferences.
That's pretty much a fact for this one. I mean sure there are those who would disagree....
Nope, not a fact at all. It's all personal preference.
Nope, fact :P
Yeah, it is still an opinion, but it really is a popular opinion.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment