Do PS3 exclusives really require blu-ray or was it marketing BS all along?

  • 118 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SkaRy_RuLeZ
SkaRy_RuLeZ

253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 SkaRy_RuLeZ
Member since 2004 • 253 Posts

PC games dont come on Blu-Ray disc either, and I dont think youll ever find a 50 GB download on Steam. Its more marketing BS from Sony.

pelvist

You have dozens of multi plats that use 2 dvd's on 360 and 1 bd on ps3. DCUO would take 3 dvd's. Final fantasy 13 has 4 times higher resolution cinematics and much better lossless sound compared to 360 because of Bluray, and it was still 2 dvd's on the 360. Just because no games utilize the full 50 gb doesn't mean it's being wasted, at least you have no games with disk swapping.

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

There are a small number of games that are on one disk vs multiple disks. There is also better audio available on many PS3; unfortunately, only a small % of system owners actually have the 7.1 sound system needed to take full advantage. That is about it.

Games are not longer, nor are they better, nor are they better looking because of BluRay. It is storage that is all. Nice to have. Not necessary. Hampered/undercut by the sloooooowww BD drive used in the PS3. Which then increases the size of the game in bytes, which is mistakenly believed to mean that more bytes equals more game/content, when in reality more bytes just means less compression and more redundant data.

Avatar image for SkaRy_RuLeZ
SkaRy_RuLeZ

253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 SkaRy_RuLeZ
Member since 2004 • 253 Posts

sup

Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts
Blu-Ray isn't REQUIRED. But that doesn't mean it isn't beneficial.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

sup

SkaRy_RuLeZ

20 DL-DVDs = 170GB.

So at around 32GB for MGS4, you are looking at four DVDs, including all the duplicates that would be buffing up its file size. Now factor in that the games linear design would not be a problem for disk swapping, and that swapping a disk is considerably faster than the mandatory installs that PS3 gamers went through with MGS4.

Of course, that's just a joke image; and I probably shouldn't be looking at it in such depth.

Avatar image for Silent_Ninja87
Silent_Ninja87

1509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Silent_Ninja87
Member since 2009 • 1509 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]What Ps3 games have you seen on a portable?alexfla



MGS4 and Uncharted.

Uncharted was shown as tech demo for the NGP but MGS4 is not portable. MGS peacewalker and the 3Ds version of MGS 3 are portable MGS games however.

Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

[QUOTE="alexfla"]

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]What Ps3 games have you seen on a portable?Silent_Ninja87



MGS4 and Uncharted.

Uncharted was shown as tech demo for the NGP but MGS4 is not portable. MGS peacewalker and the 3Ds version of MGS 3 are portable MGS games however.

MGS4, was the tech demo. Uncharted Portable will be released as a full game for the NGP, I believe.

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#58 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

[QUOTE="Silent_Ninja87"]

[QUOTE="alexfla"]

MGS4 and Uncharted.

windsquid9000

Uncharted was shown as tech demo for the NGP but MGS4 is not portable. MGS peacewalker and the 3Ds version of MGS 3 are portable MGS games however.

MGS4, was the tech demo. Uncharted Portable will be released as a full game for the NGP, I believe.

Off topic you'v got an awesome sig

Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts

PC games are using DVD and they look better than PS3 games so anybody that says games these days require blu-ray arent fooling anybody.

Avatar image for Upparoom
Upparoom

2111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Upparoom
Member since 2010 • 2111 Posts

Yes and no. Most of the extra space on the Blu-Ray is generally eaten up by uncompressed audio(sounds hawt on surround sound)

Avatar image for nygiantsfan1
nygiantsfan1

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 nygiantsfan1
Member since 2007 • 160 Posts

PC games are using DVD and they look better than PS3 games so anybody that says games these days require blu-ray arent fooling anybody.

Miketheman83
This is a stupid comparison. You have to install a PC game. They have unlimited install size and the game runs best off the hard drive. Right now console games can't rely on install because of the lack of hard drive space.
Avatar image for deadesa
deadesa

1706

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 deadesa
Member since 2005 • 1706 Posts

It's all but needed for uncompressed audio. The 8.5gigs on standard DVDs fill up quick.

Avatar image for WAJ
WAJ

771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 WAJ
Member since 2003 • 771 Posts

If you take into account the size of PS3 iso's then there really is only handfull of games that utilise the extra space available on the blu-ray format. Most PS3 iso's come in at around the 6-13GB mark, so no, for the most part ps3 exclusive games do not require blu-ray.

Avatar image for TheGrudge13
TheGrudge13

1198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#65 TheGrudge13
Member since 2009 • 1198 Posts
the Blue-Ray only gives more space so you won't need more than one for the game it has nothing to do with the quality of the game
Avatar image for Merex760
Merex760

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#66 Merex760
Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts
How can anyone hate on Blu-Ray? It's far superior of a media than DVD.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
considering most pc games are around 7 -15gb blu ray is useful but not required and ram is the biggest limitation this gen. disk space is useless if you have no ram to load it into.
Avatar image for spookykid143
spookykid143

10393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 spookykid143
Member since 2009 • 10393 Posts

PC games are using DVD and they look better than PS3 games so anybody that says games these days require blu-ray arent fooling anybody.

Miketheman83

PC games look better because of the hardware.

Avatar image for F1ame_Shie1d
F1ame_Shie1d

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 F1ame_Shie1d
Member since 2010 • 1389 Posts

Yes and no. Most of the extra space on the Blu-Ray is generally eaten up by uncompressed audio(sounds hawt on surround sound)

Upparoom

I can't believe it took 4 pages before someone finally answered correctly. Sad really. A huge chunk of the space being used is Audio. The actual game is still only 5 or 6 gigs while the audio take up most of the rest. At least that's what they said about MGS4. 90% of MGS4 was audio and 1080p cutscenes.

Avatar image for F1ame_Shie1d
F1ame_Shie1d

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 F1ame_Shie1d
Member since 2010 • 1389 Posts

considering most pc games are around 7 -15gb blu ray is useful but not required and ram is the biggest limitation this gen. disk space is useless if you have no ram to load it into. imprezawrx500
You're literally comparing apples to oranges. I hate it when people compare a PC game to a console game when it comes to storage medium. They're not even close to the same thing so don't even bother.

Avatar image for antifanboyftw
antifanboyftw

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 antifanboyftw
Member since 2007 • 2214 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]What Ps3 games have you seen on a portable?alexfla



MGS4 and Uncharted.

you saw a CUTSCENE of mgs4. not the actual game. its called a tech demo. the real game is 50gb and i don't think that they make memory sticks that big. as for uncharted, again. you didn't see uncharted 1 or 2. it has the graphics, but you don't know anything else. also, i don't think uncharted is one of the ps3 games that takes up a lot of memory on the disk. blu-ray has nothing to do with graphics. it is only about disk space and audio. it allows for more so that there is no compression needed.

Avatar image for Rage010101
Rage010101

5470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Rage010101
Member since 2006 • 5470 Posts

PC games are using DVD and they look better than PS3 games so anybody that says games these days require blu-ray arent fooling anybody.

Miketheman83

so for some reason you think storage = graphics. wow you really need to get your facts straight

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
Who cares? How is more storage space a bad thing? I just don't get blu ray hate.Deathtransit
blu ray is very expensive on a per gigabyte/$ ratio. Why would you chose to go with blu ray over a hdd when you can get a 640gb wd black for the same price a s just a slow 4x bd reader? that br drive would struggle to get even 30mb/s while the hdd peaks at around 160mb/s Optical media really has no place for running games any more and when you just have to move data 2 dvds wont make any difference compared to 1 bd.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

killzone 3 has 40 gigs of data which can only be accomplished with a blu ray, mgs4 i blelive has 24 gigs of data which can only be accomplished on blu ray.

it would take 3-4 disks from 360 to match that data, which is why i feel alot of 360 exclusives feel underwhelming and incomplete. (gears of war, crackdown, alan wake, halo)

right4dead
yet crysis is till the most advanced fps at a whopping 7gb. all bd has done is make devs not care about wasting space. plus the slow read of br means often they put stuff on multiple times to make loading faster.
Avatar image for F1ame_Shie1d
F1ame_Shie1d

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 F1ame_Shie1d
Member since 2010 • 1389 Posts

[QUOTE="right4dead"]

killzone 3 has 40 gigs of data which can only be accomplished with a blu ray, mgs4 i blelive has 24 gigs of data which can only be accomplished on blu ray.

it would take 3-4 disks from 360 to match that data, which is why i feel alot of 360 exclusives feel underwhelming and incomplete. (gears of war, crackdown, alan wake, halo)

imprezawrx500

yet crysis is till the most advanced fps at a whopping 7gb. all bd has done is make devs not care about wasting space. plus the slow read of br means often they put stuff on multiple times to make loading faster.

Once again. PC's play games differently then consoles do. You literally can't compare them as directly as you are. Well you can, but it doesn't make any sense to.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
so how big is gta4 on ps3? if it is more than 15gb it will show that they only use the space to duplicate stuff to make up for the slow read times. Optical media for running games has died on pc and it is time it dies on consoles too considering most ps3 games install part of the game anyway. There is no point in using slow optical drives to run you game when you have fast hdds bigger than anything in a consoles for under $50
Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#77 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

Pretty much sony bs, bc2 a game that looks amazing on pc 7 gb, crysis 7 gb, brand new pc game 7-10 gb, with the exception of total war and open world, just cause 2 7 gb

Until games are 7 plus gb always there currently is no need for blueray. When we start have 16 x blue ray players and 20 gb games across the board then yes it may be usefull

James161324

I'm sure JC2 was a 12GB download or more from Steam, and as was Mass Effect 2. Also why 16x blu ray players? I mean as it is, 12x blu ray players can transfer 54MB per second of data, compared to 24x of DVD which can only transfer speed of up to 33MB per second.

Avatar image for youngmurk911
youngmurk911

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#78 youngmurk911
Member since 2004 • 3895 Posts

[QUOTE="alexfla"]

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]What Ps3 games have you seen on a portable?FIipMode



MGS4 and Uncharted.

That was a tech demo and Uncharted isn't a PS3 game, it's an NGP game, boy are you misinformed.

^^^this

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

[QUOTE="imprezawrx500"][QUOTE="right4dead"]

killzone 3 has 40 gigs of data which can only be accomplished with a blu ray, mgs4 i blelive has 24 gigs of data which can only be accomplished on blu ray.

it would take 3-4 disks from 360 to match that data, which is why i feel alot of 360 exclusives feel underwhelming and incomplete. (gears of war, crackdown, alan wake, halo)

F1ame_Shie1d

yet crysis is till the most advanced fps at a whopping 7gb. all bd has done is make devs not care about wasting space. plus the slow read of br means often they put stuff on multiple times to make loading faster.

Once again. PC's play games differently then consoles do. You literally can't compare them as directly as you are. Well you can, but it doesn't make any sense to.

excuses, excuses, crysis is bigger, better looking and uses less space than killzone 2. A console doesn't need more space than pcs to run games. gta4 is under 8gb on x360 yet it is around twice the size on pc at 15gb. You still have to have all the same stuff to load into the ram be it on console or pc. The only difference is pcs load a whole level in at once when there is ram to do it while consoles stream, doesn't mean the pc needs less data. The fact the install size of 95% of pc games would fit on a dvd tells you br is not needed and a game like crysis which had nothing to to do with consoles is still way under says br is more marketing than usefully in a system with 512mb ram. If they had 2gb ram then dvds would be more of a limitation.
Avatar image for antifanboyftw
antifanboyftw

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 antifanboyftw
Member since 2007 • 2214 Posts
so how big is gta4 on ps3? if it is more than 15gb it will show that they only use the space to duplicate stuff to make up for the slow read times. Optical media for running games has died on pc and it is time it dies on consoles too considering most ps3 games install part of the game anyway. There is no point in using slow optical drives to run you game when you have fast hdds bigger than anything in a consoles for under $50imprezawrx500
most ps3 games have install due to the ps3 having a pretty slow running blu-ray drive compared to current ones. but that's what it gets for releasing ahead of its time (when it was still an unproven format that could fail) also, a multiplat where the ps3 version was ported is not a good comparison. use FFXIII or something to compare between consoless.
Avatar image for mejiseike
mejiseike

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 mejiseike
Member since 2011 • 530 Posts
All you need to know.... 1 game FINAL FANTASY 13 PS3 it was 1 disk, HD resolution, HD sound 360 it was 3 disks, Lower resolution, not as HQ sound point is Blu ray discs are better, end of discussion and another fact is that Blu Ray is almost finished.... HVDs (Holographic Versatile Disc) are coming out soonish
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="imprezawrx500"]so how big is gta4 on ps3? if it is more than 15gb it will show that they only use the space to duplicate stuff to make up for the slow read times. Optical media for running games has died on pc and it is time it dies on consoles too considering most ps3 games install part of the game anyway. There is no point in using slow optical drives to run you game when you have fast hdds bigger than anything in a consoles for under $50antifanboyftw
most ps3 games have install due to the ps3 having a pretty slow running blu-ray drive compared to current ones. but that's what it gets for releasing ahead of its time (when it was still an unproven format that could fail) also, a multiplat where the ps3 version was ported is not a good comparison. use FFXIII or something to compare between consoless.

well that's part of my point, optical media is painfully slow and there really isn't any point in making it any bigger till they figure out how ti make it read at least as fast as a hdd from over 5 years ago. Even the fasted optical media can't even match the slowest read on a new hdd and it will never sustain a fast read while hdds can easily read at over 70mb/s for a long period.
Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts
Hey tc did sony state what the max size of the game cards are? For al u kno games will be used on 32gb cards
Avatar image for HerzogJan
HerzogJan

424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 HerzogJan
Member since 2006 • 424 Posts

I never understood the urge of Lemmings to champion dvd which is inferior, just because their fanboi choice of medium is implemented on their console of fanboi choice.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="mejiseike"]All you need to know.... 1 game FINAL FANTASY 13 PS3 it was 1 disk, HD resolution, HD sound 360 it was 3 disks, Lower resolution, not as HQ sound point is Blu ray discs are better, end of discussion and another fact is that Blu Ray is almost finished.... HVDs (Holographic Versatile Disc) are coming out soonish

yes br is better than dvd but is still terrible when there is the vastly superior tech of the hdd, don't even get me started on ssds. Space is pointless without the transfer rates. A hdd for 10 years ago can read much faster than ps3's bd drive.
Avatar image for Kholdstare14
Kholdstare14

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 Kholdstare14
Member since 2005 • 427 Posts

7/10 alexfla 7/10...not your best but still funny.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#87 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

All you need to know.... 1 game FINAL FANTASY 13 PS3 it was 1 disk, HD resolution, HD sound 360 it was 3 disks, Lower resolution, not as HQ sound point is Blu ray discs are better, end of discussion and another fact is that Blu Ray is almost finished.... HVDs (Holographic Versatile Disc) are coming out soonishmejiseike

I'm pretty certain Holographic discs are not going to be the norm for another decade,

Avatar image for tommyas
tommyas

2594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 tommyas
Member since 2007 • 2594 Posts

A lot of bragging by cows about blu-ray for years now. They claim the 360 games are gimped because they are stuck with only DVD. Well, my question is, if blu-ray is needed to run PS3 exclusives, then how will they ever be ported to their portable?

If PS3 games can be run by a portable then this is definitive proof that blu-ray is just a format that's good for playing HD movies and does nothing for gaming.

alexfla

Please take a look how large games like GoW 3, Heavy Rain, MGS4, Killzone 3, LBP2, FF13, GT5 and many more are. Little hint. much above 10 GB.

Avatar image for johny300
johny300

12496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 johny300
Member since 2010 • 12496 Posts
Uncompressed audio, and unchared 2 took 25GB, MGS4 more than 41GB, GOW3 took 35GB, KZ3 41GB, Mass effect 2.
Avatar image for mztazmz
mztazmz

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 mztazmz
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts

PC games dont come on Blu-Ray disc either, and I dont think youll ever find a 50 GB download on Steam. Its more marketing BS from Sony.

pelvist

PC games don't come on Bluray because 1% of PC owners have a Bluray drive:roll:

You do know that DVD drives were available for PC's in the late 90's, yet most PC games were still on CD up until a few years ago.

And you don't find 50GB steam downloads because it would take forever to download, would take up too much HD space, and the games are also delivered on DVD therefore steam download size is the same. On PS3(with the exception of a few games that have sizeable installs) you can have a 50GB game with no install so HD space is not an issue. Also GOW3 is 35GB with NO CGI so that whole "CGI takes up all the space" arguement is history.

Maybe you should ask John Carmack what he thinks about Bluray?

Anyways, another anti-bluray campaign shot down in flames. There'll probably be another one tomorrow:P

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#91 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
I don't know if it's required but I'm guessing some games require the extra space. Even if it isn't required for most games, there's nothing wrong with having the extra space, developers know it's there and have the ability to use it if they wish.
Avatar image for Supabul
Supabul

4266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#92 Supabul
Member since 2004 • 4266 Posts

Games size's

Assassins Creed 2 5.2 gigs

Battlefield Bad Company 24.9 gigs

Bayonetta6.8 gigs

Boarderlands3.3 gigs

Casltevania LOS12.8 gigs

Dragon Age origins6.4 gigs

Fable 36.6 gigs

Gears 26.3 gigs

GTA 46.4 gigs

Red Dead Redemption6.7 gigs

Just Cause 24.1 gigs

Mass Effect 212 gigs

Two Worlds 24.7 gigs

PS3 exclusives

Uncharted 225 gigs

Killzone 345gigs

MGSsuppose to have max out Blu-ray 50gigs

GOW335 gigs

I don't know but I'm inclined to think it just marketing BS for Blu-ray


Avatar image for mztazmz
mztazmz

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 mztazmz
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts

[QUOTE="mejiseike"]All you need to know.... 1 game FINAL FANTASY 13 PS3 it was 1 disk, HD resolution, HD sound 360 it was 3 disks, Lower resolution, not as HQ sound point is Blu ray discs are better, end of discussion and another fact is that Blu Ray is almost finished.... HVDs (Holographic Versatile Disc) are coming out soonishimprezawrx500
yes br is better than dvd but is still terrible when there is the vastly superior tech of the hdd, don't even get me started on ssds. Space is pointless without the transfer rates. A hdd for 10 years ago can read much faster than ps3's bd drive.

You have a good point, but there is a good workaround to this which several devs have used, Uncharted is a good example.

It's using the HD as a large cache for data. Uncharted does not have a permanant install, but during gameplay it buffers upcoming data to the HD so that it has quick access to it when needed. As you move through the game, the engine decides what data will be needed soon and copies it from the Bluray to the HD and it also discards data it no longer needs. It's constantly writing and deleting data just like a page file on a PC.

This is a major reason Sony wanted HD's as standard in PS3, unlike 360 where it is optional and therefore games are not desinged to do this(btw this is very different from the option to install a game to the HD which is for the purpose of speeding up load times).

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#94 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
I'm sure some do, but a lot of them could probably be on 360 with no problem, or they look no bigger than normal games.
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#95 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]

This again?? :|

alexfla



Do you have any intelligent thoughts on the matter?

Do YOU?

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#96 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
well imo is not needed yet but there is a benefit of adding extra features on the game disk ( like commentary ). Its not like more storage is a bad think or anything
Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#97 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

I've always understood that most of the space used on blu-ray is taken up with loss less audio, and multiple copies of the game that make up for the slowness of the BD drive in the PS3. More than likely most of the exclusives on the PS3 could fit on 1-2 DVD discs.

Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts

Most games fits on one DVD if the developers work and plan hard enough, with how much compression to use, what they would have to remove, how many different areas they can have, how much dialog they can have, and how long the game can be. The X360 has been maxing the DVD for a long time, so the devs have been very good at this planning. They want to add this, well, then they'll have to remove or compress that.

On the PS3 however, the developers working on a PS3 exclusive would'nt have as much to be concerned about when making a game, they know that no matter what, they're game will fit on one disc.

They can have alot more varied textures in the games, alot of different environments without using the same assets over and over, and tons of dialog and sound effects in high bitrate.