Do sheep really think mario galaxy is on par with graphics in Rachet an clank?

im not talkin about gameplay as im sure mario galaxy nailed it, but im talkin about next gen graphics something mario galaxy an nintendo didnt' have to improve at all on cept for some new shiny glows on the stars this is on par with the cube graphical capability

other developers have to actually work much ahrder to get graphics to next gen on the ps3 nintendo go to sit back an reuse the same graphics from there cube games and didn't even add any good multiplayer or extra fluff like yoshi that ppl would expect on other next gen systems

what exactly did nintendo do with all that free time they saved on usin the same crappy graphics from the cube cuz im lookin at it an not seeing any huge innovation, i mean gimme a break the wii mote collects items is that really next gen control that looks so gimmicky an do a little spin move come on now even okami did better then that with the ps2 controllers

anyway i still think ppl who pay 250 for a wii aren't the smartest fish in the sea an i bought n64 which i thought was awesome so i was a ninty fanboy back then but then i saw how dumb they were an didnt buy a cube an have no plans for a wii

lol

graphics do not make a game better....look at R&C....if it did, it would have scored higher than smg.....but did it? no...so just move along...ur fanboy is showingDante2710

Can you read? He never said that graphics make a game better (they do by the way, but gameplay is definately more important that graphics). He was only asking if people seriously thought that Galaxy's graphics were better the Ratchet and Clanks. Maybe you should read before you rave.

art style>tech

and by the way,.,.remember lair? ;) thats what happens when developers focus way too much into graphicsDante2710

R&C was an awesome game though. regardless what it scored ehre.

Who said anything about SMG graphics being better then R&C's?

Just get over it buddy.

9.5>>>>>>>>>>>7.5

[QUOTE="Dante2710"]and by the way,.,.remember lair? ;) thats what happens when developers focus way too much into graphicsblack_awpN1

R&C was an awesome game though. regardless what it scored ehre.

I played the demo. It was pretty tight.

[QUOTE="Dante2710"]graphics do not make a game better....look at R&C....if it did, it would have scored higher than smg.....but did it? no...so just move along...ur fanboy is showingGIJames248

Can you read? He never said that graphics make a game better (they do by the way, but gameplay is definately more important that graphics). He was only asking if people seriously thought that Galaxy's graphics were better the Ratchet and Clanks. Maybe you should read before you rave.

[QUOTE="Dante2710"]and by the way,.,.remember lair? ;) thats what happens when developers focus way too much into graphicsblack_awpN1

R&C was an awesome game though. regardless what it scored ehre.

And yet he flames Wii about the graphics and starts calling it a waste of money, on yet again the graphics.. But I thought that gameplay counts? So... How did he jump from weither SMG andR and C are considered the same graphics- to the Wii being gimicky?

So I guess it gives him full right to rave?

[QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="Dante2710"]and by the way,.,.remember lair? ;) thats what happens when developers focus way too much into graphicsMellowMight

R&C was an awesome game though. regardless what it scored ehre.

I played the demo. It was pretty tight.

Don't try to tell him that, he's a fanboy.

[QUOTE="MellowMight"][QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

[QUOTE="Dante2710"]and by the way,.,.remember lair? ;) thats what happens when developers focus way too much into graphicsIlived

R&C was an awesome game though. regardless what it scored ehre.

I played the demo. It was pretty tight.

Don't try to tell him that, he's a fanboy.

Im a fanboy becasue I liked R&C? weeeeeird.

Mario Galaxy is not even close.

It's a great looking game, but it doesn't even really look as good as God of War 2.

im not talkin about gameplay as im sure mario galaxy nailed it, but im talkin about next gen graphics something mario galaxy an nintendo didnt' have to improve at all on cept for some new shiny glows on the stars this is on par with the cube graphical capability

other developers have to actually work much ahrder to get graphics to next gen on the ps3 nintendo go to sit back an reuse the same graphics from there cube games and didn't even add any good multiplayer or extra fluff like yoshi that ppl would expect on other next gen systems

what exactly did nintendo do with all that free time they saved on usin the same crappy graphics from the cube cuz im lookin at it an not seeing any huge innovation, i mean gimme a break the wii mote collects items is that really next gen control that looks so gimmicky an do a little spin move come on now even okami did better then that with the ps2 controllers

anyway i still think ppl who pay 250 for a wii aren't the smartest fish in the sea an i bought n64 which i thought was awesome so i was a ninty fanboy back then but then i saw how dumb they were an didnt buy a cube an have no plans for a wii

ProtossRushX

cartoon graphics all look the same pretty much.

Technically no...but artistically it's the best looking game of the year IMO. I'd also say Okami on the PS2 was artistically better than anything on the next gen consoles last year.

I think that the artistic style and framerate are better on SMG but the grand atmospheres and textures are better on R and c.

But it doesnt really matter to me because SMG literally monkey stomps R and C in every other way.

technically speaking i do not think that galaxy is better looking than galaxy. but i likes galaxies over all look way more than r & c's. also the game play is much more fun and platform oriented. it is a great game. and i am glad r & c came out before it did. otherwise i would have passed on r & c completly.

also galaxy looks way better than sunshine. the picture comparison they did was rubbish. the depth of field, texturs, mapping ext all make galaxy look way better than sunshine. also the fact that it runs in 60 frames instead of 30 makes a big differance.

personally i think people like you are not the smartest fish in the sea because you limit yourself to only buying one system.

Technical wise, certainly not... Although the framerate really seems to be an advantage of Galaxy.
Art wise I would say that Galaxy kicks the ass out of R&C.

But maybe I'm being a bit biased towards Mario because I still love playing his games.

EDIT: Btw, OP. I really feel sorry for you.
Creating damage control thread after thread, typing like a 12 year old who has to prove something because he wants to be sure he's cool.
Just get over it.

7.5.Eponique

and thats all that really needs to be said

7.5 games are not worthy of discussion here in system wars

[QUOTE="Eponique"]7.5.JB730

and thats all that really needs to be said

7.5 games are not worthy of discussion here in system wars

[QUOTE="Eponique"]7.5.JB730

and thats all that really needs to be said

7.5 games are not worthy of discussion here in system wars

actually rache an clank is a triple A title on gamrankin's plz step outside

why dont u go play more carppy wii ports an bad games like cookin mama an wii fit let the serious gamers talk in here

[QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="Eponique"]7.5.ProtossRushX

and thats all that really needs to be said

7.5 games are not worthy of discussion here in system wars

actually rache an clank is a triple A title on gamrankin's plz step outside

why dont u go play more carppy wii ports an bad games like cookin mama an wii fit let the serious gamers talk in here

Twilight Princess.

Metroid Prime 3.

Are we counting gamerankings? Becuase the Wii would still have more great games than the PS3, even with all the WAGGLAN games.

Becuase the PS3 has NO GAMES.

[QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="Eponique"]7.5.ProtossRushX

and thats all that really needs to be said

7.5 games are not worthy of discussion here in system wars

actually rache an clank is a triple A title on gamrankin's plz step outside

why dont u go play more carppy wii ports an bad games like cookin mama an wii fit let the serious gamers talk in here

R&C = 89.4% = AA on GameRankings.

R&C = 89.4% = AA on GameRankings.Spindoc_SEI

[QUOTE="Spindoc_SEI"]R&C = 89.4% = AA on GameRankings.Jandurin

That mean old gayspot >:C

[QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="Eponique"]7.5.ProtossRushX

and thats all that really needs to be said

7.5 games are not worthy of discussion here in system wars

actually rache an clank is a triple A title on gamrankin's plz step outside

why dont u go play more carppy wii ports an bad games like cookin mama an wii fit let the serious gamers talk in here

[QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="Eponique"]7.5.ProtossRushX

and thats all that really needs to be said

7.5 games are not worthy of discussion here in system wars

actually rache an clank is a triple A title on gamrankin's plz step outside

why dont u go play more carppy wii ports an bad games like cookin mama an wii fit let the serious gamers talk in here

:lol: this cow's furious! :lol:

the wii has more AAA exclusives than the PS3......more AA exclusives too

i know it burns, but next time please try not to let your anger get the best of you....its not a good look

graphics do not make a game better....look at R&C....if it did, it would have scored higher than smg.....but did it? no...so just move along...ur fanboy is showingDante2710

Wii games are NOT reviewed comparing it to the PS3 or the 360. PS3 and 360 reviews are compared.If you would compare a Wii game next to a 360 or PS3 game it wouldnt stand a chance.

PS- Ratchet and Clank and Heavenly Sword are underrated

wow. going into this thread was like falling into a pit of lava. Sure I still have 99+ lives since Im ****in Mario, but man, its always about graphics with you people, isnt it? I take it you haven't even read the review of Mario's-I mean my game.TalesofRaGnArOk

[QUOTE="Dante2710"]graphics do not make a game better....look at R&C....if it did, it would have scored higher than smg.....but did it? no...so just move along...ur fanboy is showingSony_92

Wii games are NOT reviewed comparing it to the PS3 or the 360. PS3 and 360 reviews are compared.If you would compare a Wii game next to a 360 or PS3 game it wouldnt stand a chance.

PS- Ratchet and Clank and Heavenly Sword are underrated

[QUOTE="ProtossRushX"][QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="Eponique"]7.5.JB730

and thats all that really needs to be said

7.5 games are not worthy of discussion here in system wars

actually rache an clank is a triple A title on gamrankin's plz step outside

why dont u go play more carppy wii ports an bad games like cookin mama an wii fit let the serious gamers talk in here

:lol: this cow's furious! :lol:

the wii has more AAA exclusives than the PS3......more AA exclusives too

i know it burns, but next time please try not to let your anger get the best of you....its not a good look

PS3 games ARE UNDERRATED. Go to 1up , GamePro , Gametrailers , Gamespy , IGN etc. and the PS3 HAS AAA TITLES.

Ps- to all you lemmings , how does it feel to get OWNED by the PS2.

360 - 15 million units in 2 years (2005-2007 sales )

PS2 - 15 million units in 1 year and its last gen (2006 sales )

Looks like our little calve is OWNING