I think GeOW and Halo 3 deserved a 8.5-9.0 (GeOW especially).
Go figure.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Why are we still arguing about this? Aren't there more recent games to be scrutinizing over instead of NMH? Was it really that controversial? But whatever, I say yes. NMH was over the top awesome in just about every way. It was like the kind of game I wish existed when I was a little kid. Over the top satirical violence, insane character designs, and a story that made me go WTF at least 10 times. Yes, the graphics were horrendous, but I think the awesome artstyle and sense of humor more than made up for it.
glitchgeeman
It's probably because NMH2 was just announced.
this game should not be criticized for it's hub in any way since it isn't trying to be gta..
voxware00
I disagree.
Whether it is trying to be GTA or not, doesn't change the fact that the hub blows. And unfortunately that is where a fair amount of the game takes place.
Don't get me wrong, I liked the game. But in no way did it deserve 9.0. On the other hand, a lot of people look past, say, Metal Gear Solid's shortcomings for the story, so I guess it's understandable.
GameInformer gave it a 6. Funny thing is, people call them soft.TheGrat1
gameinformer=hypeinformer. Almost all of it's reviews are blatantly based on hype. Rarely will they ever give a game that is really hyped a bad score. While they often give unhyped games lower scores than most other gaming media sources.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment