Do we know if the 360 version of Fallout NV is better then the PS3 version?

All the reviews ive seen have only been 360 version reviews and make no mention of wether there are big issues on PS3, which makes me think two things:

1. They only sent out 360 reveiw codes because they knew PS3 version was trash. \

2. There isnt any issues and its fine, so reviewers didnt bother posting it.

If number 1 is true, I think Bethesda either needs to re-evaluate how they dev multiplatform games or they need a new engine. they cannot cnotinue to favor one and still bs viable really.

They all have problems. But it dosen't make a difference. I could care less if there are a few bugs here an there.

digital foundry and lens of truth will review that game in no time THEN we'll know if there are any differences personally i'll just buy the Pc versionohthemanatee

Well, DF and Lens of truth dont reveiw gaems. Eurogamer 9which DF is apart of) reveiw stuff, but never makes mention of any differences, adn LOT hardly reviews anything, and they usualy have a comparison up before they do. The thing these sites need to realize that posting a comaprison for a game that came out 4 days earlier really dosent do us alot of good since we would have already decided on a version by then if were that interested.

They all have problems. But it dosen't make a difference. I could care less if there are a few bugs here an there.

15strong

mainly worried about Graphics.

I've heard things are fairly similar to Fallout 3 (ie PS3 version is inferior, but not terribly so), but nothing concrete.

This is Bethesda we're talking about, I think it's pretty obvious that it will just be business as usual.

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]digital foundry and lens of truth will review that game in no time THEN we'll know if there are any differences personally i'll just buy the Pc versionXboximusPrime

Well, DF and Lens of truth dont reveiw gaems.

they don't have to, they just have to tell you if there are any differences and what they are.

isn't that what you want?

There was a video posted a day or so ago that claimed to be the PS3 version being extremely choppy, I'm not sure how valid it is but has something to do with it in the title so it shouldn't be hard to dig up. Still didn't see any solid confirmation of it though.

[QUOTE="15strong"]

They all have problems. But it dosen't make a difference. I could care less if there are a few bugs here an there.

XboximusPrime

mainly worried about Graphics.

(And it will probably be buggy and glitchy on both too, since... it's Obsidian)

It probably is, lets be honest hereSw33tChilLi

its game by game. We should never assume things.

I've heard things are fairly similar to Fallout 3 (ie PS3 version is inferior, but not terribly so), but nothing concrete.

PBSnipes

Dissapoitning if true, Bethesda needs to man up and stop favoring the 360. They have a potential over 30 million suerbase on PS3 that they are basicaly thinking of as a afterthought.

360...4xMSAA...PS3...0xMSAA.Dunno bout performance but apart from AA they are the same.Seen the comparison on one deutch site...

If history tells us anything concerning 90+% of all game they share then yes the 360 version is better. Although their is those three built from the ground up PS3 games that are marginally better graphicly so lets forgive ALL those other games shall we?:lol:

360...4xMSAA...PS3...0xMSAA.Dunno bout performance but apart from AA they are the same.Seen the comparison on one deutch site...

Bus-A-Bus

AA isnt a gamebreaker for me though. Was planning on renting it on 360 anyway, but gamefly didnt ship it. Bethesda needs to man up I think if this thing is worse on PS3 again. Were at the point where most devs get the games lookintg so close it dosent really matter, and them not being able to meet that just makes them look bad.

If history tells us anything concerning 90+% of all game they share then yes the 360 version is better. Although their is those three built from the ground up PS3 games that are marginally better graphicly so lets forgive ALL those other games shall we?:lol:

vaderhater

we need to define better here. Is better stuff you wouldnt even notice?

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

360...4xMSAA...PS3...0xMSAA.Dunno bout performance but apart from AA they are the same.Seen the comparison on one deutch site...

XboximusPrime

AA isnt a gamebreaker for me though. Was planning on renting it on 360 anyway, but gamefly didnt ship it. Bethesda needs to man up I think if this thing is worse on PS3 again. Were at the point where most devs get the games lookintg so close it dosent really matter, and them not being able to meet that just makes them look bad.

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

360...4xMSAA...PS3...0xMSAA.Dunno bout performance but apart from AA they are the same.Seen the comparison on one deutch site...

shinrabanshou

AA isnt a gamebreaker for me though. Was planning on renting it on 360 anyway, but gamefly didnt ship it. Bethesda needs to man up I think if this thing is worse on PS3 again. Were at the point where most devs get the games lookintg so close it dosent really matter, and them not being able to meet that just makes them look bad.

They made the engine though. And I can gurantee you that the next Bethesda made game by Tod Howard and company will probaly be worse on PS3 too because of their suspected inability to adapt to PS3.

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

[QUOTE="15strong"]

They all have problems. But it dosen't make a difference. I could care less if there are a few bugs here an there.

mainly worried about Graphics.

(And it will probably be buggy and glitchy on both too, since... it's Obsidian)

Fallout 3 on the 360 had screen tearing but none on PS3, is this true with New Vegas does anyone know?

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

If history tells us anything concerning 90+% of all game they share then yes the 360 version is better. Although their is those three built from the ground up PS3 games that are marginally better graphicly so lets forgive ALL those other games shall we?:lol:

XboximusPrime

we need to define better here. Is better stuff you wouldnt even notice?

Not too sure how legit this site is, but that's all I could find. I'm in the same boat as many people, I've got both platforms and don't know which one to buy for. I've got Fallout 3 GOTY edtion for the 360, but kind of wanting to get more games for my PS3...It would be on PC for sure for this game, but my gaming rig is almost 5 years old and it is lacking in performance department for todays games. So I'm stuck till I get more info PS3 or 360??? Graphics aren't a must, but I'd like to have the smoothest running and least buggy out of the 2 console versions.

http://n4g.com/news/629241/fallout-new-vegas-ps3-vs-xbox-360-hd-screenshot-comparison

They made the engine though. And I can gurantee you that the next Bethesda made game by Tod Howard and company will probaly be worse on PS3 too because of their suspected inability to adapt to PS3.

XboximusPrime

TC if you know your renting it for the 360, why do you need to know which version is better? i'm getting it this weekend for the ps3. i mean they won't launch a game thats buggy to hell...oh wait

I have seen a comparation in the 360 boards. PS3 seems to have better textures and 360 higher res and AA.

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]digital foundry and lens of truth will review that game in no time THEN we'll know if there are any differences personally i'll just buy the Pc versionXboximusPrime

Well, DF and Lens of truth dont reveiw gaems. Eurogamer 9which DF is apart of) reveiw stuff, but never makes mention of any differences, adn LOT hardly reviews anything, and they usualy have a comparison up before they do. The thing these sites need to realize that posting a comaprison for a game that came out 4 days earlier really dosent do us alot of good since we would have already decided on a version by then if were that interested.

They usually don't do comparisons unless they think they're gonna find something different, otherwise they'd have comparisons for every game released.

The best comparison I've seen anywhere was actually posted by TC in the official hype thread. It's here. For a full, detailed analysis of performance system by system, you're gonna have to wait a few days for one of our usual comparison sites to put the two versions through the ringer.

I think it's pretty clear if those photos hold up that we aren't talking about a lousy PS3 port, graphically. Some people looking at them have said stuff about higher resolution for the 360 which I can't personally tell glancing at the photos, but perhaps. The third photo seems to show AA on the 360 that's not present on the PS3. The texture detail is quite a bit higher on the PS3 version.

Probably, considering FO3 was better on the 360. It'll still be butt ugly though, thanks to Bethesda's awesome, photorealistic graphics engine.

I have seen a comparation in the 360 boards. PS3 seems to have better textures and 360 higher res and AA.

PAL360

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

I have seen a comparation in the 360 boards. PS3 seems to have better textures and 360 higher res and AA.

johny300

He's probably talking about the one I linked above you, here.

[QUOTE="johny300"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

I have seen a comparation in the 360 boards. PS3 seems to have better textures and 360 higher res and AA.

santoron

He's probably talking about the one I linked above you, here.

Guess i'll go with the ps3 version even though it has more bugs lol.johny300

Well we don't know which is buggier, if any are. The reviews noting glitches and bugs are of the 360 version. My assumption is that all 3 will be pretty bad.

Is it me or the ps3 version has better textures. in the 4th pic 360 looks better, in the 7th pic 360 is better, in the 8 pic ps3 nails it with detailes,

Since they didn't sync up the brightness/contrast of the two platforms, it's tough to see all details, but the PS3's higher textures are clear side by side, as is the 360 version's AA.

[QUOTE="johny300"]Guess i'll go with the ps3 version even though it has more bugs lol.santoron

Well we don't know which is buggier, if any are. The reviews noting glitches and bugs are of the 360 version. My assumption is that all 3 will be pretty bad.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=23432 some pics the ps3 looks better, and some the 360 looks better.krayzieE99

Agreed. Both versions have an upper hand in different areas.

I saw tath Lens of truth thing. First of all, there first comaprison with the old man is wrong. The logos are switched. Int aht comaprison, the screen that has the PS3 logo is obviously the 360 version because of the better contrast and colors that we see the 360 have in every other pic. So they messed that up.

Other then that, it appears to be that PS3 has better Textures, but 360 better everything else. Gonna have to wait for full analysis though.

probably the 360.

it doesn't matter to me anyway since i only use ps3 for exclusives.

Buy the 360 version. Some people have told me about their PS3s exploding thanks to New Vegas. I doubt they would exaggerate about that.

I saw tath Lens of truth thing. First of all, there first comaprison with the old man is wrong. The logos are switched. Int aht comaprison, the screen that has the PS3 logo is obviously the 360 version because of the better contrast and colors that we see the 360 have in every other pic. So they messed that up.

Other then that, it appears to be that PS3 has better Textures, but 360 better everything else. Gonna have to wait for full analysis though.

XboximusPrime

360 clearly has better AA. Contrast/brightness is debatable, as we all know different games show up differently on different systems. That's a big reason why brightness controls are in so many games (including this one). I did notice that the difference between the comparisons you linked last night and the LoT the difference in brightness was less pronounced, but still darker on the 360. A few people are pointing out a longer draw distance on the PS3 as well based on the exterior shots, but honestly, I didn't look hard enough to see a difference. I think it's safe to say AA for 360, and Textures for PS3. If more info is imprtant for people to base purchases (or ownage) on, it'll be along soon enough.

Honestly, I think the big concern was that we'd have another mess on our hands with the PS3 port, and both in comparison shots and from player feedback that isn't the case. The PS3 seem no buggier or less stable than the 360 (which is to say they are both buggy and unstable) and there isn't an across the board winner visually either. Performance would be the last area, and it's hard to believe the PS3 version performs worse than the 360, which has been ripped for long loading times (even fully installed) and sputtering framerate in the reviews. Unless those numbers are worse on the PS3, I think we're looking at something around a tie for this title, and people can choose a title on console preference, or the access to the first DLC, or so on.

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

I saw tath Lens of truth thing. First of all, there first comaprison with the old man is wrong. The logos are switched. Int aht comaprison, the screen that has the PS3 logo is obviously the 360 version because of the better contrast and colors that we see the 360 have in every other pic. So they messed that up.

Other then that, it appears to be that PS3 has better Textures, but 360 better everything else. Gonna have to wait for full analysis though.

santoron

360 clearly has better AA. Contrast/brightness is debatable, as we all know different games show up differently on different systems. That's a big reason why brightness controls are in so many games (including this one). I did notice that the difference between the comparisons you linked last night and the LoT the difference in brightness was less pronounced, but still darker on the 360. A few people are pointing out a longer draw distance on the PS3 as well based on the exterior shots, but honestly, I didn't look hard enough to see a difference. I think it's safe to say AA for 360, and Textures for PS3. If more info is imprtant for people to base purchases (or ownage) on, it'll be along soon enough.

Honestly, I think the big concern was that we'd have another mess on our hands with the PS3 port, and both in comparison shots and from player feedback that isn't the case. The PS3 seem no buggier or less stable than the 360 (which is to say they are both buggy and unstable) and there isn't an across the board winner visually either. Performance would be the last area, and it's hard to believe the PS3 version performs worse than the 360, which has been ripped for long loading times (even fully installed) and sputtering framerate in the reviews. Unless those numbers are worse on the PS3, I think we're looking at something around a tie for this title, and people can choose a title on console preference, or the access to the first DLC, or so on.

Ill wait for LoT and DF to do their thing to find out which is better. I think 360 still will be better though. Im probaly just going to get my multipalts on 360 now. Ill still look at Comaprisons, but i wont feel as bad when they say its better on 360. When they say its better on PS3, ill got that way.

who cares, the game is an un-rewarding piece of crap, where you have to travel for hours and save every 2 minutes to avoid starting all over