[QUOTE="zipozal"][QUOTE="MyopicCanadian"][QUOTE="zipozal"]Here you go you missed the last part (editied in) where you grossly misquoted Crytek
AND FINALLY
You said right in your post I QUOTE YOU
"and that the memory bandwidth is too slow (which is ACTUALLY what Cavet Yeti said, he didn't mention the amount of memory, but the bandwidth). "
The problem is buddy HE DIDN'T SAY THAT AT ALL!
I QUOTE the CEO of Crytek
I mean um the bandwith of the memory is high enough to stream, but streaming requires a different type of game design. If you want to stream Crysis bubbles and bubbles and bubbles of actions it's going to be a different gameplay experience the thing that makes Crysis different is the nano suit, the customizable weapons the AI, that simulation itself along side with an
open environment and that experience that your part of a world that actually, despite the fact we have loadings of course, but that we still need like 2 gigs of system memory alone on a high end config once we stream the high end and some parts of the game still in the memory so now imagine we have to make a conversion out of that, it's going to be very difficult to do that right.
So actually he said the exact opposite of what you said he said HE SAID THE MEMORY SIZE IS THE ISSUE NOT THE BANDWIDTH!
MyopicCanadian
On a high-end configuration he said you'd need 2 gigs, but earlier in the interview he mentioned the game will run well with 1 GB of system memory and a 6800. So if you consider specs like those, using a proper level of optimization on a console, I don't see why it couldn't be done. I'm not expecting the same experience as Crysis, but I expect them to do something with the franchise for the 360, and I don't think it will be nearly as neutered as everyone expects it to be.
This is just pathetic first you completely lie about what he said claiming he said it was the bandwidth and then argue that the memory bandwidth was not an issue even though he never said that, now you got caught lying and you try to flip it to argue for the memory.
Sorry buddy, CALL ME CRAZY, but I think the CEO of a major game company a COMPANY that has made console games and is even rumored to be working on one, knows a whole hell of a lot more about his games engine and game coding in general then you do.
So when he tells me that there just isn't enough memory on the consoles to pull off the sheer scale, physics, AI and what not of Crysis on the dinky memory of the consoles I'm inclinded to believe him.
And you still haven't even acknowledged the fact that while instincts may have been a good game it was at heart DRASTICALLY different then farcry as it's environments were not open ened really at all, that game had extremely linear paths which is the opposite of what farcry did.
Now if you have listened to anything the devs at Crytek have said you would know the freedom the environment allows is extremely important to the way the game plays, much more so then it was even in farcry. Hence the reason he says the game would basically have to be a completely different other game to be on consoles.
Wow, I misheard something, I didn't lie. Honestly, what's wrong with you? Your posts COULD be filled with sensible discussion but you always open up with some sort of flaming. I can't believe you had the audicity to refer to ME as a "kid".
Great just ignore the bulk of the post and focus on the fact that I said you lied, it's ok though I understand you've been destroyed, I made a complete joke of your laughable argument and made far better points.
TBH I can't blame you, you got beat so bad what else was there to do other then try to focus on my lie accusation and a semi insult from a few posts back.
And you know I wouldn't have said you lied, but then after you saw my post that pointed out your freaking error you continued with another post as if it never happend, that action said to me "If this guy isn't willing to acknowledge his mistake I have the right to call him on it in an even harsher tone."
Log in to comment