Do You Really Think That Sony Wont Charge For Its Online Gameplay Next Gen?

  • 117 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for tonitorsi
tonitorsi

8692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 tonitorsi
Member since 2006 • 8692 Posts

They'll keep it FREE like its always been. But will emphasize way more on convincing their fanbase to pay for PS+ by giving it a plethora of features that more than justify its yearly subscritions.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#52 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts
The basic service will always be free but PS+ will be getting more and more premium features.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Here's the thing, and the Lems don't seem to be aware of this, FREE online gaming is the industry standard, and it has always been. MS is the ONLY one to charge you in order to play part of the game you already paid full price for over your own internet. PC, PS3, hell even Nintendo has free online. It IS the industry standard and now that PSN has been improved it really makes people question the value of xbox live. And then there is Steam which is also FREE and it smashes the argument of paying for online MP into the ground!

Ly_the_Fairy

I really wish people would quit saying the PC has free online.

99% of game servers exist because guess what? CONSUMERS pay for them through donations.

And of course there are a handful of MMOs out there like WoW, EVE, and FFXI that charge players a monthly fee to play.

Seriously, quit bringing up the PC as having free online. If there are no gamers paying for it then there'd be no online on the PC.

Have you ever considered the thought that when you bought the game you already paid for that stuff? MMOs are different because we would think the developers are still working on the game throughout.
Avatar image for BigBadBully
BigBadBully

2367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 BigBadBully
Member since 2006 • 2367 Posts

Sony will charge.

1.Network Security/Maintenance

2.Digital Distribution

This isn't the PS2 days where you just connected to a simple deathmatch for online. Network technology and gaming is growing and it cost money to support it. It's going to come down to who is more creative with the paid online service.

Want to game online for free, save up for a gaming PC.

Avatar image for Heroldp813
Heroldp813

2103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#55 Heroldp813
Member since 2008 • 2103 Posts

Sony will charge.

1.Network Security/Maintenance

2.Digital Distribution

This isn't the PS2 days where you just connected to a simple deathmatch for online. Network technology and gaming is growing and it cost money to support it. It's going to come down to who is more creative with the paid online service.

Want to game online for free, save up for a gaming PC.

BigBadBully

So well put. Bravo sir, Bravo.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

Sony starting to charge for online would give Wii U a big advantage. In the end, Wii U (by the time PS4/NeXbox come out) would be: 1) A well established console 2) More hardcore with great first party and third party support and 3) The only console left with free online.

Avatar image for sergemyster8
sergemyster8

1749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 sergemyster8
Member since 2006 • 1749 Posts
I hope not.
Avatar image for BigBadBully
BigBadBully

2367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 BigBadBully
Member since 2006 • 2367 Posts
when people bring up that nintendo wii online is free? take what the nintendo wii online service is, would you even consider paying in the first place? i think you see why the wii online service is free. now with ps3, yes it offers a nice online service for free but to adapt for the future i believe they'll need to look at a paid online service. pc is in a different category, its open to anybody. nintendo,ms, and sony = closed console. you cut out most of the luxuaries that the pc offers because everything is in control of the company when dealing with consoles.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

when people bring up that nintendo wii online is free? take what the nintendo wii online service is, would you even consider paying in the first place? i think you see why the wii online service is free. now with ps3, yes it offers a nice online service for free but to adapt for the future i believe they'll need to look at a paid online service. pc is in a different category, its open to anybody. nintendo,ms, and sony = closed console. you cut out most of the luxuaries that the pc offers because everything is in control of the company when dealing with consoles.BigBadBully

Wii online is bad. Wii U online won't be bad since they're supposedly fixing all the problems that the Wii had.

Avatar image for PSP107
PSP107

18980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 PSP107
Member since 2007 • 18980 Posts
They won't charge but will have the PS+ service with much better features than is currently available.JohnF111
The PS+ is proof that Sony might charge for online play. MSoft proved that people are willing to spend $50( now $60) a year to play online. I won't be surprised if PS+ is the only way to play online games on PS4 and even Vita.
Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts
Yeah, sony isn't going to let cow's have a free ride next gen. PSN+ was just the beginning.
Avatar image for movin_target
movin_target

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#62 movin_target
Member since 2005 • 3412 Posts

I don't see why Sony would, seeing as PS+ is working well for them at the moment. Like others have said in the topic, one of the draws of the PS3 is the free network play, which was the huge draw for me.

If Sony does decide to make this BS move of charging for online play, then it's PC gaming for me.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]They won't charge but will have the PS+ service with much better features than is currently available.PSP107
The PS+ is proof that Sony might charge for online play. MSoft proved that people are willing to spend $50( now $60) a year to play online. I won't be surprised if PS+ is the only way to play online games on PS4 and even Vita.

AND the fact not everyone is not xbl and there are people on PSN proves there are those that arent willing to pay for online. Sony knows this is one of the cards they have against MS. They wont give it up easly as some may think.

Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#64 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts
I could see Sony going the route of offering various advanced features, such as chat and such, to paying only, but limiting themselves to pay to play I don't see working for them. It is a attractive quality to their system that they really can't afford to lose. Beyond that, if they did go pay to play, the comparison on XBL will become far more valid, and expectations with vastly increase, and Sony doesn't have the capital right now to do major network investments.
Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#65 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts

I think that Sony will keep it's current stratagy of free online with a premium service. I think Microsoft would be crazy to not go with such a system.

Wasdie
its making them too much money, it would be crazy for ms to do other wise
Avatar image for Ly_the_Fairy
Ly_the_Fairy

8541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Ly_the_Fairy
Member since 2011 • 8541 Posts
[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Here's the thing, and the Lems don't seem to be aware of this, FREE online gaming is the industry standard, and it has always been. MS is the ONLY one to charge you in order to play part of the game you already paid full price for over your own internet. PC, PS3, hell even Nintendo has free online. It IS the industry standard and now that PSN has been improved it really makes people question the value of xbox live. And then there is Steam which is also FREE and it smashes the argument of paying for online MP into the ground!

LOXO7

I really wish people would quit saying the PC has free online.

99% of game servers exist because guess what? CONSUMERS pay for them through donations.

And of course there are a handful of MMOs out there like WoW, EVE, and FFXI that charge players a monthly fee to play.

Seriously, quit bringing up the PC as having free online. If there are no gamers paying for it then there'd be no online on the PC.

Have you ever considered the thought that when you bought the game you already paid for that stuff? MMOs are different because we would think the developers are still working on the game throughout.

When I paid $50 to Valve for my copy of the Orange Box I also sent money to the guy running a server computer in his basement that hosts my favorite TF2 server? Are you serious?
Avatar image for Ly_the_Fairy
Ly_the_Fairy

8541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Ly_the_Fairy
Member since 2011 • 8541 Posts

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Here's the thing, and the Lems don't seem to be aware of this, FREE online gaming is the industry standard, and it has always been. MS is the ONLY one to charge you in order to play part of the game you already paid full price for over your own internet. PC, PS3, hell even Nintendo has free online. It IS the industry standard and now that PSN has been improved it really makes people question the value of xbox live. And then there is Steam which is also FREE and it smashes the argument of paying for online MP into the ground!

ShadowMoses900

I really wish people would quit saying the PC has free online.

99% of game servers exist because guess what? CONSUMERS pay for them through donations.

And of course there are a handful of MMOs out there like WoW, EVE, and FFXI that charge players a monthly fee to play.

Seriously, quit bringing up the PC as having free online. If there are no gamers paying for it then there'd be no online on the PC.

Do I pay to play on PC? Nope not a cent. So there goes your argument. Unless your talking about MMO's but they don't count.

So you mooch? Great argument. Too bad those servers you play on are still paid for BY GAMERS. And I like how MMOs don't count :D
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
If they do it I won't buy their console and I would curse at M$ forever.
Avatar image for timmy00
timmy00

15360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#69 timmy00
Member since 2006 • 15360 Posts

Depends on if they think they can get away with it. I can see them still using PSN+ for the PS4 or whatever you call it.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

I really wish people would quit saying the PC has free online.

99% of game servers exist because guess what? CONSUMERS pay for them through donations.

And of course there are a handful of MMOs out there like WoW, EVE, and FFXI that charge players a monthly fee to play.

Seriously, quit bringing up the PC as having free online. If there are no gamers paying for it then there'd be no online on the PC.

Ly_the_Fairy

Do I pay to play on PC? Nope not a cent. So there goes your argument. Unless your talking about MMO's but they don't count.

So you mooch? Great argument. Too bad those servers you play on are still paid for BY GAMERS. And I like how MMOs don't count :D

To be honest I never heard of anyone paying to play thier games online with PC unless mmo. Unless your counting your internet service which I wouldint count in this discusion.

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#71 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts
Microsoft are the ones who would be idiots if they charge for online play next gen. It's obscene that they are charging for something that they could easily let people access for free and still profit from.
Avatar image for Ly_the_Fairy
Ly_the_Fairy

8541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Ly_the_Fairy
Member since 2011 • 8541 Posts

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Do I pay to play on PC? Nope not a cent. So there goes your argument. Unless your talking about MMO's but they don't count.

finalfantasy94

So you mooch? Great argument. Too bad those servers you play on are still paid for BY GAMERS. And I like how MMOs don't count :D

To be honest I never heard of anyone paying to play thier games online with PC unless mmo. Unless your counting your internet service which I wouldint count in this discusion.

People host servers for games, and they do not do it entirely out of the kindness of their hearts. Those servers stay up because gamers donate to them. Luckily for cheap gamers there's enough donations made to where you can get by without paying.


But on a smaller scale, like say my friend who pays $30 a month to host a Minecraft server for our group of friends, no. We all have to chip in, or we don't get to play online.

That's how PC gaming works. It's not like there are thousands upon thousands of servers all being hosted for free. Gamers are paying for those to be there. Not Valve, not Tripwire, not Blizzard. GAMERS

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Free online play is a huge selling point for Sony so I doubt they would get rid of it. They will just continue to improve PS+ and leave PSN bare bones

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
they'll probably have to. their online service this gen has been awful
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"] So you mooch? Great argument. Too bad those servers you play on are still paid for BY GAMERS. And I like how MMOs don't count :DLy_the_Fairy

To be honest I never heard of anyone paying to play thier games online with PC unless mmo. Unless your counting your internet service which I wouldint count in this discusion.

People host servers for games, and they do not do it entirely out of the kindness of their hearts. Those servers stay up because gamers donate to them. Luckily for cheap gamers there's enough donations made to where you can get by without paying.


But on a smaller scale, like say my friend who pays $30 a month to host a Minecraft server for our group of friends, no. We all have to chip in, or we don't get to play online.

That's how PC gaming works. It's not like there are thousands upon thousands of servers all being hosted for free. Gamers are paying for those to be there. Not Valve, not Tripwire, not Blizzard. GAMERS

It has nothing to do with being a cheap gamer. Theres nothing telling you people are paying to keep this up. I have never ever ran into a sign like that hwen I played a PC game online.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

they'll probably have to. their online service this gen has been awfulmems_1224

Thats a good one. PSN is very far from awful.

Avatar image for yanni1
yanni1

1067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 yanni1
Member since 2004 • 1067 Posts
Why wouldn't they? MS have shown that people will pay a yearly subscription. It's just smart from a business standpoint.
Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#78 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts
If sony starts charging for online play next gen then the only console I'll consider picking up is the Wii U.Moriarity_
what makes you think that nintendo will have free online ?
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#79 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

Next gen all big budget games will comw with overly expensive DLC, and all online must be paid twice for, or three times.
For the audience it doesn't matter much, they would happily pay more for whatever you throw at them. For me it does.

I just 'know' that buying a M$ or Sony system would be a horrible idea next gen, cause they are likely going to raise prices for the services like crazy. And they're going to have many revisions and schemes. I think next gen will be the ultimate milkage gen.

Avatar image for mztazmz
mztazmz

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 mztazmz
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts

I dunno,

With more and more people getting annoyed with XBL putting up ads, charging for content that is free on PSN, giving devs far less freedom(think Steam), and being the only company that charges to play online, the question you may want to ask is:

Do you really think that Microsoft WILL be able to charge for online next gen?????????

Then I just realized, given that this gen, we have seen just how much 360 owners are willing to put up with, I guess the answer is YES8)

Avatar image for LovePotionNo9
LovePotionNo9

4751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 LovePotionNo9
Member since 2010 • 4751 Posts

I don't know if they will, but if it means a much better, higher quality service, then they probably should.

Avatar image for Allthishate
Allthishate

1879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Allthishate
Member since 2009 • 1879 Posts
Again people here are mixing what they want and reality IMO. The reality is MS is making insane sums of money off a service imo that should be free but they have every right to charge for it (as long as xbl product is worth the money). Sony has been Losing tons of money of there online service and as a company in general. So u can assume that Sony will not want to continue this trend and will start charging for online play. i know its a trump card that sony has over the 360 but the cost of having that trump card could run the company in administration or what ever. and not having sony in the gaming industry would be bad for all gaming parties regardless of the brand u like.
Avatar image for sakura_Ex
sakura_Ex

3066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 sakura_Ex
Member since 2007 • 3066 Posts

Again people here are mixing what they want and reality IMO. The reality is MS is making insane sums of money off a service imo that should be free but they have every right to charge for it (as long as xbl product is worth the money). Sony has been Losing tons of money of there online service and as a company in general. So u can assume that Sony will not want to continue this trend and will start charging for online play. i know its a trump card that sony has over the 360 but the cost of having that trump card could run the company in administration or what ever. and not having sony in the gaming industry would be bad for all gaming parties regardless of the brand u like. Allthishate

Sony will be fine,they make their money from PSN+ and Home ( which sucks by the way ).

Avatar image for skanjos
skanjos

647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 skanjos
Member since 2006 • 647 Posts

i will pay ,as i do with xbox live, online is mandatory to a gamer at this point,to have the full expirience from a game you have to go online so yeah... they will suck our blood in the end .. :)

Avatar image for sakura_Ex
sakura_Ex

3066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 sakura_Ex
Member since 2007 • 3066 Posts

i will pay ,as i do with xbox live, online is mandatory to a gamer at this point,to have the full expirience from a game you have to go online so yeah... they will suck our blood in the end .. :)

skanjos
Correction... they will suck your blood in the end,I on the other hand won't be paying a dime for online gaming.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45567 Posts

The SP magic 8 ball says... Bank on it !! :P

EDIT: :oops: I read "won't" as "will" so yeah, that should make clearer my position.

Avatar image for phantomblade220
phantomblade220

958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 phantomblade220
Member since 2010 • 958 Posts

It doesn't matter to me. Business wise it'd make a lot of sense for Sony to charge for at least a premium service of their online. Whether they charge or not I'll still get a PS4. Sony has so many strong IP's and first party studios, that I could live paying for online just to keep playing their games.

Avatar image for JohnDead80
JohnDead80

294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 JohnDead80
Member since 2011 • 294 Posts

Sony wants to make money, but they aren't THAT greedy lol. Come on now, charging for online? Thats absurd.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]they'll probably have to. their online service this gen has been awfulfinalfantasy94

Thats a good one. PSN is very far from awful.

theres a reason i haven't done a firmware update in 5 months. psn is a pain

Avatar image for mbrockway
mbrockway

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 mbrockway
Member since 2007 • 3560 Posts
[QUOTE="JohnF111"]They won't charge but will have the PS+ service with much better features than is currently available.PSP107
The PS+ is proof that Sony might charge for online play. MSoft proved that people are willing to spend $50( now $60) a year to play online. I won't be surprised if PS+ is the only way to play online games on PS4 and even Vita.

PS+ is awesome and actually adds stuff instead of holding online play hostage like Live. The auto-updates, discounts, and cloud saving are pretty sweet.
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#92 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

gona keep the free and premium service feature MS should do the same

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#93 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

I'm pretty sure they are going to charge something. The only reason it was free for the PS3 is because it was in last place and trying to play catch up. After all lots a people bought a PS3 because of it's free online.

Avatar image for coltgames
coltgames

2120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#94 coltgames
Member since 2009 • 2120 Posts
hope they dont charge if they do i will no longer be playing games on consoles
Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#95 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I think that Sony will keep it's current stratagy of free online with a premium service. I think Microsoft would be crazy to not go with such a system.

Diviniuz
its making them too much money, it would be crazy for ms to do other wise

exactly. Too many people argue based on what they want to happen, as opposed to what will happen.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#96 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
[QUOTE="Diviniuz"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I think that Sony will keep it's current stratagy of free online with a premium service. I think Microsoft would be crazy to not go with such a system.

fadersdream
its making them too much money, it would be crazy for ms to do other wise

exactly. Too many people argue based on what they want to happen, as opposed to what will happen.

What they want and what happens used to be more congruent than they are now. Or is that our memory tricking us, I wonder? I feel that way too, that the industry is moving more into directions that are not good. Can't remember having that feeling say 5 years ago, but maybe that is part of growing up.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

I'm sure someone at Sony is kicking themselves in the head to see MS make so much money for Xbox Live. Do you think they will end up charging next gen? Thoughts SW?

Heroldp813
Money isn't everything,i am sure that they can rip off people but up until when is the real question. The PS Vita will have free online play with party chat,so i don't see sony fallowing the road of pay to play,free online play is a big part of the PS brand now,what we may see for sure is a richer experience next gen which would still be free of a fee,and sony expanding even more PSN+ which is the right idea.
Avatar image for M8ingSeezun
M8ingSeezun

2313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 M8ingSeezun
Member since 2007 • 2313 Posts

They're NOT.

Free Online Play = PS3 selling point.

Having to pay for PSN will likely make Sony lose a helluva lot of PS3 gamers.

If they do, I'll quit console gaming forever. And move on to PC.

Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#99 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

They're NOT.

Free Online Play = PS3 selling point.

Having to pay for PSN will likely make Sony lose a helluva lot of PS3 gamers.

If they do, I'll quit console gaming forever. And move on to PC.

M8ingSeezun
I don't think they'll lose a lot of gamers, and all they really have to do is be a couple dollars cheaper than their nearest competitor. You're more likely to see price competition than no price at all. And PC really isn't the free escape it's made out to be, most expenses are paid directly to the game companies (this is mainly on MMO's though).
Avatar image for Easyle
Easyle

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#100 Easyle
Member since 2010 • 2034 Posts

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

I have no f***ing clue.

Heroldp813

I sense a bit of hostility in your post. Why?:D

It is a stupid question.