Do you think HDTVS are necessary??

  • 62 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for KillaHalo2o9
KillaHalo2o9

5305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 KillaHalo2o9
Member since 2006 • 5305 Posts

Will about 28% of Americans have a HDTV. Alot of people I talked to have different opinions on it some say that there is no difference your just watching Television and, other will die for a HDTV.

What do you think would you spend $1500.00 on a TV?

Avatar image for Watch_Me_Xplode
Watch_Me_Xplode

8049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 Watch_Me_Xplode
Member since 2005 • 8049 Posts
They're not necessary, but they sure make games a lot better. I am saving up for one myself. Don't think I'd pay 1500, there are some very good HDTVs for under a thousand.
Avatar image for Huxley_00
Huxley_00

1309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Huxley_00
Member since 2006 • 1309 Posts

shows,sports, movies and games yes..

 other than that.. HDTVs aren't necessary..

Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts

yes!

once you have one you wont go back....

Avatar image for karicha9
karicha9

6927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 karicha9
Member since 2003 • 6927 Posts

I just bought an HDTV and I have to say that it really doesn't make a great difference to me.

The biggest difference to me was going from analog to digital signals for TV programming.

Avatar image for KillaHalo2o9
KillaHalo2o9

5305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 KillaHalo2o9
Member since 2006 • 5305 Posts

yes!

once you have one you wont go back....

daveg1

Lol Agree 

Avatar image for tegovoltio
tegovoltio

9280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 tegovoltio
Member since 2004 • 9280 Posts
Are you talking about right now or overral? Because HDTVs are already getting a lot of attention and even more once they start going down in price and HD content becomes even more standard.
Avatar image for illmatikkk
illmatikkk

2361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 illmatikkk
Member since 2005 • 2361 Posts
Yes, they are.
Avatar image for D0013ER
D0013ER

3765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 D0013ER
Member since 2007 • 3765 Posts

I just bought an HDTV and I have to say that it really doesn't make a great difference to me.

The biggest difference to me was going from analog to digital signals for TV programming.

karicha9

Last gen, nah.

This gen, no, but almost. (If you're going to blow $400-$600 on a console, don't cheap out on your choice of output)

Next gen, more than likely. 

Avatar image for Videodogg
Videodogg

12611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Videodogg
Member since 2002 • 12611 Posts
I have two hdtv's in my house. I cant imagine not having one.
Avatar image for cheezisgoooood
cheezisgoooood

6130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#11 cheezisgoooood
Member since 2004 • 6130 Posts
If I did not have one I would probably say no, but since I do, I'm forced to say yes, since it really does help the cinematic experience and immersion of games a lot.
Avatar image for Corvin
Corvin

7266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Corvin
Member since 2002 • 7266 Posts
It certainly makes things look a lot nicer, I love widescreen for gaming.  I'd definitely go with a projector over typical TV setup though, after playing 360 at 110" in 1080p no standard TV size will feel worth the money to me.
Avatar image for KillaHalo2o9
KillaHalo2o9

5305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 KillaHalo2o9
Member since 2006 • 5305 Posts

I have two hdtv's in my house. I cant imagine not having one.Videodogg

Im trying to buy another one also for myself only :? 

Avatar image for johngmills
johngmills

4349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 johngmills
Member since 2005 • 4349 Posts

HDTV's are not a necessity.....but a luxury item.

Avatar image for dexter111344
dexter111344

1578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 dexter111344
Member since 2005 • 1578 Posts
I wouldn't mind having one, but they aren't necessary. The only things that are necessary are oxygen, food, water, and a place to live.
Avatar image for darcom1
darcom1

1483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 darcom1
Member since 2004 • 1483 Posts

Will about 28% of Americans have a HDTV. Alot of people I talked to have different opinions on it some say that there is no difference your just watching Television and, other will die for a HDTV.

What do you think would you spend $1500.00 on a TV?

KillaHalo2o9

looks like you don't have one ........... i own one and the difference is abysmal, need one in your room not in sears or bb to see the difference 

Avatar image for SemiMaster
SemiMaster

19011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 81

User Lists: 0

#17 SemiMaster
Member since 2006 • 19011 Posts
Of course not. You could play on a 3 inch TV still, it's just that HDTVs are a tremendous boost in graphical enjoyment.
Avatar image for Cedmln
Cedmln

8802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#18 Cedmln
Member since 2006 • 8802 Posts
They are much better for your eyes. So i say yes.
Avatar image for Flow4U
Flow4U

1529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Flow4U
Member since 2007 • 1529 Posts
Yes
Avatar image for SIP_YEK_NOD
SIP_YEK_NOD

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 SIP_YEK_NOD
Member since 2004 • 304 Posts

 42", 57", 37"

plasma, CRT proj, LCD

TV, gaming, computer.

 

 

Anything less than HD is uncivilized. 

Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts
It's funny that this is still even a debate. I remember over a year back lemmings and sheep bashing PS3's HDMI and how it centered around HD experience.... they would say only %8 of households have HDTVs, then %15, now %28. HDTV market is growing fast and getting cheaper and for everybody but grandma watching her soaps is going to be the standard within 5 years. The picture quality and detail difference is amazing for movies, real HD signal, and games. TVs themselves aren't necessary so there's no real basis for arguing HDTVs aren't necessary.... it's all luxuries and HDTV is significantly better.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
Before I had one I said "pfft, big deal", but now, no kidding, it rocks. Don't even worry about getting a next gen dvd player upgrade your cable to HD and you will enjoy it. Games are the icing on the cake.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
No they aren't needed they are a nice luxary though.
Avatar image for KillaHalo2o9
KillaHalo2o9

5305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 KillaHalo2o9
Member since 2006 • 5305 Posts
[QUOTE="KillaHalo2o9"]

Will about 28% of Americans have a HDTV. Alot of people I talked to have different opinions on it some say that there is no difference your just watching Television and, other will die for a HDTV.

What do you think would you spend $1500.00 on a TV?

darcom1

looks like you don't have one ........... i own one and the difference is abysmal, need one in your room not in sears or bb to see the difference

I do have a HDTV a Panasonic Tau 53inch 1080i :P

Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts

already did!

and i am loving it

Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#27 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts

pfffft no. I dont care how fancy the graphics are, im not paying that much just for a TV.

It a TV for god's sake. Watching some god-awful show in HD isnt gonna make the show any better is it?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Important for watching the select few television channels and movies offered? No.

Important for getting the most out of your HD gaming system? Somewhat... if you have money to burn.
Avatar image for TrustCo1971
TrustCo1971

1721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 TrustCo1971
Member since 2006 • 1721 Posts
To me HD pictures are only about 10% better than a good standard signal. I think if people spent more time on perfecting what we have instead of always trying to make something new we would be better off...But this is just my opinion...
Avatar image for PS2Hawk
PS2Hawk

4180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 PS2Hawk
Member since 2003 • 4180 Posts
the graphics do look better but it depends though, I got tired of the little 21 inch 10 year old CRT I had!
Avatar image for SIP_YEK_NOD
SIP_YEK_NOD

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 SIP_YEK_NOD
Member since 2004 • 304 Posts

To me HD pictures are only about 10% better than a good standard signal. I think if people spent more time on perfecting what we have instead of always trying to make something new we would be better off...But this is just my opinion...TrustCo1971

 

always trying to make something new? you still reeling from that big switch to color tv? 

Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#32 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts
If you ask me, its like a bunch of guys with small d*cks over compensating for their **** sex life - "my TV is bigger than yours", or "my TV has more pixels".
Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#33 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts

[QUOTE="TrustCo1971"]To me HD pictures are only about 10% better than a good standard signal. I think if people spent more time on perfecting what we have instead of always trying to make something new we would be better off...But this is just my opinion...SIP_YEK_NOD

 

always trying to make something new? you still reeling from that big switch to color tv? 

I know that was some rubbish attempt at sarcasm, but you really cant compare the switch from colour to the change from STV to HDTV - the differences and benefits arent as obvious.

The way some people talk about new technology on this board, they sound like theyre employed by the local electronics manufacturer. The fact is, at this moment in time, HD has little benefit to the average consumer, but plenty of bragging value for tech junkies.

Avatar image for KillaHalo2o9
KillaHalo2o9

5305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 KillaHalo2o9
Member since 2006 • 5305 Posts
Before I had one I said "pfft, big deal", but now, no kidding, it rocks. Don't even worry about getting a next gen dvd player upgrade your cable to HD and you will enjoy it. Games are the icing on the cake.Riverwolf007

[QUOTE="TrustCo1971"]To me HD pictures are only about 10% better than a good standard signal. I think if people spent more time on perfecting what we have instead of always trying to make something new we would be better off...But this is just my opinion...SIP_YEK_NOD

 

always trying to make something new? you still reeling from that big switch to color tv?

lol:) 

Avatar image for audioaxes
audioaxes

1570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 audioaxes
Member since 2004 • 1570 Posts

since i rarely go into stores i was a late comer to viewing a hdtv but i heard all stuff about it

when i finally seen one i was very underwhelmed 

factor in the price and the amount of time i spend behind a tv (or lack there of) i find it a complete waste 

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

Will about 28% of Americans have a HDTV. Alot of people I talked to have different opinions on it some say that there is no difference your just watching Television and, other will die for a HDTV.

What do you think would you spend $1500.00 on a TV?

KillaHalo2o9

27" 720p LCD HDTV - $500 January 2007
Spherex 5.1 surround system - $200 April 2007

Where's the $1500 number you're pulling? It's absolutely worth it - there's no going back. Hook up a PC running emulators via VGA @1024x768 for all your old (4:3) games, hook up an Xbox 360, PS3, or Wii at 480p or 720p via component or hdmi for all your new games. I have a DVD player hooked up via component set to 480p widescreen, and use an optical cable to get digital surround. It's absolutely awesome.

I'm in college, and earned the money for everything I own on your basic $7/hr type jobs (I'll be picking up a new one for summer semester to get my 360 Elite) so it's perfectly possible if you shop around for sales (example, Spherex normally $500 - got it for $200).

I put having an HDTV and surround system above getting a next-gen system, and went for it first. I really don't get people who talk about buying $400 ~ $600 gaming system, but won't put down the $200 or so for a widescreen monitor or the $200 for a sound system (shop sales, sphrex, logitech z5500, etc...)

Avatar image for marioblah
marioblah

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 marioblah
Member since 2004 • 793 Posts

I recentley got one. And HOLY ****. I almost killed myself. 1080P 61" 1900 dollars. I can't blieve it, SD was like the dark ages.

 

Playing Resistance and Oblivion on a 70" TV is incredible . 

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
I spent $3,200 on my 57" 1080p Samsung LCD, so I guess I don't have a problem with investing into an hdtv. They are the future. Most of my local stores only carry a few sdtv's.
Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts
Most definately for Sports. That's the only thing I care about in HD.
Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts

shows,sports, movies and games yes..

other than that.. HDTVs aren't necessary..

Huxley_00

 

so everything a tv is used for... 

Avatar image for TacoJelly
TacoJelly

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 TacoJelly
Member since 2005 • 1723 Posts

Necessary no.  A good sound system is more necessary IMO (i still see people who rock HDTV's but only use the two crappy speakers on the box).

I, like many people, are waiting for them to be affordable ($300-600). 

Avatar image for TacoJelly
TacoJelly

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 TacoJelly
Member since 2005 • 1723 Posts

Most definately for Sports. That's the only thing I care about in HD.waynehead895

I never understood why it's necessary for sports to have a good picture.  The camera work in Sports broadcast is so bland I just don't see the appeal at all (maybe its the fact that I'm a filmarker). 

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#43 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

I spent $3,200 on my 57" 1080p Samsung LCD, so I guess I don't have a problem with investing into an hdtv. They are the future. Most of my local stores only carry a few sdtv's.BioShockOwnz


When I went in late 2004 to get an SDTV with component inputs for my Xbox, I spent $250 on a 20" Samsung set with Dynasound. Now, in early 2007 when I went HDTV shopping for my upcoming Xbox 360, I spent $500 on a 27" Insignia, and spent $200 on a Spherex surround system (sales are your friend)...  in either case I think I got my money's worth.

I used the *heck* out of my Samsung set - poor thing has geometry issues, noise, et cetera... one of the speakers was even dying for a while until I isolated the problem down to a faulty headphone port. It spent so much time displaying Halo, Halo 2, KOTOR, Phantom Dust, Disgaea, and Phantasy Star Online that it has really earned its retirement. At my new place it's being relegated to being the tv for the PS2 and Gamecube (deinterlaced images look horrible on my HDTV) and as a bedroom tv - it's finally going to get some well earned rest.

I never grasped why people who call themselves hardcore gamers dont put a little more money into the equipment that provides graphics and sound to them. It's like buying a third party controller - is saving $10 really worth having piss-poor control?

Avatar image for springz300
springz300

2050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 springz300
Member since 2004 • 2050 Posts
nothing is necessary. is life necessary?
Avatar image for Sagacious_Tien
Sagacious_Tien

12562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#45 Sagacious_Tien
Member since 2005 • 12562 Posts
Theya ren'ta  necessity, but there is no doubt that they add a great deal to the experience.
Avatar image for KillaHalo2o9
KillaHalo2o9

5305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 KillaHalo2o9
Member since 2006 • 5305 Posts

nothing is necessary. is life necessary?springz300

Lol not sure :? 

Avatar image for SambaLele
SambaLele

5552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 SambaLele
Member since 2004 • 5552 Posts

i think television isn't necessary.

so, yes, HDTVs aren't necessary as well.

but ppl will want them more and more, as time passes by. 

Avatar image for 16bitkevin
16bitkevin

3962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 16bitkevin
Member since 2005 • 3962 Posts
I want one. I don't need one.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#49 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

Necessary no. A good sound system is more necessary IMO (i still see people who rock HDTV's but only use the two crappy speakers on the box).

I, like many people, are waiting for them to be affordable ($300-600).

TacoJelly

Y'know what bothers me more? People buy HDTVs, then they buy 5.1 computer speakers, hook the left and right audio cables into them using a splitter, and talk about how great the "surround" is. Absolutely unbelievable. It's like the Xbox 360 owners who post talking about how HDTV doesn't improve anything, yet have the system set to 480i - whoops. 

Avatar image for InTheBible
InTheBible

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 InTheBible
Member since 2007 • 40 Posts

Necessary no. A good sound system is more necessary IMO (i still see people who rock HDTV's but only use the two crappy speakers on the box).

I, like many people, are waiting for them to be affordable ($300-600).

TacoJelly

Why dont you just buy a 32" Vizio? 599.99 USD.  Its LCD screen, 1200:1 contrast, 1366x768p, 8ms response time. You cant go wrong. (The viewing angle sux though)