Do you think PS3 and PC multiplats should be cheaper than 360's.

well, considering the fact that they nearly always get the worst versions (apart from the occasional wii release), I think 360 owners should get these games cheaper.

well, considering the fact that they nearly always get the worst versions (apart from the occasional wii release), I think 360 owners should get these games cheaper.

arbitor365

Is this a 360 is holding back the PS3's true potential thread in disguise?

BPoole96

well, considering the fact that they nearly always get the worst versions (apart from the occasional wii release), I think 360 owners should get these games cheaper.

arbitor365

[QUOTE="NeonNinja"]

[QUOTE="DudeNtheRoom"]Don't lie please. I NEVER said exclusives look the same. I said the exact opposite. Don't try and make your argument look better when it's not.

As for the fact that I "held back" on the PC, it's b/c no one was arguing about the PC being equal to the 360.....seriously, can you keep up?

As for the dum argument of PC settings: it's not even the same thing. PC developers maximize the graphics just as much as the minimize them. THATS WHY THEY HAVE SETTINGS IN THE FIRST PLACE.

With consoles you are stuck with what they give you.

Do you think before you post?

DudeNtheRoom

Are you mad? At me? That's cute.

The first line was a grammatical error, I meant to split that sentence into two, but hit a comma and kept it as one so I can understand your confusion there. You say system specs are almost the same and so I say the games look really freaking close, but somehow according to you PS3 games are magically better looking by miles. That's blind fanboyism.

Also, you claim to hold back the PC argument because no one mentioned it, but when you quoted me one of the first things I did was criticize your stance on PCs. Can you keep up?

You claim that with consoles you are stuck with what they give you, but due to the PS3's godlike performance the games are clearly being held back by the laggard Xbox 360. Now you're saying the same argument can't be made for the varying performances of PC's?

You can toss insults with each of your posts sunshine, it doesn't change the fact that you have only posted this topic as a way to glorify your console of choice.

It's good to know that you literally have nothing else to reply to other than sunshine. Again, the guy asking me "Can you keep up?" and "Do you think before you post?" is calling the pot black.

It's been pleasant chatting with you. We should do this again if you want to run out of things to say next time as well. Maybe you should study up at "insult school" since you could learn how to be a bit more subtle with your own insults. ;)

I think more developers should be competing to release games at lower prices than eachother. Might help sell some games that people would normally overlook. Just an idea though.

PC games should be cheaper than console because PC don't have royalty fees badtaker

[QUOTE="badtaker"]PC games should be cheaper than console because PC don't have royalty fees IronBass

yes but now some PC games are sold at 60$badtaker

[QUOTE="badtaker"]yes but now some PC games are sold at 60$IronBass

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="badtaker"]PC games should be cheaper than console because PC don't have royalty fees badtaker

Yeah, and it's ridiculous. If a game is popular they jack up the price. It doesn't follow standard pricing, it's just like, "massive hype? we sell at $10 more!"

[QUOTE="badtaker"][QUOTE="IronBass"] But PC games are cheaper :!: NeonNinja

Yeah, and it's ridiculous. If a game is popular they jack up the price. It doesn't follow standard pricing, it's just like, "massive hype? we sell at $10 more!"

thats because there is no standard pricing on PC... PS3 and xbox set price controls... when you have an open platform like the PC, devs are obviously open to charge whatever the hell they want.

[QUOTE="DudeNtheRoom"]

Stay with me on this.

From what I've seen the PS3 is capable of better graphics than the 360. It takes more "tricks" but it is possible. The PC is of coarse more powerful than both.

Eventhough they are both more capable, multiplats are usually of less quality than exclusives on the respective platforms. It's as if the 360 gets it's good graphics, then very little is done to boost them on the PS3 and PC.

So basically, 360 owners are getting their game respectively and PS3 and PC owners are being held back.

So wouldn't it be fair that they cost less?

In the case of PC games being cheaper 90% of the time anyway lets say, for arguments sake, that thats not the case.

cainetao11

I haven't played batman but RDR & AC certanly aren't even close to most exclusives in terms of quality especially not AC:B which is in fact just pure crap.