Do you think some websites might get pressured to give Halo a good score?

  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Freshprince221
Freshprince221

624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Freshprince221
Member since 2005 • 624 Posts

Think about it. There are alot alot of lemmings on this board. If gamespot gives it an 8.5 (besides the riots, the hate threads' and babies) some crazy fanboys might now want to come to gamespot anymore. Or they will say " GAmESpt Sux!!!!!111!!one!eleven". Now im not saying gamespot is the only website. and im not saying that lemming will do this. Im just saying that the guy (or girl ) that reviews halo on gamespot will have a lot on their shoulders because if they make it flop i dont think too many lemmings will come to them for reviews.

halo will be out and i look foward to playing it at my friends house. allll that weekend. till our eyes bleed :shock:

Avatar image for Freshprince221
Freshprince221

624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Freshprince221
Member since 2005 • 624 Posts
not*
Avatar image for HermitCommando
HermitCommando

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 HermitCommando
Member since 2007 • 178 Posts
Why would they? Don't you know it's cool and hip to call Halo overrated trash? That's the style nowadays.
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
GS is too afraid to flop this game.
Avatar image for ItalStallion777
ItalStallion777

1953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ItalStallion777
Member since 2005 • 1953 Posts
i don't think they will give halo 3 a AAA score because they are pressured but because that's what it really deserves. after watching several videos i can't even conceive this game getting any lower than a 9.0, but that's just me.
Avatar image for nyoroism
nyoroism

3778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 nyoroism
Member since 2007 • 3778 Posts
Why would they? Don't you know it's cool and hip to call Halo overrated trash? That's the style nowadays.HermitCommando
I was doing it first. You can thank me for this cool and hip style. Or you can slap me for it.
Avatar image for Trading_Zoner
Trading_Zoner

4100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#7 Trading_Zoner
Member since 2007 • 4100 Posts

Yeah I'm sure they are shaking in thier boots because of the fanboys on thier message boards... :roll:

You guys are funny.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
Since the editors at Gamespot are all older than 7 years old, I don't think they really care what the majority of fanboys think.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

Nope.

Halo 3 will be a great game and scores will reflect that.

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts
That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.
Avatar image for mjgulkis
mjgulkis

459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 mjgulkis
Member since 2004 • 459 Posts

if it scores AAA, it better be different than halo 1 and 2 or else i'm gona get pissed about zelda tp and mp3 again

Avatar image for ginglejangle
ginglejangle

3171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 ginglejangle
Member since 2007 • 3171 Posts
gamespot arent scared to flop any game.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.dream431ca

:roll: That's not what happened with the halo 2 score. Please don't make unfounded claims.

Avatar image for Freshprince221
Freshprince221

624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Freshprince221
Member since 2005 • 624 Posts
im not talkin about only gamespot. im saying that other websites might care about what theyre fanboys think. plus if angry fanboys leave your site becuase u gave a game a review lower than expected. that would be a bummer
Avatar image for EG101
EG101

2091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 EG101
Member since 2007 • 2091 Posts
If anything they probably feel pressure to be extra hard on Halo3 seeing as everyone seems to be hating on Halo.
Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.sonicare

:roll: That's not what happened with the halo 2 score. Please don't make unfounded claims.

I'm sorry. I tried :)

Seriously. Do you really think that game deserved a 9.4? I sure didn't. I loved Halo 1. Halo 2 didn't even match Halo 1 in terms of gameplay, physics, and fun. Online was fun, but I was expecting a spectacular single player and all I got was a dud :( I'm afraid Halo 3 might turn out the same way which is more than likely given Microsoft's strict time constraint.

Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts
yes. halo 3 will get 9.5 but it will earn a 9
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

i don't think they will give halo 3 a AAA score because they are pressured but because that's what it really deserves. after watching several videos i can't even conceive this game getting any lower than a 9.0, but that's just me.ItalStallion777

that may be but 9 at best, and if thats the case then halo 2 deserved like an 8 at best its way overrated, ce is a 9 though as well, great game

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#19 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.dream431ca
Halo 2 was the best console shooter in terms of multiplayer out there. It had the best online multiplayer, most variety, most depth, had the production values.

The singleplayer while short and an annoying ending had a good story and had its bright spots. Just it wasnt as good as the first one. Also Halo 2 played alot differently from Halo combat evolved.

That game deserved its high scores.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#20 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
Its going to get AAA because it deserves it. It will have an amazing campaign and an amazing multiplayer. the millions of people that will begin playing Halo 3 come 9/25/07 will be playing one of the best games this gen.
Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.jg4xchamp
Halo 2 was the best console shooter in terms of multiplayer out there. It had the best online multiplayer, most variety, most depth, had the production values.

The singleplayer while short and an annoying ending had a good story and had its bright spots. Just it wasnt as good as the first one. Also Halo 2 played alot differently from Halo combat evolved.

That game deserved its high scores.

I always ask, then why wasn't Halo 2 just multiplayer? It would have made sense because Bungie spent more than 75% on it. Why would you make a horrible single player? I think Bungie was bossed around by Microsoft a little too much.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#22 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.dream431ca

:roll: That's not what happened with the halo 2 score. Please don't make unfounded claims.

I'm sorry. I tried :)

Seriously. Do you really think that game deserved a 9.4? I sure didn't. I loved Halo 1. Halo 2 didn't even match Halo 1 in terms of gameplay, physics, and fun. Online was fun, but I was expecting a spectacular single player and all I got was a dud :( I'm afraid Halo 3 might turn out the same way which is more than likely given Microsoft's strict time constraint.

Bungie jumped the game ahead, because they had more than enough time. Bungie thought they themselves messed up with Halo 2 and have been on this game nonstop. They have put in tons of work. the epsilon, the beta, etc all those player opinions to help them build the perfect send off to there fans.

Id say Halo 3 will be the total package the Halo fans like myself are hyping it to be.
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.jg4xchamp
Halo 2 was the best console shooter in terms of multiplayer out there. It had the best online multiplayer, most variety, most depth, had the production values.

The singleplayer while short and an annoying ending had a good story and had its bright spots. Just it wasnt as good as the first one. Also Halo 2 played alot differently from Halo combat evolved.

That game deserved its high scores.

imo i would disagree with ur view of the halo 2 campaign having bright spots. it was probably the most bored ive ever been while playing a game but i had to play it after loving halo:ce

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#24 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="dream431ca"]That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.dream431ca

Halo 2 was the best console shooter in terms of multiplayer out there. It had the best online multiplayer, most variety, most depth, had the production values.

The singleplayer while short and an annoying ending had a good story and had its bright spots. Just it wasnt as good as the first one. Also Halo 2 played alot differently from Halo combat evolved.

That game deserved its high scores.

I always ask, then why wasn't Halo 2 just multiplayer? It would have made sense because Bungie spent more than 75% on it. Why would you make a horrible single player? I think Bungie was bossed around by Microsoft a little too much.

no, they wanted all those guys who played at lan parties, and all the Halo fans that went to tournaments to get a proper online MP. and it delivered on that and thensome.

The story etc was fine. Bungie screwed up the missions and nobody liked being the arbiter his missions sucked. ALso the boss fights were stupid. it deserved its high scores and it has nothing to do with MS. there not very hands on, they just fund there games. Bungie themselves screwed up, and intend on doing the franchise single player justice this time around.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#25 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="dream431ca"]That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.blues3531

Halo 2 was the best console shooter in terms of multiplayer out there. It had the best online multiplayer, most variety, most depth, had the production values.

The singleplayer while short and an annoying ending had a good story and had its bright spots. Just it wasnt as good as the first one. Also Halo 2 played alot differently from Halo combat evolved.

That game deserved its high scores.

imo i would disagree with ur view of the halo 2 campaign having bright spots. it was probably the most bored ive ever been while playing a game but i had to play it after loving halo:ce

its bright spots, were the battles, the environments, the graphics, the master chief missions being fun in some areas and a some great battles in that game. the scarab was fun. so was the end fight when the covenant are having there civil war. every thing else sucked. and considering all that i mentioned is only like 3 missions. that means that more than half the campaign stunk beyond belief.

Halo 2 had its bright spots, just it was very disapointing. they took a 9 single player and turned it into like a 7. Halo 3 will be much better.
Avatar image for glitchgeeman
glitchgeeman

5638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#26 glitchgeeman
Member since 2005 • 5638 Posts
Probably, even though Metroid, Zelda, Mario, etc are better franchises, Halo has such commercial power that flopping it would probably do some considerable damage to GS's reputation. I can already imagine how many fanboys and even normal gamers would leave if Halo 3 were to flop.
Avatar image for LinKuei_warrior
LinKuei_warrior

2670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#27 LinKuei_warrior
Member since 2006 • 2670 Posts
[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="dream431ca"]That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.jg4xchamp

Halo 2 was the best console shooter in terms of multiplayer out there. It had the best online multiplayer, most variety, most depth, had the production values.

The singleplayer while short and an annoying ending had a good story and had its bright spots. Just it wasnt as good as the first one. Also Halo 2 played alot differently from Halo combat evolved.

That game deserved its high scores.

I always ask, then why wasn't Halo 2 just multiplayer? It would have made sense because Bungie spent more than 75% on it. Why would you make a horrible single player? I think Bungie was bossed around by Microsoft a little too much.

no, they wanted all those guys who played at lan parties, and all the Halo fans that went to tournaments to get a proper online MP. and it delivered on that and thensome.

The story etc was fine. Bungie screwed up the missions and nobody liked being the arbiter his missions sucked. ALso the boss fights were stupid. it deserved its high scores and it has nothing to do with MS. there not very hands on, they just fund there games. Bungie themselves screwed up, and intend on doing the franchise single player justice this time around.

i thought the arbiter had way better missions than chiefy

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
Of course. I'm confident GS won't, though.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#29 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="dream431ca"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="dream431ca"]That's what happened with Halo 2. It's gonna happen again with Halo 3. The score will be fixed, so the review doesn't count.LinKuei_warrior

Halo 2 was the best console shooter in terms of multiplayer out there. It had the best online multiplayer, most variety, most depth, had the production values.

The singleplayer while short and an annoying ending had a good story and had its bright spots. Just it wasnt as good as the first one. Also Halo 2 played alot differently from Halo combat evolved.

That game deserved its high scores.

I always ask, then why wasn't Halo 2 just multiplayer? It would have made sense because Bungie spent more than 75% on it. Why would you make a horrible single player? I think Bungie was bossed around by Microsoft a little too much.

no, they wanted all those guys who played at lan parties, and all the Halo fans that went to tournaments to get a proper online MP. and it delivered on that and thensome.

The story etc was fine. Bungie screwed up the missions and nobody liked being the arbiter his missions sucked. ALso the boss fights were stupid. it deserved its high scores and it has nothing to do with MS. there not very hands on, they just fund there games. Bungie themselves screwed up, and intend on doing the franchise single player justice this time around.

i thought the arbiter had way better missions than chiefy

ok im wrong. everybody but linkuei warrior hated the arbiter missions......jk

but no seriousaly i though the chiefs missions were more fun. Delta Halo, the city, gravemind, the covenant civil war battle going on, etc were more fun than the arbiter missions IMo.
Avatar image for jackvegas21
jackvegas21

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 jackvegas21
Member since 2007 • 3157 Posts

im not talkin about only gamespot. im saying that other websites might care about what theyre fanboys think. plus if angry fanboys leave your site becuase u gave a game a review lower than expected. that would be a bummerFreshprince221

Wow! You actually think they care about posters on a forum?

Avatar image for FF-resevil-halo
FF-resevil-halo

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 FF-resevil-halo
Member since 2006 • 1380 Posts
im thinking halo 3 is an 8.5 ino its low or w.e but I just dont see it being bioshock (and i dont even like bioshock) halo 3 is too much of the same thing from halo 1 and 2 not saying thats bad there is a reason this game is so beloved, but just to me seems like unless they do something drastic then this game wont be receiving AAA
Avatar image for Jeimseu
Jeimseu

247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Jeimseu
Member since 2007 • 247 Posts
If a reviewer has a backbone, they will give Halo 3 (or indeed any other game), what it deserves and not be pressured by the hype.
Avatar image for bad82man82
bad82man82

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 bad82man82
Member since 2006 • 1059 Posts

Ofcourse they will be pressurd for some games, but that doesn't mean they will make it 10/10, they will score it in the AAA so everybody will be relaxed, if they make it AA, it will be Hysteria here in SW and between employees of GS.

Look at Bioshock, I was anticipating this game from the first time I saw it and they gave it 9.0, I did go and buy it, then played the game for 5 hours, after that, I didn't continue playing, it deserve less but they are pressured some how.

Avatar image for SgtWhiskeyjack
SgtWhiskeyjack

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#34 SgtWhiskeyjack
Member since 2004 • 16364 Posts

No.

Avatar image for hazuki87
hazuki87

2031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#35 hazuki87
Member since 2004 • 2031 Posts

Think about it. There are alot alot of lemmings on this board. If gamespot gives it an 8.5 (besides the riots, the hate threads' and babies) some crazy fanboys might now want to come to gamespot anymore. Or they will say " GAmESpt Sux!!!!!111!!one!eleven". Now im not saying gamespot is the only website. and im not saying that lemming will do this. Im just saying that the guy (or girl ) that reviews halo on gamespot will have a lot on their shoulders because if they make it flop i dont think too many lemmings will come to them for reviews.

halo will be out and i look foward to playing it at my friends house. allll that weekend. till our eyes bleed :shock:

Freshprince221

more likely it will be underscored in order for sites to seem "tougher" and "more honest"

Avatar image for hazuki87
hazuki87

2031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#36 hazuki87
Member since 2004 • 2031 Posts

Ofcourse they will be pressurd for some games, but that doesn't mean they will make it 10/10, they will score it in the AAA so everybody will be relaxed, if they make it AA, it will be Hysteria here in SW and between employees of GS.

Look at Bioshock, I was anticipating this game from the first time I saw it and they gave it 9.0, I did go and buy it, then played the game for 5 hours, after that, I didn't continue playing, it deserve less but they are pressured some how.

bad82man82

yeah well its less an issue of pressure causing bioshock to score well and more that you for some reason didnt like it as much as the rest of the world.

Avatar image for hal02g0d
hal02g0d

132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#37 hal02g0d
Member since 2006 • 132 Posts

Am i the only one to notice that almost every 5 seconds, somewhere one GS, some1 is either overhyping or not even giving it a chance. wait until the actual game comes out before you say "Halo 3 Rulzzz!!!!" or "Halo 3 sux!!!11!! Heavenly Sword PWNS!!!!!"

personally, i cant wait fore halo 3

Avatar image for Sir_Marwin
Sir_Marwin

9734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Sir_Marwin
Member since 2006 • 9734 Posts
Gamespot should just give it 8.5 at first and then say sike and give the real score :P
Avatar image for ShmenonPie
ShmenonPie

1117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 ShmenonPie
Member since 2007 • 1117 Posts

Why would they? Don't you know it's cool and hip to call Halo overrated trash? That's the style nowadays.HermitCommando

It's not cool and hip, it's true. TRUE, as it IS overrated trash!!!!!!

Avatar image for hazuki87
hazuki87

2031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#40 hazuki87
Member since 2004 • 2031 Posts

[QUOTE="HermitCommando"]Why would they? Don't you know it's cool and hip to call Halo overrated trash? That's the style nowadays.ShmenonPie

It's not cool and hip, it's true. TRUE, as it IS overrated trash!!!!!!

Spyro eh?

Avatar image for hal02g0d
hal02g0d

132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 hal02g0d
Member since 2006 • 132 Posts

[QUOTE="HermitCommando"]Why would they? Don't you know it's cool and hip to call Halo overrated trash? That's the style nowadays.ShmenonPie

It's not cool and hip, it's true. TRUE, as it IS overrated trash!!!!!!

wow you probably have the biggest moo in the entire heard.

Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#42 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
pressured? i certainly hope not. that would just be dumb
Avatar image for AdolescentDon
AdolescentDon

9081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#43 AdolescentDon
Member since 2005 • 9081 Posts

Wow you guys are already thinking up reasons why Halo 3's AAA (if it actually happens) score is unjustified... Nice one.

From the looks of it Halo 3 is a fully fleshed out game, it has everything! I really don't see why It wouldn't get AAA but only time will tell.

Avatar image for funnymario
funnymario

9122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#44 funnymario
Member since 2005 • 9122 Posts
I would hope not.
Avatar image for bad82man82
bad82man82

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 bad82man82
Member since 2006 • 1059 Posts
[QUOTE="bad82man82"]

Ofcourse they will be pressurd for some games, but that doesn't mean they will make it 10/10, they will score it in the AAA so everybody will be relaxed, if they make it AA, it will be Hysteria here in SW and between employees of GS.

Look at Bioshock, I was anticipating this game from the first time I saw it and they gave it 9.0, I did go and buy it, then played the game for 5 hours, after that, I didn't continue playing, it deserve less but they are pressured some how.

hazuki87

yeah well its less an issue of pressure causing bioshock to score well and more that you for some reason didnt like it as much as the rest of the world.

No gemaover= no challange, don't tell me to load, because it is a feature in the game and second no one else loaded the game, and if you tell me to load, you telling me that feature is not needed and when features are not needed= downer, Lair anybody.

The game is so repetitve and dead, no action, radio there and radio that, don't justify the story by the radio, you will look silly.

The atmosphere and art design is the most beautiful thing in this game.

Avatar image for ComBaTsOuL
ComBaTsOuL

507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 ComBaTsOuL
Member since 2006 • 507 Posts

Wow you guys are already thinking up reasons why Halo 3's AAA (if it actually happens) score is unjustified... Nice one.

From the looks of it Halo 3 is a fully fleshed out game, it has everything! I really don't see why It wouldn't get AAA but only time will tell.

AdolescentDon

Nail on the head there mate, these people are scared because they no that halo 3 as every chance of being AAA.

The game is going to be nothing less than an awesome experience because bungie no that its halo fans are not going to be expecting anything less.. ;)

Avatar image for inertk
inertk

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 inertk
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts
How can a hat of money pressure someone? :/
Avatar image for Mass_Effect
Mass_Effect

1993

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Mass_Effect
Member since 2006 • 1993 Posts

It's not cool and hip, it's true. TRUE, as it IS overrated trash!!!!!!

ShmenonPie

Overrated: Yes. Trash: No.

You cannot call a game like Halo trash, even if you don't personally like it.

Avatar image for daqua_99
daqua_99

11170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#49 daqua_99
Member since 2005 • 11170 Posts

It won't happen ... it'll get a good score though because it is a great continuation of the story from the previous two games ....

Avatar image for Codename33
Codename33

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#50 Codename33
Member since 2005 • 2719 Posts
No, Jeff would probably find it funny to see what panic ensues on system wars if he gives Halo 3 an 8.5.