This topic is locked from further discussion.
Not at all, they are entitled to their opinion. Personally I know im going to enjoy the game, and with sites such as IGN giving it glowingly positive previews im not worried.EVOLV3
They also gave a glowingly positive review to Folklore. IGN's PS3 team is a bunch of fanboys.
[QUOTE="EVOLV3"]Not at all, they are entitled to their opinion. Personally I know im going to enjoy the game, and with sites such as IGN giving it glowingly positive previews im not worried.bungie93
They also gave a glowingly positive review to Folklore. IGN's PS3 team is a bunch of fanboys.
uhhh, Folklore is a good game, and I bet KZ2 wil be good as well[QUOTE="EVOLV3"]Not at all, they are entitled to their opinion. Personally I know im going to enjoy the game, and with sites such as IGN giving it glowingly positive previews im not worried.bungie93
They also gave a glowingly positive review to Folklore. IGN's PS3 team is a bunch of fanboys.
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="EPaul"]How did Gamesradar review a game coming in Feb 09?:?EPaul
They did preliminary reviews of everything they got to play...Killzone 2 got a 6....Banjo got a 5.
The idea of "Preliminary reviews" doesnt makes much sense to me but whatever
Im sure it was hands on, dont you think?
Or are they just MS fanboys? You tell me, cause I told you that this game stunk and everyone knows that. The barrels are annoyingMetsvideogame
How you know that game stink when you haven't even try it? It still got months of development and polishing to be done. Wait till you try the game to give your judgement.
[QUOTE="Metsvideogame"]Or are they just MS fanboys? You tell me, cause I told you that this game stunk and everyone knows that. The barrels are annoyingenral
How you know that game stink when you haven't even try it? It still got months of development and polishing to be done. Wait till you try the game to give your judgement.
listen im not gonna toot my own horn, but I kinda think I know what I am talking about. Killzone 2 wont come close to the level of Gears 2, and thats what Im comparing it to. Basically its going to be a good game, but nothing epic. They were gunning for Killzone 2 to be alot better than what its going to actually be. I guess time will tell, but I know im right and will just wait for stuff like this to come up to back up what im saying.
Or are they just MS fanboys? You tell me, cause I told you that this game stunk and everyone knows that. The barrels are annoyingMetsvideogame
Everyone knows your the apprentice of GhostMLD, only you seem to leave out the humour in his posts. But back onto your point, why would it scare me? I think the game looks great, always have. And before you go and tell everyone that because Killzone 1 sucked Killzone 2 will, just know that your beloved gamesradar gave Killzone 1 a 9/10.
[QUOTE="EPaul"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="EPaul"]How did Gamesradar review a game coming in Feb 09?:?Metsvideogame
They did preliminary reviews of everything they got to play...Killzone 2 got a 6....Banjo got a 5.
The idea of "Preliminary reviews" doesnt makes much sense to me but whatever
Im sure it was hands on, dont you think?
How about they play the full retail version of the game before reviewing it?
Or are they just MS fanboys? You tell me, cause I told you that this game stunk and everyone knows that. The barrels are annoyingMetsvideogame
Well if u lemmings are going to take gamesradar opinion over gamespot and ign and other game sites praising killzone 2 then I dont see whats the point in posting here at gamespot. If u think gamesradar is a better source then I suggest u go use those forums since there credability seems to be on point for some of u.
Also wanted to add then I guess all the talk about Banjo being awesome will be discredited aswell since we want to use gamesradar as credability now huh?
[QUOTE="enral"][QUOTE="Metsvideogame"]Or are they just MS fanboys? You tell me, cause I told you that this game stunk and everyone knows that. The barrels are annoyingMetsvideogame
How you know that game stink when you haven't even try it? It still got months of development and polishing to be done. Wait till you try the game to give your judgement.
listen im not gonna toot my own horn, but I kinda think I know what I am talking about. Killzone 2 wont come close to the level of Gears 2, and thats what Im comparing it to. Basically its going to be a good game, but nothing epic. They were gunning for Killzone 2 to be alot better than what its going to actually be. I guess time will tell, but I know im right and will just wait for stuff like this to come up to back up what im saying.
I think you "tooted your own horn" there. A bit stuck up and presumptuous, don't you think? Not unlike the concept of a preliminary review, i.e., a review of an unfinished, unpolished game. Not surprising it got a 6. Try again next time.
[QUOTE="Metsvideogame"]Or are they just MS fanboys? You tell me, cause I told you that this game stunk and everyone knows that. The barrels are annoyingenral
How you know that game stink when you haven't even try it? It still got months of development and polishing to be done. Wait till you try the game to give your judgement.
Yet people on these boards do it all the time and it is accepted. Gears 2 get bashed by cows constantly, they haven't played it and even though the first was a success people say the game will suck without playing it. Same goes for games like Banjo 3, Resistance 2, M.A.G, etc.
Or are they just MS fanboys? You tell me, cause I told you that this game stunk and everyone knows that. The barrels are annoyingMetsvideogame
since your the op in this thread , did you actually read through all the pages of reviews and get to the part where they state
that these are not actual reviews but merely conceptual placeholders for amusement only?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment