With the third birthday being recently announced, a Star Ocaen game, Suikoden 2 rerelease, etc the PSP wins by a landslide.Vandalvideo
LMFAO. Do you people even research things before they type?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
With the third birthday being recently announced, a Star Ocaen game, Suikoden 2 rerelease, etc the PSP wins by a landslide.Vandalvideo
LMFAO. Do you people even research things before they type?
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]With the third birthday being recently announced, a Star Ocaen game, Suikoden 2 rerelease, etc the PSP wins by a landslide.HarlockJC
DQ >> Star Ocean
I'm going to have to call shinanigans, especialyl since it was the OG stuff that was released.[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]With the third birthday being recently announced, a Star Ocaen game, Suikoden 2 rerelease, etc the PSP wins by a landslide.mubarakibnumar
LMFAO. Do you people even research things before they type?
So what did I say that was wrong?[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]With the third birthday being recently announced, a Star Ocaen game, Suikoden 2 rerelease, etc the PSP wins by a landslide.HarlockJC
DQ >> Star Ocean
Suikoden > All. Its just true
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]With the third birthday being recently announced, a Star Ocaen game, Suikoden 2 rerelease, etc the PSP wins by a landslide.Vandalvideo
DQ >> Star Ocean
I'm going to have to call shinanigans, especialyl since it was the OG stuff that was released.Not sure where your going with that. Just saying I rather play DQ and even FF remakes over Star Ocean remakes. Even thought I myself will be playing both.
Not sure where your going with that. Just saying I rather play DQ and even FF remakes over Star Ocean remakes. Even thought I myself will be playing both.HarlockJCDragon Quest and Final Fantasy are the perennial underachievers of the JRPG genre. Suikoden and Star Ocean are easily better games in terms of originality and gameplay.
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]With the third birthday being recently announced, a Star Ocaen game, Suikoden 2 rerelease, etc the PSP wins by a landslide.SpruceCaboose
DQ >> Star Ocean
Suikoden > All. Its just true
I have never played a Suikoden game. Based on the review scores the first one was 6.5 and the second one was 7.6.
Then again review scores can be pointless sometimes. If you say it good then I will give it a try. But better than DQ9, sorry I just don't see it.
I have never played a Suikoden game. Based on the review scores the first one was 6.5 and the second one was 7.6.Then again review scores can be pointless sometimes. If you say it good then I will give it a try. But better than DQ9, sorry I just don't see it. HarlockJCSuikoden 1 and 2 are two jrpgs that suffered from the Final Fantasy complex that was plaguing reviewers of that time period, and still do to this day. Reviewers of the JRPG genre are knocking games for what they praise Final Fantasy. The Suikoden series has a storyline that easily trumps anything that you find in and Final Fantasy. Being based off of the Water Margin, the Suikoden story is easily one of the best stories in the entire history of the JRPG genre. Not only that, but its combination of three unique gameplay elements, evolving character progression, the sheer size of the roster, the complex backstories, the unique magic system, etc all make the Suikoden series easily one of, if not the best JRPG ever to come out.
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]I have never played a Suikoden game. Based on the review scores the first one was 6.5 and the second one was 7.6.Then again review scores can be pointless sometimes. If you say it good then I will give it a try. But better than DQ9, sorry I just don't see it. VandalvideoSuikoden 1 and 2 are two jrpgs that suffered from the Final Fantasy complex that was plaguing reviewers of that time period, and still do to this day. Reviewers of the JRPG genre are knocking games for what they praise Final Fantasy. The Suikoden series has a storyline that easily trumps anything that you find in and Final Fantasy. Being based off of the Water Margin, the Suikoden story is easily one of the best stories in the entire history of the JRPG genre. Not only that, but its combination of three unique gameplay elements, evolving character progression, the sheer size of the roster, the complex backstories, the unique magic system, etc all make the Suikoden series easily one of, if not the best JRPG ever to come out.
The Final Fantasy complex?
Care to elaborate?
I have never played a Suikoden game. Based on the review scores the first one was 6.5 and the second one was 7.6.
Then again review scores can be pointless sometimes. If you say it good then I will give it a try. But better than DQ9, sorry I just don't see it.
HarlockJC
If you can find the originals somewhere (They are rather rare) I highly suggest trying them. The war battles are great fun, as is the compulsion to get all 108 characters
[QUOTE="mubarakibnumar"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]With the third birthday being recently announced, a Star Ocaen game, Suikoden 2 rerelease, etc the PSP wins by a landslide.Vandalvideo
LMFAO. Do you people even research things before they type?
So what did I say that was wrong?What landslide if i may ask?
Saying that the psp wins by a landslide is like console gamers saying consoles have better fps's than the pc. Do yourself a favour and go and check the list of both available and upcoming rpgs for the ds.
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]Not sure where your going with that. Just saying I rather play DQ and even FF remakes over Star Ocean remakes. Even thought I myself will be playing both.VandalvideoDragon Quest and Final Fantasy are the perennial underachievers of the JRPG genre. Suikoden and Star Ocean are easily better games in terms of originality and gameplay.
I have been playing DQ games from the point of the fact I still have my DQ1 with the Nintendo Power which had the map in it. DQ4 is one of my all time favored games to the fact I even have a sealed copy of the game. So sorry I disagree with you on DQ vs SO but I have not played Suikoden so I could be wrong there. I will give it a try when it comes out.
The Final Fantasy complex? Care to elaborate? WAIWSure. The JRPG genre used to be a genre cloaked in mystery to the western world. Many people didn't know of its existance until one JRPG game along and changed all that. For what its worth, Final Fantasy was the first JRPG to ever bring the genre into the true mainstream. However, one of the largest side effects of that is a widespread case of nostalgia that plagues all the reviewers of the genre. People like me who have played every last JRPG known to man, even esoteric stuff like Linda Cubed (which none of you have probably ever even heard of), they can see the problem with JRPG genre reviewers. One of the most recent examples of this phenomenon is the recent underscoring of Lost Odyssey. LO is a game that was knocked by reviewers for being "unoriginal and using many elements from the JRPG genre of the past". However, LO in reality is a combination of two of the greatest innovations in the genre from last generation, twitch based gameplay from Shadow Hearts and the stance systems of Suikoden. I had an indepth conversation with Kevin Vanord about this phenomenon awhile back in System Wars (have fun looking for it). I clearly pointed out that this phenomenon is indeed real. Games that are far superior to Final Fantasy have been dogged by the reviewing community simply because they think Final Fantasy is the de facto standard of the genre. In reality, Final Fantasy is nothing more than the standardized bastard child of the genre.
pSaying that the psp wins by a landslide is like console gamers saying consoles have better fps's than the pc. Do yourself a favour and go and check the list of both available and upcoming rpgs for the ds. mubarakibnumarI've checke the list, and its nothing but list filler with a few notable titles. Star Ocean, Suikoden, and Parasite Eve are easily some of the best JRPGs ever made, and easily allow for the PSP to take a lead.
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]I have never played a Suikoden game. Based on the review scores the first one was 6.5 and the second one was 7.6.
Then again review scores can be pointless sometimes. If you say it good then I will give it a try. But better than DQ9, sorry I just don't see it.
SpruceCaboose
If you can find the originals somewhere (They are rather rare) I highly suggest trying them. The war battles are great fun, as is the compulsion to get all 108 characters
Based on the fact you are stating it a good enoght JRPG to play I will buy it. I will wait for the PSP remake though. I have been enjoing playing JRPGS more on my handhelds over my Consoles has of late.
Any idea when it will be coming out?
tbh I find the DS seems to have more true RPG's (not pure dungeon crawlers or SRPG's) but a lot of the ones announced seem to vanish into the trans-international ether.Articuno76
Just pointing it out because I want a sequal a great dungeon crawler is Orks and Elves for the DS and if less than $10 new at Gamestop. Graphics are not the best but it a fun game.
[QUOTE="WAIW"]The Final Fantasy complex? Care to elaborate? VandalvideoSure. The JRPG genre used to be a genre cloaked in mystery to the western world. Many people didn't know of its existance until one JRPG game along and changed all that. For what its worth, Final Fantasy was the first JRPG to ever bring the genre into the true mainstream. However, one of the largest side effects of that is a widespread case of nostalgia that plagues all the reviewers of the genre. People like me who have played every last JRPG known to man, even esoteric stuff like Linda Cubed (which none of you have probably ever even heard of), they can see the problem with JRPG genre reviewers. One of the most recent examples of this phenomenon is the recent underscoring of Lost Odyssey. LO is a game that was knocked by reviewers for being "unoriginal and using many elements from the JRPG genre of the past". However, LO in reality is a combination of two of the greatest innovations in the genre from last generation, twitch based gameplay from Shadow Hearts and the stance systems of Suikoden. I had an indepth conversation with Kevin Vanord about this phenomenon awhile back in System Wars (have fun looking for it). I clearly pointed out that this phenomenon is indeed real. Games that are far superior to Final Fantasy have been dogged by the reviewing community simply because they think Final Fantasy is the de facto standard of the genre. In reality, Final Fantasy is nothing more than the standardized bastard child of the genre.
Or maybe the real issue is that LO does in fact do nothing remarkable...from what I've played that is certainly the case. It's a PS2 game running on newer hardware (in many ways it's actually technically behind the PS2 standard in many ways such as with loads). JRPG's work well on handhelds simply because they've done little new with the technology since the PS1/2 shift which has led to a sort of staling of the genre.
Sure LO may well borrow good elements but it does "borrow" rather than create and more importantly it does nothing to reinvgorate a genre that really needs it.
What mostly annoys me about the genre is the need to pad out the game with dungeons or transgressions that have nothing ot do with the core story...the result is poorly paced stories in comparision to many older RPG's. A good example of this is Eternal Sonata which exemplifies the use of a very set dungeon/boss/town sequences often throwing in a dungeon just to uphold that structure.
Or maybe the real issue is that LO does in fact do nothing remarkable...from what I've played that is certainly the case. It's a PS2 game running on newer hardware (in many ways it's actually technically behind the PS2 standard in many ways such as with loads). JRPG's work well on handhelds simply because they've done little new with the technology since the PS1/2 shift which has led to a sort of staling of the genre.Sure LO may well borrow good elements but it does "borrow" rather than create and more importantly it does nothing to reinvgorate a genre that really needs it.Articuno76Thats the problem though, Final Fantasy doesn't do anything remarkable either. If you look at what LO was knocked in score for; loading problems and unoriginality, Final Fantasy could just as easily be knocked for the exact same thing. Sans Fina lFantasy 12, FF is the standard bastard child of the genre, relying on the innovations of other games to get by. Its about as unoriginal as they come. Thats why so many people associate the gameplay elements of FF with the JRPG genre as a whole. Far too often I hear people say "All JRPGs are turn based" or "all JRPG characters have spikey hair" or "All jrpgs are anime based". Its a phenomenon that most certainly exists.
Based on the fact you are stating it a good enoght JRPG to play I will buy it. I will wait for the PSP remake though. I have been enjoing playing JRPGS more on my handhelds over my Consoles has of late.
Any idea when it will be coming out?
HarlockJC
http://kotaku.com/388752/suikoden-coming-to-playstation-store
That is about as good as the info gets. It was released as a Sukoden 1 & 2 set in Japan in 2006 (So if you know Japanese, great import idea), but this may be the only way to get Suikoden goodness in the US.
[QUOTE="Articuno76"]Or maybe the real issue is that LO does in fact do nothing remarkable...from what I've played that is certainly the case. It's a PS2 game running on newer hardware (in many ways it's actually technically behind the PS2 standard in many ways such as with loads). JRPG's work well on handhelds simply because they've done little new with the technology since the PS1/2 shift which has led to a sort of staling of the genre.Sure LO may well borrow good elements but it does "borrow" rather than create and more importantly it does nothing to reinvgorate a genre that really needs it.VandalvideoThats the problem though, Final Fantasy doesn't do anything remarkable either. If you look at what LO was knocked in score for; loading problems and unoriginality, Final Fantasy could just as easily be knocked for the exact same thing. Sans Fina lFantasy 12, FF is the standard bastard child of the genre, relying on the innovations of other games to get by. Its about as unoriginal as they come. Thats why so many people associate the gameplay elements of FF with the JRPG genre as a whole. Far too often I hear people say "All JRPGs are turn based" or "all JRPG characters have spikey hair" or "All jrpgs are anime based". Its a phenomenon that most certainly exists.
The difference is this...FF has something in place of the fact that it does little new, the pacing is normally at least good whereas LO is labourisouly slow paced. On top of that the load times in LO cannot be compared to FF12 if anything there are more loads in that game than in most PS1 games...longer too. LO however is simply just what you seem to be describing FF as...a copycat. LO is the real copycat here and it has little in the way of excellent excecution at the very least to make up for it.
As for the last comment...chicken and egg. FF drives the genre and the genre it drive it absorbs in turn. LO was unoriginal-it hurt the game. FF may well be but ultimately it hurts those games less perhaps because those games at least have a distinct identity or maybe just because the execution is better.
The difference is this...FF has something in place of the fact that it does little new, the pacing is normally at least good whereas LO is labourisouly slow paced. On top of that the load times in LO cannot be compared to FF12 if anything there are more loads in that game than in most PS1 games...longer too. LO however is simply just what you seem to be describing FF as...a copycat. LO is the real copycat here and it has little in the way of excellent excecution at the very least to make up for it.As for the last comment...chicken and egg. FF drives the genre and the genre it drive it absorbs in turn.Articuno76Pacing alone doesn't turn a 7.5 game into an AAA title. The load times DID NOT exist in the LO retail, and you mentioning them shows that you really didn't play the retail game. There was a big ado about this where they were given a beta version of the game, and the retail version didn't have the long load times. Lost Oddyssey does exactly what Final Fantasy has been doing for decades. Its taking the unique gameplay elements of other JRPGs and combining it into a unique, albeit cliche package. In spite of all that, it only got 7.5, despite being a great game. Had the game been labeled Final Fantasy you bet it would have been scored more lenient.
[QUOTE="WAIW"]The Final Fantasy complex? Care to elaborate? VandalvideoSure. The JRPG genre used to be a genre cloaked in mystery to the western world. Many people didn't know of its existance until one JRPG game along and changed all that. For what its worth, Final Fantasy was the first JRPG to ever bring the genre into the true mainstream. However, one of the largest side effects of that is a widespread case of nostalgia that plagues all the reviewers of the genre. People like me who have played every last JRPG known to man, even esoteric stuff like Linda Cubed (which none of you have probably ever even heard of), they can see the problem with JRPG genre reviewers. One of the most recent examples of this phenomenon is the recent underscoring of Lost Odyssey. LO is a game that was knocked by reviewers for being "unoriginal and using many elements from the JRPG genre of the past". However, LO in reality is a combination of two of the greatest innovations in the genre from last generation, twitch based gameplay from Shadow Hearts and the stance systems of Suikoden. I had an indepth conversation with Kevin Vanord about this phenomenon awhile back in System Wars (have fun looking for it). I clearly pointed out that this phenomenon is indeed real. Games that are far superior to Final Fantasy have been dogged by the reviewing community simply because they think Final Fantasy is the de facto standard of the genre. In reality, Final Fantasy is nothing more than the standardized bastard child of the genre.
Let's agree to disagree.
I could undertsand your viewpoint if you're only talking about some of the PS2 Final Fantasies (XII just sucked). But for the most part, the name is a JRPG standard -- from I-X, from Tactics to WotL, the name guarenteed quality. Perhaps not daring or innovative, but always solid, with tons of polish and competent at worst gameplay. Few other titles guarentee that in the genre.
The problem I find with your theory; Chrono Trigger anyone? Pokemon? TWEWY? Disgaea? Kingdom Hearts? Xenogears? Etrian Odyssey? Dragon Quest? Hell, even Mario gets tons of RPG love on the handhelds. Sure half of those are other Square Enix titles, but it just goes to show, if its a quality JRPG, the title won't hold it back.
) But for the most part, the name is a JRPG standard -- from I-X, from Tactics to WotL, the name guarenteed quality. Perhaps not daring or innovative, but always solid, with tons of polish and competent at worst gameplay. Few other titles guarentee that in the genre.The problem I find with your theory; Chrono Trigger anyone? Pokemon? TWEWY? Disgaea? Kingdom Hearts? Xenogears? Etrian Odyssey? Dragon Quest? Hell, even Mario gets tons of RPG love on the handhelds. Sure half of those are other Square Enix titles, but it just goes to show, if its a quality JRPG, the title won't hold it back.WAIWThe name isn't a standard, its merely a name that has been inendated into the mainstream from the lack of expsoure to far greater titles. Final Fantasy games aren't as high quality as people make them out to be. They are the perennial underachievers of the genre, relying on the success of others to get by. Other games in the genre that have largely gone unnoticed have far better stories, gameplay, and characters than anything in any Final Fantasy game. Even as much as I like Final Fantasy 7, Suikoden 2 is worlds beyond it in story, gameplay, and practically everything else.
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]I have never played a Suikoden game. Based on the review scores the first one was 6.5 and the second one was 7.6.
Then again review scores can be pointless sometimes. If you say it good then I will give it a try. But better than DQ9, sorry I just don't see it.
SpruceCaboose
If you can find the originals somewhere (They are rather rare) I highly suggest trying them. The war battles are great fun, as is the compulsion to get all 108 characters
I missed one guy near the end in Suikoden 5 and didn't have the will to go on. :(
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]Based on the fact you are stating it a good enoght JRPG to play I will buy it. I will wait for the PSP remake though. I have been enjoing playing JRPGS more on my handhelds over my Consoles has of late.
Any idea when it will be coming out?
SpruceCaboose
http://kotaku.com/388752/suikoden-coming-to-playstation-store
That is about as good as the info gets. It was released as a Sukoden 1 & 2 set in Japan in 2006 (So if you know Japanese, great import idea), but this may be the only way to get Suikoden goodness in the US.
Oh so you get me into looking forward to a game only to tell me it not coming out. Why even list it has a game on the PSP. I know some people import but still.
Anyways "nothing that ever happened on Earth could possibly make the slightest bit of sense."
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment