Duke Nukem Forever - Xbox, Ps3 & PC Comparison

  • 71 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Wow what an ugly game... this reminds me of Prey so much (in a very bad way). I will rent the game even if it gets 5/10 but will never buy it.
Avatar image for themagicbum9720
themagicbum9720

6536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 themagicbum9720
Member since 2007 • 6536 Posts
i don't get why people are having problems with performance. the demo runs perfectly fine on my computer.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
Member since 2008 • 2051 Posts

[QUOTE="nutcrackr"]Looks terrible on all platforms.finalstar2007

Couldnt agree more, i dont know why people are excited for this, look average at best

It's duke thats why.

Avatar image for PatchMaster
PatchMaster

6013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#54 PatchMaster
Member since 2003 • 6013 Posts

[QUOTE="McStrongfast"][QUOTE="tomarlyn"]Virtually identical, nice work.DarkLink77
No. 360 demo is terrible. Suppose it's possible it's an old build. But for now, terrible.

It's the demo from PAX last year, folks. They've been polishing for a year since then.

Why would they wait till now to release an unpolished, year-old demo that only puts off potential customers? Makes no sense.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="McStrongfast"]No. 360 demo is terrible. Suppose it's possible it's an old build. But for now, terrible.PatchMaster

It's the demo from PAX last year, folks. They've been polishing for a year since then.

Why would they wait till now to release an unpolished, year-old demo that only puts off potential customers? Makes no sense.

Don't ask me, but it is the PAX demo.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
Member since 2008 • 2051 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="McStrongfast"]No. 360 demo is terrible. Suppose it's possible it's an old build. But for now, terrible.PatchMaster

It's the demo from PAX last year, folks. They've been polishing for a year since then.

Why would they wait till now to release an unpolished, year-old demo that only puts off potential customers? Makes no sense.

The first part was excellent, the second part was sub decent. I bet there will big a massive diffrence trough out the entire game.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

[QUOTE="PatchMaster"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] It's the demo from PAX last year, folks. They've been polishing for a year since then. Robbazking

Why would they wait till now to release an unpolished, year-old demo that only puts off potential customers? Makes no sense.

The first part was excellent, the second part was sub decent. I bet there will big a massive diffrence trough out the entire game.

Shouldn't it be UE3 if it has DX11? (Remember that topic showing up around here last month and it using UE3 since the first reveal trailer.)

Anyway did the FAC code get sent to your email or how did you get it? I got the BoS edition preordered but haven't seen mine yet.

Avatar image for cyborg100000
cyborg100000

2905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 cyborg100000
Member since 2005 • 2905 Posts

I swear most games with pre-2005 tech have a hideous blurry Photoshop effect slapped on the image even what's in focus, ugh. Still, I don't care much; I take graphics for granted very fast unless a game's a beast from the future.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="Robbazking"]

[QUOTE="PatchMaster"]

Why would they wait till now to release an unpolished, year-old demo that only puts off potential customers? Makes no sense.

ChubbyGuy40

The first part was excellent, the second part was sub decent. I bet there will big a massive diffrence trough out the entire game.

Shouldn't it be UE3 if it has DX11? (Remember that topic showing up around here last month and it using UE3 since the first reveal trailer.)

Anyway did the FAC code get sent to your email or how did you get it? I got the BoS edition preordered but haven't seen mine yet.

Did you get a First Access Code with your preorder?
Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

It's not a particularly good looking game, but that's to be expected with the engine they are using. Still, hoping to get my hands on the PC demo to see how it is. If I buy it, that will be where, for the cheaper price.

Avatar image for flashn00b
flashn00b

3961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#61 flashn00b
Member since 2006 • 3961 Posts

360 and PS3 are mostly similar, but since this was being primarily developed on the PC, you can notice the difference between textures and shadows when comparing PC and console.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
Member since 2008 • 2051 Posts

360 and PS3 are mostly similar, but since this was being primarily developed on the PC, you can notice the difference between textures and shadows when comparing PC and console.

flashn00b
PC lacks most common settings to, so they probably decide just to optimize it as it is.
Avatar image for joel_c17
joel_c17

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 joel_c17
Member since 2005 • 3206 Posts
i think the first pic looks the same, second pic goes to xbox, 3rd to ps3 and 4th looks the same. of course pc looks the best in all
Avatar image for deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
Member since 2008 • 2051 Posts
i think the first pic looks the same, second pic goes to xbox, 3rd to ps3 and 4th looks the same. of course pc looks the best in alljoel_c17
Other then lower res on console you don't really think about the shadows either.
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#66 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
It looks flawless in all of them!
Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#67 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5598 Posts

Robbaz, next time you should compare the FULL HD 1080P version with 4X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic filtering VS the console version. Comparing console 720P vs PC 720P is USELESS because no one on PC plays at those lame resolution. Maybe if this was early 2000's or late 90's.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#68 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5598 Posts

I had bad performance with Vsync on. It was bad no matter what settings I had it at.

Phenom II X6 1055T 3.20 GHz
4GB ram
460GTX 1GB

gameofthering

I don't know how some of you guys are getting such bad performance. I played this on my gaming laptop with a Core 2 Duo T5850 and overclocked ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 (550/557) and I was able to play it everything maxed out with 0xAA and Film Grain OFF @1440x900 HD. It lagged in outdoor environments but indoors it was 'playable' and that is with everything maxed out minus the AA and film grain.

So, with your specs it should be downright silky smooth a minium of 40 FPS with everything maxed out with 4xFSAA at ATLEAST HD 1680x1050.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
Member since 2008 • 2051 Posts

Robbaz, next time you should compare the FULL HD 1080P version with 4X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic filtering VS the console version. Comparing console 720P vs PC 720P is USELESS because no one on PC plays at those lame resolution. Maybe if this was early 2000's or late 90's.

Xtasy26
It is 1920x1080 on pc.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 deactivated-5b4ca38d5fcb0
Member since 2008 • 2051 Posts

Robbaz, next time you should compare the FULL HD 1080P version with 4X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic filtering VS the console version. Comparing console 720P vs PC 720P is USELESS because no one on PC plays at those lame resolution. Maybe if this was early 2000's or late 90's.

Xtasy26
Updated all the pictures with hd links :)
Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#71 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5598 Posts

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

Robbaz, next time you should compare the FULL HD 1080P version with 4X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic filtering VS the console version. Comparing console 720P vs PC 720P is USELESS because no one on PC plays at those lame resolution. Maybe if this was early 2000's or late 90's.

Robbazking

Updated all the pictures with hd links :)

Thanks! Now that looks much better. I really can't imagine playing this on the consoles at lame 720P with low AA, it looks digusting frankly. Console version will look even WORSE on a big screen HDTV. Duke Nukem Forever on the PC FTW!:D