Durango vs Orbis explained

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/df-hardware-spec-analysis-durango-vs-orbis?page=comments

Feb 20th couldnt come any sooner.:(

The secret sauce is the new cell.

nothing new same old vgleak

This is for cows that got all mad over SuperDaE for saying specs of durango are old,they called him a troll and liar :lol: he owned most cows from this forum :cool:

''And finally there's the wild card - SuperDAE, arch-leaker extraordinaire, undeniably in possession of early dev kits and the crucial documentation that goes with them. From talking with him directly in order to verify his leaks, we know his information - typically posted on vgleaks.com - is entirely accurate, the only question being how old it is, and whether the hardware has improved since he received his data. He also has - somehow - hands-on access to non-final next-gen dev kits and his pictures of an older Durango dev kit having been verified by trusted sources.''

DF believes final specs won't change that much they're probably right,but why SuperDaE said he is going to provide them with new info?

nothing new same old vgleak

This is for cows that got all mad over SuperDaE for saying specs of durango are old,they called him a troll and liar :lol: he owned most cows from this forum :cool:

''And finally there's the wild card - SuperDAE, arch-leaker extraordinaire, undeniably in possession of early dev kits and the crucial documentation that goes with them. From talking with him directly in order to verify his leaks, we know his information - typically posted on vgleaks.com - is entirely accurate, the only question being how old it is, and whether the hardware has improved since he received his data. He also has - somehow - hands-on access to non-final next-gen dev kits and his pictures of an older Durango dev kit having been verified by trusted sources.''

DF believes final specs won't change that much they're probably right,but why SuperDaE said he is going to provide them with new info?

Tessellation

Hmm I must have missed this. When did he own the cows?

Hmm I must have missed this. When did he own the cows?Blazerdt47

I smell incoming butthurt.

Might be moving over to Sony this gen.

Poor lems :(kuraimen

Omg, my sides:lol: Did you make that Gif?

Someone needs to ban you from making threadsRR360DD

:lol: Why, dont hate the messenger. Butthurt much?

[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]Hmm I must have missed this. When did he own the cows?Tessellation

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]Hmm I must have missed this. When did he own the cows?clyde46

Sucks your other thread got locked by a butthurt lemming.

Lems getting owned :lol:

Poor lems :(kuraimen

Fcking love the sig.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Poor lems :(NineTailedGoku

Omg, my sides:lol: Did you make that Gif?

[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Poor lems :(kuraimen

Omg, my sides:lol: Did you make that Gif?

Yeah, you guys had to execute your evil deranged twin brother :lol: Right clicked and saved:lol:

Sucks your other thread got locked by a butthurt lemming.

Lems getting owned :lol:

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Poor lems :(Speedzilla

Fcking love the sig.

I know, wasnt expecting that.

2nd and 3rd place final round....FIGHT

Poor lems :(kuraimen

[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Poor lems :(kuraimen

Omg, my sides:lol: Did you make that Gif?

love the sig :lol:

Tessellation owned...again :lol:

Elsewhere, most of the custom hardware works to ease the CPU burden, not to improve GPU performance, so those hoping for 'secret sauce' to overcome Orbis's theoretical graphics advantages are probably going to be disappointed.

LOL at Lems hoping for Wizard Piss to save them.

It will come down to; 1. Price 2. Appeal 3. Bang for your buck 4. Which system is more user friendly ie plays used games, allows the user to use other companies products it the most so you can upgrade for less, doesn't require a constant internet connection, backward compatable, free online etc. 

The one that has the most consumer appeal for all reasons will sell the most. 

Wait a minute...so they offer the same specs? LMAO @ Sony fanboys claiming ownage. Pathetic as usual.percech

[QUOTE="percech"]Wait a minute...so they offer the same specs? LMAO @ Sony fanboys claiming ownage. Pathetic as usual.Shewgenja

It will come down to; 1. Price 2. Appeal 3. Bang for your buck 4. Which system is more user friendly ie plays used games, allows the user to use other companies products it the most so you can upgrade for less, doesn't require a constant internet connection, backward compatable, free online etc. 

The one that has the most consumer appeal for all reasons will sell the most. 

clr84651

Intresting article but it's still based on rumour. Until the actual system specs are officially released for both consoles we know nothing.

It will come down to; 1. Price 2. Appeal 3. Bang for your buck 4. Which system is more user friendly ie plays used games, allows the user to use other companies products it the most so you can upgrade for less, doesn't require a constant internet connection, backward compatable, free online etc. The one that has the most consumer appeal for all reasons will sell the most. clr84651

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Tessellation"] DF said he is legit,how he acts is a complete different thing.Tessellation

Dude you're the new Sniper I swear.

ps4 has blast processing! What does blast processing do? It makes you sexy.

[QUOTE="clr84651"]It will come down to; 1. Price 2. Appeal 3. Bang for your buck 4. Which system is more user friendly ie plays used games, allows the user to use other companies products it the most so you can upgrade for less, doesn't require a constant internet connection, backward compatable, free online etc. The one that has the most consumer appeal for all reasons will sell the most. hanman9

:lol: i hope your being sarcastic. Wii u appeal? Bang for your buck :lol:

so much butt hurt

Both have an AMD 8 core CPU @1.6Ghz with 4MB of L2 cache.
They both have 800 MHz AMD GPUs and 6x BD-ROMs.

The only differences are that the Durango has more RAM and ESRAM, the Orbis has more memory bandwidth and shader cores.

All in all they are both pretty meh.

Both have an AMD 8 core CPU @1.6Ghz with 4MB of L2 cache.
They both have 800 MHz AMD GPUs and 6x BD-ROMs.

The only differences are that the Durango has more RAM and ESRAM, the Orbis has more memory bandwidth and shader cores.

All in all they are both pretty meh.

skektek

In the end, it will come down to the games, which I'm sure the PS4 will prevail at.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/df-hardware-spec-analysis-durango-vs-orbis?page=comments

Feb 20th couldnt come any sooner.:(

NineTailedGoku

From http://www.anandtech.com/show/4455/amds-graphics-core-next-preview-amd-architects-for-compute/5

Radeon HD 79x0/89x0-OEM has 6 memory controllers with each having 128KB L2 cache i.e. a total of 768 KB L2 cache.

From http://www.anandtech.com/show/4455/amds-graphics-core-next-preview-amd-architects-for-compute/5

Radeon HD 79x0/89x0-OEM has 6 memory controllers with each having 128KB L2 cache i.e. a total of 768 KB L2 cache.

 

Durango's 512KB L2 cache looks to be corresponding to four memory controllers type GCN e.g. AMD FirePro W5000 i.e. Pitcairn with 12 CU and 32 ROPs.

16 ROPs with 512 KB L2 cache doesn't quite jive with the current known GCN config.

 

Low end GCN like 7770 has 64 KB L2 cache per memory controller i.e. a total of 128KB L2 cache.

 

Durango's GCN is not AMD Cape Verde i.e. GpGPU performance should be similar AMD FirePro W5000 instead of AMD Radeon HD 7770.

 

ronvalencia

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

From http://www.anandtech.com/show/4455/amds-graphics-core-next-preview-amd-architects-for-compute/5

Radeon HD 79x0/89x0-OEM has 6 memory controllers with each having 128KB L2 cache i.e. a total of 768 KB L2 cache.

Durango's 512KB L2 cache looks to be corresponding to four memory controllers type GCN e.g. AMD FirePro W5000 i.e. Pitcairn with 12 CU and 32 ROPs.

16 ROPs with 512 KB L2 cache doesn't quite jive with the current known GCN config.

Low end GCN like 7770 has 64 KB L2 cache per memory controller i.e. a total of 128KB L2 cache.

Durango's GCN is not AMD Cape Verde i.e. GpGPU performance should be similar AMD FirePro W5000 instead of AMD Radeon HD 7770.

lundy86_4

Sorry, Anandtech made a mistake on 64KB L2 cache per memory controller.

From http://www.behardware.com/articles/855-2/review-amd-radeon-hd-7750-and-hd-7770-xfx-black-super-oc-edition.html

Cape Verde actually has 512 KB L2 cache i.e. 256 KB L2 cache per memory controller.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

From http://www.anandtech.com/show/4455/amds-graphics-core-next-preview-amd-architects-for-compute/5

Radeon HD 79x0/89x0-OEM has 6 memory controllers with each having 128KB L2 cache i.e. a total of 768 KB L2 cache.

 

Durango's 512KB L2 cache looks to be corresponding to four memory controllers type GCN e.g. AMD FirePro W5000 i.e. Pitcairn with 12 CU and 32 ROPs.

16 ROPs with 512 KB L2 cache doesn't quite jive with the current known GCN config.

 

Low end GCN like 7770 has 64 KB L2 cache per memory controller i.e. a total of 128KB L2 cache.

 

Durango's GCN is not AMD Cape Verde i.e. GpGPU performance should be similar AMD FirePro W5000 instead of AMD Radeon HD 7770.

 

ronvalencia

Sorry, Anandtech made a mistake on 64KB L2 cache per memory controller.

From http://www.behardware.com/articles/855-2/review-amd-radeon-hd-7750-and-hd-7770-xfx-black-super-oc-edition.html

Cape Verde actually has 512 KB L2 cache i.e. 256 KB L2 cache per memory controller.

Serously whats the point of your post?

edit: considering that the GPU is attached to a seperate memory controller and doesn't have its own bank, I doubt it has memory controllers built in.  At least in a traditional GPU sense, also note that the devkits have NVIDIA cards for durango

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

From http://www.anandtech.com/show/4455/amds-graphics-core-next-preview-amd-architects-for-compute/5

Radeon HD 79x0/89x0-OEM has 6 memory controllers with each having 128KB L2 cache i.e. a total of 768 KB L2 cache.

Durango's 512KB L2 cache looks to be corresponding to four memory controllers type GCN e.g. AMD FirePro W5000 i.e. Pitcairn with 12 CU and 32 ROPs.

16 ROPs with 512 KB L2 cache doesn't quite jive with the current known GCN config.

Low end GCN like 7770 has 64 KB L2 cache per memory controller i.e. a total of 128KB L2 cache.

Durango's GCN is not AMD Cape Verde i.e. GpGPU performance should be similar AMD FirePro W5000 instead of AMD Radeon HD 7770.

ronvalencia

Sorry, Anandtech made a mistake on 64KB L2 cache per memory controller.

From http://www.behardware.com/articles/855-2/review-amd-radeon-hd-7750-and-hd-7770-xfx-black-super-oc-edition.html

Cape Verde actually has 512 KB L2 cache i.e. 256 KB L2 cache per memory controller.

In laymans terms, they are both weightlifters right?

except the orbis can lift twice as much as Lolango.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/df-hardware-spec-analysis-durango-vs-orbis?page=comments

Feb 20th couldnt come any sooner.:(

NineTailedGoku

In laymans terms, they are both weightlifters right?

except the orbis can lift twice as much as Lolango.

ReadingRainbow4

In layman's term Durango is casual trash that you can scream at hop and in front of..