EA: Wii U Can Do Anything Xbox 360 and PS3 Can

  • 101 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

I hate to "go here", since we know next to nothing about this device's cost, but I think we should also keep in mind a few things: 1) Nintendo is currently making an obscene profit on the 3DS, a device that costs roughly $103 to produce and manufacture, but is being sold for $250; 2) The external controller/tablet on the Wii U will obviously cost more to produce than a normal controller, 3) $299 is historically the sweet-spot launch price for a new console, 4) Nintendo is not emphasizing graphics or specs.

Based off of the type of profit margins Nintendo likes to have in their devices, their power consumption preferences (always low; this is true even going back to systems like the Gamecube), and all the above, I'm starting to think we're looking at a pretty weak RV770 -- something similar to a Radeon 4830, at best.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60831 Posts
[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="dercoo"]

Can it play blurays8)

nintendoboy16
Wont allow for playback of DVD's either.

And this is bad because... ?

Just poking fun of what the HD twins can currently do and the Wiiu *could* do(DVD) but Nintendo won't pay the licensing fee.
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

Well, that seems to be what they're doing. I imagine Sony and Microsoft will probably compete with the Wii U through the 360/PS3 for a few years, then release systems that potentially destroy it in 2014 or so.

Over the next 3 years, I think a lot of work is going to be done in trying to get better performance-per-watt from today's graphics cards, shrinking them down to reduce cost, heat and power consumption. So that by 2014, there will be some relatively low-power solutions that can pack a lot of bang for the buck.

SakusEnvoy

I agree, and I would hope they go down that route, especially since the RROD debacle this gen.

Persoanly, and this is kind of a side note, I would be intriguied to see a next gen console with two graphics cards, one strong and one weak. The weak one's job would be to display an image on the screen at a desirable resolution with some AA and without screen tear. The strong cards job would be to render that image. Theoretically, at that point, devs only use the stronger card, and wouldn't ever have to worry about screen resolution or AA.

But I'm no hardware architect. :P

Avatar image for steviebhoy6sic6
steviebhoy6sic6

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 steviebhoy6sic6
Member since 2011 • 45 Posts

I would hope that it can do everything the 360 and ps3 can but the real question is can it do every thing the ps4 and next xbox can do (which we won't know till they are announced)

Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts

The fact they are being mentioned in the same sentence with out having a word along the lines of obliterates is actually worrying, this is supposed to be a next gen console and will no doubt carry a next gen price tag.

Avatar image for WarTornRuston
WarTornRuston

2712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 WarTornRuston
Member since 2011 • 2712 Posts

They are only 5 years late.

Avatar image for 6matt6
6matt6

9726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 6matt6
Member since 2005 • 9726 Posts
This is Nintendo's new thing is it? Always be a generation behind with its technology?
Avatar image for Sonicplys
Sonicplys

2606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 Sonicplys
Member since 2004 • 2606 Posts
Well. Nintendo wins another gen. The weakest console always wins.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#59 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42224 Posts
Well. Nintendo wins another gen. The weakest console always wins. Sonicplys
The SNES wasn't the weakest console and it won the 16-bit era.
Avatar image for Sonicplys
Sonicplys

2606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 Sonicplys
Member since 2004 • 2606 Posts
Like people want to spend 1000 dollars on the FPStation 4 and the next FPSbox.
Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

Like people want to spend 1000 dollars on the FPStation 4 and the next FPSbox. Sonicplys
Technology can jump a lot in a short period of time, though. Microsoft and Sony could probably release a system much more powerful than the Wii U, at the same entry-level price point, if they wait on releasing it until - say - 2 years into the Wii U's lifespan. Plus the fact that Sony and Microsoft are willing to take a hit on hardware and sell at a loss, whereas Nintendo seems to be leaning in favor of obscene day one profits these days.

In other words, a much more powerful PS4/720 might not be as expensive as you'd think. Certainly nothing over $399. A good exhibit for this is the Vita compared to the 3DS.

Avatar image for -Renegade
-Renegade

8340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#62 -Renegade
Member since 2007 • 8340 Posts
This is Nintendo's new thing is it? Always be a generation behind with its technology? 6matt6
Actually Nintendo has always been a generation behind when it comes to technology. I remember my friend who was a big Sony fanboy used to say that all the time during the PS2/gamecube/Xbox era. If you think about it Nintendo has always been a generation behind.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#63 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42224 Posts
[QUOTE="6matt6"]This is Nintendo's new thing is it? Always be a generation behind with its technology? -Renegade
Actually Nintendo has always been a generation behind when it comes to technology. I remember my friend who was a big Sony fanboy used to say that all the time during the PS2/gamecube/Xbox era. If you think about it Nintendo has always been a generation behind.

They weren't ENTIRELY with Gamecube.
Avatar image for The_Gaming_Baby
The_Gaming_Baby

6425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 52

#64 The_Gaming_Baby
Member since 2010 • 6425 Posts

It can play Blu Rays?

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Saying that a 'next gen' system can do what the current gen can isn't exactly a positive statement. Gearbox calling it a 'stop-gap console' also isn't positive.
Avatar image for Nozizaki
Nozizaki

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#66 Nozizaki
Member since 2007 • 1471 Posts

[QUOTE="Sonicplys"]Like people want to spend 1000 dollars on the FPStation 4 and the next FPSbox. SakusEnvoy

Technology can jump a lot in a short period of time, though. Microsoft and Sony could probably release a system much more powerful than the Wii U, at the same entry-level price point, if they wait on releasing it until - say - 2 years into the Wii U's lifespan. Plus the fact that Sony and Microsoft are willing to take a hit on hardware and sell at a loss, whereas Nintendo seems to be leaning in favor of obscene day one profits these days.

In other words, a much more powerful PS4/720 might not be as expensive as you'd think. Certainly nothing over $399. A good exhibit for this is the Vita compared to the 3DS.

What? Just because Vita is launching a little under a year later proves crap. The 3DS is selling for a notable amount of profit. Vita is almost definetely being sold at a loss. Sony is willing to do that.

More on topic here, if the PS4 and Nexbox launch too late, Nintendo could already have a large portion of the market already claimed.

Avatar image for bmbmbmbmbmbmbm2
bmbmbmbmbmbmbm2

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 bmbmbmbmbmbmbm2
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
how about xbox720 and ps4?
Avatar image for GotNugz
GotNugz

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 GotNugz
Member since 2010 • 681 Posts

Nintendo need to go back to the drawing board concerning their hardware. Is this supposed to be a good thing somehow? that is like MS coming out and saying the Xbox can do everything the N64 can. X720/PS4 are going to blow this toy away when their systems come out, the gap might actually be larger than this gen with Wii and 360/PS3.

Avatar image for AdolescentDon
AdolescentDon

9081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 AdolescentDon
Member since 2005 • 9081 Posts

Nintendo is always a generation behind in the tech department, it's nothing new.

It doesn't really bother me all that much... apart from the cost.

Avatar image for Nozizaki
Nozizaki

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#71 Nozizaki
Member since 2007 • 1471 Posts

Nintendo is always a generation behind in the tech department, it's nothing new.

It doesn't really bother me all that much... apart from the cost.

AdolescentDon

...what? Before the Wii, Nintendo has always had one of the most powerful systems each gen.

Nintendo need to go back to the drawing board concerning their hardware. Is this supposed to be a good thing somehow? that is like MS coming out and saying the Xbox can do everything the N64 can. X720/PS4 are going to blow this toy away when their systems come out, the gap might actually be larger than this gen with Wii and 360/PS3.

GotNugz

No, despite this statement, Wii U will be comparable to PS4 and/or Nexbox.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"]

[QUOTE="Sonicplys"]Like people want to spend 1000 dollars on the FPStation 4 and the next FPSbox. Nozizaki

Technology can jump a lot in a short period of time, though. Microsoft and Sony could probably release a system much more powerful than the Wii U, at the same entry-level price point, if they wait on releasing it until - say - 2 years into the Wii U's lifespan. Plus the fact that Sony and Microsoft are willing to take a hit on hardware and sell at a loss, whereas Nintendo seems to be leaning in favor of obscene day one profits these days.

In other words, a much more powerful PS4/720 might not be as expensive as you'd think. Certainly nothing over $399. A good exhibit for this is the Vita compared to the 3DS.

What? Just because Vita is launching a little under a year later proves crap. The 3DS is selling for a notable amount of profit. Vita is almost definetely being sold at a loss. Sony is willing to do that.

More on topic here, if the PS4 and Nexbox launch too late, Nintendo could already have a large portion of the market already claimed.

That was my point. Time was not much of a factor in the case of the Vita; in that case, it was more about selling at a profit/versus selling at a loss. But a combination of taking time for technology to evolve and advance, plus willingness to sell at a loss, could be a potent mix that enables the next PS and Xbox to be much more powerful than the Wii U at an affordable price point.

In my opinion, there is no such thing as a "next-gen" market that is in complete isolation to the "current gen" market. The Wii U's library will almost certainly consist primarily of the same types of games available on 360/PS3. So long as the 360/PS3 continue to sell well, it would probably be in Sony and Microsoft's interest to let those systems compete with the Wii U. It would give them time to develop consoles that would be capable of thrashing the Wii U so badly that multiplats between the Wii U and 720/PS4 would not be a realistic possibility.

Avatar image for GotNugz
GotNugz

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 GotNugz
Member since 2010 • 681 Posts

[QUOTE="AdolescentDon"]

Nintendo is always a generation behind in the tech department, it's nothing new.

It doesn't really bother me all that much... apart from the cost.

Nozizaki

...what? Before the Wii, Nintendo has always had one of the most powerful systems each gen.

Nintendo need to go back to the drawing board concerning their hardware. Is this supposed to be a good thing somehow? that is like MS coming out and saying the Xbox can do everything the N64 can. X720/PS4 are going to blow this toy away when their systems come out, the gap might actually be larger than this gen with Wii and 360/PS3.

GotNugz

No, despite this statement, Wii U will be comparable to PS4 and/or Nexbox.

sure, as comparable as the Wii was to the 360/ps3. your expectations are too high for Wiiu on the hardware side. Devs have already called it a gap console, and of course publishers are going to say all the right things because they are under NDA's.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="AdolescentDon"]

Nintendo is always a generation behind in the tech department, it's nothing new.

It doesn't really bother me all that much... apart from the cost.

Nozizaki

...what? Before the Wii, Nintendo has always had one of the most powerful systems each gen.

Nintendo need to go back to the drawing board concerning their hardware. Is this supposed to be a good thing somehow? that is like MS coming out and saying the Xbox can do everything the N64 can. X720/PS4 are going to blow this toy away when their systems come out, the gap might actually be larger than this gen with Wii and 360/PS3.

GotNugz

No, despite this statement, Wii U will be comparable to PS4 and/or Nexbox.

Except that we don't know that. We have absolutely no idea what Microsoft and Sony will do, when they will launch, and what they will launch. We can only speculate. Perhaps someone planning to buy the Wii U would like to have some personal assurance that their system will be supported for a long time, and won't be totally outclassed by the next generation of systems from competitors, but such an assurance is absolutely impossible.

Avatar image for mztazmz
mztazmz

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 mztazmz
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts

A 2012 console can do everything a console made in 2005 can do? I would sure hope so.

Wasdie

yeah, that statement doesn't say much at all.

It should be able to do alot more than PS360, if not, what a joke:?

Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#76 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

Except that we don't know that. We have absolutely no idea what Microsoft and Sony will do, when they will launch, and what they will launch. We can only speculate. Perhaps someone planning to buy the Wii U would like to have some personal assurance that their system will be supported for a long time, and won't be totally outclassed by the next generation of systems from competitors, but such an assurance is absolutely impossible.

SakusEnvoy

ps4 xbox 720 will not be better than the best PC of 2011....and they are supoorting the 360 and ps3 just fine...a 6 year old technology.

Avatar image for Cheese-Muffins
Cheese-Muffins

569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Cheese-Muffins
Member since 2008 • 569 Posts

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"] Except that we don't know that. We have absolutely no idea what Microsoft and Sony will do, when they will launch, and what they will launch. We can only speculate. Perhaps someone planning to buy the Wii U would like to have some personal assurance that their system will be supported for a long time, and won't be totally outclassed by the next generation of systems from competitors, but such an assurance is absolutely impossible.

KBFloYd

ps4 xbox 720 will not be better than the best PC of 2011....and they are supoorting the 360 and ps3 just fine...a 6 year old technology.

This. Rumors are pointing toward both Sony and Microsoft using AMD next gen. What's the best AMD GPU out there right now? 6970? Even if they were able to put that kind of card in a console next gen (not even sure about that btw), it still wouldn't be "OMGWTFBBQ" better than what's in the Wii U. People need to stop comparing it to the Wii. It's physically impossible to say it will be a repeat of the current gen.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="KBFloYd"]

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"] Except that we don't know that. We have absolutely no idea what Microsoft and Sony will do, when they will launch, and what they will launch. We can only speculate. Perhaps someone planning to buy the Wii U would like to have some personal assurance that their system will be supported for a long time, and won't be totally outclassed by the next generation of systems from competitors, but such an assurance is absolutely impossible.

Cheese-Muffins

ps4 xbox 720 will not be better than the best PC of 2011....and they are supoorting the 360 and ps3 just fine...a 6 year old technology.

This. Rumors are pointing toward both Sony and Microsoft using AMD next gen. What's the best AMD GPU out there right now? 6970? Even if they were able to put that kind of card in a console next gen (not even sure about that btw), it still wouldn't be "OMGWTFBBQ" better than what's in the Wii U. People need to stop comparing it to the Wii. It's physically impossible to say it will be a repeat of the current gen.

Not really. Again, it depends heavily on the timing of Sony and Microsoft's next console. The best AMD GPUs in 2014/2015 will look very different the best AMD GPUs of 2011, as will their power consumption requirements.

Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
As long as the U offers quality third party support along with the Nintendo first-party, I will be happy.
Avatar image for Cheese-Muffins
Cheese-Muffins

569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Cheese-Muffins
Member since 2008 • 569 Posts

[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]

[QUOTE="KBFloYd"]

ps4 xbox 720 will not be better than the best PC of 2011....and they are supoorting the 360 and ps3 just fine...a 6 year old technology.

SakusEnvoy

This. Rumors are pointing toward both Sony and Microsoft using AMD next gen. What's the best AMD GPU out there right now? 6970? Even if they were able to put that kind of card in a console next gen (not even sure about that btw), it still wouldn't be "OMGWTFBBQ" better than what's in the Wii U. People need to stop comparing it to the Wii. It's physically impossible to say it will be a repeat of the current gen.

Not really. Again, it depends heavily on the timing of Sony and Microsoft's next console. The best AMD GPUs in 2014/2015 will look very different the best AMD GPUs of 2011, as will their power consumption requirements.

The only problem I have with looking at the future, more powerful GPU's is that they will be ridiculously expensive. Are Microsoft and Sony willing to take a huge loss on hardware in order to stay competetive with Nintendo? Will they be willing to do a $599 console when Wii U will no doubt be over $200 cheaper at that time? I'm taking 6970-power level as being the max it could possibly be put in just because of cost, heat, and power consumption. Also, 2015 would be too late to launch a console, imo.

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#81 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

Less powerful console means more $$ for me. I would rather have something cheaper.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"]

[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]

This. Rumors are pointing toward both Sony and Microsoft using AMD next gen. What's the best AMD GPU out there right now? 6970? Even if they were able to put that kind of card in a console next gen (not even sure about that btw), it still wouldn't be "OMGWTFBBQ" better than what's in the Wii U. People need to stop comparing it to the Wii. It's physically impossible to say it will be a repeat of the current gen.

Cheese-Muffins

Not really. Again, it depends heavily on the timing of Sony and Microsoft's next console. The best AMD GPUs in 2014/2015 will look very different the best AMD GPUs of 2011, as will their power consumption requirements.

The only problem I have with looking at the future GPU's is that they will be ridiculously expensive. Is Microsoft and Sony willing to take a huge loss on hardware in order to stay competetive with Nintendo? Will they be willing to do a $599 console when Wii U will no doubt be over $200 cheaper at that time? I'm taking 6970-power level as being the max it could possibly be put in just because of cost, heat, and power consumption. Also, 2015 would be too late to launch a console, imo.

2015 might be too late, it might not be. What I'm really interested in seeing, actually, is if the 360 can keep its present momentum and stay the top console in North America next year even despite the Wii U launch.

Personally, I expect that it will. Especially if Microsoft is aggressive and price cuts one of the models to $149, or price cuts the Kinect to $99, or even makes a 360+Kinect bundle for $199 (!). It would sell like hot cakes.

Same thing with the PS3 -- the PS3 will probably sell much better at $199, especially if Sony keeps pumping out high quality first party software for it.

The truth is there's a chance the Wii U might not even be able to compete with the current-gen consoles, much less the next-gen ones. Sure, it's more powerful (though no one is sure how much) and it has a tablet controller; but that alone doesn't mean anything. What if the PS3/360 versions of multiplat games still sell way better than the Wii U ones?

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]

[QUOTE="KBFloYd"]

ps4 xbox 720 will not be better than the best PC of 2011....and they are supoorting the 360 and ps3 just fine...a 6 year old technology.

SakusEnvoy

This. Rumors are pointing toward both Sony and Microsoft using AMD next gen. What's the best AMD GPU out there right now? 6970? Even if they were able to put that kind of card in a console next gen (not even sure about that btw), it still wouldn't be "OMGWTFBBQ" better than what's in the Wii U. People need to stop comparing it to the Wii. It's physically impossible to say it will be a repeat of the current gen.

Not really. Again, it depends heavily on the timing of Sony and Microsoft's next console. The best AMD GPUs in 2014/2015 will look very different the best AMD GPUs of 2011, as will their power consumption requirements.

The GPU the Wii U is using is supposedly from mid-2008 and not 2011. So the gap between the Wii U and PS4/Next Xbox will be wider then most think.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

[QUOTE="6matt6"]This is Nintendo's new thing is it? Always be a generation behind with its technology? -Renegade
Actually Nintendo has always been a generation behind when it comes to technology. I remember my friend who was a big Sony fanboy used to say that all the time during the PS2/gamecube/Xbox era. If you think about it Nintendo has always been a generation behind.

A big Sony fanboy's words are credible in any way? :lol:

Avatar image for GotNugz
GotNugz

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 GotNugz
Member since 2010 • 681 Posts

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"] Except that we don't know that. We have absolutely no idea what Microsoft and Sony will do, when they will launch, and what they will launch. We can only speculate. Perhaps someone planning to buy the Wii U would like to have some personal assurance that their system will be supported for a long time, and won't be totally outclassed by the next generation of systems from competitors, but such an assurance is absolutely impossible.

KBFloYd

ps4 xbox 720 will not be better than the best PC of 2011....and they are supoorting the 360 and ps3 just fine...a 6 year old technology.

why do people think like this has history not taught anyone anything? lets say the next consoles come out in 2013-2014 don't be naive into thinking they won't be more powerful than 2011 hardware. what was more powerful than the 360 at launch, what about the PS3, or Xbox 1 in 2001? the answer of course is not much if anything. people need to get over whatever is on pc now and think of what will be availible a few years from now.

Avatar image for GotNugz
GotNugz

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 GotNugz
Member since 2010 • 681 Posts

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"]

[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]

This. Rumors are pointing toward both Sony and Microsoft using AMD next gen. What's the best AMD GPU out there right now? 6970? Even if they were able to put that kind of card in a console next gen (not even sure about that btw), it still wouldn't be "OMGWTFBBQ" better than what's in the Wii U. People need to stop comparing it to the Wii. It's physically impossible to say it will be a repeat of the current gen.

KC_Hokie

Not really. Again, it depends heavily on the timing of Sony and Microsoft's next console. The best AMD GPUs in 2014/2015 will look very different the best AMD GPUs of 2011, as will their power consumption requirements.

The GPU the Wii U is using is supposedly from mid-2008 and not 2011. So the gap between the Wii U and PS4/Next Xbox will be wider then most think.

finally an intelligent person on SW board.

Avatar image for Cheese-Muffins
Cheese-Muffins

569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Cheese-Muffins
Member since 2008 • 569 Posts

[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]

The only problem I have with looking at the future GPU's is that they will be ridiculously expensive. Is Microsoft and Sony willing to take a huge loss on hardware in order to stay competetive with Nintendo? Will they be willing to do a $599 console when Wii U will no doubt be over $200 cheaper at that time? I'm taking 6970-power level as being the max it could possibly be put in just because of cost, heat, and power consumption. Also, 2015 would be too late to launch a console, imo.

SakusEnvoy

2015 might be too late, it might not be. What I'm really interested in seeing, actually, is if the 360 can keep its present momentum and stay the top console in North America next year even despite the Wii U launch.

Personally, I expect that it will. Especially if Microsoft is aggressive and price cuts one of the models to $149, or price cuts the Kinect to $99, or even makes a 360+Kinect bundle for $199 (!). It would sell like hot cakes.

Same thing with the PS3 -- the PS3 will probably sell much better at $199, especially if Sony keeps pumping out high quality first party software for it.

The truth is there's a chance the Wii U might not even be able to compete with the current-gen consoles, much less the next-gen ones. Sure, it's more powerful (though no one is sure how much) and it has a tablet controller; but that alone doesn't mean anything. What if the PS3/360 versions of multiplat games still sell way better than the Wii U ones?

I think it all boils down to the launch lineup. If Nintendo pulls another 3DS, then yes, things won't be looking good. However, Nintendo's 1st party sells. A LOT. If they can have some big name game at launch, then I'd think the system will do well. They need to have a big install base from the get-go, so there is the potential for big multiplat sales on Wii U. Of course, I can't speak for everyone, but when I buy a new system, I like to buy a few games to start off with to fully play and experience the potential of the console. A big 1st party title will drive this and push people over the edge to move on and buy the Wii U.

The GPU the Wii U is using is supposedly from mid-2008 and not 2011. So the gap between the Wii U and PS4/Next Xbox will be wider then most think.KC_Hokie

That doesn't mean anything. There are cards today that are not as powerful as some of the top end R700 cards from 2008.

Avatar image for ugoo18
ugoo18

1005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 ugoo18
Member since 2010 • 1005 Posts

Nintendo is always a generation behind in the tech department, it's nothing new.

It doesn't really bother me all that much... apart from the cost.

AdolescentDon

This again *sigh*, did Nintendo's entire pre-Wii history dissapear on SW.

Avatar image for yoshi_64
yoshi_64

25261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#90 yoshi_64
Member since 2003 • 25261 Posts
I don't think the question of the Wii U and it being more powerful than the 360 and PS3 is even something that should be asked. I just will hate when we see nothing but a bunch of ports on the system, because you know it will happen. It happened early in the 360's lifespan, where "HD" versions of your PS2 games were there and they marginally looked better. When original games are made, by people who will take the time to develop for it, you'll see the system separate itself. If anything does happen when games are being ported, I hope it comes with some extra content, and runs at 60 FPS (there should be no reason it shouldn't) because I doubt the developers will bother going through all assets and increasing the res on them and making the graphics look prettier when it's faster to just ship out the game already made.
Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

WOW!!!! A console that isn't even released yet can outperform one that was released 6 years ago. GG Nintendo, you do have a beast of a console....

Avatar image for GotNugz
GotNugz

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 GotNugz
Member since 2010 • 681 Posts

I don't think the question of the Wii U and it being more powerful than the 360 and PS3 is even something that should be asked. I just will hate when we see nothing but a bunch of ports on the system, because you know it will happen. It happened early in the 360's lifespan, where "HD" versions of your PS2 games were there and they marginally looked better. When original games are made, by people who will take the time to develop for it, you'll see the system separate itself. If anything does happen when games are being ported, I hope it comes with some extra content, and runs at 60 FPS (there should be no reason it shouldn't) because I doubt the developers will bother going through all assets and increasing the res on them and making the graphics look prettier when it's faster to just ship out the game already made. yoshi_64

3rd party ports are to be expected but they should look marginally better. i'm more interested in exclusive that show what the machine is capable of. games like Perfect Dark Zero, Project Gothem racing 3, Oblivion, all launch titles that showed the power of the 360, i'm expecting the same for WiiU.

Avatar image for Gamingclone
Gamingclone

5224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#93 Gamingclone
Member since 2009 • 5224 Posts

Good to hear that it can do everything that the current gen consoles can do. I would hope it can. For now I'll take EA's comment and put it with what Epic said and come to the conclusion that the Wii U can do everything that the 360 and PS3 can do and more.

Avatar image for EABGamer
EABGamer

230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 EABGamer
Member since 2011 • 230 Posts

Except get multi plat support for the full life of the console or even get Nintendo to support there own console for the full life of it. Thats what always happened with a Nintendo console ever since the end of the SNES. Why people even bother getting a Nintendo console in the first place is beyond me. Last gen systems sold as new gen prices:!: Why people get suckered into it is beyond me. Samething with there handheld. Nintendo is the biggest rip off artists for gamers. Selling there first party games like new when there 4-5 years old i mean i could go on and on and on about them. Nintendo is a good second system to own down the line when the price is at its lowest other wise its a waste of space.

Avatar image for Solid_Tango
Solid_Tango

8609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Solid_Tango
Member since 2009 • 8609 Posts

A 2012 console can do everything a console made in 2005 can do? I would sure hope so.

Wasdie
This is just what i came here to say. Nintendo is trying to appeal to other audiences now it seems. I hope it get some 3rd party exclusives thats the only way they ll catch my attention or with more mature 1st party but i dont see that happening any time soon!
Avatar image for Rude_Bwoii
Rude_Bwoii

523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Rude_Bwoii
Member since 2011 • 523 Posts

The fact that this is being talked about is what worries me. Next gen consoles are typically much stronger by far than the last gen. So yeah the wii u should own the ps3/360 but rendering two screenswill sap some of the power. Still unless ms and sony make a wii type system then the wii u should get owned.

Avatar image for Kingpin0114
Kingpin0114

2607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Kingpin0114
Member since 2008 • 2607 Posts

Devs are all over the place with their statements about the Wii U when it comes to how powerful it is. Some say it is way more powerful than 360/PS3 and others say it's about the same. I'm not expecting much.

I will be getting one as a secondary console though.

Avatar image for Rude_Bwoii
Rude_Bwoii

523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Rude_Bwoii
Member since 2011 • 523 Posts

Devs are all over the place with their statements about the Wii U when it comes to how powerful it is. Some say it is way more powerful than 360/PS3 and others say it's about the same. I'm not expecting much.

I will be getting one as a secondary console though.

Kingpin0114

If it is cheap then yeah I will pick one up also but nintendo said it won't be cheap. Also looking at the markup on the parts vs price on the 3ds I will most likely get a ps4 before the wii u.

Avatar image for ShuichiChamp24
ShuichiChamp24

5014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 ShuichiChamp24
Member since 2009 • 5014 Posts
I'll take Epics word over anyone from EA Sports.
Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#100 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

The GPU the Wii U is using is supposedly from mid-2008 and not 2011. So the gap between the Wii U and PS4/Next Xbox will be wider then most think.KC_Hokie

how far apart is a ps3 from a top PC? will it be a bigger gap than wiiu and the ps4?