Elder Scrolls vs Dark Soul games

  • 140 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#51  Edited By jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

@ConanTheStoner said:
@jhcho2 said:

No point having this discussion. It's like trying to compare Street Fighter and Tekken. Tekken clearly is the deeper fighting game, but Street Fighter is more popular and the one most people can get into since it has a lower entry requirement.

I think Mortal Kombat would have been a more fitting comparison, both Tekken and Street Fighter are very involving, technical games. You kinda just come off as a Street Fighter hater tbh.

I didn't use Mortal Kombat as an example because I'm fairly certain that there are fewer serious MK players than there are serious Tekken players. So it's difficult to say that MK is more popular when clearly, it has more of a cult following. The MK player base has always been a cult following. MK9 in 2011 increased the mainstream exposure to it, but I don't count the average console player who bought the game, raved about it on the internet, but stopped playing after that. I prefer defining the player base size of a fighting game based on 'active' players, not the number of people who bought the game

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#52 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

The Elder Scrolls

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
Cloud_imperium

15146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 103

User Lists: 8

#53 Cloud_imperium
Member since 2013 • 15146 Posts

I prefer The Elder Scrolls. I like games with deep lore, where you read about something in a book and then go out to find that place/item/NPC etc and face something mysterious when you get there or along the way. I feel like I am part of that world and on an epic adventure. Other open world games like GTA fail to do so. May be because it is set in present time, so it fails to grab me like other games like Deus Ex, The Elder Scrolls, Divinity, Black Flag (not RPG of course, just used as example), Witcher etc.

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
Cloud_imperium

15146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 103

User Lists: 8

#54 Cloud_imperium
Member since 2013 • 15146 Posts
@mems_1224 said:

@wolverine4262 said:

@mems_1224: eh, I did like one of them... Then just did the guilds and fighting ring thing.

I think the guild missions in oblivion were better but the overall world in skyrim is so much better and detailed. almost every dungeon feels different and has its own story.

I went back to Oblivion few days ago and couldn't get into it. The main element of The Elder Scrolls games is Exploration. For that to be fun, it is important to have better looking visuals and more alive environments to grab you and make you want to explore more. While map of Oblivion is bigger than Skyrim, the quality itself is better in Skyrim. Graphics are better, production values are higher, music is better, towns and villages feel more alive and so on. But drawbacks are there too; UI is worse, RPG elements are dumbed down etc. But overall it is better game IMO.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@_Matt_: in what ways could you tackle a fight? Because from what I remember of dark souls, I pretty much did the same thing with every enemy. Swing, run in circles and avoid their attacks and repeat while occasionally blocking.

In skyrim you could use magic, stealth, bows, melee, shouts or any combination of those abilities.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

ES should be compared to facebook games, not real rpgs like the Souls series. Morrowind was the last ES that was considered as a "real rpg". Since Skyrim sold as much as it did, i don't think Bethesda will ever release anything close to Morrowind.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
This is YOU, the Souls series hater!
This is YOU, the Souls series hater!

Also.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#58 uninspiredcup  Online
Member since 2013 • 62682 Posts

The elder scrolls requires modding to be good. Darksouls isn't just good: it's great.

Avatar image for Doom_HellKnight
Doom_HellKnight

12217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#59 Doom_HellKnight
Member since 2005 • 12217 Posts

I'd much rather play The Elder Scrolls (sans Oblivion) on the basis that I don't enjoy the gameplay offered by the Souls games. I can see the appeal, but they're not my cup of tea.

Avatar image for anderswhk
anderswhk

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#60  Edited By anderswhk
Member since 2014 • 129 Posts

They are different games in my opinion, why even compare them? Skyrim has a much more immersive and detailed world. DS has a much more fun and engaging combat system. DS is a frustrating trial and error game, that becomes very satisfying once you beat that level/boss. TES games dont have that.

In my opinion nothing triumphs modded Morrowind. You can get it to look better than Oblivion with the right texture packs, removal of the fog and such. Vvardenfell is a very beautiful place once you remove the fog and you have huge draw distances. Kind of looks a little like Blades Edge mountains from WoW. Theres also a whole lot more content than other RES games, once you add the expansions. The combat in Morrowind is a little poor tho.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61  Edited By delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

@foxhound_fox said:

@funsohng said:

@foxhound_fox said:

The Elder Scrolls games in their vanilla forms are not role-playing games. They are action adventure games.

Action? Elder Scrolls?

What?

Yeah, you swing big metal things at things that go crunch... over and over again, ad nauseum.

Because you don't replay the same fights or sections over an over again in souls games right?

if you called Skyrim an action adventure game then i can go with that Begrudgingly but Morrowind and Oblivion? no Fucking way are they action adventure games, Oblivion and Morrowind have more Stat, Character development features than Most RPG's on the Market.

Personally i would go with the Elder scrolls over Souls games all day long, Bigger scale, more NPC interaction, More options for character development, More Races, More classes, more locations to explore, more Enemy types and a huge seamless world within which you can interact with Virtually every object you come across.

And i don't have to rinse and repeat EXACTLY the same levels with EXACTLY the same enemy over and over Again.

The only thing Souls beats Elder scrolls in my opinion is the Combat is better on souls, Apart from that Elder scrolls wins in every other category.

Souls is more of an Action adventure game than Elder scrolls will ever be, even Skyrim has more Character development options than souls games, which is what role playing games are all about.

How many different characters can you be in Dark souls? can you be a Merchant for example?

There are nowhere near as many options for character development in souls games, end of.

As someone already said anyway,Souls games are more Dungeon Crawlers than RPG's.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

@silversix_ said:

ES should be compared to facebook games, not real rpgs like the Souls series. Morrowind was the last ES that was considered as a "real rpg". Since Skyrim sold as much as it did, i don't think Bethesda will ever release anything close to Morrowind.

How the Hell are souls games more of an RPG than Elder scrolls? Even Skyrim has Way more character development options than souls for starters.

Can you get married in souls games? own property? Interact with NPC's the same way you do in Skyrim? is there a Crime and punishment system in souls?

I can understand people saying they prefer the combat in souls and souls games in general but to say that Skyrim is less of an RPG (ROLE PLAYING GAME) than Souls is juts plain BS

Larger world, Way bigger scale, More NPC's, more locations, more quests, more Races, more variety in enemys, richer more realistic world and More character development options.

It beggars belief that people would call what is essentially a dungeon Crawler with Minimal character development options more of an RPG than elder scrolls games.

i swear people around here have no clue what an RPG actually is,lol

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52551 Posts

Souls games.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

@delta3074 said:

@silversix_ said:

ES should be compared to facebook games, not real rpgs like the Souls series. Morrowind was the last ES that was considered as a "real rpg". Since Skyrim sold as much as it did, i don't think Bethesda will ever release anything close to Morrowind.

How the Hell are souls games more of an RPG than Elder scrolls? Even Skyrim has Way more character development options than souls for starters.

Can you get married in souls games? own property? Interact with NPC's the same way you do in Skyrim? is there a Crime and punishment system in souls?

I can understand people saying they prefer the combat in souls and souls games in general but to say that Skyrim is less of an RPG (ROLE PLAYING GAME) than Souls is juts plain BS

Larger world, Way bigger scale, More NPC's, more locations, more quests, more Races, more variety in enemys, richer more realistic world and More character development options.

It beggars belief that people would call what is essentially a dungeon Crawler with Minimal character development options more of an RPG than elder scrolls games.

i swear people around here have no clue what an RPG actually is,lol

At launch ES (the last two excluding the mmo one) is a casual adventure game aka Dora The Explorer simulator. One month after release it becomes a porn game. Year(s) later its a porn simulator. That's all you need to know about ES.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@delta3074 said:

@silversix_ said:

ES should be compared to facebook games, not real rpgs like the Souls series. Morrowind was the last ES that was considered as a "real rpg". Since Skyrim sold as much as it did, i don't think Bethesda will ever release anything close to Morrowind.

How the Hell are souls games more of an RPG than Elder scrolls? Even Skyrim has Way more character development options than souls for starters.

Can you get married in souls games? own property? Interact with NPC's the same way you do in Skyrim? is there a Crime and punishment system in souls?

I can understand people saying they prefer the combat in souls and souls games in general but to say that Skyrim is less of an RPG (ROLE PLAYING GAME) than Souls is juts plain BS

Larger world, Way bigger scale, More NPC's, more locations, more quests, more Races, more variety in enemys, richer more realistic world and More character development options.

It beggars belief that people would call what is essentially a dungeon Crawler with Minimal character development options more of an RPG than elder scrolls games.

i swear people around here have no clue what an RPG actually is,lol

At launch ES (the last two excluding the mmo one) is a casual adventure game aka Dora The Explorer simulator. One month after release it becomes a porn game. Year(s) later its a porn simulator. That's all you need to know about ES.

Please explain how that would make Elder scrolls Less of an RPG than souls games? even if it was a Porn simulator it still has more RPG elements and character customization/Management than the souls games and as far as i was aware RPG's are defined by Character management and developement and interaction with the gameworld, NPC's, enemys, Etc

Nothing you have said even remotely debunks anything i have said, good job.

Hands down Elder scrolls has more RPG elements and features than souls games

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#66 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

@Cloud_imperium said:

I prefer The Elder Scrolls. I like games with deep lore, where you read about something in a book and then go out to find that place/item/NPC etc and face something mysterious when you get there or along the way. I feel like I am part of that world and on an epic adventure. Other open world games like GTA fail to do so. May be because it is set in present time, so it fails to grab me like other games like Deus Ex, The Elder Scrolls, Divinity, Black Flag (not RPG of course, just used as example), Witcher etc.

Skyrim's lore is not deep. Not in the slightest. Skyrim manages to beat Dark Souls in narration, but not depth of lore. Both games chose different approaches to their methodology of exposition. Skyrim chose narration as their medium of exposition, whereas Dark Souls chose visual display and discovery. So if you walk around the world of Dark Souls without observing stuff, you'll totally miss out their lore - and perceived it as being non-existent.

I would say that you're the kind of gamer who wants to be told, not shown things.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Anyone who's sane would pick the Souls series since Bethesda games are trash.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

@delta3074 said:

@silversix_ said:

@delta3074 said:

@silversix_ said:

ES should be compared to facebook games, not real rpgs like the Souls series. Morrowind was the last ES that was considered as a "real rpg". Since Skyrim sold as much as it did, i don't think Bethesda will ever release anything close to Morrowind.

How the Hell are souls games more of an RPG than Elder scrolls? Even Skyrim has Way more character development options than souls for starters.

Can you get married in souls games? own property? Interact with NPC's the same way you do in Skyrim? is there a Crime and punishment system in souls?

I can understand people saying they prefer the combat in souls and souls games in general but to say that Skyrim is less of an RPG (ROLE PLAYING GAME) than Souls is juts plain BS

Larger world, Way bigger scale, More NPC's, more locations, more quests, more Races, more variety in enemys, richer more realistic world and More character development options.

It beggars belief that people would call what is essentially a dungeon Crawler with Minimal character development options more of an RPG than elder scrolls games.

i swear people around here have no clue what an RPG actually is,lol

At launch ES (the last two excluding the mmo one) is a casual adventure game aka Dora The Explorer simulator. One month after release it becomes a porn game. Year(s) later its a porn simulator. That's all you need to know about ES.

Please explain how that would make Elder scrolls Less of an RPG than souls games? even if it was a Porn simulator it still has more RPG elements and character customization/Management than the souls games and as far as i was aware RPG's are defined by Character management and developement and interaction with the gameworld, NPC's, enemys, Etc

Nothing you have said even remotely debunks anything i have said, good job.

Hands down Elder scrolls has more RPG elements and features than souls games

i don't need to explain anything, this conversation is so 2012. ES is a casual adventure game that has only one thing going for it, mod community. Its like comparing Street Fighter to the last DOA and pretend its a better/more of a fighter than SF.

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
Cloud_imperium

15146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 103

User Lists: 8

#69  Edited By Cloud_imperium
Member since 2013 • 15146 Posts

@jhcho2 said:

@Cloud_imperium said:

I prefer The Elder Scrolls. I like games with deep lore, where you read about something in a book and then go out to find that place/item/NPC etc and face something mysterious when you get there or along the way. I feel like I am part of that world and on an epic adventure. Other open world games like GTA fail to do so. May be because it is set in present time, so it fails to grab me like other games like Deus Ex, The Elder Scrolls, Divinity, Black Flag (not RPG of course, just used as example), Witcher etc.

Skyrim's lore is not deep. Not in the slightest. Skyrim manages to beat Dark Souls in narration, but not depth of lore. Both games chose different approaches to their methodology of exposition. Skyrim chose narration as their medium of exposition, whereas Dark Souls chose visual display and discovery. So if you walk around the world of Dark Souls without observing stuff, you'll totally miss out their lore - and perceived it as being non-existent.

I would say that you're the kind of gamer who wants to be told, not shown things.

Nope. When I play the game I explore every nook and cranny in the game. Skyrim's story isn't anything special either. What I meant was, there is a lot to do TES games and everything has a background story. Dark Souls is combat heavy game. I like story of Amnesia as well, where you learn the story by finding pages and reading them. Different games unfold their story and world differently but it is not hard to see that TES games offer more than just combat. You play Dark Souls, but you live in TES.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51583 Posts

I'll never understand the love for ES games. I've tried, but they are so boring, souless, and actually terrible to play that I could never enjoy one.

Souls all the way

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71  Edited By mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@jhcho2 said:

@Cloud_imperium said:

I prefer The Elder Scrolls. I like games with deep lore, where you read about something in a book and then go out to find that place/item/NPC etc and face something mysterious when you get there or along the way. I feel like I am part of that world and on an epic adventure. Other open world games like GTA fail to do so. May be because it is set in present time, so it fails to grab me like other games like Deus Ex, The Elder Scrolls, Divinity, Black Flag (not RPG of course, just used as example), Witcher etc.

Skyrim's lore is not deep. Not in the slightest. Skyrim manages to beat Dark Souls in narration, but not depth of lore. Both games chose different approaches to their methodology of exposition. Skyrim chose narration as their medium of exposition, whereas Dark Souls chose visual display and discovery. So if you walk around the world of Dark Souls without observing stuff, you'll totally miss out their lore - and perceived it as being non-existent.

I would say that you're the kind of gamer who wants to be told, not shown things.

lol dark souls has no story or lore and if it does it sure as hell wasn't interesting enough to pay any attention to

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
@mems_1224 said:

@jhcho2 said:

@Cloud_imperium said:

I prefer The Elder Scrolls. I like games with deep lore, where you read about something in a book and then go out to find that place/item/NPC etc and face something mysterious when you get there or along the way. I feel like I am part of that world and on an epic adventure. Other open world games like GTA fail to do so. May be because it is set in present time, so it fails to grab me like other games like Deus Ex, The Elder Scrolls, Divinity, Black Flag (not RPG of course, just used as example), Witcher etc.

Skyrim's lore is not deep. Not in the slightest. Skyrim manages to beat Dark Souls in narration, but not depth of lore. Both games chose different approaches to their methodology of exposition. Skyrim chose narration as their medium of exposition, whereas Dark Souls chose visual display and discovery. So if you walk around the world of Dark Souls without observing stuff, you'll totally miss out their lore - and perceived it as being non-existent.

I would say that you're the kind of gamer who wants to be told, not shown things.

lol dark souls has no story or lore and if it does it sure as hell wasn't interesting enough to pay any attention to

god damn you're clueless especially when talking about the original Dark Souls...

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@delta3074 said:

Please explain how that would make Elder scrolls Less of an RPG than souls games? even if it was a Porn simulator it still has more RPG elements and character customization/Management than the souls games and as far as i was aware RPG's are defined by Character management and developement and interaction with the gameworld, NPC's, enemys, Etc

Nothing you have said even remotely debunks anything i have said, good job.

Hands down Elder scrolls has more RPG elements and features than souls games

i don't need to explain anything, this conversation is so 2012. ES is a casual adventure game that has only one thing going for it, mod community. Its like comparing Street Fighter to the last DOA and pretend its a better/more of a fighter than SF.

Nice cop out but if the Elder scrolls are casual adventure games what does that make soul? Especially considering Elder scrolls Dwarfs Souls games when it comes to RPG elements and features, even Skyrim has more RPG elements and features despite being heavily stripped down RPG elements and character customisation.

Quite frankly only a very silly person would claim that souls games are RPG's and Elder scrolls games are not, especially when souls games are more like a dungeon crawler than an open world RPG

Bootom line

Elder scrolls has more Character customisation options than souls

Elder scrolls has more choices as to what you character can be or do.

Elder scrolls has more Felxibility when it comes to Approaching or completing quests and exploration.

Elder scrolls has more Quests, More NPC's, more locations to explore, more variety in enemys/races and a more realistic/interactive world

Souls has better combat.

But thats fine, it's clear that you have no intention oi even debating the points i put forward so feel free and carry on Copping out with Lame statements that are purely based on personal preference, which i respect, and nothing else.

And in my opinion DOA IS a better fighting game than Streetfighter, not 'more of a fighter' but generally better.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@Chutebox said:

I'll never understand the love for ES games. I've tried, but they are so boring, souless, and actually terrible to play that I could never enjoy one.

lol thats kind of how i feel about the souls games tbh

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@silversix_ said:
@mems_1224 said:

@jhcho2 said:

@Cloud_imperium said:

I prefer The Elder Scrolls. I like games with deep lore, where you read about something in a book and then go out to find that place/item/NPC etc and face something mysterious when you get there or along the way. I feel like I am part of that world and on an epic adventure. Other open world games like GTA fail to do so. May be because it is set in present time, so it fails to grab me like other games like Deus Ex, The Elder Scrolls, Divinity, Black Flag (not RPG of course, just used as example), Witcher etc.

Skyrim's lore is not deep. Not in the slightest. Skyrim manages to beat Dark Souls in narration, but not depth of lore. Both games chose different approaches to their methodology of exposition. Skyrim chose narration as their medium of exposition, whereas Dark Souls chose visual display and discovery. So if you walk around the world of Dark Souls without observing stuff, you'll totally miss out their lore - and perceived it as being non-existent.

I would say that you're the kind of gamer who wants to be told, not shown things.

lol dark souls has no story or lore and if it does it sure as hell wasn't interesting enough to pay any attention to

god damn you're clueless especially when talking about the original Dark Souls...

sounds like a struck a nerve. truth hurts i guess.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#76  Edited By delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
@jhcho2 said:

@Cloud_imperium said:

I prefer The Elder Scrolls. I like games with deep lore, where you read about something in a book and then go out to find that place/item/NPC etc and face something mysterious when you get there or along the way. I feel like I am part of that world and on an epic adventure. Other open world games like GTA fail to do so. May be because it is set in present time, so it fails to grab me like other games like Deus Ex, The Elder Scrolls, Divinity, Black Flag (not RPG of course, just used as example), Witcher etc.

Skyrim's lore is not deep. Not in the slightest. Skyrim manages to beat Dark Souls in narration, but not depth of lore. Both games chose different approaches to their methodology of exposition. Skyrim chose narration as their medium of exposition, whereas Dark Souls chose visual display and discovery. So if you walk around the world of Dark Souls without observing stuff, you'll totally miss out their lore - and perceived it as being non-existent.

I would say that you're the kind of gamer who wants to be told, not shown things.

Have you read all the books in Skyrim? there plenty of lore if you actually look around and read the books and there is plenty of visual lore as weel if you look hard enough.

Saying that i have clocked more than 300 hours on Skyrim and explored virtually every location of which there are more than 400, there s Ton mre to see in Elder scrolls games than souls games.

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#77 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14490 Posts

Neither. Fallout New Vegas is superior to both.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@delta3074:

TES games haven't got more character customization than Souls games, what are you on about? If you mean appearance wise? Sure. If you mean gameplay wise, it's not even close.

In TES games all melee weapons feel the same in the end. Swords, axes and hammers only have different swing speeds, same goes for their larger variants. It doesn't matter if you wield blunt or bladed weapons, they all feel and play the same. Souls games have an astounding variety of weapons that control completely differently from one another. You got different move sets for each of them, different upgrade paths, skills scaling and a shitload of other things. Same goes for armor and their weight, their defense against fire, magic or lightning, the overall poise(the amount of hits you can take before getting staggered) they give you. We can then talk about the endless list of spells and how miracles and pyromancies work. Overall there is so much variety you have entire sections of wikis dedicated to different builds for different situations. The same cannot be said for Skyrim.

Skyrim has basically a hierarchy of weapons and you simply ditch the current one for the next tier once you're done. For example, Ebony is better than Orcish which is better than Dwarven which is better than Steel. There's no point in keeping Dwarven over Ebony when the latter beats it in every single imaginable category by a wide margin(except weight). In Dark Souls you have many different things to consider. The length of the weapon, its weight, how it controls(do you swing in wide arcs or simply poke?), the parrying window it gives and many many other things. Same goes for armor, at different equipment loads your character moves differently. Armors also have variying levels of defence against different elements(physical, magic, fire and lightning and darkness). Skyrim's armors have an armor rating against everything and you simply pick the one with the higher armor rating making others below it obsolete.

I played Souls games and Skyrim extensively and you're out to lunch if you think TES games have more character customization(aside from looks). They are worlds apart. It's actually not even close how much more in-depth character building there is in Souls games.

@mems_1224

Houston sucks and James Harden can't play defense.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@Juub1990: lol i win. when you cant even defend your opinion and have to resort to trying to change the subject you lose. take that L bruh. better luck next time.

souls games have no story confirmed.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

@Juub1990: lol i win. when you cant even defend your opinion and have to resort to trying to change the subject you lose. take that L bruh. better luck next time.

souls games have no story confirmed.

I actually didn't bother to respond to your post full of ignorance. Enjoy that 2nd round exit.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#81  Edited By musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

@princeofshapeir: Every ounce of enjoyment I managed to squeeze out of Dark Souls was purely because I avoided all guides. But it didn't take long to figure the game out.

It feels like a game from another age, when games were less forgiving and more repetitious.

Edit: And much more simple.

Avatar image for NoirLamia777
NoirLamia777

3180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#82 NoirLamia777
Member since 2012 • 3180 Posts

Souls any day, I love the Elder Scrolls games too but I like Souls better.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:
@mems_1224 said:

@jhcho2 said:

@Cloud_imperium said:

I prefer The Elder Scrolls. I like games with deep lore, where you read about something in a book and then go out to find that place/item/NPC etc and face something mysterious when you get there or along the way. I feel like I am part of that world and on an epic adventure. Other open world games like GTA fail to do so. May be because it is set in present time, so it fails to grab me like other games like Deus Ex, The Elder Scrolls, Divinity, Black Flag (not RPG of course, just used as example), Witcher etc.

Skyrim's lore is not deep. Not in the slightest. Skyrim manages to beat Dark Souls in narration, but not depth of lore. Both games chose different approaches to their methodology of exposition. Skyrim chose narration as their medium of exposition, whereas Dark Souls chose visual display and discovery. So if you walk around the world of Dark Souls without observing stuff, you'll totally miss out their lore - and perceived it as being non-existent.

I would say that you're the kind of gamer who wants to be told, not shown things.

lol dark souls has no story or lore and if it does it sure as hell wasn't interesting enough to pay any attention to

god damn you're clueless especially when talking about the original Dark Souls...

sounds like a struck a nerve. truth hurts i guess.

the truth is that you play your rpg's like a linear fps, skipping everything and not paying attention to the items and environment you're in. DkS1 has f*ckton of lore, wake up

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

20640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#84 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 20640 Posts

Souls is the better series. But they both play very differently and have their own strengths.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

Dark Souls is a pure Hack and Slash RPG, almost 100% combat, almost non existent story, character interactions/advancement. Elder Scrolls is more of a traditional RPG even when it's elements are a little on the low quality side, and many people call it an action adventure.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@silversix_: Lol wut? If anything, dark souls is way more linear than skyrim. Please explain the story in dark souls then. Cause from what I remember it's just dumb bullshit

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87  Edited By mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@mems_1224 said:

@Juub1990: lol i win. when you cant even defend your opinion and have to resort to trying to change the subject you lose. take that L bruh. better luck next time.

souls games have no story confirmed.

I actually didn't bother to respond to your post full of ignorance. Enjoy that 2nd round exit.

thanks for telling us what we all know. i win. here homie, hold this L.

when you're ready to explain how good the lore is in the empty, souless and boring world of dark souls you can let it go.

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#88 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

Well I despise Bethesda games so the Souls series wins by default.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

Also were is Lulu_Lulu?

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_: Lol wut? If anything, dark souls is way more linear than skyrim. Please explain the story in dark souls then. Cause from what I remember it's just dumb bullshit

Loading Video...

saying that the original Dark Souls had no story is as ignorant as it gets lol almost every item you pickup in that game had a back story/lore to it. Now this isn't present in DkS2 but its still way deeper than Skyrim with its 'kill 10 rats and come back for reward' fetch quests.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@silversix_: 2 minutes in and im already fucking bored. this is fucking stupid. saying dark souls has a deep and interesting lore is like saying mario has a deep and interesting lore except mario games are actually fun to play.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_: 2 minutes in and im already fucking bored. this is fucking stupid. saying dark souls has a deep and interesting lore is like saying mario has a deep and interesting lore except mario games are actually fun to play.

Loading Video...

you're mems_ of course you're bored. here's a CoD montage for you, enjoy.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93  Edited By mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_: 2 minutes in and im already fucking bored. this is fucking stupid. saying dark souls has a deep and interesting lore is like saying mario has a deep and interesting lore except mario games are actually fun to play.

Loading Video...

you're mems_ of course you're bored. here's a CoD montage for you, enjoy.

meh, not a fan of sniping in multiplayer games. that video has a way more interesting story than the fucking awful dark souls video you just posted.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_: 2 minutes in and im already fucking bored. this is fucking stupid. saying dark souls has a deep and interesting lore is like saying mario has a deep and interesting lore except mario games are actually fun to play.

Loading Video...

you're mems_ of course you're bored. here's a CoD montage for you, enjoy.

meh, not a fan of sniping in multiplayer games. that video has a way more interesting story than the fucking awful dark souls video you just posted.

glad you enjoyed.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_: 2 minutes in and im already fucking bored. this is fucking stupid. saying dark souls has a deep and interesting lore is like saying mario has a deep and interesting lore except mario games are actually fun to play.

Loading Video...

you're mems_ of course you're bored. here's a CoD montage for you, enjoy.

meh, not a fan of sniping in multiplayer games. that video has a way more interesting story than the fucking awful dark souls video you just posted.

glad you enjoyed.

didn't, only watched like 15 seconds of that cod video. i just said it was better than the dark souls video.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_: 2 minutes in and im already fucking bored. this is fucking stupid. saying dark souls has a deep and interesting lore is like saying mario has a deep and interesting lore except mario games are actually fun to play.

Loading Video...

you're mems_ of course you're bored. here's a CoD montage for you, enjoy.

meh, not a fan of sniping in multiplayer games. that video has a way more interesting story than the fucking awful dark souls video you just posted.

glad you enjoyed.

didn't, only watched like 15 seconds of that cod video. i just said it was better than the dark souls video.

liar. you watched the whole thing and put it in your fav folder. I know you're into dat dudebro stuff.

Avatar image for alcapello
Alcapello

1396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#97 Alcapello
Member since 2014 • 1396 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_: 2 minutes in and im already fucking bored. this is fucking stupid. saying dark souls has a deep and interesting lore is like saying mario has a deep and interesting lore except mario games are actually fun to play.

Loading Video...

you're mems_ of course you're bored. here's a CoD montage for you, enjoy.

meh, not a fan of sniping in multiplayer games. that video has a way more interesting story than the fucking awful dark souls video you just posted.

glad you enjoyed.

didn't, only watched like 15 seconds of that cod video. i just said it was better than the dark souls video.

liar. you watched the whole thing and put it in your fav folder. I know you're into dat dudebro stuff.

Probably has PSTV streaming service.

Avatar image for speedfog
speedfog

4966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#98 speedfog
Member since 2009 • 4966 Posts

So much Skyrim haters here. IMO Skyrim > Dark Souls.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@silversix_ said:

liar. you watched the whole thing and put it in your fav folder. I know you're into dat dudebro stuff.

nah

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#100  Edited By Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_: 2 minutes in and im already fucking bored. this is fucking stupid. saying dark souls has a deep and interesting lore is like saying mario has a deep and interesting lore except mario games are actually fun to play.

yeah except for the part that this a dumb analogy and your post is full of bs. If your brain can't handle the scattered lore there are some great videos on the internet that explain it and why.