E-mail Survey "Would you like to see MGS4 on 360"
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
Um, isn't MGS4 supposed to be the last one anyway?Multiplat for MGS4=the end of MGS series forever
Kahuna_1
[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Um, isn't MGS4 supposed to be the last one anyway?Multiplat for MGS4=the end of MGS series forever
Vyse_The_Daring
yup, but i meant it would be the worst of the series because instead of kojima focusing on one system, he would have to divide his time and the game wouldnt be at par with the others.
(Puts up shield for barrage of "360 can't handle MGS4" and "MGS4 needs Blu-Ray")
I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"So you guys now think achievements make a game better? I really don't care about MGS4 on 360 since the PS3 ver. would be better.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
itsallgood29
wtf? you just said konami is considering it? whered the hell no come from?
[QUOTE="itsallgood29"]I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"So you guys now think achievements make a game better? I really don't care about MGS4 on 360 since the PS3 ver. would be better.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
tegovoltio
Why would it be better?
[QUOTE="itsallgood29"]I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"So you guys now think achievements make a game better? I really don't care about MGS4 on 360 since the PS3 ver. would be better.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
tegovoltio
Achievements don't make the game better but if deciding between two games which will look the same, why not play the one with the achievements. Just like a cow to put words in our mouths!
[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"]I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"So you guys now think achievements make a game better? I really don't care about MGS4 on 360 since the PS3 ver. would be better.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
itsallgood29
Why would it be better? First of all it's being developed specifically on the PS3 architecture, and this is not any dev. but Koji. productions so they really will take advantage of PS3's strong points (it's been said on several interviews).
Also, don't try to bring up rumble (as some had done) because even if Kojima wants it, he is now working on using the Sixaxis feature and assuming it's them one could assume it would be great, besides, rumble doesn't magically make a game better.
Oh and by that I ansuer your other post, out of the 2 ver. I'd choose the PS3 one.
I don't give a dam about MGS4 . If it end up on 360 , cool . If it don't , No prob, ill borrow my cousin PS3 , rent the game finish it , and zam . there no point going back throught it again anyway .Prid3r
Sadly, I liked the MGS games but those weren't the highlights of the PStation 2 for me. The #1 reason to like to see it on 360 is to laugh at Cows. If it came I owuld buy it. If not, I might never play it which really would not bother me.
Yeah, remember how when the original XBOX got MGS2 and the series just evaporated? And how when Gamecube got Twin Snakes and the series imploded? Not to mention the numerous systems that the original MG has been released on Personally I think MGS has to move to the 360 due to the changing economics of the gaming industry The last gen was easy to be exclusive to a certain system. Sell it on the PS2 which everyone has and make money or soley sell it on one of the other systems and watch the $ fly away This gen will not be a repeat of last gen no matter who ends up on topMultiplat for MGS4=the end of MGS series forever
Kahuna_1
[QUOTE="itsallgood29"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"]I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"So you guys now think achievements make a game better? I really don't care about MGS4 on 360 since the PS3 ver. would be better.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
tegovoltio
Why would it be better? First of all it's being developed specifically on the PS3 architecture, and this is not any dev. but Koji. productions so they really will take advantage of PS3's strong points (it's been said on several interviews). Also, don't try to bring up rumble (as some had done) because even if Kojima wants it, he is now working on using the Sixaxis feature and assuming it's them one could assume it would be great, besides, rumble doesn't magically make a game better. Ok so rumble does not make a game better but motion sensing does? Good logic buddy! The PS3 architecture is not 2x as powerful so it would not take much for the game to be ported over. Do you actually think that the PS3 is has that much of an advantage over the 360? You can still argue that the 360 will always make better looking games so you need to dig a bit deeper.
[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Um, isn't MGS4 supposed to be the last one anyway?Multiplat for MGS4=the end of MGS series forever
Kahuna_1
yup, but i meant it would be the worst of the series because instead of kojima focusing on one system, he would have to divide his time and the game wouldnt be at par with the others.
or he could just make it on the PS3 and port it later :|[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Yeah, remember how when the original XBOX got MGS2 and the series just evaporated? And how when Gamecube got Twin Snakes and the series imploded? Not to mention the numerous systems that the original MG has been released on Personally I think MGS has to move to the 360 due to the changing economics of the gaming industry The last gen was easy to be exclusive to a certain system. Sell it on the PS2 which everyone has and make money or soley sell it on one of the other systems and watch the $ fly away This gen will not be a repeat of last gen no matter who ends up on topMultiplat for MGS4=the end of MGS series forever
MrBetterThenYou
let me rephrase it then..if it releases on the same day.
[QUOTE="Kev_Unreal"]I be aware of that, thanks.:wink:wmc540What happened to your 2,000 posts... did someone get the ban hammer?
no, but lets keep it like that for a unknow reason. :P
"am I well know? this is the ten times someone ask me that. :P "
[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Um, isn't MGS4 supposed to be the last one anyway?Multiplat for MGS4=the end of MGS series forever
killtactics
yup, but i meant it would be the worst of the series because instead of kojima focusing on one system, he would have to divide his time and the game wouldnt be at par with the others.
or he could just make it on the PS3 and port it later :|and hurt the ps3...there are reasons why systems have exclusives.
[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"]I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"So you guys now think achievements make a game better? I really don't care about MGS4 on 360 since the PS3 ver. would be better.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
itsallgood29
Why would it be better? First of all it's being developed specifically on the PS3 architecture, and this is not any dev. but Koji. productions so they really will take advantage of PS3's strong points (it's been said on several interviews). Also, don't try to bring up rumble (as some had done) because even if Kojima wants it, he is now working on using the Sixaxis feature and assuming it's them one could assume it would be great, besides, rumble doesn't magically make a game better. Ok so rumble does not make a game better but motion sensing does? Good logic buddy! The PS3 architecture is not 2x as powerful so it would not take much for the game to be ported over. Do you actually think that the PS3 is has that much of an advantage over the 360? You can still argue that the 360 will always make better looking games so you need to dig a bit deeper. I didn't said motion sensing made it better, just saying that it's really possible that if there are 2 ver. the motion sensing is the main focus for the game now instead of rumble. Also even if PS3 doesn't have much advantage over 360 (as you are claiming), Xbox had a considerable advantage over PS2 and that didn't helped Substance's graphics or awful controls.
BTW, I'm not just talking about a graphics difference on the versions (if it eve happens).
[QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Um, isn't MGS4 supposed to be the last one anyway?Multiplat for MGS4=the end of MGS series forever
Kahuna_1
yup, but i meant it would be the worst of the series because instead of kojima focusing on one system, he would have to divide his time and the game wouldnt be at par with the others.
or he could just make it on the PS3 and port it later :|and hurt the ps3...there are reasons why systems have exclusives.
i dont care if it hurts the PS3, i was just pointing out how what u said could be easily solved..[QUOTE="itsallgood29"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"]I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"So you guys now think achievements make a game better? I really don't care about MGS4 on 360 since the PS3 ver. would be better.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
tegovoltio
Why would it be better? First of all it's being developed specifically on the PS3 architecture, and this is not any dev. but Koji. productions so they really will take advantage of PS3's strong points (it's been said on several interviews). Also, don't try to bring up rumble (as some had done) because even if Kojima wants it, he is now working on using the Sixaxis feature and assuming it's them one could assume it would be great, besides, rumble doesn't magically make a game better. Ok so rumble does not make a game better but motion sensing does? Good logic buddy! The PS3 architecture is not 2x as powerful so it would not take much for the game to be ported over. Do you actually think that the PS3 is has that much of an advantage over the 360? You can still argue that the 360 will always make better looking games so you need to dig a bit deeper. I didn't said motion sensing made it better, just saying that it's really possible that if there are 2 ver. the motion sensing is the main focus for the game now instead of rumble. Also even if PS3 doesn't have much advantage over 360 (as you are claiming), Xbox had a considerable advantage over PS2 and that didn't helped Substance's graphics or awful controls.
BTW, I'm not just talking about a graphics difference on the versions (if it eve happens).
the graphics and controls were just fine:question:
I mean, Kojima knows that if he decided to work on the 360 version before the ps3 ones out... Phil Harrison would strangle him and have snake killed off in the movie.
[QUOTE="itsallgood29"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"]I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"So you guys now think achievements make a game better? I really don't care about MGS4 on 360 since the PS3 ver. would be better.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
tegovoltio
Why would it be better? First of all it's being developed specifically on the PS3 architecture, and this is not any dev. but Koji. productions so they really will take advantage of PS3's strong points (it's been said on several interviews). Also, don't try to bring up rumble (as some had done) because even if Kojima wants it, he is now working on using the Sixaxis feature and assuming it's them one could assume it would be great, besides, rumble doesn't magically make a game better. Ok so rumble does not make a game better but motion sensing does? Good logic buddy! The PS3 architecture is not 2x as powerful so it would not take much for the game to be ported over. Do you actually think that the PS3 is has that much of an advantage over the 360? You can still argue that the 360 will always make better looking games so you need to dig a bit deeper. I didn't said motion sensing made it better, just saying that it's really possible that if there are 2 ver. the motion sensing is the main focus for the game now instead of rumble. Also even if PS3 doesn't have much advantage over 360 (as you are claiming), Xbox had a considerable advantage over PS2 and that didn't helped Substance's graphics or awful controls.
BTW, I'm not just talking about a graphics difference on the versions (if it eve happens).
But being better is an opinion! Motion sensing is good when thought out before hand and not tacked onto a console like the PS3. I am glad it has it but in all reality it does not change the game that much. I doubt anyone would complain about the 360 version lacking motion sensing! So in essence both would be equally good based on the person playing,
[QUOTE="MrBetterThenYou"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Yeah, remember how when the original XBOX got MGS2 and the series just evaporated? And how when Gamecube got Twin Snakes and the series imploded? Not to mention the numerous systems that the original MG has been released on Personally I think MGS has to move to the 360 due to the changing economics of the gaming industry The last gen was easy to be exclusive to a certain system. Sell it on the PS2 which everyone has and make money or soley sell it on one of the other systems and watch the $ fly away This gen will not be a repeat of last gen no matter who ends up on topMultiplat for MGS4=the end of MGS series forever
Kahuna_1
let me rephrase it then..if it releases on the same day.
The only thing multiplat means is more sales, I do not see how it is possible for the series to be destoryed by having it released on more than one system on the same day, there is no logical reason as to why the series would fail if it were multiplat[QUOTE="tegovoltio"] I didn't said motion sensing made it better, just saying that it's really possible that if there are 2 ver. the motion sensing is the main focus for the game now instead of rumble. Also even if PS3 doesn't have much advantage over 360 (as you are claiming), Xbox had a considerable advantage over PS2 and that didn't helped Substance's graphics or awful controls.the graphics and controls were just fine:question: The controls were not fine, compared to the PS2 ver. and Xbox had superior hardware than PS2 and the graphics didn't improved.
BTW, I'm not just talking about a graphics difference on the versions (if it eve happens).
killtactics
[QUOTE="itsallgood29"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"]I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"So you guys now think achievements make a game better? I really don't care about MGS4 on 360 since the PS3 ver. would be better.
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
tegovoltio
Why would it be better? First of all it's being developed specifically on the PS3 architecture, and this is not any dev. but Koji. productions so they really will take advantage of PS3's strong points (it's been said on several interviews). Also, don't try to bring up rumble (as some had done) because even if Kojima wants it, he is now working on using the Sixaxis feature and assuming it's them one could assume it would be great, besides, rumble doesn't magically make a game better. Ok so rumble does not make a game better but motion sensing does? Good logic buddy! The PS3 architecture is not 2x as powerful so it would not take much for the game to be ported over. Do you actually think that the PS3 is has that much of an advantage over the 360? You can still argue that the 360 will always make better looking games so you need to dig a bit deeper. I didn't said motion sensing made it better, just saying that it's really possible that if there are 2 ver. the motion sensing is the main focus for the game now instead of rumble. Also even if PS3 doesn't have much advantage over 360 (as you are claiming), Xbox had a considerable advantage over PS2 and that didn't helped Substance's graphics or awful controls.
BTW, I'm not just talking about a graphics difference on the versions (if it eve happens).
Also you must realize that the software used to make MGS4 is the same software they use to make the 360 games. Making it MP is just a hassle not and ordeal and if Konami can make lots of money with a 360 version then they will.
wtf? you just said konami is considering it? whered the hell no come from?
he never even consider it..when people asked him if the trailers he showed off can be done on the 360 he said yes..but it was only a freaken trailers..lol..i doubt the 360 can handle the full game..and if you lemming want a downgrade game then go ahead..it be on 3 disk as well..kojima even said blue ray isnt enough for him..its his last mgs4 game so he have make it the best.
[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]Um, isn't MGS4 supposed to be the last one anyway? last one with snakeMultiplat for MGS4=the end of MGS series forever
kuza_9999
Kojimas last MGS game as well
He is then moving onto Wii
I got an e-mail about two days ago asking me to take a marketing survey about the 360 and related products. One of the questions was "Would you like to see MGS4 on the 360?" and "Would you buy a 360 just to play MGS4?"Tecmo did something similar during the PS2 and Xbox days regarding Ninja Gaiden. It was a poll on their site which asked if people would buy Ninja Gaiden for PS2 etc
I did not think much of this survey but now Joystoq and a few other blogs seem to think that this now means the MGS4 on the 360 is still a posibility. Why would MS make such survey unless they had some kind of dialouge going on with Kojima and Konami.
Either way its all good, but I would rather play it on my 360 for the achievements. Although if its a timed exclusive I might have to get it for both.
If you want to read the blog posts just go to Joystiq right now as it is one of the first few stories.
itsallgood29
Kojimas last MGS game as well
He is then moving onto Wii
He's gonna mke ''something'' for the Wii also said he is interested on 360 and is looking onto PC.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment