Enjoy that good gameplay? It wont be ANYTHING without graphics.

  • 193 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Drkr_Zen
Drkr_Zen

7330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#151 Drkr_Zen
Member since 2004 • 7330 Posts

Someone got their topic all jumbled.. lol

At least, in my view its mixed up.

I'm sure it has been said, but you could have the most amazing looking game in the world.. and if it plays horribly, it will BE horrible. Anyone that disagrees, quite honestly, is an idiot.. or just looks at their games while someone else plays for them.. er somethin'.

Avatar image for Axel_rocks14
Axel_rocks14

780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#152 Axel_rocks14
Member since 2007 • 780 Posts

The wii graphics are crap. Nintendo wanted to make a profit unlike Sony or Microsoft (whom basically lost profits for their fans)

So they didn't make good hardware.

The_Nemacyst
It depends on your definition of HARDWARE. The gameplay with wii mote is just great and many fans casual and hardcore are obviously enjoying that and that is something apparentally microsoft and sony is missing out on. Sure, nintendo doesn't focus on graphics much but still graphics aren;t everything but they have their importance although gameplay is a little bit more important. So actually FYI nintendo is giving gamers what they want with a gaming console: FUN
Avatar image for Japanese_Monk
Japanese_Monk

1412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Japanese_Monk
Member since 2006 • 1412 Posts

This is an good example, of how art can really express better than realism.

But what do I know?

The_Nemacyst
So you ignore my post at the top huh. You seem to be ignoring alot of posts that prove you wrong. If you can't legitimately respond then you should leave your own thread. At least Flamingschmoes responds to what I write, while you on the other hand take the cowards way out and just posts something like this. And what does that mean anyway? "Art can really express better than realism"

What you don't realize is the content of that picture is why its so great. The IDEA of adam and God communicating and God creating Adam.... The closeness of the two. Its not his forms and if the lighting is perfect...or if the core shadows are properly painted. Its the content of the piece. Although its beautiful....whos to say it looks more beautiful than real life.

And again if you "think" that art can be more expressive than real life than why are you so hung up on graphics rather than gameplay?
Avatar image for Drkr_Zen
Drkr_Zen

7330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#154 Drkr_Zen
Member since 2004 • 7330 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"]

The wii graphics are crap. Nintendo wanted to make a profit unlike Sony or Microsoft (whom basically lost profits for their fans)

So they didn't make good hardware.

Axel_rocks14

It depends on your definition of HARDWARE. The gameplay with wii mote is just great and many fans casual and hardcore are obviously enjoying that and that is something apparentally microsoft and sony is missing out on. Sure, nintendo doesn't focus on graphics much but still graphics aren;t everything but they have their importance although gameplay is a little bit more important. So actually FYI nintendo is giving gamers what they want with a gaming console: FUN

Well said. Nintendo is the very definition of why graphics do NOT matter most.

The Wii and DS, although I only own the latter, both have got my family playing videogames.. even those that I would NEVER think to play a game in their lifetimes.. namely my mom, grandparents and my 91 year old great grandmother. She kicks my ass in both golf and boxing, go figure.

At any rate, I'm not going to be mean or anything.. or de-value other's opinions, as I wouldn't want that done to me, but I just detest those that think graphics are everything.. cuz like "WHOA man, the 360 has the bestest GRAFX, insta-win for this generation, ch'yeah. 360=1337."

But where's the unique games like Okami or the unique ways of playing games like with the Wiimote and stylus?

Avatar image for ROCKBO
ROCKBO

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#155 ROCKBO
Member since 2005 • 195 Posts

I am tired of fanboys. Especially sheep. Who claim " Gameplay is better than graphics"

But before you flame, read my whole post.

Fanboys usually have retarded reasons why gameplay is better than graphics.. Like

"LoLz, if you think gameplay is worser than graphics, then go watch a movie because that has good graphics.."

My comeback? "Well, if you have no graphics whatsoever, enjoy playing Zelda when your screen is black"

I also hate it how sheep act as if the Wii makes the gameplay better than the other consoles. The gameplay is the same. It's not like Xbox360/PS3 = Only graphics.

The Xbox360/PS3 = Next generation graphics, plus gameplay that we all love since last gen. I mean, I hate it how sheep hate games without motion sensing, when less than 2-3 years ago they were loving Resident Evil 4, SSBM etc.

The Wii is not new revolutionary gameplay. Games like WarioWare/Cooking Mama/Trauma Center are not game changing gameplay. There are hundreds of better games.

Gameplay depends on the actually gameplay of the game, not just the controller. The Wii also has bad graphics.

Gameplay is definitely more important than graphics, but its not like the all other consoles other than the Wii have no gameplay. You have been playing that gameplay that you have loved before the Wii, and that gameplay will still be good for many years to come.

The_Nemacyst
Dumbest. Statement. Ever.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
How are you of all people going to start a post with "I'm tired of fanboys" lol
Avatar image for Qanio
Qanio

127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Qanio
Member since 2007 • 127 Posts

I am tired of fanboys. Especially sheep. Who claim " Gameplay is better than graphics"

But before you flame, read my whole post.

Fanboys usually have retarded reasons why gameplay is better than graphics.. Like

"LoLz, if you think gameplay is worser than graphics, then go watch a movie because that has good graphics.."

My comeback? "Well, if you have no graphics whatsoever, enjoy playing Zelda when your screen is black"

I also hate it how sheep act as if the Wii makes the gameplay better than the other consoles. The gameplay is the same. It's not like Xbox360/PS3 = Only graphics.

The Xbox360/PS3 = Next generation graphics, plus gameplay that we all love since last gen. I mean, I hate it how sheep hate games without motion sensing, when less than 2-3 years ago they were loving Resident Evil 4, SSBM etc.

The Wii is not new revolutionary gameplay. Games like WarioWare/Cooking Mama/Trauma Center are not game changing gameplay. There are hundreds of better games.

Gameplay depends on the actually gameplay of the game, not just the controller. The Wii also has bad graphics.

Gameplay is definitely more important than graphics, but its not like the all other consoles other than the Wii have no gameplay. You have been playing that gameplay that you have loved before the Wii, and that gameplay will still be good for many years to come.

The_Nemacyst
You're a fanboy of something for bashing the wii
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
I could still enjoy playing NES(20 years old) games and PC(Now/today) games at the same time.:P Kev_Unreal
Well then you must be a very exceptional person... I rather play Assasins Creed or Mass Effect then a crappy old NES game. And at the same time...why don't you turn off the colour of your TV...so it looks extra old :roll:
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
you contridict your self you whine and moan about fanboys saying gameplay is better then graphics, then admit at the end that gameplay is more important then graphics...../thread
Avatar image for deactivated-586249e1b64ba
deactivated-586249e1b64ba

7629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 deactivated-586249e1b64ba
Member since 2004 • 7629 Posts

Let's see...what could I dig up from this thread?

TC says something like:

Sheep: "O YA!? HAVE FUN WATCHING A MOVIE!"

TC: " O YA!? HAVE FUN LOOKING AT A BLANK SCREEN!"

Well, considering that games are supposed to have gameplay in the first place, that point is blown off. However, the player at least also has to be able to see otherwise they can't play in the first place which is why a game needs both to be a game at all, no matter how bad. 

This is something everyone should agree on though:

A game with good gameplay but bad graphics sucks.  A game with bad gameplay but good graphics sucks even more. A game with both good gameplay and graphics rocks.

TC says something like:

Sheep: "Nintendo needs to profit because they're only a gaming company!"

TC: "Microsoft and Sony are losing money because they're not greedy!"

The problem is that if companies kept on losing money, they'd go bankrupt and then everyone would be sad when the PS4/XBox720 don't come. Everybody loses.

Companies get money which makes them happy while consumers get products which make them happy. It's a win win situation.

TC says something like:

TC: "Graphics in art will exceed realism!" "I wish more movies look like 300 because I like 300's art!"

Graphics in art can never touch realism since art is supposed to portray realism in a different way. If it touches realism, then art is no longer art because we've seen it countless times. It's no longer unique. Being unique is what makes movies like Star Wars, The Lord of The Rings, and The Matrix awesome.

I really hope you're being a fakeboy for your own good.

Avatar image for ilovesnowboard
ilovesnowboard

541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 ilovesnowboard
Member since 2007 • 541 Posts
I don't own a wii, but it does change the gameplay ! It's a motion sensing controller...the ps3 also has it, but it's barely a feature that is used. I really don't care that much about graphics, and if i had the choice to play a game with great graphics and no motion sensing, or a game with ok graphics and motion sensing, i would choose the 2nd option.
Avatar image for Kenshi_is_god
Kenshi_is_god

5414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#162 Kenshi_is_god
Member since 2004 • 5414 Posts

[QUOTE="Kenshi_is_god"][QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"][QUOTE="Kenshi_is_god"][QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"][QUOTE="rowzzr"][QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"]

The wii graphics are crap. Nintendo wanted to make a profit unlike Sony or Microsoft (whom basically lost profits for their fans)

So they didn't make good hardware.

The_Nemacyst

uhh that's dumb. of course they wanted profits, duh? would you create a company simply to lose money?
sony MS lost money for their fans? nope, that's not what they had in mind, dude. they lost money because they made wrong marketing/business/whatever moves.

If they wanted to make a big of a profit as Nintendo, then they would have never released their consoles with superior graphics in the first place?


Wrong? You're trying to tell us that MS is like. "You know what, I don't want money, lets make a gaming system, cause im getting bored. You know what? While we're at it, lets not have ANY plans for future profits!" Obviously coming into a market, you're going to take a hit. Hell MS hasn't made a profit since they started, and now they are finally doing so. So I guess in your world, MS is going to pull, wait a few years, then jump right back in right? No. Do you think Sony is happy losing billions over the PS3? No, they don't care, they want you to buy it. Hell you buy it, they got the sale #, you can do whatever the hell you want with it. They probably laugh at breakmyps3.com and say "well we already made the sale, do we care?" Answer : no. They don't.

You know nothing. Sony and Microsoft have business other than gaming, this loss is not that much. They believe that gaming is a investment for the future, or so I heard.

Anyways, SMG looks like crap. It won't look like that either, Wii is not in HD, yet the screenshots are.. Why?
You have to look at it this way, Kameo is NOT a 1st party game and yet it looks better than any Wii game as of now, and probably in the future. If you think giving the Wii time makes it a lot better, imagine the Xbox360 and PS3 with time. They are very potential consoles.

I know nothing eh?
First off, just because they can fall back on other divisions, does not mean they are happy to take a loss for you. You need to learn your business before you argue it.
Second, Kameo was worked on by Rare and MGS, therefore it is a first party title. You can argue its a second party title, but they are pretty much one in the same, being that that company would be owned by the first party title maker, they would have the same tools and help available.
Third off. SMG does not look like crap, and no those screens arent in HD, are you mentally retarded? apparently so. Notice how I say vids and you say screen shots. Watch a vid, it looks great in motion, but it's okay, I know you'll replace the word videos with screens, because you know you're wrong.
Obviously every console will evolve in time. IM not saying they will look better than 360 and ps3, find to me where i said that.
I said you're saying its bad with either no reason or terrible reasons(im beginning to get sick of reading your posts, thats how terrible they are), and you continue to deny you are wrong that with time they will look good, and it's even been proven by some game videos.

It's 1 AM. go ahead and report me for calling you retarded, I don't care, because I really think you must be. The only redemption you have right now is that you have maddox in your sig. again, it's 1 AM, im going to bed. later

[/thread]


I didn't call you a retard I said you know nothing because you were blatantly handing out false facts.

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/kameoelementsofpower/tech_info.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary

Note how it says "Publisher Microsoft Gaming Studios"

"Developer: Rare"

Anyways, Microsoft is taking in a loss because they can afford it. I simply stated their gaming division was losing money, I never said "Microsoft as a whole is in debt because they love their fans"

Super Mario Galaxy looks like crap.
1) Perfect Dark Zero looks better than it
2) The developer screenshots were in HD
3) Jaggie land

Yet again you take what I say and alter it. I didn't say you called me one, I said I called you one. Because you are. You seem to misuderstand the meaning of a publisher. A publisher provides the money for the developer and they also lend assisstance if needed, especially if its a 2nd party title. Haha I also love i said you would replace the word videos with screen shots, and you even did again =D you cease to amaze me. Can you stop breathing today?

Also i never said you said "Microsoft as a whole is in debt because they love their fans"
I said that you said they are taking a loss because they love you.

which is wrong
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

graphic whores will kill the indusrty, i hope your happy tc, youre leading the charge against the demise of videogames :(

Seriously, wii haters have been in full damage control ever since ndp numbers came in and nintendo cleaned house

sexy_luigi
No I really dont care about the sales at all :yawn:. They dont matter to me at all and in fact the sales are going to make me go by a crappy $250 game system that is a GC with a newer controller. Pretty lame if you ask me. I can go the buy the PS2 or the XBOX for $100 cheaper with the same graphics, just um no new controller.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#164 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
Hi there.

Avatar image for jeffwulf
jeffwulf

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 jeffwulf
Member since 2004 • 1569 Posts
I play nethack.  Its entirely text based, no graphics at all.  Its an amazing game, that amazing without graphics.  Hmmm, if we compare this to the original premises, something seems wrong.  Either nethack isn't a game, or the premises are wrong.
Avatar image for flazzle
flazzle

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#166 flazzle
Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts
This is just another crybaby thread that can't stand the success of the Wii and offers nothing new to the table but a graphics/gameplay argument. sigh...
Avatar image for Tristam22
Tristam22

1598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 Tristam22
Member since 2006 • 1598 Posts
[QUOTE="flamingschmoes2"][QUOTE="Tristam22"] You do realize that "ideal" beauty was (and is) completely subjective?

Da Vinci, Raphael and Michelangeo Buonorotti incorporated mathematical design into their works. They appear on the surface gentle and natural, but their work is marked with a highly calculated purpose. Seeing that you go outside and do not see things perfect in composition and symmetry but you do in their works, it is "idealized." I've read Leonardo's journals and studied art history. Please don't try to challenge me on this subject. Perhaps this is why I appreciate great graphics more, I've seen the careful, studied lighting of Rembrandt, seen the glorious vision of Tintoretto, and I see a similar creativity in the latest high-powered video games. Yep, it all adds up now.

Missed the point entirely. You're saying "HEY LOOK! LEONARDO'S STUFF LOL! PERFECTION!" You do realize that this idea of "perfection" was based entirely on a Western Renaissance-era viewpoint of the world? Do you think you could have polled Asians, Africans, or Caribbeans from the 1500s and they would have all agreed "Yup. Mona Lisa is the embodiment of perfection"? Mona Lisa is held in such high esteem not because it's "OMG GREATEST PAINTING EVER," but because it was one of the greatest paintings for its time (since you seem to be such an aficionado for things everyone learns their sophomore year in high school, surely you must know the differences between Medieval paintings and Renaissance era paintings thanks to evolved techniques). Speaking of art direction, it's a hell of a lot more pleasing to scope out the alien locales of Metroid Prime than, say, the burnt out shells of buildings in Gears of War.
Avatar image for frankeyser
frankeyser

5667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#168 frankeyser
Member since 2004 • 5667 Posts

The wii graphics are crap. Nintendo wanted to make a profit unlike Sony or Microsoft (whom basically lost profits for their fans)

So they didn't make good hardware.

The_Nemacyst

this right here is when i decided i would stop reading your retarted drivel... i am sure sony and microsoft want to loose money... i am sure their shareholders really want them to do this also...  as a matter of fact i remember bill gates saying he wants to see how fast they can bankrupt the company...

all corperations are about making money.  you grew up in a capatalist society you should atleast have that figured out by now.

Avatar image for frankeyser
frankeyser

5667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#169 frankeyser
Member since 2004 • 5667 Posts
but just for kicks try out kingdomofloathing.com.  that is one of the funniest rpgs online.  i had a ball playing it for the two years i did.  no graphics at all.. stick figures... stick figures...  yeah... stick figures...
Avatar image for The_Nemacyst
The_Nemacyst

1388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 The_Nemacyst
Member since 2007 • 1388 Posts

Let's see...what could I dig up from this thread?

TC says something like:

Sheep: "O YA!? HAVE FUN WATCHING A MOVIE!"

TC: " O YA!? HAVE FUN LOOKING AT A BLANK SCREEN!"

Well, considering that games are supposed to have gameplay in the first place, that point is blown off. However, the player at least also has to be able to see otherwise they can't play in the first place which is why a game needs both to be a game at all, no matter how bad. 

This is something everyone should agree on though:

A game with good gameplay but bad graphics sucks.  A game with bad gameplay but good graphics sucks even more. A game with both good gameplay and graphics rocks.

TC says something like:

Sheep: "Nintendo needs to profit because they're only a gaming company!"

TC: "Microsoft and Sony are losing money because they're not greedy!"

The problem is that if companies kept on losing money, they'd go bankrupt and then everyone would be sad when the PS4/XBox720 don't come. Everybody loses.

Companies get money which makes them happy while consumers get products which make them happy. It's a win win situation.

TC says something like:

TC: "Graphics in art will exceed realism!" "I wish more movies look like 300 because I like 300's art!"

Graphics in art can never touch realism since art is supposed to portray realism in a different way. If it touches realism, then art is no longer art because we've seen it countless times. It's no longer unique. Being unique is what makes movies like Star Wars, The Lord of The Rings, and The Matrix awesome.

I really hope you're being a fakeboy for your own good.

Technoweirdo
Trust me, they will. In time, when people get more tools. It will atleast touch realism.
Avatar image for Supafly1
Supafly1

4441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 Supafly1
Member since 2003 • 4441 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"][QUOTE="Hoffgod"]It may be foolhardy of me to reply, since your legacy here is one of bashing anything for any reason you see fit, but nonetheless, here goes! First off, lets just establish that graphics are relative. No, not in terms of just pushing polygons, shaders, bump mapping, etc. That's all quantifyable. However, what really matters is the opinion one takes away from the game. And that relies upon technical graphics as well as art style. For example, Gears of War. Many found it to be graphically stunning. Me? Though very impressive, technologically, I found it underwhelming, graphically, due to it's strong genericness. The art style was practically non-existant except for an intense overuse of the color grey. And as such, graphical standards are subjective. Me? I'm fine with the higher end stuff from last gen. Stuff like RE4, Rogue Leader, Ninja Gaiden Black, God of War, and Twilight Princess. You? Apparently you're different. So does the Wii have bad graphics? Comparatively, yes, it's not on the same level as the PS3 and 360. Subjectively? Well, that's subjective. You apparently think so. Me? Not so much. As for gameplay, you seem to miss the point. It's not the exact gameplay that's being changed as the control method. Take Sonic and the Secret Rings, for example. The gameplay could easily be done on any other 3D capable console. But the control method, using the Wiimote's motion and tilt sensing, takes the gameplay experience to another level. However, there we come again to subjectivity. I think the controls are excellent and serve to make the gameplay much more fun (Example: Homing attack. Flicking the Wiimote forward is much more engaging and fun than pressing "A" over and over). However, I've heard others describe it as impercise and frustrating. Once again, subjective opinions reign supreme. And is it revolutionary? Once again, opinion based on your expectations. Some expected something amazing, a paradigm shift in gaming. They will be disapointed. I was looking for it to enable me to play games that couldn't have been done on consoles before. And the Wii has already delivered in that regard. Good luck trying to do Trauma Center on the PS3 or 360. So I think it is revolutionary, in that regard. Once again, subjective opinions reign supreme. So basically your entire post boils down to a combination of hyperbole (No graphics? Do you really think that's what they're arguing?), obvious statements (No, sheep don't suddenly abjectly hate any game without motion sensing, they just find motion controls enhance the gaming experience), and opinion.

Also, the Xbox360/PS3 can have good art styles in 1080p. The Wii does not have good graphics in both 3d visuals and art styles.. Games from the PS2 are beating the Wii in graphics from both ART and 3d. New movements, but that doesn't really matter. Get this, if you are really concentrating on the game itself YOU ARE NOT GOING TO PAY ATTENTION TO YOUR MOVMENTS. They will be a side thing, while the gameplay inside the gameitself is the main thing. Imagine this, you are fiddling with a new controller with controls you don't know how to use on the PS3. At first, whatever button you press you look at it since you are new to it and aren't use to it. But once you get used to it, it becomes a 2nd thing, and you concentrate on the game itself rather than on the controls.

Still not the same thing. If you play a racing game with a driving wheel then after a day or two, you will get used to it and pay no attention, but if you go back playing the game with the controller, then you will feel that the game doesn't have the same level of fun as with the wheel.
Avatar image for IQ138
IQ138

606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#172 IQ138
Member since 2003 • 606 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"]

I am tired of fanboys. Especially sheep. Who claim " Gameplay is better than graphics"

But before you flame, read my whole post.

Fanboys usually have retarded reasons why gameplay is better than graphics.. Like

"LoLz, if you think gameplay is worser than graphics, then go watch a movie.."

My comeback? "Well, if you have no graphics whatsoever, enjoy playing Zelda when your screen is off"

I also hate it how sheep act as if the Wii makes the gameplay better than the other consoles. The gameplay is the same. It's not like Xbox360/PS3 = Only graphics.

The Xbox360/PS3 = Next generation graphics, plus gameplay that we all love since last gen. I mean, I hate it how sheep hate games without motion sensing, when less than 2-3 years ago they were loving Resident Evil 4, SSBM etc.

The Wii is not new revolutionary gameplay. Games like WarioWare/Cooking Mama/Trauma Center are not game changing gameplay. There are hundreds of better games.

Gameplay depends on the actually gameplay of the game, not just the controller. The Wii also has bad graphics.

GundamGuy0


We didn't see those kinds of games 4 years ago... and there are more and more poping up everday... Something must have changed.

I agree. When people play innovative games on the Wii for the first time such as listed above, most of them are blown away by it. I think it's revolutionary.
Avatar image for gigabrowser12
gigabrowser12

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#173 gigabrowser12
Member since 2006 • 1647 Posts
The Wii does have graphic issues though. COD3 is comparable to an N64 title.chester706
third parts hate/ love the wii. They pump out games like that but they look sooo bad. Like farcry vengence.
Avatar image for master_hookshot
master_hookshot

429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#174 master_hookshot
Member since 2006 • 429 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"]

I am tired of fanboys. Especially sheep. Who claim " Gameplay is better than graphics"

But before you flame, read my whole post.

Fanboys usually have retarded reasons why gameplay is better than graphics.. Like

"LoLz, if you think gameplay is worser than graphics, then go watch a movie because that has good graphics.."

My comeback? "Well, if you have no graphics whatsoever, enjoy playing Zelda when your screen is black"

I also hate it how sheep act as if the Wii makes the gameplay better than the other consoles. The gameplay is the same. It's not like Xbox360/PS3 = Only graphics.

The Xbox360/PS3 = Next generation graphics, plus gameplay that we all love since last gen. I mean, I hate it how sheep hate games without motion sensing, when less than 2-3 years ago they were loving Resident Evil 4, SSBM etc.

The Wii is not new revolutionary gameplay. Games like WarioWare/Cooking Mama/Trauma Center are not game changing gameplay. There are hundreds of better games.

Gameplay depends on the actually gameplay of the game, not just the controller. The Wii also has bad graphics.

Gameplay is definitely more important than graphics, but its not like the all other consoles other than the Wii have no gameplay. You have been playing that gameplay that you have loved before the Wii, and that gameplay will still be good for many years to come.

ROCKBO

Dumbest. Statement. Ever.

 

 Dumbest Statement Ever is exactly right. Plus, the controller is part of the gameplay. And did a Nintendo system shock you when you were little, because you dont seem to like Nintendo very much.

Avatar image for Skipper24
Skipper24

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Skipper24
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

I am tired of fanboys. Especially sheep. Who claim "Gameplay is better than graphics"

But before you flame, read my whole post.

Fanboys usually have retarded reasons why gameplay is better than graphics.. Like

"LoLz, if you think gameplay is worser than graphics, then go watch a movie because that has good graphics.."

My comeback? "Well, if you have no graphics whatsoever, enjoy playing Zelda when your screen is black"

I also hate it how sheep act as if the Wii makes the gameplay better than the other consoles. The gameplay is the same. It's not like Xbox360/PS3 = Only graphics.

The Xbox360/PS3 = Next generation graphics, plus gameplay that we all love since last gen. I mean, I hate it how sheep hate games without motion sensing, when less than 2-3 years ago they were loving Resident Evil 4, SSBM etc.

The Wii is not new revolutionary gameplay. Games like WarioWare/Cooking Mama/Trauma Center are not game changing gameplay. There are hundreds of better games.

Gameplay depends on the actually gameplay of the game, not just the controller. The Wii also has bad graphics.

Gameplay is definitely more important than graphics, but its not like the all other consoles other than the Wii have no gameplay. You have been playing that gameplay that you have loved before the Wii, and that gameplay will still be good for many years to come.

The_Nemacyst

You need complementary qualities in a console. Having gameplay or graphics alone is nothing. Also the Wii isn't really changing gameplay like some imply.It's just turning button presses into wrist flicks.

Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts

trolling the wrong console.

Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts

I am tired of fanboys. Especially sheep. Who claim "Gameplay is better than graphics"

But before you flame, read my whole post.

Fanboys usually have retarded reasons why gameplay is better than graphics.. Like

"LoLz, if you think gameplay is worser than graphics, then go watch a movie because that has good graphics.."

My comeback? "Well, if you have no graphics whatsoever, enjoy playing Zelda when your screen is black"

I also hate it how sheep act as if the Wii makes the gameplay better than the other consoles. The gameplay is the same. It's not like Xbox360/PS3 = Only graphics.

The Xbox360/PS3 = Next generation graphics, plus gameplay that we all love since last gen. I mean, I hate it how sheep hate games without motion sensing, when less than 2-3 years ago they were loving Resident Evil 4, SSBM etc.

The Wii is not new revolutionary gameplay. Games like WarioWare/Cooking Mama/Trauma Center are not game changing gameplay. There are hundreds of better games.

Gameplay depends on the actually gameplay of the game, not just the controller. The Wii also has bad graphics.

Gameplay is definitely more important than graphics, but its not like the all other consoles other than the Wii have no gameplay. You have been playing that gameplay that you have loved before the Wii, and that gameplay will still be good for many years to come.

The_Nemacyst

No it cows who started the whole thing last gen :|

Thats a true. you want a gameplay thats great than better grapchis that a gamepaly Etc story dosent make sense.

b3. i wouldnt be talking about fanboys here since you sound just like them with that part :o

b4. no its not you have a diffrent kind of control and even reviews say its hard to get back to a normal control.

b5. i would play it before you say anything else. cooking mama wasnt suppose to be challeging. wario ware depands how good your are.

b.6 it changes gameplay

b7. thats Opioion nothing more nothing else dont pass it as a fact

b8. hmm all you posted than you go back here. yea alright

b9. no one said it wouldnt

Avatar image for deepdreamer256
deepdreamer256

7140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#178 deepdreamer256
Member since 2005 • 7140 Posts
[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"]

I am tired of fanboys. Especially sheep. Who claim " Gameplay is better than graphics"

But before you flame, read my whole post.

Fanboys usually have retarded reasons why gameplay is better than graphics.. Like

"LoLz, if you think gameplay is worser than graphics, then go watch a movie.."

My comeback? "Well, if you have no graphics whatsoever, enjoy playing Zelda when your screen is off"

I also hate it how sheep act as if the Wii makes the gameplay better than the other consoles. The gameplay is the same. It's not like Xbox360/PS3 = Only graphics.

The Xbox360/PS3 = Next generation graphics, plus gameplay that we all love since last gen. I mean, I hate it how sheep hate games without motion sensing, when less than 2-3 years ago they were loving Resident Evil 4, SSBM etc.

The Wii is not new revolutionary gameplay. Games like WarioWare/Cooking Mama/Trauma Center are not game changing gameplay. There are hundreds of better games.

Gameplay depends on the actually gameplay of the game, not just the controller. The Wii also has bad graphics.

IQ138


We didn't see those kinds of games 4 years ago... and there are more and more poping up everday... Something must have changed.

I agree. When people play innovative games on the Wii for the first time such as listed above, most of them are blown away by it. I think it's revolutionary.

If that kind of crap is considered revolutionary . . .
Avatar image for NickJayD
NickJayD

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 NickJayD
Member since 2007 • 212 Posts

If graphics weren't important Nintendo wouldn't have made the Gamecube after the N64. Why was it needed if graphics don't matter?, graphics do matter, sheeples just won't admit it because Wii games look amazingly bad even by Xbox standards.

Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts

If graphics weren't important Nintendo wouldn't have made the Gamecube after the N64. Why was it needed if graphics don't matter?, graphics do matter, sheeples just won't admit it because Wii games look amazingly bad even by Xbox standards.

NickJayD

the whole stupid grapchis crap started when cows said

"gameplay is better than grapchis "

sheep say grapchis dont matter NOT AS MUCH AS GAMEPLAY!

and if you guys acutally bought them than MAYBE wii would be as powerful

AND GRAPCHIS

Avatar image for REVOLUTIONfreak
REVOLUTIONfreak

18418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#181 REVOLUTIONfreak
Member since 2005 • 18418 Posts
You know what I find ironic about these threads? I haven't seen a sheep make a topic about "Gameplay> Graphics" in months. So maybe if others would stop whining about this and bringing back up the topic we wouldn't even have this issue... although I still stand by the fact that Gameplay>Graphics. Sure, we wouldn't have a game without graphics, but we wouldn't have a desire to play it without gameplay.
Avatar image for Michael85
Michael85

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 Michael85
Member since 2005 • 3971 Posts
[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"]

I am tired of fanboys. Especially sheep. Who claim " Gameplay is better than graphics"

But before you flame, read my whole post.

Fanboys usually have retarded reasons why gameplay is better than graphics.. Like

"LoLz, if you think gameplay is worser than graphics, then go watch a movie.."

My comeback? "Well, if you have no graphics whatsoever, enjoy playing Zelda when your screen is off"

I also hate it how sheep act as if the Wii makes the gameplay better than the other consoles. The gameplay is the same. It's not like Xbox360/PS3 = Only graphics.

The Xbox360/PS3 = Next generation graphics, plus gameplay that we all love since last gen. I mean, I hate it how sheep hate games without motion sensing, when less than 2-3 years ago they were loving Resident Evil 4, SSBM etc.

The Wii is not new revolutionary gameplay. Games like WarioWare/Cooking Mama/Trauma Center are not game changing gameplay. There are hundreds of better games.

Gameplay depends on the actually gameplay of the game, not just the controller. The Wii also has bad graphics.

The_Nemacyst



We didn't see those kinds of games 4 years ago... and there are more and more poping up everday... Something must have changed.

We didn't see games where physics really matter 4 years ago. We didn't see full in game voicing. We didn't see revolutionary graphics. We didn't see gameplay like GoW2. We didn't see many things.

In order, respectively:

1. Half Life 2

2. Diablo....lawl, 1996

3. Donkey Kong Country. Don't tell me that wasn't revolutionary.

4. Devil May Cry.

Avatar image for RahnAetas
RahnAetas

1834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 RahnAetas
Member since 2003 • 1834 Posts
Sometimes I wonder how we ever made it through alive the SNES/Genesis Era. Let alone the NES/Master System Era.
Avatar image for -JayWong-
-JayWong-

1703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#184 -JayWong-
Member since 2006 • 1703 Posts

graphic whores will kill the indusrty, i hope your happy tc, youre leading the charge against the demise of videogames :(

Seriously, wii haters have been in full damage control ever since ndp numbers came in and nintendo cleaned house

sexy_luigi


I dont know ANY graphic whore who LOVED a great looking game with bad gameplay. Thing is, we already KNOW the gameplay should be good, its a videogame. Its always going to be the #1 set priority. But to have great graphcis is whats been keeping us excited for the "next new thng" in this industry.

NPD numbers mean nothing. Youre a true fanboy if you use that as your argument. Youre the same guy saying "gameplay matters, its all about the game" yet you're using the NPD as your argument? Fact is, teh Wii hasnt had a game that got the industry, casual, and hardcore wild. Only games so far are SSBB and SMG.
Avatar image for Vfanek
Vfanek

7719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 Vfanek
Member since 2006 • 7719 Posts

I just got my hands on Fallout 1/2, Baldurs Gate II (+ToB), PS:Tm NWN, KOTOR, KOTOR II...

Graphics are dated (except for KOTOR II, which are.. descent) yet I am enjoying these games more than any of my 360 games. As for any of the new PC games (Thief 3 was fun though).

Graphics don't make a game, but it sure is a bonus.

Avatar image for mavven
mavven

560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#186 mavven
Member since 2005 • 560 Posts

Wii it's not about gameplay,it's not aboutgraphics either, it is about 15 mins of fun.

Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#187 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts

graphic whores will kill the indusrty, i hope your happy tc, youre leading the charge against the demise of videogames :(

Seriously, wii haters have been in full damage control ever since ndp numbers came in and nintendo cleaned house

sexy_luigi

HAAHHA

if anything will kill the industry it's the wii with its constant rehashes, and versions of the same franchises over and over, and casual shovel ware

and trash graphics on the side.

Avatar image for zeldarooles
zeldarooles

260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 zeldarooles
Member since 2005 • 260 Posts
[QUOTE="sexy_luigi"]

graphic whores will kill the indusrty, i hope your happy tc, youre leading the charge against the demise of videogames :(

Seriously, wii haters have been in full damage control ever since ndp numbers came in and nintendo cleaned house

mistervengeance

HAAHHA

if anything will kill the industry it's the wii with its constant rehashes, and versions of the same franchises over and over, and casual shovel ware

and trash graphics on the side.

Yeah, games like Super Mario Galaxy, Zack and Wiki, and The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess are the worst games ever and are ruining the industry.
Avatar image for Wiicraft
Wiicraft

652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 Wiicraft
Member since 2007 • 652 Posts
[QUOTE="sexy_luigi"]

graphic whores will kill the indusrty, i hope your happy tc, youre leading the charge against the demise of videogames :(

Seriously, wii haters have been in full damage control ever since ndp numbers came in and nintendo cleaned house

mistervengeance

HAAHHA

if anything will kill the industry it's the wii with its constant rehashes, and versions of the same franchises over and over, and casual shovel ware

and trash graphics on the side.

You've dug up a thread from 6 months ago to just rehash the arguments in it when they've easily been disproven by the continued success of the Wii over those 6 months.

Avatar image for NYHoustonman
NYHoustonman

365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 NYHoustonman
Member since 2003 • 365 Posts

I wouldn't say graphics are everything, obviously, but I too am tired of people claiming they don't matter - we get it, your system doesn't have graphics that stack up so you feel the need to claim they don't matter, it's cool. To an extent they don't, but having just beat Crysis... I won't say they MAKE the game, but it was the first game that really made me sit back for a second and say wow... It was the first game that almost didn't feel like a game, in ways I really can't explain... Beyond all that, it's a great game, it was also the first time I felt I had to keep going till I beat it (last night), but the graphics do a TON to help immerse you in the world created by the developers. Games like Zelda would UNDOUBTEDLY be better if they had visuals like that - there's no arguing it. I couldn't play a game with poor gameplay, that's true, and in a way that matters more, but as an example, I tried recently to go back and play Deus Ex, a game I never played... and I really couldn't get into it. I hesitate to call myself a graphics whore, but there's simply no denying that games with better graphics are more immersive in my mind... the visuals draw me in, and if it's a good game I'll keep playing.

Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#191 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts

The wii graphics are crap. Nintendo wanted to make a profit unlike Sony or Microsoft (whom basically lost profits for their fans)

So they didn't make good hardware.

The_Nemacyst

To even imply that Nintendo doesn't make good hardware is laughable.... you could make one hella-big fool of yourself insinuating that Nintendo consoles aren't reliable...

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#192 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
[QUOTE="sexy_luigi"]

graphic whores will kill the indusrty, i hope your happy tc, youre leading the charge against the demise of videogames :(

Seriously, wii haters have been in full damage control ever since ndp numbers came in and nintendo cleaned house

mistervengeance

HAAHHA

if anything will kill the industry it's the wii with its constant rehashes, and versions of the same franchises over and over, and casual shovel ware

and trash graphics on the side.

GTA4, MGS4, FF13, GT5, GoW3, DMC4, SH5, R:FOM2, yearly R&C's, Socom, NG2, Halo3, SC:C, DOA4, SF4, VF5, COD4, Gears2 meh im not even gonna waste anymore time.
Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#193 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
[QUOTE="sexy_luigi"]

graphic whores will kill the indusrty, i hope your happy tc, youre leading the charge against the demise of videogames :(

Seriously, wii haters have been in full damage control ever since ndp numbers came in and nintendo cleaned house

mistervengeance

HAAHHA

if anything will kill the industry it's the wii with its constant rehashes, and versions of the same franchises over and over, and casual shovel ware

and trash graphics on the side.

GTA4, MGS4, FF13, GT5, GoW3, DMC4, SH5, R:FOM2, yearly R&C's, Socom, NG2, Halo3, SC:C, DOA4, SF4, VF5, COD4, Gears2 meh im not even gonna waste anymore time.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#194 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts

I just got my hands on Fallout 1/2, Baldurs Gate II (+ToB), PS:Tm NWN, KOTOR, KOTOR II...

Graphics are dated (except for KOTOR II, which are.. descent) yet I am enjoying these games more than any of my 360 games. As for any of the new PC games (Thief 3 was fun though).

Graphics don't make a game, but it sure is a bonus.

Vfanek

yep... I'm re-visiting KotOR II on xbox and I'm enjoying it much more than Mass Effect ( just finished my first ME play-through today...

Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#195 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts
[QUOTE="mistervengeance"][QUOTE="sexy_luigi"]

graphic whores will kill the indusrty, i hope your happy tc, youre leading the charge against the demise of videogames :(

Seriously, wii haters have been in full damage control ever since ndp numbers came in and nintendo cleaned house

Silenthps

HAAHHA

if anything will kill the industry it's the wii with its constant rehashes, and versions of the same franchises over and over, and casual shovel ware

and trash graphics on the side.

GTA4, MGS4, FF13, GT5, GoW3, DMC4, SH5, R:FOM2, yearly R&C's, Socom, NG2, Halo3, SC:C, DOA4, SF4, VF5, COD4, Gears2 meh im not even gonna waste anymore time.

at least there's variety there.....

with nintendo it's super smash, mario, zelda, metroid, wario, etc....

never anything new, at least this gen

Avatar image for goodlay
goodlay

5773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#196 goodlay
Member since 2005 • 5773 Posts
Hey buddy, it works the other way too. Graphics don't mean jack without gameplay. All of the great games on Wii do have great graphics like Super Mario Galaxy, Zack and Wiki, MP3, Brawl, etc.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#197 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Enjoy those good graphics? It wont be ANYTHING without gameplay.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

This is a joke of a post. Gameplay will always beter much greater then graphics? Go look at a black screen? No no no. That would be "No Graphics" as in "None"

Gameplay > Graphics and that's a fact on how to build a good game. Maybe you're in the wrong hobby. You only need as much graphics as so they do not become detrimental to the actual gameplay. Thats pretty much it.