no not really, they are each 2 years apart? its not bad at all, and it gets them out while they are still relevant and hopefully epic does soemthing newToo soon for another one, IMO.
ModernTimes
This topic is locked from further discussion.
no not really, they are each 2 years apart? its not bad at all, and it gets them out while they are still relevant and hopefully epic does soemthing newToo soon for another one, IMO.
ModernTimes
Looking back...whats so good about gears anyways? with MDW2 and BBC2 what does gears really bring to the table?Jynxzorchainsaws
Looking back...whats so good about gears anyways? with MDW2 and BBC2 what does gears really bring to the table?Jynxzor
It's a different type of game altogether. You're comparing war sims to action games with boss battles and such. It's an unfair comparison.
Looking back...whats so good about gears anyways? with MDW2 and BBC2 what does gears really bring to the table?JynxzorSo what does Uncharted bring then? Since these games are out why should anybody buy that game. Obviously some people like TPS and Gears brings the best there is on consoles. Unfortunately for EPic they messed up their multiplayer in Gears 2.
Looking back...whats so good about gears anyways? with MDW2 and BBC2 what does gears really bring to the table?JynxzorIt is just fun. The game has great graphics great gameplay and something about shooting and chainsawing the enemies is more fun. They created great game mechanics, and gears of war 2 campaign was awesome. Multiplayer not so much.
It is just fun. The game has great graphics great gameplay and something about shooting and chainsawing the enemies is more fun. They created great game mechanics, and gears of war 2 campaign was awesome. Multiplayer not so much. Ahh I have not played Gears sense the first one and I got a free week of live with it, I hated the multiplayer but found the campaign to be fairly fun. I do guess it bring a more "Viceral" twist to the TPS gaming genre. From what I've heard the Multiplayer was a mess with the second one as well, it's extremly odd for the developers of the UT franchise to botch Multiplayer so. So point taken *and don't shoot me for forgetting gears is a TPS* doy...[QUOTE="Jynxzor"]Looking back...whats so good about gears anyways? with MDW2 and BBC2 what does gears really bring to the table?nhh18
Gears of War and Gears of War 2 are the only games this gen that I have completely unplayable connections on in multiplayer Fix dat **** EpicJuggernaut140
Your connection is not Epics problem, only people who complain have lousy connections.
While 2 years isn't a bad timeframe for a major change (like Mass Effect 2 and AC2 have shown), Gears 2 was WAY too much like Gears 1 but with gimped MP and Horde mode.
I guess if it did release, MS would finally have a year with mroe than a few exclusives to match Nintendo (which admittadly is full of shovelware) and Sony which tends to shed games like hair lately. It could finally be back to its 2007 golden "lotsa games here" state. Of course, witha Halo game set for 2010 as well as Natal (which can carry its own I might say), I think Gears 3 will not only be a better game with an extra year, but keep a tight release format so they don't run out in 2011 and have to rely on multiplats.
I mean, at this point Gears is almost as major as Halo and with the fun (but not quite living up to the hype) Gears 2, I think Gears 3 can really do something.
Anyways, this was sort of mandatory a new Gears would be mentioned. Gears 2 wasfirst officially mentioned around earlier the year it came out, with a small teaser in spring. At this point both time frames seem likely.
[QUOTE="Juggernaut140"]Gears of War and Gears of War 2 are the only games this gen that I have completely unplayable connections on in multiplayer
Fix dat **** Epic
Ultra_Combo
Your connection is not Epics problem, only people who complain have lousy connections.
Yeah, no
While 2 years isn't a bad timeframe for a major change (like Mass Effect 2 and AC2 have shown), Gears 2 was WAY too much like Gears 1 but with gimped MP and Horde mode.
I guess if it did release, MS would finally have a year with mroe than a few exclusives to match Nintendo (which admittadly is full of shovelware) and Sony which tends to shed games like hair lately. It could finally be back to its 2007 golden "lotsa games here" state. Of course, witha Halo game set for 2010 as well as Natal (which can carry its own I might say), I think Gears 3 will not only be a better game with an extra year, but keep a tight release format so they don't run out in 2011 and have to rely on multiplats.
I mean, at this point Gears is almost as major as Halo and with the fun (but not quite living up to the hype) Gears 2, I think Gears 3 can really do something.
Anyways, this was sort of mandatory a new Gears would be mentioned. Gears 2 wasfirst officially mentioned around earlier the year it came out, with a small teaser in spring. At this point both time frames seem likely.
SPYDER0416
Gears 2 had way better set pieces, the combat environments weren't as linear and had more open areas for flanking tactics. It had multiple vehicle levels that were actually fun this time around and the boss battles made those in Gears 1 look completely pathetic. Gears 2 SP campaign was soo much better then the first. I agree about the MP though, there's no excuse for it working so poorly. Shame too, as the game mechanics for it are really fun.
Even if they dont have gears 3 this year, i'd like to see what new 'tech' they are workign with for it.
they are basically competing sales with halo reach. It will hurt fable 3 and ultimately kill all the sales for the game. They are not releasing it and it is not coming out. It is basically the odds of killzone 2 and resistance 2 coming out 1 month apart.While 2 years isn't a bad timeframe for a major change (like Mass Effect 2 and AC2 have shown), Gears 2 was WAY too much like Gears 1 but with gimped MP and Horde mode.
I guess if it did release, MS would finally have a year with mroe than a few exclusives to match Nintendo (which admittadly is full of shovelware) and Sony which tends to shed games like hair lately. It could finally be back to its 2007 golden "lotsa games here" state. Of course, witha Halo game set for 2010 as well as Natal (which can carry its own I might say), I think Gears 3 will not only be a better game with an extra year, but keep a tight release format so they don't run out in 2011 and have to rely on multiplats.
I mean, at this point Gears is almost as major as Halo and with the fun (but not quite living up to the hype) Gears 2, I think Gears 3 can really do something.
Anyways, this was sort of mandatory a new Gears would be mentioned. Gears 2 wasfirst officially mentioned around earlier the year it came out, with a small teaser in spring. At this point both time frames seem likely.
SPYDER0416
Looking back...whats so good about gears anyways? with MDW2 and BBC2 what does gears really bring to the table?JynxzorSingle player in Gears stomps both MW and BC. Also Horde Mode was immense fun IMO. I personally don't care about the MP in Gears that much.
They couldnt release it this year... its just too jampacked. Holiday season presents will alrady be stuffed with Reach, Fable 2, and other games that people missed earlier in the year. theres not enough room for gears. Hopefully they hold off til 2011 sometime
[QUOTE="2mrw"]
i couldn't care less, that won't happen anyway.
You won't care because it's only coming on the 360 rite?
nop, coz GeOW isn't that good, played GeOW1 on PC, couldnt have the patience to finish it, i am a PS3 owner, however if the game is good enough, i will be intrested for sure, AW caught my attention, i don't think GeOW3 will do that considering how GeOW2 was.i totally see this as the 360 also drops it price 2010. year of the 360, and yes our sales will show it too, gotta love being a LEM these days
I dont know why people are claiming it wont happen. Only reason I dont think it would is because Halo Reach is coming out... but I can imagine MS going crazy and launching both. Between those two and the Natal buzz... they would completely dominate the winter in marketing if nothing else.TommyV3456halo reach, fable 3, natal all coming out at the same time. That right now is 180 $ worth of exclusive games.
I'm okay with Gears 3, as long as it's going to end series as promised. I don't want to see Epic turning into a one-trick-pony. I want to see new titles from them, or heck even previous titles that they were known for in the past like Unreal (not unreal tournament though... ).
I just want to play a single player Unreal game that doesn't disappoint. I kinda liked the Unreal universe.
To me Gears needs a break at this point. I'd rather they took their time with it. Hopefully though, it's not a side-story crap like experience that many developers in this day and age seem to enjoy throwing at us. If that is the case, I'd preffer the 3rd one in the series.
Please epic, FIX THE ****ING MULTIPLAYER!!! Apart from that, it's all good :DlocopathoThis I agree with.
[QUOTE="locopatho"]Please epic, FIX THE ****ING MULTIPLAYER!!! Apart from that, it's all good :Dsikanderahmed
yeah i want Gears 1 MP back :evil:
No, both are baaaad. Give Gears 3 dedicated servers. The series deserves it.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment