Epic: PS3 is "Ideal" for Unreal Torunament Mods

[QUOTE="_Pedro_"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]Haven't we cows been saying this for a long time? PS3 doesn't control developers. We win in the end. Developers LOVE PSN.LosDaddie

Sega doesn't seem to love PSN.

and sega aren't biased? Last time I checked they were thrown out of the console market by Sony.

Sounds like damage control to me.

I'm no cow, but Sega is a bad example IMHO. It's the same as asking Apple if they like Microsoft.

[QUOTE="archpro"]

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]Haven't we cows been saying this for a long time? PS3 doesn't control developers. We win in the end. Developers LOVE PSN.NobuoMusicMaker

Wouldn't jump to conlusions, we still aren't seen all the stuff xbox is getting on their marketplace, which is what I'd love to see.

XBL's closed system and proprietery control of any developers do. :lol: Yeah wow!

And yet that closed system spanks PSN when it comes to content from developers (especially, demos). :lol:

[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

you realize shareware games are free? their not even comercial games.

LosDaddie

And your point is???

Again, what platform were these gams done on?

of course the PC....shareware games dont exist on consoles.

publishing shareware games doesnt make you a PC developer, when the first major game you make...is ported to the consoles. EPIC has always developed for the PC first,,,,but they also port everything to the consoles.

I'm no cow, but Sega is a bad example IMHO. It's the same as asking Apple if they like Microsoft.

_Pedro_

Sega is a perfect example of a developer not "loving" PSN.

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

you realize shareware games are free? their not even comercial games.

cobrax75

And your point is???

Again, what platform were these gams done on?

of course the PC....shareware games dont exist on consoles.

publishing shareware games doesnt make you a PC developer, when the first major game you make...is ported to the consoles. EPIC has always developed for the PC first,,,,but they also port everything to the consoles.

That's weird.

I don't recall playing UT 2004 on a console.

[QUOTE="_Pedro_"]

I'm no cow, but Sega is a bad example IMHO. It's the same as asking Apple if they like Microsoft.

LosDaddie

Sega is a perfect example of a developer not "loving" PSN.

Just name another one next time :P

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

you realize shareware games are free? their not even comercial games.

LosDaddie

And your point is???

Again, what platform were these gams done on?

of course the PC....shareware games dont exist on consoles.

publishing shareware games doesnt make you a PC developer, when the first major game you make...is ported to the consoles. EPIC has always developed for the PC first,,,,but they also port everything to the consoles.

That's weird.

I don't recall playing UT 2004 on a console.

they created a spin off when they realized a multiplayer geared game wouldnt be succesfull on consoles.

they created a spin off when they realized a multiplayer geared game wouldnt be succesfull on consoles.

cobrax75

Make up your mind: Either Epic ports everything to the consoles or they don't.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

they created a spin off when they realized a multiplayer geared game wouldnt be succesfull on consoles.

LosDaddie

Make up your mind: Either Epic ports everything to the consoles or they don't.

oh....so your telling me they have never made any console games before?

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="_Pedro_"]

I'm no cow, but Sega is a bad example IMHO. It's the same as asking Apple if they like Microsoft.

_Pedro_

Sega is a perfect example of a developer not "loving" PSN.

Just name another one next time :P

How about EA and the lack of an NCAA Football 08 demo on PSN while there's one on XBL?

Do you consider that EA "loving" PSN?

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

they created a spin off when they realized a multiplayer geared game wouldnt be succesfull on consoles.

cobrax75

Make up your mind: Either Epic ports everything to the consoles or they don't.

oh....so your telling me they have never made any console games before?

:lol: :lol:

Where did you get that from?

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]Haven't we cows been saying this for a long time? PS3 doesn't control developers. We win in the end. Developers LOVE PSN.LosDaddie

Sega doesn't seem to love PSN.

Sega doesn't seem to care too much about their reputation with the majority of their games.

It makes sense that Sega would be more in Micorsoft's favor.

Microsoft helped build the Dreamcast and Sony put them out of the console business.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

they created a spin off when they realized a multiplayer geared game wouldnt be succesfull on consoles.

LosDaddie

Make up your mind: Either Epic ports everything to the consoles or they don't.

oh....so your telling me they have never made any console games before?

:lol: :lol:

Where did you get that from?

maybe because you seemed to think Epic used to develop games exsclusivly for the PC.....and even went as far as arguing over shareware games.....

clearly they never developed exsclusivly for the PC If they have made console games in the past

I think it's finally time to admit that the PSN has some clear cut advantages over Xbox Live. It certainly gives developers a lot more freedom to do what they want. If I recall correctly, a while back Microsoft forced Epic to charge for their Gears map pack downloads. I'm not saying the PSN as a whole is better than Xbox Live, not by a long shot, but there are definitely certain things which prove advantageous.

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]Haven't we cows been saying this for a long time? PS3 doesn't control developers. We win in the end. Developers LOVE PSN.nnavidson

Sega doesn't seem to love PSN.

Sega doesn't seem to care too much about their reputation with the majority of their games.

It makes sense that Sega would be more in Micorsoft's favor.

Microsoft helped build the Dreamcast and Sony put them out of the console business.

Well, that certainly explains why VF5 came out on PS3 first.

dude, you've totally convinced me of Sega's hatred for Sony!!:D

YOu do know that most mods take a long time to make.

PS3_3DO

[QUOTE="nnavidson"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]Haven't we cows been saying this for a long time? PS3 doesn't control developers. We win in the end. Developers LOVE PSN.LosDaddie

Sega doesn't seem to love PSN.

Sega doesn't seem to care too much about their reputation with the majority of their games.

It makes sense that Sega would be more in Micorsoft's favor.

Microsoft helped build the Dreamcast and Sony put them out of the console business.

Well, that certainly explains why VF5 came out on PS3 first.

dude, you've totally convinced me of Sega's hatred for Sony!!:D

I guess you have a point. It's just hard for me to let go of the cold days of being a Saturn owner.

maybe because you seemed to think Epic used to develop games exsclusivly for the PC.....cobrax75

Which is a fact, even you admitted to that.

So, know you want to argue against facts?

RE-read my initial post. You seem to have forgot what I said.

I guess you have a point. It's just hard for me to let go of the cold days of being a Saturn owner.nnavidson

I just believe Sega has moved past the point of holding a grudge against Sony. It wouldn't make sense for Sega to act that way....at least IMO.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

maybe because you seemed to think Epic used to develop games exsclusivly for the PC.....LosDaddie

Which is a fact, even you admitted to that.

So, know you want to argue against facts?

RE-read my initial post. You seem to have forgot what I said.

"He means that PSN is more "open" than XBL. For a former PC-only developer's standpoint, it gives them the freedom they're generally used to."

now clearly they were never a PC only developer if all thier games ended up on consoles one way or another.

"He means that PSN is more "open" than XBL. For a former PC-only developer's standpoint, it gives them the freedom they're generally used to."

now clearly they were never a PC only developer if all thier games ended up on consoles one way or another.

cobrax75

But Epic was a PC-only developer, you even admitted that. UT 2003 and UT 2004 didn't end up on consoles and those games relied heavily on mods.

Honestly, I don't even know why that statement got you so riled up. Let it go

[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

"He means that PSN is more "open" than XBL. For a former PC-only developer's standpoint, it gives them the freedom they're generally used to."

now clearly they were never a PC only developer if all thier games ended up on consoles one way or another.

LosDaddie

But Epic was a PC-only developer, you even admitted that. UT 2003 and UT 2004 didn't end up on consoles and those games relied heavily on mods.

Honestly, I don't even know why that statement got you so riled up. Let it go

so unreal champianship 1 and 2 never existed right?

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

"He means that PSN is more "open" than XBL. For a former PC-only developer's standpoint, it gives them the freedom they're generally used to."

now clearly they were never a PC only developer if all thier games ended up on consoles one way or another.

cobrax75

But Epic was a PC-only developer, you even admitted that. UT 2003 and UT 2004 didn't end up on consoles and those games relied heavily on mods.

Honestly, I don't even know why that statement got you so riled up. Let it go

so unreal champianship 1 and 2 never existed right?

So Epic's games before UC1 &2 never existed?

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

"He means that PSN is more "open" than XBL. For a former PC-only developer's standpoint, it gives them the freedom they're generally used to."

now clearly they were never a PC only developer if all thier games ended up on consoles one way or another.

LosDaddie

But Epic was a PC-only developer, you even admitted that. UT 2003 and UT 2004 didn't end up on consoles and those games relied heavily on mods.

Honestly, I don't even know why that statement got you so riled up. Let it go

so unreal champianship 1 and 2 never existed right?

So Epic's games before UC1 &2 never existed?

yes, and Unreal Tournament was ported to the sega and playstation 2.

wtf? you cant download from the internet browser..... can you?da1on2

Yes.. I've downloaded videos/pictures and music from the internet browser o_o.

[QUOTE="MCGSMB"]I think it's safe to say that even with all this, you really should get UT3 for the PC. No other system will come close to it.NobuoMusicMaker

:lol: That's like self-ownage with all the 360 games heading to the PC.

That's the funny part; not all the 360 games are going to the PC. The games look much better on my 50in HDTV then on my 17in PC. UT3 won't play or look the same on ever gamers PC either. Some people will have to change the resolution, others won't have enough RAM so the game won't run smooth. We won't have that problem on the 360 and if Epic is smart, they will add more content to the XBox 360 version for making us wait.

Correct me if I'm wrong but don't modders have to buy the PC version, make the mod then buy the PS3 version and transfer it over?

Who would buy 2 copies?darklord888

Apperently from what I've read Mods for the PC version of UT can be directly ported over to the ps3 so no you don't need to buy the ps3 version.