Eurogamer- 9/10 Heavy Rain review.

  • 85 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62031 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

No, if it is not up to par by the reviewers standards it will be marked down. Which I thought was kind of obvious :? I don't review the games.

"That's called ignorance towards other people, and the world."

^^ Erm... What is?

BlindfireMcgee

What are you referring to when you reference "Reviewer's standards"? Are you insinuating that majority reviewers will be listening to the game in English? Once again, that is displaying absurd ignorance as I myself will play through the game more than once in other languages than English.

I'm not insinuating that at all. Undoubtedly though, like with any other language, there will be a lot of English reviewers. If the English VA were no good, for any number of possible reasons (just in case you misunderstand, I am not insinuating it will be no good, this is a hypothetical), then they would no doubt mark it down.

You're reading to far between the lines, and drawing conclusions about what I have said that seemingly hold no footing in reality. You basically misunderstood everything.

Avatar image for BlindfireMcgee
BlindfireMcgee

323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 BlindfireMcgee
Member since 2010 • 323 Posts

I'm not insinuating that at all. Undoubtedly though, like with any other language, there will be a lot of English reviewers. If the English VA were no good, for any number of possible reasons (just in case you misunderstand, I am not insinuating it will be no good, this is a hypothetical), then they would no doubt mark it down.

You're reading to far between the lines, and drawing conclusions about what I have said that seemingly hold no footing in reality. You basically misunderstood everything.

lundy86_4


Then blatantly, those reviews will be flawed in execution. Infact, if any mainstream gaming website is basing the voice acting off of it's English counterpart, when they have the opportune moment to select between 9 other languages, then the reviewer's credibility (and the website for that matter) is up for serious question. Why? Because their lack of effort is inconsistent, and their ignorance is appalling. They take the the time out to critique a game, but yet cannot be bothered to assort the language through a simple menu swap? Odd.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62031 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

I'm not insinuating that at all. Undoubtedly though, like with any other language, there will be a lot of English reviewers. If the English VA were no good, for any number of possible reasons (just in case you misunderstand, I am not insinuating it will be no good, this is a hypothetical), then they would no doubt mark it down.

You're reading to far between the lines, and drawing conclusions about what I have said that seemingly hold no footing in reality. You basically misunderstood everything.

BlindfireMcgee


Then blatantly, those reviews will be flawed in execution. Infact, if any mainstream gaming website is basing the voice acting off of it's English counterpart, when they have the opportune moment to select between 9 other languages, then the reviewer's credibility (and the website for that matter) is up for serious question. Why? Because their lack of effort is inconsistent, and their ignorance is appalling. They take the the time out to critique a game, but yet cannot be bothered to assort the language through a simple menu swap? Odd.

Why would it be flawed? If a game is recorded in multiple languages for a widespread audience, then it's VA should be even across the board. If one is of a lesser quality than the other, that's exactly a reason why it would be marked down, as it would impact the immersiveness of the game.

Your basically saying they should ignore the bad VA in lieue of using the subtitles? That is a workaround, and undoubtedly not the way the game is meant to be portrayed.

Avatar image for BlindfireMcgee
BlindfireMcgee

323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 BlindfireMcgee
Member since 2010 • 323 Posts

Why would it be flawed? If a game is recorded in multiple languages for a widespread audience, then it's VA should be even across the board. If one is of a lesser quality than the other, that's exactly a reason why it would be marked down, as it would impact the immersiveness of the game.

Your basically saying they should ignore the bad VA in lieue of using the subtitles? That is a workaround, and undoubtedly not the way the game is meant to be portrayed.

lundy86_4

There is no way to critique a language you do not know. To suggest otherwise is completely misinformed. So there is no way to know if all the languages are decent, because you do not know the pronouciation. However, bashing a videogame based off a language that is not even it's native recording (with the added option of ten different subtitles with all languages), while completely ignoring the availabilitiy of other languages, is laughable.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62031 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Why would it be flawed? If a game is recorded in multiple languages for a widespread audience, then it's VA should be even across the board. If one is of a lesser quality than the other, that's exactly a reason why it would be marked down, as it would impact the immersiveness of the game.

Your basically saying they should ignore the bad VA in lieue of using the subtitles? That is a workaround, and undoubtedly not the way the game is meant to be portrayed.

BlindfireMcgee

There is no way to critique a language you do not know. To suggest otherwise is completely misinformed. So there is no way to know if all the languages are decent, because you do not know the pronouciation. However, bashing a videogame based off a language that is not even it's native recording (with the added option of ten different subtitles with all languages), while completely ignoring the availabilitiy of other languages, is laughable.

Again, I never said this. Stop reading between the lines, as your coming up with complete fallacies. The reviewer will be playing their game in their native language (presumably), so if the VA is not very good, it can be marked down for such.

Avatar image for BlindfireMcgee
BlindfireMcgee

323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 BlindfireMcgee
Member since 2010 • 323 Posts

Again, I never said this. Stop reading between the lines, as your coming up with complete fallacies. The reviewer will be playing their game in their native language (presumably), so if the VA is not very good, it can be marked down for such.

lundy86_4


No, I believe you did:

"If a game is recorded in multiple languages for a widespread audience, then it's VA should be even across the board."

By that you are suggesting that one would know if all languages are within consistent value ranges. Which is incorrect as you cannot compare a language you know to one you do not know. It simply cannot be done.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62031 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Again, I never said this. Stop reading between the lines, as your coming up with complete fallacies. The reviewer will be playing their game in their native language (presumably), so if the VA is not very good, it can be marked down for such.

BlindfireMcgee


No, I believe you did:

"If a game is recorded in multiple languages for a widespread audience, then it's VA should be even across the board."

By that you are suggesting that one would know if all languages are within consistent value ranges. Which is incorrect as you cannot compare a language you know to one you do not know. It simply cannot be done.

And where did I say a reviewer would be reviewing it, whilst not playing it in their native language.

You misinterpreted what I said, and as such stated a fallacy.

I am simply stating, that it's acceptable to believe that all VA, regardless of it's language should be even across the board. Whether or not someone can assess this in all 10 languages is regardless.

Avatar image for Nerd_Man
Nerd_Man

13819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Nerd_Man
Member since 2007 • 13819 Posts

N4G review 6/10 for Heavy Rain.I have play the demo but you can't call HR game and it have no replay value,far too soft for a movie, and very boring for a video game.

Panosola

Oh so you're saying Heavy Rain is not even 2 hours long? Ok, gotcha.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Why would it be flawed? If a game is recorded in multiple languages for a widespread audience, then it's VA should be even across the board. If one is of a lesser quality than the other, that's exactly a reason why it would be marked down, as it would impact the immersiveness of the game.

Your basically saying they should ignore the bad VA in lieue of using the subtitles? That is a workaround, and undoubtedly not the way the game is meant to be portrayed.

BlindfireMcgee

There is no way to critique a language you do not know. To suggest otherwise is completely misinformed. So there is no way to know if all the languages are decent, because you do not know the pronouciation. However, bashing a videogame based off a language that is not even it's native recording (with the added option of ten different subtitles with all languages), while completely ignoring the availabilitiy of other languages, is laughable.

Well..I'm sorry to say, but that's how reviews work. Just look how many euro pcgames get bashed for weak english voice acting

Avatar image for AdjacentLives
AdjacentLives

1173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 AdjacentLives
Member since 2009 • 1173 Posts

If Eurogamer gives it a 9, that's good enough for me.

Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts

"Quantic Dream's game has touched me, unquestionably, both as a player because it symbolizes today the culmination of a genre halfway between cinema and video game that has always seemed interesting in it's intentions but rarely conclusive."

This is from their French counterpart, I predict the same score for the UK, if not higher.

BlindfireMcgee
I don't think so. 8/10 at most, but realistically I think it will be a 7/10.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

This is FRENCH Eurogamer guys...its the birtish that are harsh reviewers. Also since the magazine is french and so are the devs I believe the rating is made higher by national pride. Im not saying its as bad as the germans giving Venetica great scores (Venetica is garbage) but still I think its a little bloated.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

N4G review 6/10 for Heavy Rain.I have play the demo but you can call HR game and it have no replay value,far too soft for a movie, and very boring for a video game.

Cons:
* We're often bored
* QTEs for really everything and anything
* Clumsy gameplay
* Serious rhythm problems
* Some inconsistencies in the scenario

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-469314.aspx

BlindfireMcgee


I fail to see how that diminishes Heavy Rain's value, N4G's reviews are made BY users, therefore the credibility is already questionable.

nope, it's not by the users, the review is from a site gamkult

Avatar image for zarshack
zarshack

9936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 0

#64 zarshack
Member since 2009 • 9936 Posts

This is FRENCH Eurogamer guys...its the birtish that are harsh reviewers. Also since the magazine is french and so are the devs I believe the rating is made higher by national pride. Im not saying its as bad as the germans giving Venetica great scores (Venetica is garbage) but still I think its a little bloated.

rzepak

It could be that but its still on the same level as the other reviews currently out for the game, and from what i can see this review wont be counted on metacritic in anycase.

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

first MAG then Heavy rain, the ownage this week immense!!! Keep the 9s coming quantic dream

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Wooahoho. I am looking forward to this. Potentially pushing the boundaries of interactive narrative? I am there.
Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#67 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts
9 or 9.5 confirmed on GS :)
Avatar image for Some-Mist
Some-Mist

5631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#68 Some-Mist
Member since 2009 • 5631 Posts

It's looking good so far, but one caveat to note is that Eurogamer rated WKC an 8, so I don't think anyone should draw any forgone conclusions.

Different reviewers will always have different tastes, and HR is one game that I'm sure will not be for everyone.

shinrabanshou

If anything, I think WKC deserved an 8/10 more than a 6.0/10. I'd agree more with eurogamer's review altho I'd personally rate the game at about a 7.5 myself.

Regardless, I'll agree that this game isn't for everyone, just as WKC isn't, but what point are you trying to get at? Eurogamer loses its credibility because the 8/10? IMO eurogamer is one of the more credible reviewers on the internet. Who do you feel is more credible?

Avatar image for KiZZo1
KiZZo1

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 KiZZo1
Member since 2007 • 3989 Posts

There's already an initial score at Metacritic - it's 95 from 4 reviews.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#70 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

first MAG then Heavy rain, the ownage this week immense!!! Keep the 9s coming quantic dream

Zaibach

Yeah, that 8.0 that MAG got owned everybody.

Avatar image for Disturbed123
Disturbed123

1665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Disturbed123
Member since 2005 • 1665 Posts

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

N4G review 6/10 for Heavy Rain.I have play the demo but you can call HR game and it have no replay value,far too soft for a movie, and very boring for a video game.

Cons:
* We're often bored
* QTEs for really everything and anything
* Clumsy gameplay
* Serious rhythm problems
* Some inconsistencies in the scenario

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-469314.aspx

Panosola

Meh so what.

And they have give Mass Effect 2 on XBOX360 9/10.

http://www.n4g.com/News-469646.aspx

:lol: Self ownage. GameKult gave Mass Effect 7/10 (The site that also gave HR 6)

Get your facts right

Avatar image for jwsoul
jwsoul

5472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#72 jwsoul
Member since 2005 • 5472 Posts

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

N4G review 6/10 for Heavy Rain.I have play the demo but you can call HR game and it have no replay value,far too soft for a movie, and very boring for a video game.

Cons:
* We're often bored
* QTEs for really everything and anything
* Clumsy gameplay
* Serious rhythm problems
* Some inconsistencies in the scenario

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-469314.aspx

Rza_rectah

the troll is strong with this one... too bad that is Gamekult not N4G they arent even reputable.

That made me LOL well done the Troll is strong with this lol heheheh

Yeah HEavy Rain i like the theme on PSN its RAINING :P

Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#73 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
I didn't expect this game to do well, but it appears i was wrong....very wrong!
Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]

It's looking good so far, but one caveat to note is that Eurogamer rated WKC an 8, so I don't think anyone should draw any forgone conclusions.

Different reviewers will always have different tastes, and HR is one game that I'm sure will not be for everyone.

Some-Mist

If anything, I think WKC deserved an 8/10 more than a 6.0/10. I'd agree more with eurogamer's review altho I'd personally rate the game at about a 7.5 myself.

Regardless, I'll agree that this game isn't for everyone, just as WKC isn't, but what point are you trying to get at? Eurogamer loses its credibility because the 8/10? IMO eurogamer is one of the more credible reviewers on the internet. Who do you feel is more credible?

I wasn't really implying anything about Eurogamer's credibility, nor Gamespot's. :/ Both are respectable, credible sites.

I was just saying that one reviewer's review doesn't necessitate other's being similar, WKC being an apt example.

Heavy Rain will likely garner even more disparate opinions, because of the type of game it is.

Avatar image for Some-Mist
Some-Mist

5631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#75 Some-Mist
Member since 2009 • 5631 Posts

[QUOTE="Some-Mist"]

[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]

It's looking good so far, but one caveat to note is that Eurogamer rated WKC an 8, so I don't think anyone should draw any forgone conclusions.

Different reviewers will always have different tastes, and HR is one game that I'm sure will not be for everyone.

shinrabanshou

If anything, I think WKC deserved an 8/10 more than a 6.0/10. I'd agree more with eurogamer's review altho I'd personally rate the game at about a 7.5 myself.

Regardless, I'll agree that this game isn't for everyone, just as WKC isn't, but what point are you trying to get at? Eurogamer loses its credibility because the 8/10? IMO eurogamer is one of the more credible reviewers on the internet. Who do you feel is more credible?

I wasn't really implying anything about Eurogamer's credibility, nor Gamespot's. :/ Both are respectable, credible sites.

I was just saying that one reviewer's review doesn't necessitate other's being similar, WKC being an apt example.

Heavy Rain will likely garner even more disparate opinions, because of the type of game it is.

true, but I still feel like heavy rain will be more mainstream, with more advertising than WKJ, an underrated JRPG.

Avatar image for Swift_Boss_A
Swift_Boss_A

14579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Swift_Boss_A
Member since 2007 • 14579 Posts
Colour me surprised, still think it will be AA here though based on the demo my personal hype is AAA.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51584 Posts

[QUOTE="RavenLoud"]

Looks like it's going to be great. Now if GS rated it AA SW would become very entertaining :D

I'll just look on youtube for the story though :P

Odrec

Hype is AA so if it gets AA is not a big deal...

Hype is at AAA right now in the thread on the front page. I think it's AA, but more than people waiting for the game are voting too. :P

It's nothing new.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

[QUOTE="BlindfireMcgee"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

N4G review 6/10 for Heavy Rain.I have play the demo but you can call HR game and it have no replay value,far too soft for a movie, and very boring for a video game.

Cons:
* We're often bored
* QTEs for really everything and anything
* Clumsy gameplay
* Serious rhythm problems
* Some inconsistencies in the scenario

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-469314.aspx

naval


I fail to see how that diminishes Heavy Rain's value, N4G's reviews are made BY users, therefore the credibility is already questionable.

nope, it's not by the users, the review is from a site gamkult

Which is a site thats also been blacklisted by Sony and many other publishers. Obviously a review by some french site wont have any backing. Their opinion=void.

Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#80 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

N4G review 6/10 for Heavy Rain.I have play the demo but you can call HR game and it have no replay value,far too soft for a movie, and very boring for a video game.

Cons:
* We're often bored
* QTEs for really everything and anything
* Clumsy gameplay
* Serious rhythm problems
* Some inconsistencies in the scenario

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-469314.aspx

Panosola

Meh so what.

And they have give Mass Effect 2 on XBOX360 9/10.

http://www.n4g.com/News-469646.aspx

you do realized you linked two reviews for 2 different gaming sites

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#81 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

first MAG then Heavy rain, the ownage this week immense!!! Keep the 9s coming quantic dream

heretrix

Yeah, that 8.0 that MAG got owned everybody.

it was hyped as a failure, so yah it owned the ever gathering haters.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
Critics love art games. This should come as no surprise.
Avatar image for 10MP
10MP

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 10MP
Member since 2009 • 454 Posts

I think HR will make a great rental or bargain bin purchase being basically an interactive movie. do you really have $60 or $70 to waste on a short single play interactive movie?

This "game" simply should not be getting so much attention even on system wars. Some of you have played indigo prophecy and you know what I'm talking about.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62031 Posts

I think HR will make a great rental or bargain bin purchase being basically an interactive movie. do you really have $60 or $70 to waste on a short single play interactive movie?

This "game" simply should not be getting so much attention even on system wars. Some of you have played indigo prophecy and you know what I'm talking about.

10MP

It's not single play. There is room for multiple playthroughs. As one character dies, you take control of another and the story fills in different ways, dependant upon who lives and who dies.

Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#85 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts

Is this the same EuroGamer that throws out 6/10's like a james bond ejection seat?

This must be one heck of a game...

samuraiguns
They gave Fable II a 10..