Eurogamer gives Mag 7/10

Pretty good score, Im thinking 7.5 here

Good score, I think it'll get A here, won't be surprised if higher though.

I had guessed an 8.0 from GS but lately I'm thinking this is the Too Human of PS3 and a 6.5 now seems more likely. Still a good game but not what it coulda been.

Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.Bread_or_Decide

Say that to Warhawk. Or Quake Live.

edit: lack of aim assist is a win though. still, i'll wait to see how the community gets on.

Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.Bread_or_Decide

It seems to me that games should be judged on the basis of what they are and what they're trying to be--not what they're missing (unless it's a glaring omission). If Infinity Ward had announced that Modern Warfare 2 was going to be multiplayer only, I honestly believe most people would have been fine it.

In my view, docking points from a game like MAG because it doesn't have a single-player campaign is wrong.

Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.Bread_or_Decide

Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.Bread_or_Decide

THE Superdupermegatron ps3 game exclusive that Sony Cows were saying that was going to be one of the best 2010 game is getting a 7

Well Thats a good score but no like fanboys predicted

well i was right, total flop for the AAA halo killer the cows were hyping

Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.Bread_or_Decide

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.AgentA-Mi6

That's pretty high from Eurogamer. I reckon an 8 from GS.

Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.Bread_or_Decide

Something that turns me off is that they are still charging 60.00, despite the fact that it has no single player. It should have launched at 39.99 in my opinion. The game would be much more attractive at that price.

this game not appealing to casual nooobs is its lack of successs. Sometime If I make a game I will give them an auto assist button. And yes if you read the review it was that it didn't appeal to casual gamers as its main complaint.

THE Superdupermegatron ps3 game exclusive that Sony Cows were saying that was going to be one of the best 2010 game is getting a 7

Well Thats a good score but no like fanboys predicted

tupapi006

well i was right, total flop from the AAA halo killer the cows were hyping

Dycras

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.ironcreed

Something that turns me off is that they are still charging 60.00, despite the fact that it has no single player. It should have launched at 39.99 in my opinion. The game would be much more attractive at that price.

This is a must have game for people that must have games

Good score.

.

Eurogamers is one of the sites that knows how to score a game.

[QUOTE="Dycras"]

well i was right, total flop from the AAA halo killer the cows were hyping

Sollet

[QUOTE="ironcreed"]

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.SaudiFury

Something that turns me off is that they are still charging 60.00, despite the fact that it has no single player. It should have launched at 39.99 in my opinion. The game would be much more attractive at that price.

Why do people see a 7 from eurogamer and think GS is going to give it 8?

Why do people see a 7 from eurogamer and think GS is going to give it 8?

Espada12

Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.Bread_or_Decide

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]Good score. [QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Lack of single player campaign will always be its downfall score wise.gamer620

[QUOTE="SaudiFury"][QUOTE="ironcreed"]

Something that turns me off is that they are still charging 60.00, despite the fact that it has no single player. It should have launched at 39.99 in my opinion. The game would be much more attractive at that price.

nhh18

I am not faulting it for not having single player, I just do not agree with charging the same price as games that have both single player and multiplayer. Warhawk was a multiplayer only game and they charged accordingly. I think MAG would be much more attractive if it was priced similar.

[QUOTE="gamer620"][QUOTE="skrat_01"] Shouldn't matter if the multiplayer focus is there - looking at dedicated multiplayer games.nhh18

Also, could you imagine how much more hype for Mag there would be if like S.R., Mag was also cross-platform on-line MP with PC. 8)

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="SaudiFury"] or at 60 bucks with a earphone/mic included since this game is so hinged on cooperation. ironcreed

Nobody is faulting it for not having single player, I just do not agree with charging the same price as games that have both single player and multiplayer. Warhawk was a multiplayer only game and they charged accordingly. I think MAG would be much more attractive if it was priced similar.

[QUOTE="ironcreed"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]so why should we fault MAG for being called massive action game for not having a single player. THe whole point of the game was multiplayer aspect. It is like saying mass effect 2 should have multiplayer with its sole focus is on being a single player campaign. Both games are fantastic but they both aren't trying to pretend to be something they aren't.

nhh18

Nobody is faulting it for not having single player, I just do not agree with charging the same price as games that have both single player and multiplayer. Warhawk was a multiplayer only game and they charged accordingly. I think MAG would be much more attractive if it was priced similar.

Again, I am not faulting the game for being multiplayer only. Warhawk was multiplayer only and it provided me with some of the most fun I have had online this gen. In which sense, I agree that MAG is fine being a multiplayer only game. My gripe here is with the pricing. I feel that 60.00 is a bit too much for a game with multiplayer only and I think it would be much more appealing at 39.99, like Warhawk was.

[QUOTE="Dycras"]

well i was right, total flop from the AAA halo killer the cows were hyping

Sollet

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="ironcreed"]

Nobody is faulting it for not having single player, I just do not agree with charging the same price as games that have both single player and multiplayer. Warhawk was a multiplayer only game and they charged accordingly. I think MAG would be much more attractive if it was priced similar.

ironcreed

Again, I am not faulting the game for being multiplayer only. Warhawk was multiplayer only and it provided me with some of the most fun I have had online this gen. In which sense, I agree that MAG is fine being a multiplayer only game. My gripe here is with the pricing only. I feel that 60.00 is a bit too much for a game with multiplayer only and I think it would be much more appealing at 39.99, like Warhawk was.

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="ironcreed"]

Nobody is faulting it for not having single player, I just do not agree with charging the same price as games that have both single player and multiplayer. Warhawk was a multiplayer only game and they charged accordingly. I think MAG would be much more attractive if it was priced similar.

ironcreed

Again, I am not faulting the game for being multiplayer only. Warhawk was multiplayer only and it provided me with some of the most fun I have had online this gen. In which sense, I agree that MAG is fine being a multiplayer only game. My gripe here is with the pricing. I feel that 60.00 is a bit too much for a game with multiplayer only and I think it would be much more appealing at 39.99, like Warhawk was.

Besides that warhawk sucked.

You should wait a few months and buy it from the bargain bin. Things will only get better with time imo.MrFanboy

IF I ever buy it, it will definitely be on the cheap later on down the road.

[QUOTE="Sollet"][QUOTE="Dycras"]

well i was right, total flop for the AAA halo killer the cows were hyping

SaudiFury

[QUOTE="MrFanboy"]

You should wait a few months and buy it from the bargain bin. Things will only get better with time imo.ironcreed

IF I ever buy it, it will definitely be on the cheap later on down the road.

[QUOTE="ironcreed"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]Why not. I've played PC games all my life and the best pc multiplayer games were the ones that didn't have single player experiences. UT series, Quake seires, Battlefield 2, etc. I am surprised that suddenly games like halo, and modern warfare 2 are the only attractive fps nowadays...

nhh18

Again, I am not faulting the game for being multiplayer only. Warhawk was multiplayer only and it provided me with some of the most fun I have had online this gen. In which sense, I agree that MAG is fine being a multiplayer only game. My gripe here is with the pricing. I feel that 60.00 is a bit too much for a game with multiplayer only and I think it would be much more appealing at 39.99, like Warhawk was.

Besides that warhawk sucked.

For a game that sucked it sure as hell still has a rather large and dedicated community. It scored fairly well review wise as well. With that, nice opinion you have there. Thanks for sharing.

As far as MAG goes, if you feel that 60.00 is a good deal for a game that only has multiplayer, then more power to you. As for myself, I happen to still love single player campaigns and the fact that this game is still 60.00 despite not having one is a negative for me. In a nutshell, whatever floats your boat, pal. I sure as hell will not be paying 60.00 for it, I know that much.

7 is a pretty high score from Eurogamer, sounds like AA material here (8.0).Sollet

[QUOTE="Sollet"]7 is a pretty high score from Eurogamer, sounds like AA material here (8.0).xsubtownerx

[QUOTE="Dycras"]

well i was right, total flop from the AAA halo killer the cows were hyping

Sollet

[QUOTE="Sollet"]7 is a pretty high score from Eurogamer, sounds like AA material here (8.0).xsubtownerx

[QUOTE="Sollet"]7 is a pretty high score from Eurogamer, sounds like AA material here (8.0).xsubtownerx