Fable 2, since when did it become a bad game

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#51 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts

[QUOTE="jethrovegas"]

[QUOTE="themyth01"]

This is about Fable 2's quality, quality can be set by comparison. I never said you mentioned those titles. You're finding supposed issues that the so considered "best" games have and saying Fable 2 sucks because of it. Seriously? :roll:

I am not defending Fable 2's story, did you even read? I said it's as generic as 90% of other video games, you know like hunting down lost treasures. How the hell is the level design trash? just because you say so? please... who made your opinion fact?

Hate for any game is simply stupid, but it's funny seeing how badly your attempt to hate on this game is.

themyth01

Hate for "any game" is not necessarily stupid, and certainly not just simply stupid.

Sometimes, certain games deserve hate. Fable 2 is, in my estimation, one of those games.

If you aren't defending Fable 2's story, then why are we discussing it? So plenty of other games have bad stories, OK, who cares? How is that relevant to the discussion? Redemption by comparison? Sure, if every other video game ever made was bad, which clearly isn't the case.

Fable 2 tells a story, that story belongs to Fable 2, is told through Fable 2, and is bad as its own story, specifically, within the context of Fable 2 telling that story to the player. Is that precise and focused enough for you, or do you want to do a cross examination with Medal of Honor?

I'm not sitting there playing Fable 2 saying "well ****, at least it isn't as bad as that other game", I'm playing Fable 2 and deciding whether or not it clicks with me, for what it is, nothing more, nothing less.

P.S. The level design has no flow. It's ugly, and unfocused, and maddeningly restrictive (don't tell me you didn't want to go to the ****ing lighthouse) and contrived, and artificial, and honestly just one of many problems with the game.

Yes, it is. A wise person would ignore a game he/she dislikes and be done with it. Hating on it shows an emotional attachment to a piece of software.

It's especially interesting when it's about a game like Fable 2, which simply is not a bad game. It may not be the best game out there but it's definitely not the worst and far from bad. And most critics agree. Along with over 3 million people.

The thing you're missing about Fable 2's story is not how it goes but how you can affect it and that's what this game does like no other. If I played games for a story I wouldn't be playing games, I'd be reading books or watching movies. Just what game do you think have great stories then?

Whether you like the game or not is irrelevant. The issues you mentioned are things personal to you, to me they were non-issues as well as to most critics.

Considering this thread is about why people think it's a bad game, i think at least half of your statement becomes completely irrelevant.

Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#52 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts
I like the Fable series a lot. *flexes glutes*
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15879 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

I choose to ignore what gameplay? The combat? The combat is one button to shoot, one button to melee, and one button to magic. Using these things in tandem is the game's strong point, but trying to specialize in any way will give way to 1 button combat, and the game penalizes you for not specializing because by the end everything just feels extremely weak. Or maybe you're talking about the work in game. Sitting there waiting for the cursor a jillion times in blacksmithing and log cutting is intensely boring, and it's necessary too if you want any decent weapons or clothes, because adventuring itself has almost no rewards.

Here's a funny interview where peter tries to pretend it's combat is as deep as any game, anddescribes it as anRPG at least once.

themyth01

The combat is great, it's fun and simple but not as deep as a game as NG. You can combine magic, range and melee attacks at your discretion. The best way is to combine these attacks. But would being a button smasher make it suck, I mean other games do it and they seem to get a lot of praise for it. I never thought getting equipment was an issue at all, making money is easy and there's no need for grinding. So you can just focus on the game and side-quests which handles itself nicely in a non-linear way. The combat is just fine. Still fail to see how the game sucks, not saying it's perfect but I'd say it's far from bad.

The game also gives you a lot of freedom on how to handle things and lets you handle more of the character's life than any other game.This review explains it nicely:

"Fable is a rare role playing game that offers incredibly deep customization, ****and exploration. It can be both charming and disturbing. Its missions offer equal parts of satisfaction and tragedy, and when you're not on a mission you'll be making your own bed in which to lie (including a dog, he's literally always around)."

"You can combine magic, range and melee attacks at your discretion."

Big whoop, I've been able to do that in every action game this gen, it's nothing ground breaking to smoothly transition from melee to range to magic anymore.

"But would being a button smasher make it suck, I mean other games do it and they seem to get a lot of praise for it. "

What game that is a button masher is praised for having one button combat? I don't even think any other game is so literally one button combat. At least in something like Assassin's Creed, there is timing and dodging involved, where there is none here. In fact if I remember right I don't think there were any defensive moving, maybe parrying it's been like a year and a half, but when you get swamped basically your only option is shoot gun till they arrive, spam aoe magic.

"I never thought getting equipment was an issue at all, making money is easy and there's no need for grinding."

Grinding isn't necessary? Really? So I suppose you just bought realestate and weapons with the money you pulled out of thin air? I mean if it isn't necessary and it's boring as hell, why is it even in the game? You think Bioshock's hacking minigame is praised, or ME2's mining? Except it's even worse than either of those in that sense, because even in Mass effect 2 you can find resources while adventuring, and Bioshock has an insta hack.

"So you can just focus on the game and side-quests which handles itself nicely in a non-linear way."

Again, this isn't worthy of praise. WRPG's have been non-linear since the dawn of time. And frankly this game felt even more linear than most. Like in BG2, you are tasked with gaining 20000g early on, and are free to do so in any way you see fit. In ME2, you have to recruit a new team, and are given dossiers and told "go bananas." Fable 2 offers this structure to some degree, but it feels too forced. You come up to the next part of the story, and the npc says "I don't trust you go do more quests". And then you have to do more quests, and then the story progresses the same way.

"The game also gives you a lot of freedom on how to handle things and lets you handle more of the character's life than any other game"

The biggest problem I see here is that while the game offers freedom, it never does anything especially well.You can buy real estate, but it's never "fun" or "interesting". You can get a job, but getting a job is just as boring as a real job. You can get married and have a kid, but the experience is just as shallow as that sentence. You literally can geta wife by just by farting or dancing, and then have sex and bam, suddenly you have a kid. Then you go back to an adventure and combat, which is boring 1 button combat as we already know. The sidequests are pretty much all just fetch quests, and the worst was one where I was working for a geologist and had to travel all over the world looking for maps iirc. It's all there, but none of it feels remarkable. In Mass Effect 2, I want to explore because there might be a new weapon upgrade. I want to develop a relationship because the characters are interesting and I enjoy their personalities. As a whole Fable 2 is supposed to be an RPG with glorious freedom, and to a degree it is, but none of it's freedom is exploited in the slightest.

"Fable is a rare role playing game that offers incredibly deep customization,"

The customization isn't really any better than any other game. Your character is basically regulated to one of two extremes. Are you male or female? Are you benevolent or the spawn of satan? Do you stay skinny or become morbidly obese (actually no matter what your character ends up fat somehow.). The best customization comes from buying clothes and coloring them, and really nothing looks as good as the outfit that made me look like a 17th century aristocrat.

This is on top of all those other problems, such as bugs, unlikeable characters, and an awful story.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#54 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Also the fact that armor was only useful for aesthetic purposes was completely stupid.

themyth01

Yea using armor for aesthetic completely ruins it, how could I have missed that. I mean here I was thinking the fun gameplay mechanics, the ability to change the world through your actions, ability to socialize, the dog, the varied artwork and environments, the big world to explore, and the ability to step in someone else's world made it at least great. Silly me.

How did you manage to intepret what I said about the armor only being good for looks into all of that? Changing the world through your actions was so shallow, and also emotionally shallow aswell. those varied artworks were nice, but those 5 minute loading screens to see it were not. gameplay was not fun because it was so simplistic it got boring very quickly. using the X,B,A,Y to socialize was also incredibly boring aswell. The lack of armor actually providing stats was just stupid, but the other reasons I just mentioned are what made the game average. Fable 1 was a much better game.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#55 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
I was bored by it. I tried to get into it Just couldn't.
Avatar image for ralphikari
ralphikari

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 ralphikari
Member since 2006 • 752 Posts

It has never been a bad game. SW loves picking scapegoats to bash and Fable 2 is among the unfortunate ones. I liked most part of the game - visual, music, story, exploration, simulation, gambling... and ended up getting too much affection from NPC's which was kinda silly. Some characters such as Hannah and Reaver are underdeveloped and annoying, but since they don't travel with you it doesn't get in the way of gameplay.

I played Fable TLC on the PC. Admittedly Fable 1 had a lot more content. In comparison Fable 2 has vastly improved environment, AI, and a more focused story. The series is unique among WRPG's - not surprising for a game from Bullfrog opps I mean Lionhead :)

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#57 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

Metacritic score of 89

Gamespot score of 85.

Where is this animosity towards Fable 2 coming from? I thought it was a great game and apparently so did most critics, it even grabbed a few GOTY awards. So why the sudden hate?

themyth01
I dont think anyone hated this , why you say this?
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

Metacritic score of 89

Gamespot score of 85.

Where is this animosity towards Fable 2 coming from? I thought it was a great game and apparently so did most critics, it even grabbed a few GOTY awards. So why the sudden hate?

themyth01
just let haters be haters, i played fable 2 to death, bought all the expansion packs, and i found every single chest key and unique item in the game, i thoroughly enjoyed it and would give the game at least a 9.5, the big problem is that lemmings will admit when a Ps3 game is good, but cows refuse to admit that ANY exclusive on the 360 is a good game, you should have seen them kick off when forza 3 was given a 9.5, and look how they kicked off when 1 site gave UC2 less than a 9, the truth is, when a Ps3 game get's a high score it's well deserved, but when the 360 game gets a high score the reviewers where either paid off, or they are biased towards the 360
Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

He changed the genre cause, damage control. He's claimed Fable to be an RPG before. If anything, since when did this game become a good game?

1) It's a very shallow casualfest of game. You could play it blindfolded. You can't even die. 2) Boss variety stinks. You fight the same exact boss 2-3 times for the majority of the game and also enemy variety non existant. 3) Button mashing, no skill, strategy or brain power involved. Just tap tap tap. 4) NPC stalking as a good character. ANNOYING. 5) Awful framerate. 6) Pointless rpg-like sim sidequests that don't have any effect on anything. 7) No armor. Fugly clothing. 8) 10 hours of content. Even if this has been claimed to be a Action Adventure now. At it's core it's still and RPG. I don't care what Peter says. 8) Final boss, is not even a final boss. 9) Ending, make a wish and everything is suger and rainbows. Amazing story telling right there.

I hate to say this but FFXIII is a better game than Fable 2. Even without townz.

Avatar image for Disturbed123
Disturbed123

1665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Disturbed123
Member since 2005 • 1665 Posts

scored below 9, its a flop according to system wars, and the game DOES suck.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

scored below 9, its a flop according to system wars, and the game DOES suck.

Disturbed123
no, for a game to flop it has to score below it's hype, that's how it works, where did you get the idea that anything below a 9 is a flop? mag isn't considered a flop because it surpassed its AA hype level
Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

Well, I never played it, but I own it (think I traded it in, can't find it :?). I never really had interest in playing it, but I did watch my lil bro play. The only thing I really didn't like is the lack of consequence when dying. There's no challange either. He literally woke up on the spot after dying each time and kept playing lol.

Overall, it seems like an antertaining adventure with a lot of charm.

Avatar image for 2mrw
2mrw

6206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#63 2mrw
Member since 2008 • 6206 Posts

i agree with everything you have said excpet that the game doesn't have any haters, it's rarelly talked about anyway in SW. Fable1 was a good game, it's an 8 in my book, fable 2 looks great as well, but generally the game doesn't feel AAA, just like Infamous, both games are fun and great but they are solid AA, no more, and i expect fable 3 to be the same thing unless it is changed significantly.

Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

Since it didn't let you die, had little to no story, no end boss, pointless gameplay additions. Rubbish dog, worse skills then Fable 1, crappy combat, etc

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

It never was.

Ratings prove how good it is.

Pay no mind to the people who want to bash.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#66 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
Because it was far worse than it was supposed to be.
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#67 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts

It never was.

Ratings prove how good it is.

Pay no mind to the people who want to bash.

BioShockOwnz
Bu-bu-bu-bu-opinions :cry:
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

IMO it was just crap. The story,characters,bosses and ending. It was all crap and this is a type of rpg that shows it wants to focuse and be good at those things I listed and it just doesint it falls on its face. I remember liking fable lost chapters and compared to that game this one just plain sucks. The fact some people thought GOTY made me want to smash my head in. I know it thier opinion but still.

Avatar image for zassimick
zassimick

10471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 2

#69 zassimick  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 10471 Posts

The thing you're missing about Fable 2's story is not how it goes but how you can affect it and that's what this game does like no other. If I played games for a story I wouldn't be playing games, I'd be reading books or watching movies. Just what game do you think have great stories then?

themyth01

Ugh... I dislike it when people say that. Its like gamers don't care about the mediocrity their getting; we deserve great stories and we are starting to see them. Developers need to find that balance between boring, unrelated-to-the-plot filler nonsense and what is necessary to moving the story forward.

Anyways, I still enjoyed the game. I think I enjoyed the first a lot more but whatever. My biggest disappoint though were all the leaves. They were so very much hyped...

Avatar image for jethrovegas
jethrovegas

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 jethrovegas
Member since 2007 • 5103 Posts

Yes, it is. A wise person would ignore a game he/she dislikes and be done with it. Hating on it shows an emotional attachment to a piece of software.

It's especially interesting when it's about a game like Fable 2, which simply is not a bad game. It may not be the best game out there but it's definitely not the worst and far from bad. And most critics agree. Along with over 3 million people.

The thing you're missing about Fable 2's story is not how it goes but how you can affect it and that's what this game does like no other. If I played games for a story I wouldn't be playing games, I'd be reading books or watching movies. Just what game do you think have great stories then?

Whether you like the game or not is irrelevant. The issues you mentioned are things personal to you, to me they were non-issues as well as to most critics.

themyth01

That is completely ridiculous. Criticising a game you think is bad is the same goddamn thing as praising a game you think is good. Same sport, same league, same ***ing ballpark.

I think that it's a bad game. I've explained my reasoning. All you've been able to come up with is "hurr durr, lot's of people like it, and uh, critics, sales, etc." That isn't an argument. You have yet to address my criticism of the game itself.

Have you played an RPG? Ever?

Bad core mechanics are personal? Weak content is personal? The fact that the game is incredibly short and boasts a meagre amount of side quests, most of which are poor, that's personal? Technical problems are personal? Bad menus are personal? A laughable morality system that lets you be Mr. Super Evil Murderer one second, and Mr. Shining Golden Hero literally the very next, that's personal? A character system with no depth, made for people who don't actually want to have to think whilst playing their games, that's personal? The fact the entire game is ridiculously easy, and doesn't build up any challenge up for the player as it progresses, nor give them any reason to think about the ways in which they upgrade their character, that's personal? The lame character interaction, that's personal? The fact that the co-op system is a massive pile of ****, both poorly designed and poorly implemented, that's personal?

I mean, damn man, I'd sure hate to see the non-personal problems.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

Well, I never played it, but I own it (think I traded it in, can't find it :?). I never really had interest in playing it, but I did watch my lil bro play. The only thing I really didn't like is the lack of consequence when dying. There's no challange either. He literally woke up on the spot after dying each time and kept playing lol.

Overall, it seems like an antertaining adventure with a lot of charm.

Episode_Eve

I think if you die you get cuts more and more and you get ugly. I think thats about it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8

22399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
Member since 2007 • 22399 Posts
its above average to be sure. but its not a great game in any respect
Avatar image for mccoyca112
mccoyca112

5434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#73 mccoyca112
Member since 2007 • 5434 Posts

its too easy

a couple of hours of grind and you have a bottomless $ stream to buy whatever

audioaxes

That reminds me. I am probably in the billions by now of money. I dont even want to check. Others have stated their reasoning though and hit the nail right on the head. It could have scored 10/10 worldwide. That wouldnt make me like it. The only reason I havent traded it in is because its being borrowed and I probably wouldnt get squat anyway.

Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts

haha! higher metacritic score then infamous and resistance 2

2 of the AAAE's cows love

Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

Not a bad game, but not a great game in my opinion. But theres one thing you can't deny, and that it's so damn charming. :)

Avatar image for Cerberus_Legion
Cerberus_Legion

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#76 Cerberus_Legion
Member since 2007 • 1233 Posts

Bad? No. Wholly unremarkable? Yes.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#77 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

I never knew it became a "bad" game... or that it was ever a "good" game either. I always thought the common opinion of the game was that it was "eh... alright."

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#78 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Honestly it never was a good game to begin with. Peter overhyped it alot.
Avatar image for nethernova
nethernova

5721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 nethernova
Member since 2008 • 5721 Posts
This thread reminded me that I actually own that game but never got too far, so I played for like 2 hours. Half of the time I was pressing one button to cut wood though, until my wife showed up and yelled something about a divorce. In game that is. It's not a bad game but it fails at keeping me interested.
Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#80 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

Its not really a bad game....its just it could have been ALOT better.

Avatar image for Parasomniac
Parasomniac

2723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Parasomniac
Member since 2007 • 2723 Posts
The ending was terrible. Wow the guy falls down to his death with no boss fight. Very rewarding.
Avatar image for Chronospherics
Chronospherics

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Chronospherics
Member since 2009 • 29 Posts

Honestly... it does kinda suck. I mean I don't really know anyone who wouldn't rather pick up Fable 1 instead... so I think that says something.

I got it ages ago, 1 day, 7hours playtime and 800 gamerscore later and it was back to the shop.

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 ropumar
Member since 2005 • 1135 Posts

Since it was released, given that it sucked a fat one.

REASONING:

For starters, the core game content is lame, with a short, poorly designed main quest, augmented by a handful of short, poorly designed sidequests that don't even try to make up in quantity what they lacked in quality; there aren't that many, and the few that are there are as sucky as the rest of the game, with perhaps one or two exceptions.

Then you have the incredibly bad story, a poorly implemented morality system, weak core mechanics, laughable character building, and a tiny, maddeningly restrictive gameworld that struggles pathetically to convince you that it is "open"and "free" whilst simultaneously restricting you to tiny paths and refusing you access to even blatantly visible landmarks.

Thrown in the numerous technical problems, the burdensome menus, and the jaw droppingly stupid level design and you've got a recipe for another massive hit from Sir Peter Molyneux, master bull **** artist and part-time game designer.

Also, for the record, I think the first Fable was much better. It wasn't a masterpiece, but it was fun, and it managed to be pretty good in a few areas, something Fable 2 wasn't nearly capable of doing.

jethrovegas

Don't forget the idiotic DLC mini-game design, which was launched before the game, people found out how to cheat and completly ruined any sense of pourpose the money had for the game.

And don't forget the boring co-op multiplayer design it had, that was pure nonsense.

Also molyneux was a completly clown with the hype, overstating every mediocre feature the game had like was something GENIUS.

DOG for example.

Avatar image for Indie_Hitman
Indie_Hitman

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Indie_Hitman
Member since 2008 • 2457 Posts
I borrowed Fable 2 for a while but I just found it boring. ot a bad game, just something about it felt bland for me.
Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#85 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts

It's a decent game, but not without its problems, and I didn't like it nearly as much as I liked Fable I.

Avatar image for Laxer04
Laxer04

1256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Laxer04
Member since 2008 • 1256 Posts

i never heard of anyone bashing it? i haven't played it yet but i def want to someday. i haven't even finished the first fable yet