Fact: Multiplatform Games Are Better On 360 Than PS3

It's a fact that multiplatform games are better on the Xbox 360 than the PS3 this gen. It just wouldn't make any sense spending money on the same game if that game is worse, for whatever reason, on a console that is $200 more expensive. There shouldn't be any excuses like, "oh it's just the developers, they're lazy", because that would be alot of developers if not all "being lazy". Come on, give them some credit. The PS3 is just flawed and an inferior gaming machine.I doubt things will change this gen. So the smartest thing to do is to get future multiplayer games like Haze, GTA IV, Mercenaries 2, The Darkness, DiRT, Transformers, Stranglehold, Madden 08, The Bigs, DMC4, NBA 2k8, and all future multiplats on the console that makes the best out of the game, the Xbox 360.Why would you buy the same game for the same price if the quality is less. It just doesn't make sense. That's a fact.

tom clancy's splinter cell double agent

ps3 = 8.0 360 = 8.5

pirates of the carribian

ps3 = 6.0 360 = 6.2

f.e.a.r.

ps3 = 7.1 360 = 8.6

the elder's scrolls: oblivion

ps3 = 9.5 360 = 9.6

virtual tennis

ps3 = 8.2 360 = 8.4

enchanted arms

ps3 = 6.8 360 = 7.1

the god father

ps3 = 7.6 360 = 7.9

fight night round 3

ps3 = 8.2 360 = 8.3

need for speed carbon

ps3 = 7.4 360 = 7.6

marvel: ultimate alliance

ps3 = 8.2 360 = 8.3

call of duty 3

ps3 = 8.2 360 = 8.8

tony hawk's project 8

ps3 = 7.3 360 = 7.9

in the early days around the time of the PS3 launch the devs were inexperienced with the PS3 hardware, so it was not lazyness. Today, the ps3 is still a bit more difficult to program for, but that hasn't stopped devs in the past.

that oblivion score is ridiculous. when you compare the stand-alone games and forget the expansions, the PS3 version wins out hands down IMO, better draw distance, textures, and load times.

Bu... bu... but teh 360's been around for longer!!!MCGSMB

is there anyone who can make a mature response anymore? I'd like to see a response without seeing "teh"

in the early days around the time of the PS3 launch the devs were inexperienced with the PS3 hardware, so it was not lazyness. Today, the ps3 is still a bit more difficult to program for, but that hasn't stopped devs in the past.

that oblivion score is ridiculous. when you compare the stand-alone games and forget the expansions, the PS3 version wins out hands down IMO, better draw distance, textures, and load times.

Mordred19

So in essence what you just said is: DAMAGE CONTROL :shock:

[QUOTE="MCGSMB"]Bu... bu... but teh 360's been around for longer!!!Mordred19

is there anyone who can make a mature response anymore? I'd like to see a response without seeing "teh"

Don't bother reasoning with lemmings, they are too delusional to talk with.

Are we back in late 2006/early 2007 again?!

[QUOTE="MCGSMB"]Bu... bu... but teh 360's been around for longer!!!Mordred19

is there anyone who can make a mature response anymore? I'd like to see a response without seeing "teh"

come on man it was a joke

Present =/= Future. DA_B0MB

I agree

Bu... bu... but teh 360's been around for longer!!!MCGSMB

The same could have been said of Xbox 1 and PS2. Yet, Xbox 1 always demonstrated better framerates and added effects from the very beginning. If the PS3 actually has more power, but can't show it, than Sony pwned themselves.

I don't know about you guys, but I love me some

OPINIONS.