Fallout 3 - Eurogamer comparison. Slightly surprising... PS3 has more detail!!!

  • 64 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -Mad_Rhetoric-
-Mad_Rhetoric-

1765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 -Mad_Rhetoric-
Member since 2008 • 1765 Posts
[QUOTE="Nisim19"]

the problem is the PS3 var is the bugs and low FPS and texture pops

this problems have bad effects to the gameplay and thats why the PS3 var got lower scores

and btw every ather review say that the X360 also looks better

thetruespin

not exactly true.. some have said the ps3 and the pc version "look" better... but in motion yes, the 360 version easily wins.

that made no sense, your saying the graphics get better if your not standing still?
Avatar image for stappy
stappy

611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#52 stappy
Member since 2004 • 611 Posts
I've watched several comparison videos, and the only difference i see is that the PS3 uses bloom, and has a higher resolution textures, while the 360 uses full HDR. Besides, i'm playing it on the PC, so i'm able to tell the difference between Bloom and HDR.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
A lil off-topic here....does anyone else think the lvl 20 cap is kinda weaksauce? I mean if u play in hard mode u hit the cap WAAAY too early :?
Avatar image for kingman03
kingman03

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 kingman03
Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts
It does look better on PS3, but it plays smoother on 360. I've seen both versions running and it's pretty damn obvious.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#55 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
"hair looks nicer, and metallic items look more metallic" - is it me or are these official graphics comparisons starting to get more and more pathetic? No offense to EuroGamer, but i'm sure they could be writing far more valuable articles than pointing out the quality of the hair.
Avatar image for rexoverbey
rexoverbey

7622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#56 rexoverbey
Member since 2002 • 7622 Posts

Sadly, the jagged edges, washed-out lighting, and slightly diminished draw distance of the PS3 release aren't so easy to dismiss. We also experienced a number of visual bugs on the PS3. Character faces disappeared several times, leaving only eyeballs and hair; limbs on robots went missing; some character models had an odd outline around them as if they were cel-shaded; and the day-to-night transition may cause odd streaks on the screen as you move the camera around. This version doesn't even offer trophies, whereas the Xbox 360 and PC versions offer Xbox Live/Windows Live achievements. Aside from a few PS3-specific sound quirks....

However, there is one major issue with the PS3 version that can't be fixed with a reset. Every time anybody on your friends list signs on or sends you a message (or any time you receive any network notification), the game freezes and the screen blurs for a few seconds. If you have a lot of friends signing on and off all day, this will completely ruin the game.

^^^^ Doesn't sound like Gamespot/IGN agrees with Eurogamer's comparison. I like how Eurogamer says better lighting and Gamespot says washed-out. Plus there where comparison shots on here a few days ago where the PS3 version had missing objects. What did you scour the web to find this one review who disagrees?

Sound quirks, jaggies, washed-out lighting, draw distance, pop-in, missing textures, framerate issues. Ya that sounds like a winner and a better technical achievement! V-sync is not a real demading option and is an option most left on in old CRT monitors to keep from tearing. Plus if the 360 version left off 2xFSAA it would probably run and a better clip also ;)

Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts

I bought the 360 version. It looks good for the most part considering how big it is. Alot of washed out textures, but the framerate is better than the PS3 right now.

Better textures and lighting on PS3 is understandable since it has a standard HDD. So basicallly once F3 for the PS3 is patched it will be technically better?

Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts

DLC is the only difference that really matters to me.

Along with controller which applies for all games.

Avatar image for MojondeVACA
MojondeVACA

3916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 MojondeVACA
Member since 2008 • 3916 Posts
Sorry cows but reviews say that 360 version > ps3 version no matter how much u guys try to spin it.
Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#60 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
Again, 80% of the things they mentioned people will barely ever notice. :roll:
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#61 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts
[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="thetruespin"]no... turning off V-Sync pretty much always give a big increase in Frames per second. ask any PC gamer. spike6566

That's if your game is already running smoothly...from my knowledge at least.

i take it, you dotn play pc games at all.

Most of what I play are PC games. Turning on and off vsync doesn't help unless your PC achieve a framerate higher than it currently has unless your hardware can achieve it, from my experience. Since the PS3 version has framerate problems Vsync won't help.

Avatar image for ZoomZoom2490
ZoomZoom2490

3943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 ZoomZoom2490
Member since 2008 • 3943 Posts

How did GS miss all that? but saw few frame drops here and there? :|

Avatar image for Sir_Graham
Sir_Graham

3983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 Sir_Graham
Member since 2002 • 3983 Posts
Great game on any platform I imagine. Frame rate problems wouldn't ruin a game like this.
Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts
The fact that we keep seeing these posts trying to show that SOMEWHERE the PS3 version measures up is quite pathetic. This has happened again and again concerning multiplats. All I have to ask cows is how is this not an embarrassment? Wasn't the PS3 suppose to be clearly more powerful than the competition from its outset? Making posts to try to show little to no improvement over the supposed "weaker competition" seems kind of pathetic. I don't care, there is no way Any one of you could convince me that the PS3 is more powerful than the 360. The split memory and the weaker GPU being the biggest.