Fallout New Vegas Graphics Are "WORSE" Then Fallout 3's??????

WTF they are and a lot of others have mentioned this also. Talk about nothing but a 6 gig expansion:cry:

Look how low res most of this game is. :oROFLLLSSS

WTF they are and a lot of others have mentioned this also. Talk about nothing but a 6 gig expansion:cry:

MortgageMan007

Really? I havn't noticed that. They're running the same engine arn't they? Certainly shouldn't look worse. Got any links/pics or anything?

WTF they are and a lot of others have mentioned this also. Talk about nothing but a 6 gig expansion:cry:

MortgageMan007

Isnt the game 4x the size of Fallout 3? It will be fine.

Who cares the game will be awesome and bigger than F3 was.

Isnt the game 4x the size of Fallout 3? It will be fine.

Kahuna_1

And I think this is why the Graphics in vegas took a hit and are not as sharp and lower res textures. Go look at pics it's not impressive looking at all.

Does it matter? Still gonna be awesome.

The gameplay is better so I honestly don't care.

Does it matter? Still gonna be awesome.

lx_theo

Dude it really does you should never go backwards in a new game in graphics.

It uses the same engine, and they looked about the same to me.

[QUOTE="lx_theo"]

Does it matter? Still gonna be awesome.

MortgageMan007

Dude it really does you should never go backwards in a new game in graphics.

[QUOTE="lx_theo"]

Does it matter? Still gonna be awesome.

MortgageMan007

Dude it really does you should never go backwards in a new game in graphics.

I don't really mind graphics on these sort of games anyway; it's the content that counts.

In comparison Fallout 3 had (without DLC)

-163 marked locations
-~20 side quests
-~35 free quests

And new Vegas has


-well over 200 marked locations
~70 full fledged sidequests
~90 free quests

The above info provided by "cerberuspledge" Thanks Brother...

Fallout New Vegas Mega Wasteland Hype Thread

S'all good.

I don't really mind graphics on these sort of games anyway; it's the content that counts.

[QUOTE="Fallout New Vegas Mega Wasteland Hype Thread"]

In comparison Fallout 3 had (without DLC)

-163 marked locations
-~20 side quests
-~35 free quests

And new Vegas has


-well over 200 marked locations
~70 full fledged sidequests
~90 free quests

The above info provided by "cerberuspledge" Thanks Brother...

Words-of-Sorrow

S'all good.

I don't really mind graphics on these sort of games anyway; it's the content that counts.

[QUOTE="Fallout New Vegas Mega Wasteland Hype Thread"]

In comparison Fallout 3 had (without DLC)

-163 marked locations
-~20 side quests
-~35 free quests

And new Vegas has


-well over 200 marked locations
~70 full fledged sidequests
~90 free quests

The above info provided by "cerberuspledge" Thanks Brother...

Words-of-Sorrow

S'all good.

NICE. All of those quests will be good too, and not written by 12 year olds with pin up posters in their bedrooms.

I don't really mind graphics on these sort of games anyway; it's the content that counts.

[QUOTE="Fallout New Vegas Mega Wasteland Hype Thread"]

In comparison Fallout 3 had (without DLC)

-163 marked locations
-~20 side quests
-~35 free quests

And new Vegas has


-well over 200 marked locations
~70 full fledged sidequests
~90 free quests

The above info provided by "cerberuspledge" Thanks Brother...

Words-of-Sorrow

S'all good.

To be honest, I find that Fallout 1 and 2 did a much better job at conveying the game world to the player with 2D sprites. It left much more to the imagination.

Graphics this, graphics king that...

Do people even care about how much fun a game is anymore? New Vegas is going to be bigger, have new features, and it's going to be more fun than Fallout 3.

Do the people that call the game an expanation even bother to research? This game is going to be even more massive than Fallout 3 and the only reason why people are brushing it off as a rip off is because the developers didn't spend an extra 2 years improving the visuals on the game's engine.lawlessx

Exactly. I wish more developers focused on adding new features or improving the gameplay instead of worrying about how the game looks.

[QUOTE="Words-of-Sorrow"]

I don't really mind graphics on these sort of games anyway; it's the content that counts.

[QUOTE="Fallout New Vegas Mega Wasteland Hype Thread"]

In comparison Fallout 3 had (without DLC)

-163 marked locations
-~20 side quests
-~35 free quests

And new Vegas has


-well over 200 marked locations
~70 full fledged sidequests
~90 free quests

The above info provided by "cerberuspledge" Thanks Brother...

dommeus

S'all good.

NICE. All of those quests will be good too, and not written by 12 year olds with pin up posters in their bedrooms.

Umm... what?:?

Graphics this, graphics king that...

Do people even care about how much fun a game is anymore? New Vegas is going to be bigger, have new features, and it's going to be more fun than Fallout 3.

hanslacher54

I don't mind if it looks the same, I just want it to run better on consoles (mainly the PS3, since that had tons of problems that were never addressed)

[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]

Isnt the game 4x the size of Fallout 3? It will be fine.

hotfiree

[QUOTE="hanslacher54"]

Graphics this, graphics king that...

Do people even care about how much fun a game is anymore? New Vegas is going to be bigger, have new features, and it's going to be more fun than Fallout 3.

ocstew

The graphics weren't the problem with Fallout 3, the aiming was, and it has been fixed.

1. I dont care about graphics

2. It has been said that the devs worked REALLY hard on makign a better story, dialogue and rpg elements then Fallout3 had

This game should be better then Fallout3 in every single way except graphics

WTF they are and a lot of others have mentioned this also. Talk about nothing but a 6 gig expansion:cry:

Look how low res most of this game is. :oROFLLLSSS

MortgageMan007

i'm glad Obsidian decided to focus their work on the gameplay content instead of the graphics.

As long as the gameplay is good, it's good :)

who cares? Still gonna be bad ass

do i care about graphics..not really no, as long as the gameplay is awesome, graphics are irrelevent

I don't think that anybody here played Fallout 3 for its graphics. And besides, it still looks better than Dragon Age.

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]Do the people that call the game an expanation even bother to research? This game is going to be even more massive than Fallout 3 and the only reason why people are brushing it off as a rip off is because the developers didn't spend an extra 2 years improving the visuals on the game's engine.hanslacher54

Exactly. I wish more developers focused on adding new features or improving the gameplay instead of worrying about how the game looks.

Thats just one bad pic, it might be stating the obvious, but FO3 looks pretty good overall due to its art design. Hopefully the engine has matured since, it was an absolute mess for Oblivion.GulliversTravel

Must be the console version, I think the PC version will look better.

Here are screenshots I took from my Fallout 3 gameplay.

.

.

.

[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]

Isnt the game 4x the size of Fallout 3? It will be fine.

hotfiree

[QUOTE="hotfiree"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]

Isnt the game 4x the size of Fallout 3? It will be fine.

ocstew

Yah Crysis could easily fit on one Xbox 360 disk.

PS2 quality visuals, great.

I don't really mind graphics on these sort of games anyway; it's the content that counts.

[QUOTE="Fallout New Vegas Mega Wasteland Hype Thread"]

In comparison Fallout 3 had (without DLC)

-163 marked locations
-~20 side quests
-~35 free quests

And new Vegas has


-well over 200 marked locations
~70 full fledged sidequests
~90 free quests

The above info provided by "cerberuspledge" Thanks Brother...

Words-of-Sorrow

S'all good.

bummer if true but tbo idc, i'm going to roam the wasteland and have a blast exploring and goofing around in another huge game.

fallout 3 was a bit clunky and slow paced but i still loved it.

i can see the point of people that don't like it though, it's not exactly an instant gratification type of game for the hair trigger types out there.

[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]

Isnt the game 4x the size of Fallout 3? It will be fine.

MortgageMan007

And I think this is why the Graphics in vegas took a hit and are not as sharp and lower res textures. Go look at pics it's not impressive looking at all.