[QUOTE="Flamestos"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Flamestos"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.Blackbond
Please what's done is done. If you're going to take on developing a PS3 game now that it's difficulties are common knowledge I expect a developer to put out a quality product or not bother at all Plus Bethesda has PS3 experience this is just a sloppy port.
Take the game as it is or don't take it at all then. Be thankful that you even got the game. Does Bethesda have experience with the PS3? Yes they do but they had 6 monthes to port the game over to PS3. They were not afforded this luxary with Fallout 3.
That's the reason developers especially this generation of gaming get away with putting out games filled with glitches, bugs and whatever else. Bethesda chose to release the game in that condition period if they needed more time they should've taking it. If I was a PS3 only owner I would just not buy Fallout 3. Good thing I'm not.
So you'd be willing to wait an extended period of time after the PC/360 for a PS3 version that is equal to the PC/360 version?
A choice between a sloppy port with glitches and some freezing or a good well developed port. If I'm spending $60 on it I think I'd rather have a product worth my money. Some people think Fallout 3 is fine and good enough for them on the PS3. I'm not one of them.
Log in to comment