Final Fantasy 1 coming out for the PSN... But in Japan

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for double_heist
double_heist

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 double_heist
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

http://scrawlfx.com/2009/06/final-fantasy-coming-to-japanese-playstation-store

Hopefully, we might see this coming too in the NA. :D

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

why not release the PSP remake instead of the ps1 version?

Avatar image for double_heist
double_heist

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 double_heist
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

why not release the PSP remake instead of the ps1 version?

WilliamRLBaker
There is already a PSP remake though, it costs around $30
Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

How many times has this game been released now?

Avatar image for double_heist
double_heist

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 double_heist
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

How many times has this game been released now?

agentfred
4-5 times I guess. This being probably the 5th. It's cheap too, $5.99 :P
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

why not release the PSP remake instead of the ps1 version?

double_heist
There is already a PSP remake though, it costs around $30

um....yes...hence the point of me saying why not release THE psp remake of final fantasy 1 instead of the ps1 version which is infact less then the psp version...
Avatar image for double_heist
double_heist

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 double_heist
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts
[QUOTE="double_heist"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

why not release the PSP remake instead of the ps1 version?

WilliamRLBaker
There is already a PSP remake though, it costs around $30

um....yes...hence the point of me saying why not release THE psp remake of final fantasy 1 instead of the ps1 version which is infact less then the psp version...

Beats me, like what they did with FF:T. It's going to be $5.99 though.
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

This game has already been milked to death, lets see some FFIX action already...

Avatar image for Luigi_Vincetana
Luigi_Vincetana

7389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Luigi_Vincetana
Member since 2004 • 7389 Posts
http://shop.ebay.com.au/?_from=R40&_trksid=p3907.m38.l1313&_nkw=Final+Fantasy+Dawn+of+Souls&_sacat=See-All-Categories 'Tis the way to go really.
Avatar image for -Grieves-
-Grieves-

1708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 -Grieves-
Member since 2007 • 1708 Posts

This game has already been milked to death, lets see some FFIX action already...

Blue-Sky

^That + FFVIII.

Avatar image for Warriorboy1990
Warriorboy1990

3813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#11 Warriorboy1990
Member since 2008 • 3813 Posts

Not getting it....I have the PSP version lol.

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#12 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

It wasn't even a very good game :|

Without the Final Fantasy name no one would care about these ancient, antiquated and plain mediocre RPG's (referring to the first three).

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

It wasn't even a very good game :|

Without the Final Fantasy name no one would care about these ancient, antiquated and plain mediocre RPG's (referring to the first three).

WAIW

I would, they are old games and as such inherently flawed but I still think that without the FF name I would have enjoyed them just as much. Or are you saying I'm a blind fanboy?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

4-5 times I guess. This being probably the 5th. It's cheap too, $5.99 :Pdouble_heist

Famicom/NES version
MSX2 version
FF I & II compilation for Famicom
Wonderswan Color version
FF I & II compilation for Playstation
FF I & II: Dawn of Souls compilation for Gameboy Advance
CDMA and docomo cellphone versions
SoftBank Yahoo! Keitai cellphone version
North American cellphone version
FF I & II compilation for PSP
Virtual Console version
PSN version

Its a few more than 4-5... Link Its at least 10. No game should be re-released that many times.

Avatar image for TheGreatOutdoor
TheGreatOutdoor

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 TheGreatOutdoor
Member since 2009 • 3234 Posts

I can't wait until they start releasing games that I don't already own the hard copy of.

Avatar image for double_heist
double_heist

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 double_heist
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

[QUOTE="double_heist"]4-5 times I guess. This being probably the 5th. It's cheap too, $5.99 :Pfoxhound_fox


Famicom/NES version
MSX2 version
FF I & II compilation for Famicom
Wonderswan Color version
FF I & II compilation for Playstation
FF I & II: Dawn of Souls compilation for Gameboy Advance
CDMA and docomo cellphone versions
SoftBank Yahoo! Keitai cellphone version
North American cellphone version
FF I & II compilation for PSP
Virtual Console version
PSN version

Its a few more than 4-5... Link Its at least 10. No game should be re-released that many times.



Wow o_o Anyway I might get it if it comes out :lol: But I'd really like to see IV, VI, VIII, and IX to be released though.

Avatar image for ShadowTech_FTW
ShadowTech_FTW

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 ShadowTech_FTW
Member since 2008 • 195 Posts

already got it on the gba sp..HAH

Avatar image for jyoung312
jyoung312

4971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 jyoung312
Member since 2003 • 4971 Posts
[QUOTE="double_heist"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="double_heist"] There is already a PSP remake though, it costs around $30

um....yes...hence the point of me saying why not release THE psp remake of final fantasy 1 instead of the ps1 version which is infact less then the psp version...

Beats me, like what they did with FF:T. It's going to be $5.99 though.

Bc then you can double dip in sales bc psp FFT and FF1 aren't playable on ps3.
Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#19 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

[QUOTE="WAIW"]

It wasn't even a very good game :|

Without the Final Fantasy name no one would care about these ancient, antiquated and plain mediocre RPG's (referring to the first three).

ActicEdge

I would, they are old games and as such inherently flawed but I still think that without the FF name I would have enjoyed them just as much. Or are you saying I'm a blind fanboy?

You are so, so right. "Almost nobody would care about these..." is what I should have said. Any game and every game has people that like it, no matter the name, level of quallity or anything else.
Avatar image for caryslan2
caryslan2

2486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 caryslan2
Member since 2005 • 2486 Posts

It wasn't even a very good game :|

Without the Final Fantasy name no one would care about these ancient, antiquated and plain mediocre RPG's (referring to the first three).

WAIW

Final Fantasy I is not a mediocre RPG by any means. Granted, it may seem dated compared to modern RPGs, but at the time of its original release it was one of the best RPGs you could get on a console. The various remakes over the years have helped update the game and move it closer to modern standards.

However, even the orginal NES version is hardly a mediocre game. It may feel dated, but its still a polished well-made game that I still play to this day.

FF I deserves respect for being a high-quality RPG that still appeals to fans and sees new releases on a regular basis. Its not successful because it has the Final Fantasy name attached to it, it reamins successful because its still an excellent RPG.

Without FF I's contrubtion to gaming there would be no Square Enix.

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#21 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

[QUOTE="WAIW"]

It wasn't even a very good game :|

Without the Final Fantasy name no one would care about these ancient, antiquated and plain mediocre RPG's (referring to the first three).

caryslan2

Final Fantasy I is not a mediocre RPG by any means. Granted, it may seem dated compared to modern RPGs, but at the time of its original release it was one of the best RPGs you could get on a console. The various remakes over the years have helped update the game and move it closer to modern standards.

However, even the orginal NES version is hardly a mediocre game. It may feel dated, but its still a polished well-made game that I still play to this day.

FF I deserves respect for being a high-quality RPG that still appeals to fans and sees new releases on a regular basis. Its not successful because it has the Final Fantasy name attached to it, it reamins successful because its still an excellent RPG.

Without FF I's contrubtion to gaming there would be no Square Enix.

Please tell me what you like about the game compared to other RPG's.

I find that compared to standard 6th-7th gen RPG's; it doesn't look good, it doesn't play well or differently from other RPG's, and the narrative is underdeveloped trash.

Avatar image for caryslan2
caryslan2

2486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 caryslan2
Member since 2005 • 2486 Posts

[QUOTE="caryslan2"]

[QUOTE="WAIW"]

It wasn't even a very good game :|

Without the Final Fantasy name no one would care about these ancient, antiquated and plain mediocre RPG's (referring to the first three).

WAIW

Final Fantasy I is not a mediocre RPG by any means. Granted, it may seem dated compared to modern RPGs, but at the time of its original release it was one of the best RPGs you could get on a console. The various remakes over the years have helped update the game and move it closer to modern standards.

However, even the orginal NES version is hardly a mediocre game. It may feel dated, but its still a polished well-made game that I still play to this day.

FF I deserves respect for being a high-quality RPG that still appeals to fans and sees new releases on a regular basis. Its not successful because it has the Final Fantasy name attached to it, it reamins successful because its still an excellent RPG.

Without FF I's contrubtion to gaming there would be no Square Enix.

Please tell me what you like about the game compared to other RPG's.

I find that compared to standard 6th-7th gen RPG's; it doesn't look good, it doesn't play well or differently from other RPG's, and the narrative is underdeveloped trash.

Regardless of the version you play, the game looks good when compared to other 8-bit or 16-bit titles. It play very well in the fact that the classes areunique, the boss fights areinteresting, and its an accomplishment to clear a dungeon. As for the battle system, it stills holds up after all these years. One thing to remember is that most RPGs owe their basic gameplay and combat systems to what Ultima, Dragon Quest I, and Final Fantasy I founded years before. Yes, they feel more advanced, but strip away the fancy combat systems and skill advancement systems and the foundations from those three games laid are stillapparent. Do you still go through menus to pick commands in an RPG battle(Even in a real time battle system)? Do you still gain EXP from battles?

As for the storyline, I enjoyed it. Yes, it has no chance of matching up to the storylines of 6th or 7th generation RPG, but then, very RPGs in that era had storylines that would match up with modern RPGs.

The problem with your argument is that you are comparing it to a 6th-7th generation RPG. Of course its gonna lose when compared to modern titles, it was developed in a older era where the standards of a quality RPG where different. Its like saying Super Mario Brothers sucks compared to Super Mario Galaxy because SMB looks dated, has a horrible storyline compared to SMG, and has fewer variety in levels.

If that argument can't fly against SMB, than the 6th-7th gen RPG argument can't work against FFI. The various remakes and releases were never designed to compete with the modern RPGs of their day, they were attempts to update the graphics to 16-bit standards in the hopes of attracting a new generation of gamers to the title.

As for the reason why I like FFI, its very simple. I like the game for its setting, gameplay, The ability to replaynumeroustimes with a different party, and the general style of the game. Yes, its not the greatest RPG I've ever played, but I still love the game and play it almost yearly.

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15070 Posts

That's cool for those who don't own it already and don't feel like spending more for the PSP version. I own the PS1 and PSP version...awesome game.

Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#24 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

Again? Seriously, how often is Square planning to rerelease the original Final Fantasy?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts

It wasn't even a very good game :|

Without the Final Fantasy name no one would care about these ancient, antiquated and plain mediocre RPG's (referring to the first three).

WAIW
It's one of my favorites and I've beaten them all. :) Don't get the point of this release though...there's the NES, PS1, GBA, PSP versions already.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
[QUOTE="agentfred"]

How many times has this game been released now?

double_heist
4-5 times I guess. This being probably the 5th. It's cheap too, $5.99 :P

How is that cheap? especially considering how old this game is. Anyway I don't understand why anyone would want to jump on and buy this game. I think their are better Final Fantasy's and more classic RPG's to buy out there.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
[QUOTE="double_heist"][QUOTE="agentfred"]

How many times has this game been released now?

JangoWuzHere
4-5 times I guess. This being probably the 5th. It's cheap too, $5.99 :P

How is that cheap? especially considering how old this game is. Anyway I don't understand why anyone would want to jump on and buy this game. I think their are better Final Fantasy's and more classic RPG's to buy out there.

I would jump in and buy this game if I didn't already have the PS1, GBA and PSP version >_>
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="double_heist"] 4-5 times I guess. This being probably the 5th. It's cheap too, $5.99 :P

How is that cheap? especially considering how old this game is. Anyway I don't understand why anyone would want to jump on and buy this game. I think their are better Final Fantasy's and more classic RPG's to buy out there.

I would jump in and buy this game if I didn't already have the PS1, GBA and PSP version >_>

for 6$? I don't know about you but that sounds like a rip off to me...
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"] How is that cheap? especially considering how old this game is. Anyway I don't understand why anyone would want to jump on and buy this game. I think their are better Final Fantasy's and more classic RPG's to buy out there.

I would jump in and buy this game if I didn't already have the PS1, GBA and PSP version >_>

for 6$? I don't know about you but that sounds like a rip off to me...

Cheaper than any of the versions I got.
Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts
I love how people decide it's "Cool" to bash anything with the name Final Fantasy on it nowdays. It's just too bad that these people are cutting themselves off from some of the best JRPG's there are out there.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

I love how people decide it's "Cool" to bash anything with the name Final Fantasy on it nowdays. It's just too bad that these people are cutting themselves off from some of the best JRPG's there are out there.Jynxzor

I don't think thats saying much really.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

I love how people decide it's "Cool" to bash anything with the name Final Fantasy on it nowdays. It's just too bad that these people are cutting themselves off from some of the best JRPG's there are out there.Jynxzor

based upon what bashing in this thread? no what your seeing is a logcal debate on how square being a remake company now rererererererererereleased final fantasy 1 on so many different systems and portable devices that its inane they are now releaseing it on psn and expecting peopel to pay 10 dollars for it.

Square doesn't make new IP's or new parts of a franchise any more in the way they should they instead spend 3-4 years on them and ride their old titles that they endlessly rerelease often with out any new content or upgrade at all.

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#33 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

[QUOTE="WAIW"]

[QUOTE="caryslan2"]

[QUOTE="WAIW"]

It wasn't even a very good game :|

Without the Final Fantasy name no one would care about these ancient, antiquated and plain mediocre RPG's (referring to the first three).

caryslan2

Final Fantasy I is not a mediocre RPG by any means. Granted, it may seem dated compared to modern RPGs, but at the time of its original release it was one of the best RPGs you could get on a console. The various remakes over the years have helped update the game and move it closer to modern standards.

However, even the orginal NES version is hardly a mediocre game. It may feel dated, but its still a polished well-made game that I still play to this day.

FF I deserves respect for being a high-quality RPG that still appeals to fans and sees new releases on a regular basis. Its not successful because it has the Final Fantasy name attached to it, it reamins successful because its still an excellent RPG.

Without FF I's contrubtion to gaming there would be no Square Enix.

Please tell me what you like about the game compared to other RPG's.

I find that compared to standard 6th-7th gen RPG's; it doesn't look good, it doesn't play well or differently from other RPG's, and the narrative is underdeveloped trash.

Regardless of the version you play, the game looks good when compared to other 8-bit or 16-bit titles. It play very well in the fact that the classes areunique, the boss fights areinteresting, and its an accomplishment to clear a dungeon. As for the battle system, it stills holds up after all these years. One thing to remember is that most RPGs owe their basic gameplay and combat systems to what Ultima, Dragon Quest I, and Final Fantasy I founded years before. Yes, they feel more advanced, but strip away the fancy combat systems and skill advancement systems and the foundations from those three games laid are stillapparent. Do you still go through menus to pick commands in an RPG battle(Even in a real time battle system)? Do you still gain EXP from battles?

As for the storyline, I enjoyed it. Yes, it has no chance of matching up to the storylines of 6th or 7th generation RPG, but then, very RPGs in that era had storylines that would match up with modern RPGs.

The problem with your argument is that you are comparing it to a 6th-7th generation RPG. Of course its gonna lose when compared to modern titles, it was developed in a older era where the standards of a quality RPG where different. Its like saying Super Mario Brothers sucks compared to Super Mario Galaxy because SMB looks dated, has a horrible storyline compared to SMG, and has fewer variety in levels.

If that argument can't fly against SMB, than the 6th-7th gen RPG argument can't work against FFI. The various remakes and releases were never designed to compete with the modern RPGs of their day, they were attempts to update the graphics to 16-bit standards in the hopes of attracting a new generation of gamers to the title.

As for the reason why I like FFI, its very simple. I like the game for its setting, gameplay, The ability to replaynumeroustimes with a different party, and the general style of the game. Yes, its not the greatest RPG I've ever played, but I still love the game and play it almost yearly.


What I find flawed about your agument; you are making excuses for the game. It's like people who feel the need to love indie games so much, they forgive them for their shortcomings. Compared to modern RPG's, it simply isn't notable -- like you said. The battle system, for example, is generic and has been done better a thousand times (sure, it started the trend, but that can't make up for the fact that it's outdated now).

Hence, without the FInal Fantasy name, the number of people looking forward to this would be much smaller. It has nothing tha makes it exceptional by today's standards; to the contrary, I feel it is below average for an RPG in today's world of gaming. If you like the game today for what it was yesterday, fine. I can't think that way.

I love how people decide it's "Cool" to bash anything with the name Final Fantasy on it nowdays. It's just too bad that these people are cutting themselves off from some of the best JRPG's there are out there.Jynxzor

I love how people always assume someone who doesn't like Final Fantasy is trying to boost their own ego or something.

Avatar image for HOMIE_G64
HOMIE_G64

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#34 HOMIE_G64
Member since 2005 • 1482 Posts

[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]

This game has already been milked to death, lets see some FFIX action already...

-Grieves-

^That + FFVIII.

Amazon + PS2 = Very nice? Honestly, it is a nice thing that they are rerererererereleasing the Final Fantasy games on a different medium. Not everybody was hardcore back in the days like SW, and some *gasp* have not played all the Final Fantasy games and don't have mommies and daddies that buy them a PSP where they could have potentially enjoyed the first one. Now that it is coming to the PSN on the PS3, people who own the PS3 can enjoy Final Fantasy.
Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts

based upon what bashing in this thread? no what your seeing is a logcal debate on how square being a remake company now rererererererererereleased final fantasy 1 on so many different systems and portable devices that its inane they are now releaseing it on psn and expecting peopel to pay 10 dollars for it.

Square doesn't make new IP's or new parts of a franchise any more in the way they should they instead spend 3-4 years on them and ride their old titles that they endlessly rerelease often with out any new content or upgrade at all.

WilliamRLBaker

Certanly SE remakes there games way too much, but I see way to much hate on the series itself that it doesn't deserve. Hell I'm not too enthralled that they are re-releasing the game "Again" either, but hey at least people who never played it have the chance. I would much rather see the costs put into making FF13 or V13 come out a little sooner.

Avatar image for D00nut
D00nut

7618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#36 D00nut
Member since 2003 • 7618 Posts

It makes sense I guess for it to come to Japan, how many of today's gamers actually have ever touched the first Final Fantasy? It's rare to see any of them even know about FF6/FF3.

Avatar image for caryslan2
caryslan2

2486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 caryslan2
Member since 2005 • 2486 Posts

[QUOTE="caryslan2"]

[QUOTE="WAIW"]

Regardless of the version you play, the game looks good when compared to other 8-bit or 16-bit titles. It play very well in the fact that the classes areunique, the boss fights areinteresting, and its an accomplishment to clear a dungeon. As for the battle system, it stills holds up after all these years. One thing to remember is that most RPGs owe their basic gameplay and combat systems to what Ultima, Dragon Quest I, and Final Fantasy I founded years before. Yes, they feel more advanced, but strip away the fancy combat systems and skill advancement systems and the foundations from those three games laid are stillapparent. Do you still go through menus to pick commands in an RPG battle(Even in a real time battle system)? Do you still gain EXP from battles?

As for the storyline, I enjoyed it. Yes, it has no chance of matching up to the storylines of 6th or 7th generation RPG, but then, very RPGs in that era had storylines that would match up with modern RPGs.

The problem with your argument is that you are comparing it to a 6th-7th generation RPG. Of course its gonna lose when compared to modern titles, it was developed in a older era where the standards of a quality RPG where different. Its like saying Super Mario Brothers sucks compared to Super Mario Galaxy because SMB looks dated, has a horrible storyline compared to SMG, and has fewer variety in levels.

If that argument can't fly against SMB, than the 6th-7th gen RPG argument can't work against FFI. The various remakes and releases were never designed to compete with the modern RPGs of their day, they were attempts to update the graphics to 16-bit standards in the hopes of attracting a new generation of gamers to the title.

As for the reason why I like FFI, its very simple. I like the game for its setting, gameplay, The ability to replaynumeroustimes with a different party, and the general style of the game. Yes, its not the greatest RPG I've ever played, but I still love the game and play it almost yearly.

WAIW


What I find flawed about your agument; you are making excuses for the game. It's like people who feel the need to love indie games so much, they forgive them for their shortcomings. Compared to modern RPG's, it simply isn't notable -- like you said. The battle system, for example, is generic and has been done better a thousand times (sure, it started the trend, but that can't make up for the fact that it's outdated now).

Hence, without the FInal Fantasy name, the number of people looking forward to this would be much smaller. It has nothing tha makes it exceptional by today's standards; to the contrary, I feel it is below average for an RPG in today's world of gaming. If you like the game today for what it was yesterday, fine. I can't think that way.

I love how people decide it's "Cool" to bash anything with the name Final Fantasy on it nowdays. It's just too bad that these people are cutting themselves off from some of the best JRPG's there are out there.Jynxzor

I love how people always assume someone who doesn't like Final Fantasy is trying to boost their own ego or something.

And why are you compareing FFI to modern RPGs? Like I said before, what you are doing is like somebody compareing Super Mario Brothers to Super Mario Galaxy. As I said before, the game can't compare to modern RPGs because it was desgined in a different era. FFI does not get by simply because it carries the Final Fantasy name. It still sees ports on modern systems because people love the game and it was a success back when it first came out in Japan and the US.

I fail to see how the battle system is generic when it was one of the first games to use it.

Its notable because it and DQI helped introduce concepts that are still used in modern RPGs. Its fine if you want to dislike FFI, but you need a better reason than it doens't compare to modern RPGs. Going by that logic, almost any game over 15 years old would look dated and generic compared to modern games.

Avatar image for double_heist
double_heist

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 double_heist
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts
[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="double_heist"] 4-5 times I guess. This being probably the 5th. It's cheap too, $5.99 :P

How is that cheap? especially considering how old this game is. Anyway I don't understand why anyone would want to jump on and buy this game. I think their are better Final Fantasy's and more classic RPG's to buy out there.

I would jump in and buy this game if I didn't already have the PS1, GBA and PSP version >_>

I lost my FF1 Origins copy so if it comes out, yea I might buy it IF it comes out. Maybe it will support trophies :P
Avatar image for Kiljoy66
Kiljoy66

481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Kiljoy66
Member since 2008 • 481 Posts

Freaking bastards have Einhander too! :evil::evil::evil::evil::evil::evil::evil::evil::evil: