First 11 minutes of Alan Wake up (video inside, your pants might explode)

If this was the game to prove that the 360 can be good as a PS3...It failed. You get screen tearing with almost nothing happening on screen. GOW 3 looks better with way more stuff happening on screen and it has smooth framerate.

GeneralShowzer

Huh?

How do you know that screen-tearing isn't the video encoding, or the player?

How do you know that nothing is happening on screen from a 10 minute video?

How do you know that is the latest video clip, and not something that was introduced long ago, and re-used by the video sites?

Did you see the same video I did? Or is your inherent bias ruining it for the rest of us?

TL : DR- Let's wait till next month.

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

If this was the game to prove that the 360 can be good as a PS3...It failed. You get screen tearing with almost nothing happening on screen. GOW 3 looks better with way more stuff happening on screen and it has smooth framerate.

Salt_The_Fries

If this was the game to prove that the 360 can be good as a PS3...It failed. You get screen tearing with almost nothing happening on screen. GOW 3 looks better with way more stuff happening on screen and it has smooth framerate.

GeneralShowzer

Its screen tearing duo to encoding,dont worry,there is no screen tearing in game,confirmed by devs.

I like the narrative and the graphics look great although I think they've made a mistake on two key things; the camera is too far out (it should be shoulder height like Dead Space) and the cutscenes really take you out of the moment and ruin the atmosphere.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

This must be pre-rendered!! Only PS3 can run those graphics :P

Seriously, looks amazing :D

Chutebox

I wasnt serious man. But i desagree with the second part of your post

The voice is actually Alice because Alan fell asleep in the car on the drive to Bright Falls.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

This must be pre-rendered!! Only PS3 can run those graphics :P

Seriously, looks amazing :D

PAL360

I wasnt serious man. But i desagree with the second part of your post

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Ugh, you really had to start? If anything that video cements U2 and KZ2 at the top for now.Chutebox

I wasnt serious man. But i desagree with the second part of your post

On the serious note,UC2 looks better,not that AW is bad(we still have to see day light) but UC2 edges it.

video is loading too slow!wolverine4262

[QUOTE="Giancar"]my most hyped 360 game for sure! :DSalt_The_Fries

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]video is loading too slow!Chutebox

Freakin JEEZ, how can Cows not see that looks as good and better than Uncharted 2. Thats freakin AWESOME.

Freakin JEEZ, how can Cows not see that looks as good and better than Uncharted 2. Thats freakin AWESOME.

Hathesulacon

[QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]

Freakin JEEZ, how can Cows not see that looks as good and better than Uncharted 2. Thats freakin AWESOME.

Chutebox

I think they could have picked a better voice for Alan Wake, and i really hope the story doesnt go down the "Split personality" path.

Anyway it looks pretty spooky, and if it decides to come out on PC it will be a day one purchase for me.

[QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]

Freakin JEEZ, how can Cows not see that looks as good and better than Uncharted 2. Thats freakin AWESOME.

Chutebox

Both of you guys are just shooting up opinions, leave the graphics be until the game comes out.

[QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]

Freakin JEEZ, how can Cows not see that looks as good and better than Uncharted 2. Thats freakin AWESOME.

Chutebox

It cant look better then UC2 in its wildest dreams.Yea lightning is better,but textures,animations,character models no contest,UC2 wins hands down.RDR looks better then AW,and is bit worse then UC2,lemms should get their hopes for that game.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]

Freakin JEEZ, how can Cows not see that looks as good and better than Uncharted 2. Thats freakin AWESOME.

Bus-A-Bus

It cant look better then UC2 in its wildest dreams.Yea lightning is better,but textures,animations,character models no contest,UC2 wins hands down.RDR looks better then AW,and is bit worse then UC2,lemms should get their hopes for that game.

In my opinion, Alan wake comes together and has a nice "real" vibe to it. Yeah, Alan wake has weaker textures/animation. But all the light/shadow(I also think they use SSAO and SS) also makes it look very good it is close. This is only one part I expect the game too look better in other parts as well, like the slightly older videos.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]

Freakin JEEZ, how can Cows not see that looks as good and better than Uncharted 2. Thats freakin AWESOME.

MC3887

Both of you guys are just shooting up opinions, leave the graphics be until the game comes out.

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Because it doesn't, just let it go and stop being like cows and actually hype the gameplay.Chutebox

Both of you guys are just shooting up opinions, leave the graphics be until the game comes out.

Atleast it will be better opinions.

The interior looks so amazing just got to that part.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Because it doesn't, just let it go and stop being like cows and actually hype the gameplay.MC3887

It cant look better then UC2 in its wildest dreams.Yea lightning is better,but textures,animations,character models no contest,UC2 wins hands down.RDR looks better then AW,and is bit worse then UC2,lemms should get their hopes for that game.

In my opinion, Alan wake comes together and has a nice "real" vibe to it. Yeah, Alan wake has weaker textures/animation. But all the light/shadow(I also think they use SSAO and SS) also makes it look very good it is close. This is only one part I expect the game too look better in other parts as well, like the slightly older videos.

Game looks great,aint no body will say otherwise,its just you can feel that engine is a bit old.Textures look meh and poly count appears to be pretty low in comparison with newer games.Lightning is great,volumetric fog looks nice and all,but game looks a bit to stiff.Anyway,Gears 2 is still benchmark for 360 exclusives and it will be bettered by RDR,then Gears 3 which could REALLY look nice according to what Cliffy said in latest interview and what Epic showed with updated UE3.We wont count Crysis 2 in this :P People should just take it easy with these gfx wars,it lasts now for 5 yrs and there is no sign of that stopin,so cows have to include MGS4 and Rachet in their "cant be done on 360 lists" while lemms are hyping AW to be better then UC2 while it really does not.

http://techland.com/2010/04/13/the-techland-interview-cliff-bleszinski-part-1/3/

At what stage of development are you for G3?

"We're a year out. At this point, the campaign is fully playable. A lot of the co-op and multiplayer features are coming online. Previously, for Gears 2, our tagline was "Bigger, Better, More Bad-Ass," which got played out very quickly. The key messages for Gears 3 are that it will be the best-looking, most fun Gears to date but it'll also be the most polished. And that's the beauty of holding it off until April. Holiday [timeframe for releases] is still so jammed so it's, like, let's carve out our own window like Will Smith used to do with July 4th. Let's call out our date and take the next year and just make a great game and polish it. Because the bar continues to be raised. There's some amazing games out there, from Uncharted 2 to Modern Warfare, and we need to exceed that bar [from where they raised it]."

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

It cant look better then UC2 in its wildest dreams.Yea lightning is better,but textures,animations,character models no contest,UC2 wins hands down.RDR looks better then AW,and is bit worse then UC2,lemms should get their hopes for that game.

Bus-A-Bus

In my opinion, Alan wake comes together and has a nice "real" vibe to it. Yeah, Alan wake has weaker textures/animation. But all the light/shadow(I also think they use SSAO and SS) also makes it look very good it is close. This is only one part I expect the game too look better in other parts as well, like the slightly older videos.

Game looks great,aint no body will say otherwise,its just you can feel that engine is a bit old.Textures look meh and poly count appears to be pretty low in comparison with newer games.Lightning is great,volumetric fog looks nice and all,but game looks a bit to stiff.Anyway,Gears 2 is still benchmark for 360 exclusives and it will be bettered by RDR,then Gears 3 which could REALLY look nice according to what Cliffy said in latest interview and what Epic showed with updated UE3.We wont count Crysis 2 in this :P People should just take it easy with these gfx wars,it lasts now for 5 yrs and there is no sign of that stopin,so cows have to include MGS4 and Rachet in their "cant be done on 360 lists" while lemms are hyping AW to be better then UC2 while it really does not.

http://techland.com/2010/04/13/the-techland-interview-cliff-bleszinski-part-1/3/

At what stage of development are you for G3?

"We're a year out. At this point, the campaign is fully playable. A lot of the co-op and multiplayer features are coming online. Previously, for Gears 2, our tagline was "Bigger, Better, More Bad-Ass," which got played out very quickly. The key messages for Gears 3 are that it will be the best-looking, most fun Gears to date but it'll also be the most polished. And that's the beauty of holding it off until April. Holiday [timeframe for releases] is still so jammed so it's, like, let's carve out our own window like Will Smith used to do with July 4th. Let's call out our date and take the next year and just make a great game and polish it. Because the bar continues to be raised. There's some amazing games out there, from Uncharted 2 to Modern Warfare, and we need to exceed that bar [from where they raised it]."

Well, I gonna have to disagree with you here, AWs engine seems very dynamic, I meas tornado's, things flying places, weather, lights moving, shooting lights out, etc. The textures are probably slightly above average and poly counts on the character is slightly below average, but AW looks very detailed to me, especially in interiors. That said I don't think RDR looks that great. I know C2 will probaby crush everything, I don't think epic has anything on remedy either.

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

It cant look better then UC2 in its wildest dreams.Yea lightning is better,but textures,animations,character models no contest,UC2 wins hands down.RDR looks better then AW,and is bit worse then UC2,lemms should get their hopes for that game.

Bus-A-Bus

In my opinion, Alan wake comes together and has a nice "real" vibe to it. Yeah, Alan wake has weaker textures/animation. But all the light/shadow(I also think they use SSAO and SS) also makes it look very good it is close. This is only one part I expect the game too look better in other parts as well, like the slightly older videos.

Game looks great,aint no body will say otherwise,its just you can feel that engine is a bit old.Textures look meh and poly count appears to be pretty low in comparison with newer games.Lightning is great,volumetric fog looks nice and all,but game looks a bit to stiff.Anyway,Gears 2 is still benchmark for 360 exclusives and it will be bettered by RDR,then Gears 3 which could REALLY look nice according to what Cliffy said in latest interview and what Epic showed with updated UE3.We wont count Crysis 2 in this :P People should just take it easy with these gfx wars,it lasts now for 5 yrs and there is no sign of that stopin,so cows have to include MGS4 and Rachet in their "cant be done on 360 lists" while lemms are hyping AW to be better then UC2 while it really does not.

http://techland.com/2010/04/13/the-techland-interview-cliff-bleszinski-part-1/3/

At what stage of development are you for G3?

"We're a year out. At this point, the campaign is fully playable. A lot of the co-op and multiplayer features are coming online. Previously, for Gears 2, our tagline was "Bigger, Better, More Bad-Ass," which got played out very quickly. The key messages for Gears 3 are that it will be the best-looking, most fun Gears to date but it'll also be the most polished. And that's the beauty of holding it off until April. Holiday [timeframe for releases] is still so jammed so it's, like, let's carve out our own window like Will Smith used to do with July 4th. Let's call out our date and take the next year and just make a great game and polish it. Because the bar continues to be raised. There's some amazing games out there, from Uncharted 2 to Modern Warfare, and we need to exceed that bar [from where they raised it]."

are you brain-washed ?? i could swear you were a lemming not long time ago!!!!!!!

[QUOTE="theseekar"]

Well, Crytek have to start looking for another job as it seems :)

At last, true next gen stunning visuals on a real game with real art, and not generic jungles or cities like Crysis 1-2

GeneralShowzer

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

In my opinion, Alan wake comes together and has a nice "real" vibe to it. Yeah, Alan wake has weaker textures/animation. But all the light/shadow(I also think they use SSAO and SS) also makes it look very good it is close. This is only one part I expect the game too look better in other parts as well, like the slightly older videos.

MC3887

Game looks great,aint no body will say otherwise,its just you can feel that engine is a bit old.Textures look meh and poly count appears to be pretty low in comparison with newer games.Lightning is great,volumetric fog looks nice and all,but game looks a bit to stiff.Anyway,Gears 2 is still benchmark for 360 exclusives and it will be bettered by RDR,then Gears 3 which could REALLY look nice according to what Cliffy said in latest interview and what Epic showed with updated UE3.We wont count Crysis 2 in this :P People should just take it easy with these gfx wars,it lasts now for 5 yrs and there is no sign of that stopin,so cows have to include MGS4 and Rachet in their "cant be done on 360 lists" while lemms are hyping AW to be better then UC2 while it really does not.

http://techland.com/2010/04/13/the-techland-interview-cliff-bleszinski-part-1/3/

At what stage of development are you for G3?

"We're a year out. At this point, the campaign is fully playable. A lot of the co-op and multiplayer features are coming online. Previously, for Gears 2, our tagline was "Bigger, Better, More Bad-Ass," which got played out very quickly. The key messages for Gears 3 are that it will be the best-looking, most fun Gears to date but it'll also be the most polished. And that's the beauty of holding it off until April. Holiday [timeframe for releases] is still so jammed so it's, like, let's carve out our own window like Will Smith used to do with July 4th. Let's call out our date and take the next year and just make a great game and polish it. Because the bar continues to be raised. There's some amazing games out there, from Uncharted 2 to Modern Warfare, and we need to exceed that bar [from where they raised it]."

Well, I gonna have to disagree with you here, AWs engine seems very dynamic, I meas tornado's, things flying places, weather, lights moving, shooting lights out, etc. The textures are probably slightly above average and poly counts on the character is slightly below average, but AW looks very detailed to me, especially in interiors. That said I don't think RDR looks that great. I know C2 will probaby crush everything, I don't think epic has anything on remedy either.

Well Epic is just notch above 99% of devs when it comes to graphics and rendering engines,and they are quite better then Remedy.Gears 1 was first undisputed gfx king.Gears 2 was rushed and engine wasnt advanced that much(like this time around) but it was still best looking game on consoles in 2008.Gears 3 will have more time to polish,more advanced UE3,i dont know if you have seen GDC 10 updates but it looks second to CE3,AMAZING.They now have much better foliage,texture streaming,shadowing,better lightning,added indirect lightning and much better animation,thats just enough to sit there with the best.

RDR looks to me easily better then AW,even textures mind you its open world game look better then AW.Character models look amazing,almost UC2ish and animation could end up being one of the best this gen.I dont know if you watched this trailer but it does look more impressive then AW.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttBRf7yNzhQ

I thought the environment looked great but there's too much hand-holding. Anyone else notice all the checkpoints? Did they really need a bright light in the sky to explain that enemies are vulnerable to light? Couldn't you just let the player figure that out?

It looks like a good game but the preview didn't blow me away. I was hoping for something closer to Silent Hill where the game isn't your friend.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

In my opinion, Alan wake comes together and has a nice "real" vibe to it. Yeah, Alan wake has weaker textures/animation. But all the light/shadow(I also think they use SSAO and SS) also makes it look very good it is close. This is only one part I expect the game too look better in other parts as well, like the slightly older videos.

2mrw

Game looks great,aint no body will say otherwise,its just you can feel that engine is a bit old.Textures look meh and poly count appears to be pretty low in comparison with newer games.Lightning is great,volumetric fog looks nice and all,but game looks a bit to stiff.Anyway,Gears 2 is still benchmark for 360 exclusives and it will be bettered by RDR,then Gears 3 which could REALLY look nice according to what Cliffy said in latest interview and what Epic showed with updated UE3.We wont count Crysis 2 in this :P People should just take it easy with these gfx wars,it lasts now for 5 yrs and there is no sign of that stopin,so cows have to include MGS4 and Rachet in their "cant be done on 360 lists" while lemms are hyping AW to be better then UC2 while it really does not.

http://techland.com/2010/04/13/the-techland-interview-cliff-bleszinski-part-1/3/

At what stage of development are you for G3?

"We're a year out. At this point, the campaign is fully playable. A lot of the co-op and multiplayer features are coming online. Previously, for Gears 2, our tagline was "Bigger, Better, More Bad-Ass," which got played out very quickly. The key messages for Gears 3 are that it will be the best-looking, most fun Gears to date but it'll also be the most polished. And that's the beauty of holding it off until April. Holiday [timeframe for releases] is still so jammed so it's, like, let's carve out our own window like Will Smith used to do with July 4th. Let's call out our date and take the next year and just make a great game and polish it. Because the bar continues to be raised. There's some amazing games out there, from Uncharted 2 to Modern Warfare, and we need to exceed that bar [from where they raised it]."

are you brain-washed ?? i could swear you were a lemming not long time ago!!!!!!!

I was NEVER a lemm,i was heavily biased towards them because im irritated by cows,but no body gonna tell me this looks better then UC2,IMO Gears 2 looks better.AW looks somehow empty,i dont know but im not so impressed.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]

Freakin JEEZ, how can Cows not see that looks as good and better than Uncharted 2. Thats freakin AWESOME.

I think they could have picked a better voice for Alan Wake, and i really hope the story doesnt go down the "Split personality" path.

Anyway it looks pretty spooky, and if it decides to come out on PC it will be a day one purchase for me.

It is tempting, but I just cannot watch this.

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Game looks great,aint no body will say otherwise,its just you can feel that engine is a bit old.Textures look meh and poly count appears to be pretty low in comparison with newer games.Lightning is great,volumetric fog looks nice and all,but game looks a bit to stiff.Anyway,Gears 2 is still benchmark for 360 exclusives and it will be bettered by RDR,then Gears 3 which could REALLY look nice according to what Cliffy said in latest interview and what Epic showed with updated UE3.We wont count Crysis 2 in this :P People should just take it easy with these gfx wars,it lasts now for 5 yrs and there is no sign of that stopin,so cows have to include MGS4 and Rachet in their "cant be done on 360 lists" while lemms are hyping AW to be better then UC2 while it really does not.

http://techland.com/2010/04/13/the-techland-interview-cliff-bleszinski-part-1/3/

At what stage of development are you for G3?

"We're a year out. At this point, the campaign is fully playable. A lot of the co-op and multiplayer features are coming online. Previously, for Gears 2, our tagline was "Bigger, Better, More Bad-Ass," which got played out very quickly. The key messages for Gears 3 are that it will be the best-looking, most fun Gears to date but it'll also be the most polished. And that's the beauty of holding it off until April. Holiday [timeframe for releases] is still so jammed so it's, like, let's carve out our own window like Will Smith used to do with July 4th. Let's call out our date and take the next year and just make a great game and polish it. Because the bar continues to be raised. There's some amazing games out there, from Uncharted 2 to Modern Warfare, and we need to exceed that bar [from where they raised it]."

Bus-A-Bus

Well, I gonna have to disagree with you here, AWs engine seems very dynamic, I meas tornado's, things flying places, weather, lights moving, shooting lights out, etc. The textures are probably slightly above average and poly counts on the character is slightly below average, but AW looks very detailed to me, especially in interiors. That said I don't think RDR looks that great. I know C2 will probaby crush everything, I don't think epic has anything on remedy either.

Well Epic is just notch above 99% of devs when it comes to graphics and rendering engines,and they are quite better then Remedy.Gears 1 was first undisputed gfx king.Gears 2 was rushed and engine wasnt advanced that much(like this time around) but it was still best looking game on consoles in 2008.Gears 3 will have more time to polish,more advanced UE3,i dont know if you have seen GDC 10 updates but it looks second to CE3,AMAZING.They now have much better foliage,texture streaming,shadowing,better lightning,added indirect lightning and much better animation,thats just enough to sit there with the best.

RDR looks to me easily better then AW,even textures mind you its open world game look better then AW.Character models look amazing,almost UC2ish and animation could end up being one of the best this gen.I dont know if you watched this trailer but it does look more impressive then AW.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttBRf7yNzhQ

Alan wake is still open as well. RDR character models are better than AW but not UC2/GEOW IMO.. I just disagree with you I think AW>>>GEOW2 graphically so far and is a good match up for UC2, but regardless, what happens, happens I guess.

[QUOTE="2mrw"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Game looks great,aint no body will say otherwise,its just you can feel that engine is a bit old.Textures look meh and poly count appears to be pretty low in comparison with newer games.Lightning is great,volumetric fog looks nice and all,but game looks a bit to stiff.Anyway,Gears 2 is still benchmark for 360 exclusives and it will be bettered by RDR,then Gears 3 which could REALLY look nice according to what Cliffy said in latest interview and what Epic showed with updated UE3.We wont count Crysis 2 in this :P People should just take it easy with these gfx wars,it lasts now for 5 yrs and there is no sign of that stopin,so cows have to include MGS4 and Rachet in their "cant be done on 360 lists" while lemms are hyping AW to be better then UC2 while it really does not.

http://techland.com/2010/04/13/the-techland-interview-cliff-bleszinski-part-1/3/

At what stage of development are you for G3?

"We're a year out. At this point, the campaign is fully playable. A lot of the co-op and multiplayer features are coming online. Previously, for Gears 2, our tagline was "Bigger, Better, More Bad-Ass," which got played out very quickly. The key messages for Gears 3 are that it will be the best-looking, most fun Gears to date but it'll also be the most polished. And that's the beauty of holding it off until April. Holiday [timeframe for releases] is still so jammed so it's, like, let's carve out our own window like Will Smith used to do with July 4th. Let's call out our date and take the next year and just make a great game and polish it. Because the bar continues to be raised. There's some amazing games out there, from Uncharted 2 to Modern Warfare, and we need to exceed that bar [from where they raised it]."

Bus-A-Bus

are you brain-washed ?? i could swear you were a lemming not long time ago!!!!!!!

I was NEVER a lemm,i was heavily biased towards them because im irritated by cows,but no body gonna tell me this looks better then UC2,IMO Gears 2 looks better.AW looks somehow empty,i dont know but im not so impressed.

either way i like the new you, keep up that good attitude :P .

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="2mrw"]

are you brain-washed ?? i could swear you were a lemming not long time ago!!!!!!!

2mrw

I was NEVER a lemm,i was heavily biased towards them because im irritated by cows,but no body gonna tell me this looks better then UC2,IMO Gears 2 looks better.AW looks somehow empty,i dont know but im not so impressed.

either way i like the new you, keep up that good attitude :P .

So...cows will like me :) See my new avatar?Yes,i am now in very critical mode :P

[QUOTE="brennan7777"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Because it doesn't, just let it go and stop being like cows and actually hype the gameplay.KevinButlerVP

I think they could have picked a better voice for Alan Wake, and i really hope the story doesnt go down the "Split personality" path.

Anyway it looks pretty spooky, and if it decides to come out on PC it will be a day one purchase for me.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="2mrw"]

are you brain-washed ?? i could swear you were a lemming not long time ago!!!!!!!

2mrw

I was NEVER a lemm,i was heavily biased towards them because im irritated by cows,but no body gonna tell me this looks better then UC2,IMO Gears 2 looks better.AW looks somehow empty,i dont know but im not so impressed.

either way i like the new you, keep up that good attitude :P .

Lol, not everyone has to be a certain way because they are part of a "faction", just because I am consider a lem doesn't mean I will stop think GEOW stinks(MP, hate the gameplay, well, incomparison to halo). Not everyone has to be a ardcore fanboy like some people around here....*ahem*

This game has a lot of blur.

This game has a lot of blur.

TintedEyes

OMG, you went through, watched the video to find ANY possible flaw(ANY), found one with most blur(the one that transitions the camera closer no less!) and came in here to say it has blur, rofl.

It is tempting, but I just cannot watch this.

ironcreed

[QUOTE="2mrw"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

I was NEVER a lemm,i was heavily biased towards them because im irritated by cows,but no body gonna tell me this looks better then UC2,IMO Gears 2 looks better.AW looks somehow empty,i dont know but im not so impressed.

either way i like the new you, keep up that good attitude :P .

So...cows will like me :) See my new avatar?Yes,i am now in very critical mode :P

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="2mrw"]

either way i like the new you, keep up that good attitude :P .

2mrw

So...cows will like me :) See my new avatar?Yes,i am now in very critical mode :P

Is my meter broken?

Looks amazing! Welp, I guess all those cows and hermits need to get a 360 to play this, MS was smart to lock it up on their console, seeing as how bashed the 360 gets for its love affair with PC titles. I for one hope it never comes to PC, because it will jsut be pirated and used by those avoiding a 360.

Phazevariance

How about I just pirate it for the 360 instead and buy it for the PC if it ever comes to it? Huh? I don't care much for supporting the consoles, I like to support the underdog.

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]

This game has a lot of blur.

MC3887

OMG, you went through, watched the video to find ANY possible flaw(ANY), found one with most blur(the one that transitions the camera closer no less!) and came in here to say it has blur, rofl.

Graphics King???? Helllllllll no.

UC2 looks so much better it almost upsets me. Although, maybe it's just the pretty colours UC2 uses.

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]

This game has a lot of blur.

TintedEyes

OMG, you went through, watched the video to find ANY possible flaw(ANY), found one with most blur(the one that transitions the camera closer no less!) and came in here to say it has blur, rofl.

You know there is a reason lems bash KZ2 for blur right? Because it is really excessive, however almost everygame has blur now a days.

Graphics King???? Helllllllll no.

UC2 looks so much better it almost upsets me. Although, maybe it's just the pretty colours UC2 uses.

-Snooze-

Have you seen all the vids? The tutorial, is really lackluster compared to the other vids out of the tutorial.