First game with graphics comparable to Crysis?

It seems as if Project Offset is the first game that can be compared to in the same league as Crysis. I never mentioned anything about it being better.

Watch the videos and let me know what you think. While you watch them, keep in mind:

-This is a different art style.

-This game (or what they show of it) is in it's early stages of development..

-Don't be immature and bash any consoles or the PC, this is about a game, not a console.

Anyways, here's the link to the gamespot page for the 360 one.

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/projectoffset/index.html?tag=result;title;0

And the official site with more information and even more videos about the game and the engine.

www.projectoffset.com

---

Some pictures.

Let me know what you think!

=)

ehh...naaaa

good lookin game though

While good looking, it's not comparable to Crysis.

Here are some recent pictures:
http://projectoffset.com/images/teaser_k7pHUthA.jpg
http://projectoffset.com/images/teaser_Jeya8JKL.jpg

That's funny, I didn't see shadows on the ogre.

And they say "we have soft shadows on everything". Where is it? They didn't even say if it was dynamic. Where's volumetric clouds? Where's realtime ambient maps?

Seriously has nothing against Crysis. One Cryengine 2 tech demo blows this away.

This is ridiculously old and we really don't know too much about how the game is now, I'm sure there have been LOTS of changes. I bet UT3 with highest settings (on PC) will be comparable to crysis.MTBare

[QUOTE="MTBare"]This is ridiculously old and we really don't know too much about how the game is now, I'm sure there have been LOTS of changes. I bet UT3 with highest settings (on PC) will be comparable to crysis.smokeydabear076

The unreal engine has zero innovations that Cryengine is bringing. Even the Source engine is still better than the unreal engine.

FINALLY!

A possible decent Fantasy FPS ... why they havnt been done before much I dont know (Except the Legends of Might & Magic ones).

Not quite Crysis, but looks nice.

Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.Heil68

Project Offset is also a PC title.

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="MTBare"]This is ridiculously old and we really don't know too much about how the game is now, I'm sure there have been LOTS of changes. I bet UT3 with highest settings (on PC) will be comparable to crysis.NobuoMusicMaker

The unreal engine has zero innovations that Cryengine is bringing. Even the Source engine is still better than the unreal engine.

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="MTBare"]This is ridiculously old and we really don't know too much about how the game is now, I'm sure there have been LOTS of changes. I bet UT3 with highest settings (on PC) will be comparable to crysis.smokeydabear076

The unreal engine has zero innovations that Cryengine is bringing. Even the Source engine is still better than the unreal engine.

Mhmm, there was a thread saying UT3 would push into Quad Cores to get it maxxed ... has there been any info released on UT3's performance?

I dont know why Unreal Tournement 3 would require a Quad Core ... I mean ... yea it has physics ... but its mainly a RAM / GPU intensive kind of game ... since there isnt much physics other than ragdolls/ Vehicles.

all the previous UT games have been pretty CPU dependent compared to other games of their time...UT04, could be played on an onboard Intel Video card.cobrax75

Really? So there could be some truth to the Quad Core thing? well .. .I wouldnt of guessed by the way the games are. :S

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="MTBare"]This is ridiculously old and we really don't know too much about how the game is now, I'm sure there have been LOTS of changes. I bet UT3 with highest settings (on PC) will be comparable to crysis.Meu2k7

The unreal engine has zero innovations that Cryengine is bringing. Even the Source engine is still better than the unreal engine.

Mhmm, there was a thread saying UT3 would push into Quad Cores to get it maxxed ... has there been any info released on UT3's performance?

I dont know why Unreal Tournement 3 would require a Quad Core ... I mean ... yea it has physics ... but its mainly a RAM / GPU intensive kind of game ... since there isnt much physics other than ragdolls/ Vehicles.

Those don't even look better than GEOW.heretrix

They are 1080p. Why do you have such a ridiculously consistent penchant for lying?

While awesome, its kinda vaporware. It was announced two years ago and hasn't been heard of since.Ninja-Vox

Their ProjectOffset.com/AStormIsComing site revealed some new pictures, and there was a preview a few months ago that contained some new media, as well as some info.

[QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="MTBare"]This is ridiculously old and we really don't know too much about how the game is now, I'm sure there have been LOTS of changes. I bet UT3 with highest settings (on PC) will be comparable to crysis.smokeydabear076

The unreal engine has zero innovations that Cryengine is bringing. Even the Source engine is still better than the unreal engine.

Mhmm, there was a thread saying UT3 would push into Quad Cores to get it maxxed ... has there been any info released on UT3's performance?

I dont know why Unreal Tournement 3 would require a Quad Core ... I mean ... yea it has physics ... but its mainly a RAM / GPU intensive kind of game ... since there isnt much physics other than ragdolls/ Vehicles.

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="MTBare"]This is ridiculously old and we really don't know too much about how the game is now, I'm sure there have been LOTS of changes. I bet UT3 with highest settings (on PC) will be comparable to crysis.killab2oo5

The unreal engine has zero innovations that Cryengine is bringing. Even the Source engine is still better than the unreal engine.

Mhmm, there was a thread saying UT3 would push into Quad Cores to get it maxxed ... has there been any info released on UT3's performance?

I dont know why Unreal Tournement 3 would require a Quad Core ... I mean ... yea it has physics ... but its mainly a RAM / GPU intensive kind of game ... since there isnt much physics other than ragdolls/ Vehicles.

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"]

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="MTBare"]This is ridiculously old and we really don't know too much about how the game is now, I'm sure there have been LOTS of changes. I bet UT3 with highest settings (on PC) will be comparable to crysis.killab2oo5

The unreal engine has zero innovations that Cryengine is bringing. Even the Source engine is still better than the unreal engine.

Mhmm, there was a thread saying UT3 would push into Quad Cores to get it maxxed ... has there been any info released on UT3's performance?

I dont know why Unreal Tournement 3 would require a Quad Core ... I mean ... yea it has physics ... but its mainly a RAM / GPU intensive kind of game ... since there isnt much physics other than ragdolls/ Vehicles.

Not maxxed, Ultra high, which can mean anything, say all textures / full lighting / all physics , but possible we very low AA , and a "decent" resolution.

Max in Crysis / UT3 case means FULL AA / FSAA at a ridiculous resolution.

While good looking, it's not comparable to Crysis.

Here are some recent pictures:
http://projectoffset.com/images/teaser_k7pHUthA.jpg
http://projectoffset.com/images/teaser_Jeya8JKL.jpg

Einhanderkiller

Looks more like heavenly sword than crysis.

Not maxxed, Ultra high, which can mean anything, say all textures / full lighting / all physics , but possible we very low AA , and a "decent" resolution.

Max in Crysis / UT3 case means FULL AA / FSAA at a ridiculous resolution.

Meu2k7

Yes it will be, but the Crytek developer said that there is technology that will not be able to be taken advantage of in the game for at least another 3 years. I really don't know what that means, but he said something like that. Maybe there is an ULTRA ULTRA Quality or something.:?smokeydabear076

There will be an update for Crysis about 18 months after its release which will add features current PCs cannot run. I believe it will be graphics/physics updates.

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]Yes it will be, but the Crytek developer said that there is technology that will not be able to be taken advantage of in the game for at least another 3 years. I really don't know what that means, but he said something like that. Maybe there is an ULTRA ULTRA Quality or something.:?santeri_15

There will be an update for Crysis about 18 months after its release which will add features current PCs cannot run. I believe it will be graphics/physics updates.

i dont think any console game will look as good a crysis or anny other dx10 pc title.daveg1

Hypothetically speaking, if Killzone 2 achieved it's originally percieved visuals, which would be a more graphically superior showcase?

Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.Heil68

Consoles alreadyhave the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.Polaris_choice

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

i dont think any console game will look as good a crysis or anny other dx10 pc title.daveg1

Thats abosultely ridiculous consdering looking at the games coming out this and next year most of the better looking games are coming to consoles.

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.cobrax75

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

Yes look how it looks virtually identical withough modds or better yet lets look at SC.DA . Or even better lets look at winner of best graphics technical last year on very webisght ooo yea thats right a console title?

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.Polaris_choice

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

Yes look how it looks virtually identical withough modds or better yet lets look at SC.DA . Or even better lets look at winner of best graphics technical last year on very webisght ooo yea thats right a console title?

ORLY?

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6147028/p-2.html

virtually identical huh?

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.cobrax75

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

Yes look how it looks virtually identical withough modds or better yet lets look at SC.DA . Or even better lets look at winner of best graphics technical last year on very webisght ooo yea thats right a console title?

ORLY?

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6147028/p-2.html

virtually identical huh?

Um yes really you posted this already in another thread and yes it looks extremly close to the high end settings now take into accoutn the texture update with faster load times that they released 3 monthes ago in the 360 version and my point even becomes more clear.

ps. that is compared to the 360 version before the patch.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.Polaris_choice

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

Yes look how it looks virtually identical withough modds or better yet lets look at SC.DA . Or even better lets look at winner of best graphics technical last year on very webisght ooo yea thats right a console title?

ORLY?

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6147028/p-2.html

virtually identical huh?

Um yes really you posted this already in another thread and yes it looks extremly close to the high end settings now take into accoutn the texture update with faster load times that they released 3 monthes ago in the 360 version and my point even becomes more clear.

ps. that is compared to the 360 version before the patch.

"Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates."

it doesnt even look close....

even with the texture update (which only makes a marginal difference) the PC version still looks a lot better.

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.cobrax75

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

Yes look how it looks virtually identical withough modds or better yet lets look at SC.DA . Or even better lets look at winner of best graphics technical last year on very webisght ooo yea thats right a console title?

ORLY?

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6147028/p-2.html

virtually identical huh?

Um yes really you posted this already in another thread and yes it looks extremly close to the high end settings now take into accoutn the texture update with faster load times that they released 3 monthes ago in the 360 version and my point even becomes more clear.

ps. that is compared to the 360 version before the patch.

"Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates."

it doesnt even look close....

even with the texture update (which only makes a marginal difference) the PC version still looks a lot better.

PC Oblivion looks better on a high end PC. Alot better ? No.

And the 360 looks best on other PC variants. Not everyone has a high end PC.Most play it withmuch worse graphics compared to the 360.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.-Ninja_Dog-

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

Yes look how it looks virtually identical withough modds or better yet lets look at SC.DA . Or even better lets look at winner of best graphics technical last year on very webisght ooo yea thats right a console title?

ORLY?

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6147028/p-2.html

virtually identical huh?

Um yes really you posted this already in another thread and yes it looks extremly close to the high end settings now take into accoutn the texture update with faster load times that they released 3 monthes ago in the 360 version and my point even becomes more clear.

ps. that is compared to the 360 version before the patch.

"Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates."

it doesnt even look close....

even with the texture update (which only makes a marginal difference) the PC version still looks a lot better.

PC looks better on a high end PC. Alot better ? No.

And the 360 looks best on other PC variants. Not everyone has a high end PC.Most play it withmuch worse graphics compared to the 360.

thats always been a given....

besides....the hardware required to max out Oblivion today, isnt really to high end....

[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.cobrax75

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

Yes look how it looks virtually identical withough modds or better yet lets look at SC.DA . Or even better lets look at winner of best graphics technical last year on very webisght ooo yea thats right a console title?

ORLY?

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6147028/p-2.html

virtually identical huh?

Um yes really you posted this already in another thread and yes it looks extremly close to the high end settings now take into accoutn the texture update with faster load times that they released 3 monthes ago in the 360 version and my point even becomes more clear.

ps. that is compared to the 360 version before the patch.

"Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates."

it doesnt even look close....

even with the texture update (which only makes a marginal difference) the PC version still looks a lot better.

PC looks better on a high end PC. Alot better ? No.

And the 360 looks best on other PC variants. Not everyone has a high end PC.Most play it withmuch worse graphics compared to the 360.

thats always been a given....

besides....the hardware required to max out Oblivion today, isnt really to high end....

And thats about 1 and half years ago?

Damn PC gaming and their yearly upgrades.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.-Ninja_Dog-

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

Yes look how it looks virtually identical withough modds or better yet lets look at SC.DA . Or even better lets look at winner of best graphics technical last year on very webisght ooo yea thats right a console title?

ORLY?

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6147028/p-2.html

virtually identical huh?

Um yes really you posted this already in another thread and yes it looks extremly close to the high end settings now take into accoutn the texture update with faster load times that they released 3 monthes ago in the 360 version and my point even becomes more clear.

ps. that is compared to the 360 version before the patch.

"Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates."

it doesnt even look close....

even with the texture update (which only makes a marginal difference) the PC version still looks a lot better.

PC looks better on a high end PC. Alot better ? No.

And the 360 looks best on other PC variants. Not everyone has a high end PC.Most play it withmuch worse graphics compared to the 360.

thats always been a given....

besides....the hardware required to max out Oblivion today, isnt really to high end....

And thats about 1 and half years ago?

Damn PC gaming and their yearly upgrades.

you dont have to upgrade yearly.....the point is that maxing out Oblivion today...isnt really all that difficult with a mid-end GPU.

[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Looks good, well have to see about your question. First response would be to say no, since consoles don't and never will have the processing and video power of a PC.cobrax75

Consoles already ahve the video and processoing power far superior to most pc's and as good as higher end gaming pc's .

no.

again...lets look at Oblivion....

Yes look how it looks virtually identical withough modds or better yet lets look at SC.DA . Or even better lets look at winner of best graphics technical last year on very webisght ooo yea thats right a console title?

ORLY?

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6147028/p-2.html

virtually identical huh?

Um yes really you posted this already in another thread and yes it looks extremly close to the high end settings now take into accoutn the texture update with faster load times that they released 3 monthes ago in the 360 version and my point even becomes more clear.

ps. that is compared to the 360 version before the patch.

"Oblivion looks better on a high-end PC than on the Xbox 360. Note the additional foliage visible in the background. We matched up resolutions for screenshot comparison purposes here, but a high-end PC with an AMD Athlon FX-60 CPU and GeForce 7900 GTX graphics card can enable all the settings and take resolutions up to 1600x1200 or more and still maintain smooth frame rates."

it doesnt even look close....

even with the texture update (which only makes a marginal difference) the PC version still looks a lot better.

PC looks better on a high end PC. Alot better ? No.

And the 360 looks best on other PC variants. Not everyone has a high end PC.Most play it withmuch worse graphics compared to the 360.

thats always been a given....

besides....the hardware required to max out Oblivion today, isnt really to high end....

And thats about 1 and half years ago?

Damn PC gaming and their yearly upgrades.

you dont have to upgrade yearly.....the point is that maxing out Oblivion today...isnt really all that difficult with a mid-end GPU.

Yeah, but it can it let me play Crysis with everything on ?

Crysis doesn'thave an art style.It's just trying to be ultra-realistic.That's it's strength.