[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="silversix_"]One has Nexus where you chose level you wanna enter and the other is bonefire based. TOTALLY DIFFERENT GAME!!!!! But seruiously they're both the same in every way possible but unless they decrease the quality of explorarion and difficulty, i'd want as much Souls titles as possible (NOT YEARLY). What if Demon's Souls 2 is built on a true next gen engine? That would r*pe!
BrunoBRS
So basically the way the games are structured is different...
It feels like the Souls games don't need to follow the same patterns of the previous game with the new ones. Â Sicne the story is so bare bones, they aren't really constrained to one "idea" with the series.
bare bones? what? i can understand saying that about demon's, but dark souls has just so much cool lore, and it's not just stuff you read in books or other items, you get to live and experience it. you SEE the knights of gwyn (hell, you fight some of them), you visit the great swamp, you visit the painted world and meet priscilla, etc. there is a lot of lore hidden in the details, and if you pay attention, then the things you see in the game become far more interesting.Bare bones was the wrong phrase. I just meant minimalistic. Basically the story is just "not there" enough so that the IP isn't constrained to one "stream of thought" (best way I can think of putting it) while still having cool lore.
Basically, I think the lore was well done enough to be enjoyable but not so much that it would seem strange if the next Dark Souls game went in a totally different direction.
The only thing that confused me was that the flow of time was so distorted... Made it really tough to put everything in a clear chronological order.
:o
. 
,
.
Log in to comment