When will people learn direct feeds are captured from a device and normally never look as good as other screens due to being uncompressed? I take Uncharted 2 direct feeds as well.
I don't know, do direct feeds capture the AA? Say a game has 8xAA would it be captured in the screen? Either way it still looks very good IMO.SaltyMeatballs
Of course they "catch" AA.Thats how we find out what AA game is using and IF2 has no AA.
I don't know, do direct feeds capture the AA? Say a game has 8xAA would it be captured in the screen? Either way it still looks very good IMO.SaltyMeatballs
Whoah the previous Bullshots were very Bull, cause these are Jaggied as hell
monster-hunt
i have the beta, and it looks nothing like that, it actually looks real smooth and great! why do those pictures look like that? i noticed that with a lot of pictures people post from direct screenshots on gamespot
Whoah the previous Bullshots were very Bull, cause these are Jaggied as hell
SpeedsterCards
i have the beta, and it looks nothing like that, it actually looks real smooth and great! why do those pictures look like that? i noticed that with a lot of pictures people post from direct screenshots on gamespot 1. It's direct feed. 2. MLAA only works on various spots(I've noticed it in some shots). Some spots don't have jaggies while others do. 3. It's a sandbox game, doing AA on that is not easy and is demanding.
i have the beta, and it looks nothing like that, it actually looks real smooth and great! why do those pictures look like that? i noticed that with a lot of pictures people post from direct screenshots on gamespotSpeedsterCards
A direct feed provides faithful screenshots of how a game actually looks at a technical level, but you may perceive it to look much better than such screens when you're actually playing it because of TV upscaling filters and viewing distance and such. Your computer monitor doesn't disguise flaws in this way because it's always at native resolution and you're right up close, so how a game looks in direct feed screenshots does not necessarily reflect how it may appear to you on your TV; similarly, pre-release bullshots with PC-level filtering and other trickery are also not representative of the real experience.
[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]i have the beta, and it looks nothing like that, it actually looks real smooth and great! why do those pictures look like that? i noticed that with a lot of pictures people post from direct screenshots on gamespotgarrett_daniels
A direct feed provides faithful screenshots of how a game actually looks at a technical level, but you may perceive it to look much better than such screens when you're actually playing it because of TV upscaling filters and viewing distance and such. Your computer monitor doesn't disguise flaws in this way because it's always at native resolution and you're right up close, so how a game looks in direct feed screenshots does not necessarily reflect how it may appear to you on your TV; similarly, pre-release bullshots with PC-level filtering and other trickery are also not representative of the real experience.
The beta is out and Sony didnt pick me to beta test :x:cry:.. i never missed a single beta that come on PS3.. i want infamous 2 beta or the record will be broken :cry: :P
There is no way there could be no jaggies in an open world sandbox game on consoles at the graphics it's producing(at least with this hardware).
Bus-A-Bus
AC2 has farily similar graphics and it has 2xAA on both consoles.RDR also.But yea,its hard. So does GTA IV on 360, but yeah, plus I'm talking about 32xAA.=p
[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]i have the beta, and it looks nothing like that, it actually looks real smooth and great! why do those pictures look like that? i noticed that with a lot of pictures people post from direct screenshots on gamespotmitu123
A direct feed provides faithful screenshots of how a game actually looks at a technical level, but you may perceive it to look much better than such screens when you're actually playing it because of TV upscaling filters and viewing distance and such. Your computer monitor doesn't disguise flaws in this way because it's always at native resolution and you're right up close, so how a game looks in direct feed screenshots does not necessarily reflect how it may appear to you on your TV; similarly, pre-release bullshots with PC-level filtering and other trickery are also not representative of the real experience.
Someone else besides me gets it.=p So basically screenshots are worthless.
A direct feed provides faithful screenshots of how a game actually looks at a technical level, but you may perceive it to look much better than such screens when you're actually playing it because of TV upscaling filters and viewing distance and such. Your computer monitor doesn't disguise flaws in this way because it's always at native resolution and you're right up close, so how a game looks in direct feed screenshots does not necessarily reflect how it may appear to you on your TV; similarly, pre-release bullshots with PC-level filtering and other trickery are also not representative of the real experience.
Deathtransit
Someone else besides me gets it.=p So basically screenshots are worthless. They aren't, if you get a capture device and take screens you get the same results. It works differently from what you see, but that doesn't mean it's bad. Better than shots that think consoles can do 32xAA.:lol:
great shots bus, it looks great it's just sad that there's no aa just like the first infamous. though it's allright, it looks outstanding for an open world console game and has a great art style. :D
WOW, I actually wowed when I saw the first pic, the game gfx isn't that super great but they are extremely appealing .... WOOOOOWWW.
OT: to TC, where do you get ur info, dude? you uncover really cool stuff, I remember when you were a freshman in SW, hada couple of conversation wz u and you were the biggest lemming at a time, you won't remember me, now you really bring some good stuff ... great for you, but doesn' change the fact that you still have some lemming remains in u, especially when it comes to G3 :P
I'm sure this is another case of DF shots making a game look worse than it does on your TV.
The beta is out and Sony didnt pick me to beta test :x:cry:.. i never missed a single beta that come on PS3.. i want infamous 2 beta or the record will be broken :cry: :Pfinalstar2007
Same boat, Gears, Uncharted, KZ2, every beta I want I get it, sadly not the case for this.
Let's be honest. The game will never look that jaggied while you're actually playing it. I MUCH prefer videos to see how a game will really look.mythrol
it won't look that bad in motion, but not far off. the first infamous was a jaggie fest as well and also ran at 1280x720 with no AA.
still though the game looks great besides the jaggies.
I'm sure this is another case of DF shots making a game look worse than it does on your TV. [QUOTE="finalstar2007"]The beta is out and Sony didnt pick me to beta test :x:cry:.. i never missed a single beta that come on PS3.. i want infamous 2 beta or the record will be broken :cry: :PFIipMode
Same boat, Gears, Uncharted, KZ2, every beta I want I get it, sadly not the case for this.
Apparently they've only given out around 10% of the beta invites so far, so you can keep hoping. They probably just dont want to have so many people on, and having a bug that most will find. Easier with less people to start.
I don't know what everyone'e whining about. I've played it, little to no jaggies!
Whe I played the first game, I was disappointed by the graphics. 2 years later, I'm impressed with I2's. Jaggies aren't nearly as bad and the style is miles better. There's also no slowdown, which I can't say about the first.
I don't know what everyone wants to see. Its an open world game that could pass for a linerar cooridor shooter if it weren't exclusive. Especially since there's no pop in, slow downs, jaggies (well almost), or a lack of colors...
Apparently they've only given out around 10% of the beta invites so far, so you can keep hoping. They probably just dont want to have so many people on, and having a bug that most will find. Easier with less people to start.quaappybla
Great news if true. Come through for me Sucker Punch!
Because it's captured directly, try with any capture card and see what you get.;)
mitu123
Yeah I know they're all the same, I've never seen a direct feed shot that didn't look like a jaggy mess.
[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]i have the beta, and it looks nothing like that, it actually looks real smooth and great! why do those pictures look like that? i noticed that with a lot of pictures people post from direct screenshots on gamespotgarrett_daniels
A direct feed provides faithful screenshots of how a game actually looks at a technical level, but you may perceive it to look much better than such screens when you're actually playing it because of TV upscaling filters and viewing distance and such. Your computer monitor doesn't disguise flaws in this way because it's always at native resolution and you're right up close, so how a game looks in direct feed screenshots does not necessarily reflect how it may appear to you on your TV; similarly, pre-release bullshots with PC-level filtering and other trickery are also not representative of the real experience.
then why do people post these pics? in other words it looks great if you are playing on a monitor or tv, but bad if you get a direct screenshot!?!? kinda dumb if you ask me, from what i am aware of, people play on tvs and not direct screenshots
Log in to comment