[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Truth-slayer"][QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Truth-slayer"][QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Truth-slayer"][QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] And also, what will be the first PS3/360 game to get the "Best" tag on PS3?
Just curious, what you cows think it will be, since you always seem to have an excuse as to why the 360 versions score higher...
Truth-slayer
It has already happened...it's called Oblivion.9 = 9, and no version has a best tag..
Every gamesite on the planet has said Oblivion has better graphics on the PS3 than the 360, just accept it.So you don't have a guess huh? That pessemstic on it ever happening?
Why do I need to guess? It has happened twice already. Now if the question what will be the next multiplat to be better on the PS3...then I can take a guess. It has not happened...I asked which game will score higher graphics on PS3, or which will get the first "Best" tag.
The reason i specificaly say score wise is because Gamespot already takes into account extra dev time, i could have just as easily said "which multiplatform game to come out at same time will score higher graphics wise on PS3" but simply stating score wise was easier.
Isn't the end product all that matters when you buy the game anyway? That said the fact that it had the same score graphically as the 360 when taking into account dev time does give it the "Best" title whether you want to admit it or not.having a year extra of dev time does not prove which is the more capable console.
And no...The fact that it does not have the "Best" tag even with a year extra of dev time is bad for PS3, not good. The best version of a game always get's the "Best" tag, release dates are not taken into consideration for "best" tags, if one version is the "Best" it gets the "Best" tag from gamespot, its that simple, if no version is better then the other version then no version ends up getting a best tag, quite simple really.
Log in to comment