First screenshot of M.A.G

http://www.flickr.com/photos/37044807@N02/sets/72157616227223753/

The graphics and Environments look good, but i remember reading this would be a TPS so i'm dissapointed.

Why are you dissapointed? I rather it be TPS then FPS to be honest. Make it like Socom!

Why are you dissapointed? I rather it be TPS then FPS to be honest. Make it like Socom!

Eddie-Vedder

Why are you dissapointed? I rather it be TPS then FPS to be honest. Make it like Socom!

Eddie-Vedder

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Why are you dissapointed? I rather it be TPS then FPS to be honest. Make it like Socom!

-DrRobotnik-

[QUOTE="-DrRobotnik-"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Why are you dissapointed? I rather it be TPS then FPS to be honest. Make it like Socom!

Eddie-Vedder

this game is going to get delayed

Looks like frontlines on 360

Man, I hope this game fails.

Wow, it looks amazing and looks fun to play! :)

No, ps3 is not shooter driven at all.:roll:

Looks like frontlines on 360

PAL360

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Why are you dissapointed? I rather it be TPS then FPS to be honest. Make it like Socom!

Big-Boss56

those screens aren't exactly revealing...i'll wait for some gameplay before i make judgement

Looks a lot like... Frontlines: Fuel of War on 360 -RocBoys9489-

I like that it has colors. It remindes me of STALKER.

Man, I hope this game fails.

Aljosa23

[QUOTE="Big-Boss56"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Why are you dissapointed? I rather it be TPS then FPS to be honest. Make it like Socom!

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

Man, I hope this game fails.

KilIzone3

[QUOTE="KilIzone3"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

Man, I hope this game fails.

Aljosa23

who cares? if it doesnt have single player.... As long as it has good game play

Man, I hope this game fails.

Aljosa23

Why would you want a game to fail? that means one less game to play. Also people worked hard on that game wishing it to fail is like shoving s*** in there face.

I get a Frontlines feel for it, it does not look bad. But nothing that set it apart, other than the huge number of players (which may not help it)

Looking good!!

Man, I hope this game fails.

Aljosa23

I see. Why exactly? :?

HEY! these are new! gotta go!

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

Man, I hope this game fails.

Storm_Marine

I see. Why exactly? :?

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

Man, I hope this game fails.

Storm_Marine

I see. Why exactly? :?

Because it doesn't really make sense wanting an ambitious and promising game to fail. Unless you're a fanboy, but you're in GUFU, so you can't be.....

[QUOTE="Storm_Marine"]

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

Man, I hope this game fails.

Aljosa23

I see. Why exactly? :?

That's a pretty selfish mindset if you ask me. :?

Looks pretty bland and generic to me.Gh0st_Of_0nyx

That what they said about warhawk from just looks. Note this is 256 players online graphics have to suffer a tiny bit due to the large scale...

That's a pretty selfish mindset if you ask me. :?

Storm_Marine

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Looks pretty bland and generic to me.fistoflight

That what they said about warhawk from just looks. Note this is 256 players online graphics have to suffer a tiny bit due to the large scale...

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Looks pretty bland and generic to me.fistoflight

That what they said about warhawk from just looks. Note this is 256 players online graphics have to suffer a tiny bit due to the large scale...

I'm not sure if having 256 players would end up being a good thing. I remember games like BF 2, 64 player matchs were sometimes a mess. Now having 4 times that number, it may turn out to be great. But have a feeling it would be almost impossible to keep that amount of people under control. IIRC they said something about having a commander, which would probably be like playing a RTS where the units don't follow your orders.

[QUOTE="Storm_Marine"]

That's a pretty selfish mindset if you ask me. :?

Aljosa23

I don't know. It just sounds that way to me. You know, along the lines of wanting a highly ambitious game that tons of PS3 ownersare looking forward to to suck. Wanting the game to fail in sales so that people get laid off....that kind of stuff. It just doesn't sound like something a gamer with respect for the industry in general would say.

Unless by 'fail' you mean something else.

Looks like frontlines on 360

PAL360

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="Storm_Marine"]

That's a pretty selfish mindset if you ask me. :?

Storm_Marine

I don't know. It just sounds that way to me. You know, along the lines of wanting a highly ambitious game that tons ofPS3ownersare looking forward to to suck. Wanting the game to fail in sales so that people get laid off....that kind of stuff.

And how is that fanboyish? Just because the game is on the PS3, right? Typical SW.

[QUOTE="Storm_Marine"]

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]How can my opinion be selfish? I dislike shooters and I wish other people would aswell so games like that won't sell, while games like World of Goo and Noby Noby Boy should sell way more.

Aljosa23

I don't know. It just sounds that way to me. You know, along the lines of wanting a highly ambitious game that tons ofPS3ownersare looking forward to to suck. Wanting the game to fail in sales so that people get laid off....that kind of stuff.

And how is that fanboyish? Just because the game is on the PS3, right? Typical SW.

Man that's a whole different argument altogether. But I suppose it's generic in the sense that the market is so obviously saturated with mulitplayer games that supports up to 256 players in a single match?

[QUOTE="Storm_Marine"]

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]How can my opinion be selfish? I dislike shooters and I wish other people would aswell so games like that won't sell, while games like World of Goo and Noby Noby Boy should sell way more.

Aljosa23

I don't know. It just sounds that way to me. You know, along the lines of wanting a highly ambitious game that tons ofPS3ownersare looking forward to to suck. Wanting the game to fail in sales so that people get laid off....that kind of stuff.

And how is that fanboyish? Just because the game is on the PS3, right? Typical SW.