[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="22Toothpicks"] I am excited like most other people. And to those that simply bash it for no reason, jealousy must sting like the dickens. You know if it were on your console of choice you would be pumped.
DireToad
Funny thing being, most of those bashing it probably have never played the original.
Funny thing being that most of the people who bash (which is really a harsh word for criticise) are only saying that it's visual presentation seems to be lacking.
And then there are the people who are praising (graphics, gameplay, whatever all together) the game based on a couple of screenshots.
Which one seems the most logical out of the two?Its funny you say that, because i've noticed that PS fanboys do EXACTLY that, half the games being released on the PS3 have no franchise but, after they see a couple of screen shots, they go into a MASSIVE frenzy. When Assassins Creed was first mentioned (before it was known to be coming out on the X360 as well) everyone saw like one screen shot and it was "teh ownage" for days and I was thinking, well it looks pretty but no one actually knows much about it, it could be a bit crap really.
This is system wars where people talk about new things, but at least here they are basing their excitment off the first game. So no its not logical, its tedious critisism of a console's graphics, when its known its not that powerful. And to use your logic, they are basing the critisism of the grapics on early development screenshots in a first year game, which will unlikely look like the final product.
Log in to comment