For all the 3D haters...it can be done without glasses

I HIGHLY doubt that the PS3 will support said 3D but it can, has and will be done better. Mitsubishi having the coolest technology yet as the tv acts more as a portal that you can look through.

Here is the Phillips tv. And there are MANY others. Simply google "3d tv without glasses". BTW they are ALL expensive, but if you think 3D is simply a fad that's going to die, you'd be wrong. I think we'll be gaming on 3D displays that wrap arounds you LONG before we start seeing virtual reality...And BTW for all the 3D haters because you need glasses...VR will not only require Glasses but a true VR experience would have stuff placed all over your body to try to simulate pain in some form, be it a tiny shock or pin prick...whatever.

Sorry, I just needed to post this after seeing all the ignorant comments about 3D in the last couple topics.

I HIGHLY doubt that the PS3 will support said 3D but it can, has and will be done better. Mitsubishi having the coolest technology yet as the tv acts more as a portal that you can look through.

Here is the Phillips tv. And there are MANY others. Simply google "3d tv without glasses". BTW they are ALL expensive, but if you think 3D is simply a fad that's going to die, you'd be wrong. I think we'll be gaming on 3D displays that wrap arounds you LONG before we start seeing virtual reality...And BTW for all the 3D haters because you need glasses...VR will not only require Glasses but a true VR experience would have stuff placed all over your body to try to simulate pain in some form, be it a tiny shock or pin prick...whatever.

Sorry, I just needed to post this after seeing all the ignorant comments about 3D in the last couple topics.

xX-Incubus-Xx

Wow PS3 fanboys are the biggest hypocrites, remember when you guys always bashed the Wii for being gimmicky since it used motion controls?

I HIGHLY doubt that the PS3 will support said 3D but it can, has and will be done better. Mitsubishi having the coolest technology yet as the tv acts more as a portal that you can look through.

Here is the Phillips tv. And there are MANY others. Simply google "3d tv without glasses". BTW they are ALL expensive, but if you think 3D is simply a fad that's going to die, you'd be wrong. I think we'll be gaming on 3D displays that wrap arounds you LONG before we start seeing virtual reality...And BTW for all the 3D haters because you need glasses...VR will not only require Glasses but a true VR experience would have stuff placed all over your body to try to simulate pain in some form, be it a tiny shock or pin prick...whatever.

Sorry, I just needed to post this after seeing all the ignorant comments about 3D in the last couple topics.

xX-Incubus-Xx

No one is posting ignorant comments. Most the comments I read are posted by fairly intelligent individuals who actually doubt 3D will go mainstream for quite a while. And what company's are trying to sell you is just a another gimmick they know people like you will buy. True 3D is only good for inducing headaches at the moment, and until it's refined, you won't be seeing people using it inside their homes for long hours any time soon.

The current technology, whilst prohibitively expensive, also requires a user to sit in a specific position for the effect to work. If a company wants their 3D initiative to be successful, then they either need to wait until the technology is low enough in price for the mainstream public to have actually adopted it, or they need to go the cheaper route of requiring the user to wear glasses.

3D adoption is a long way off - it just goes to show that Sony seem hellbent on incorporating the highest of niche, upandcoming technologies just for the sake of it, rather than waiting for adoption.

[QUOTE="xX-Incubus-Xx"]

I HIGHLY doubt that the PS3 will support said 3D but it can, has and will be done better. Mitsubishi having the coolest technology yet as the tv acts more as a portal that you can look through.

Here is the Phillips tv. And there are MANY others. Simply google "3d tv without glasses". BTW they are ALL expensive, but if you think 3D is simply a fad that's going to die, you'd be wrong. I think we'll be gaming on 3D displays that wrap arounds you LONG before we start seeing virtual reality...And BTW for all the 3D haters because you need glasses...VR will not only require Glasses but a true VR experience would have stuff placed all over your body to try to simulate pain in some form, be it a tiny shock or pin prick...whatever.

Sorry, I just needed to post this after seeing all the ignorant comments about 3D in the last couple topics.

suntaice

Wow PS3 fanboys are the biggest hypocrites, remember when you guys always bashed the Wii for being gimmicky since it used motion controls?

The bash was for unprecise and bad motion control being tacked on games withouth enhancing the gamers control in any way. Even Nintendo recognized how unprecise was their motion control since they had to introduce the Motion PLus ++ for the minimal improvement and the support for Gamecube and ****c controller the core gamers that bought a wii demanded.

They didn't bashed the idea, but the implementation of the idea with a half-assed technology in outdated processing unit that only appealed to casual since the unpreciseness of the control paved the way for easier games and waggle parties. The only precise and meninfull implementation appeared when using the wiimote as a pointer, a technology avaible long ago with the gun controls.

[QUOTE="xX-Incubus-Xx"]

I HIGHLY doubt that the PS3 will support said 3D but it can, has and will be done better. Mitsubishi having the coolest technology yet as the tv acts more as a portal that you can look through.

Here is the Phillips tv. And there are MANY others. Simply google "3d tv without glasses". BTW they are ALL expensive, but if you think 3D is simply a fad that's going to die, you'd be wrong. I think we'll be gaming on 3D displays that wrap arounds you LONG before we start seeing virtual reality...And BTW for all the 3D haters because you need glasses...VR will not only require Glasses but a true VR experience would have stuff placed all over your body to try to simulate pain in some form, be it a tiny shock or pin prick...whatever.

Sorry, I just needed to post this after seeing all the ignorant comments about 3D in the last couple topics.

AdjacentLives

No one is posting ignorant comments. Most the comments I read are posted by fairly intelligent individuals who actually doubt 3D will go mainstream for quite a while. And what company's are trying to sell you is just a another gimmick they know people like you will buy. True 3D is only good for inducing headaches at the moment, and until it's refined, you won't be seeing people using it inside their homes for long hours any time soon.

The other 3D seen in movie theaters AKA RealD just looks fake and is obviously still bound to a screen. Not only that But I can EASILY see the seperation in the images even with the glasses on. Avatar has been the best at hiding this, although there was still some spots visible.

And to the other poster, I'm not being a fanboy or defending the PS3 attempting to move to 3D in any way...Show me where I said this. Even go through the other threads and watch me hate on current mainstream 3D technologies. get educated before pointing fingers like that.

Also, they were being ignorant. look up the definition of ignorant. It's not an insult in any way shape or form as NO MATTER WHAT. WE ARE ALL IGNORANT. This is a simple fact of life.

To ironbass, 3D gaming is already here and has come and gone numerous times, mind you these attempts required those red/blue glasses. The shutter glasses are already useable on computers but your moniter has to support it. And a LOT of older DLP tv's have supported these glasses as well. I was just always under the impression that you needed a projection tv for this technology to work...but I guess they got it working on LCD and Plasma.

BTW I own a Wii and have Wii Motion Plus and still think it's garbage. Unless it's full on VR, I don't think I'll ever come around to the idea of motion controller over a ****c controller. This is personal preference, not fanboy hate. They can make it as accurate as they want, I'll still hate it.

or 120 Hertz screens, you need either that or the glasses. Wanna know what i would prefer?

or 120 Hertz screens, you need either that or the glasses. Wanna know what i would prefer?

DoomZaW

[QUOTE="suntaice"]

[QUOTE="xX-Incubus-Xx"]

I HIGHLY doubt that the PS3 will support said 3D but it can, has and will be done better. Mitsubishi having the coolest technology yet as the tv acts more as a portal that you can look through.

Here is the Phillips tv. And there are MANY others. Simply google "3d tv without glasses". BTW they are ALL expensive, but if you think 3D is simply a fad that's going to die, you'd be wrong. I think we'll be gaming on 3D displays that wrap arounds you LONG before we start seeing virtual reality...And BTW for all the 3D haters because you need glasses...VR will not only require Glasses but a true VR experience would have stuff placed all over your body to try to simulate pain in some form, be it a tiny shock or pin prick...whatever.

Sorry, I just needed to post this after seeing all the ignorant comments about 3D in the last couple topics.

Wow PS3 fanboys are the biggest hypocrites, remember when you guys always bashed the Wii for being gimmicky since it used motion controls?

The bash was for unprecise and bad motion control being tacked on games withouth enhancing the gamers control in any way. Even Nintendo recognized how unprecise was their motion control since they had to introduce the Motion PLus ++ for the minimal improvement and the support for Gamecube and ****c controller the core gamers that bought a wii demanded.

They didn't bashed the idea, but the implementation of the idea with a half-assed technology in outdated processing unit that only appealed to casual since the unpreciseness of the control paved the way for easier games and waggle parties. The only precise and meninfull implementation appeared when using the wiimote as a pointer, a technology avaible long ago with the gun controls.

[QUOTE="ropumar"]

[QUOTE="suntaice"]

Wow PS3 fanboys are the biggest hypocrites, remember when you guys always bashed the Wii for being gimmicky since it used motion controls?

blue_hazy_basic

The bash was for unprecise and bad motion control being tacked on games withouth enhancing the gamers control in any way. Even Nintendo recognized how unprecise was their motion control since they had to introduce the Motion PLus ++ for the minimal improvement and the support for Gamecube and ****c controller the core gamers that bought a wii demanded.

They didn't bashed the idea, but the implementation of the idea with a half-assed technology in outdated processing unit that only appealed to casual since the unpreciseness of the control paved the way for easier games and waggle parties. The only precise and meninfull implementation appeared when using the wiimote as a pointer, a technology avaible long ago with the gun controls.

no 3d glasses=buying more expensive tv's

I have a 32 inch 1080p lcd tv i have no intention of upgrading any time soon, 98% of tvs sold to consumers today are incapable of 3d i have no intention of upgrading to a technology that gives me headaches.

The old blue and red 3d glasses never worked for me and gave me headaches, Imax 3d gives me headaches, and the 3d tv's i saw at a trade show last year gave me headaches.

so no thank you.