For those who keep saying PS3 is too expensive!!!

  • 74 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nc72689
nc72689

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 nc72689
Member since 2008 • 55 Posts
For those who keep saying a PS3 is too expensive and will only buy one if it is 300 dollars... I mean come on, give Sony a break! Its a blu-ray player and the functions and stuff is way more complex than a Xbox 360! Just think, a normal blu-ray player at Best Buy is going to cost you like 1000 dollars! Sony is basically losing about 200+ dollars for every system they sell! I know PS3's games aren't that strong compared to a 360, but one of the reason is because the system is too high tech that it is harder to make games for a PS3 than a 360. Well we will just have to see if PS3 can pick it up with even higher quality games that the 360 can do in the next year or two before its too late.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#2 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
Keep in mind some people saying that already have a console, and are on a budget.
Avatar image for travt-down
travt-down

1549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 travt-down
Member since 2008 • 1549 Posts
The PS3 is too expensive. You did not change my mind.
Avatar image for Stonin
Stonin

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Stonin
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts

Yeah, I hear what you are saying but ....

.... it's too expensive and why should we ever give a multi-billion dollar corporation a 'break'?

Avatar image for stika
stika

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 stika
Member since 2005 • 2628 Posts

Yeah, I hear what you are saying but ....

.... it's too expensive and why should we ever give a multi-billion dollar corporation a 'break'?

Stonin

pretty much sums it up how i feel

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
It's an old argument that cows seem to keep bringing up for some reason. It isn't as expensive as it used to be, but it's still pricey. So is the 360...Happy?
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#7 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
It doesn't matter. I don't have even $300. I can't buy any of the consoles. Anything over $100 is expensive for me.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
Comparing the PS3 price to a stand-alone Bluray player doesn't show that the PS3 isn't too expensive, it shows that the Bluray player is WAY too expensive. Also, not everyone owns an HDTV (most don't in fact) so comparing HD player prices is pointless.
Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts

PS3 = £300 for the cheapest model.

Blu Ray Re-Writer 16x Speed £90 ( Backwards compatbility with DVD & CD ) ....

Until the PS3 gets more games, IT IS OVERPRICED.

Avatar image for player_leo
player_leo

1483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 player_leo
Member since 2002 • 1483 Posts
Chalk that up as a bad judgment on sony's part.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

PS3 = £300 for the cheapest model.

Blu Ray Re-Writer 16x Speed £90 ( Backwards compatbility with DVD & CD ) ....

Until the PS3 gets more games, IT IS OVERPRICED.

Meu2k7
I wouldn't say the PS3 is overpriced. There is a lot of value in the system. It's a very good Bluray player and media center with a PS3 built in. There are some good games and the online is free. 400 bucks US is expensive, but not a ripoff.
Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts

Thank you for typing some thing I have been reading time and time again for over a year now and not bothering to even structure a sentence, Im sure you will convince many people here to change their opinions.

Edit: I will add I have been somewhat put off the HD movie formats due to motion jitter on non 24fps sets :? does the PS3 share this problem?

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

PS3 = £300 for the cheapest model.

Blu Ray Re-Writer 16x Speed £90 ( Backwards compatbility with DVD & CD ) ....

Until the PS3 gets more games, IT IS OVERPRICED.

heretrix

I wouldn't say the PS3 is overpriced. There is a lot of value in the system. It's a very good Bluray player and media center with a PS3 built in. There are some good games and the online is free. 400 bucks US is expensive, but not a ripoff.

The price is inflated with the Blu Ray player, nad possible the WiFI judging my Microsofts Xbox rip off wireless router.

Its good value as an ONLY system yes, but if you already own a PC or 360 ... then its clearly not as another system, which why people say its overpriced, in the games department it offers too little unique despite its Blu Ray "Adcvantages".

Its struggling to compete with 360 in multiplats, and well, I would rather a Blu Ray Re-Writer than just a normal Blu Ray player wouldnt you agree?

Avatar image for prodiqy32
prodiqy32

1624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 prodiqy32
Member since 2007 • 1624 Posts
$500.00 is more then fair for a PS3.
Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts
For what you get, the 360 Elite is too expensive.
Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts

For what you get, the 360 Elite is too expensive.CubanBlunt

now THAT is very true. I could get a Terebyte worth of HDD instead of that cruddy extra 100 GB on the Elite.

Avatar image for sts9kid
sts9kid

658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 sts9kid
Member since 2007 • 658 Posts

Almost everyone who says a PS3 is too expensive is adding the cost of previous consoles into their decision. If you're talking about the product itself, the PS3 is a good deal and if you find any values in the standard features like HDD, Wifi, Blu-Ray, rechargable batteries, etc.

Avatar image for tbolt76
tbolt76

987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#18 tbolt76
Member since 2008 • 987 Posts

For those who keep saying a PS3 is too expensive and will only buy one if it is 300 dollars... I mean come on, give Sony a break! Its a blu-ray player and the functions and stuff is way more complex than a Xbox 360! Just think, a normal blu-ray player at Best Buy is going to cost you like 1000 dollars! Sony is basically losing about 200+ dollars for every system they sell! I know PS3's games aren't that strong compared to a 360, but one of the reason is because the system is too high tech that it is harder to make games for a PS3 than a 360. Well we will just have to see if PS3 can pick it up with even higher quality games that the 360 can do in the next year or two before its too late.nc72689

I don't know where you live, but in DC, I can get a Blu-Ray player for $400.

Avatar image for NathanDrake
NathanDrake

906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 NathanDrake
Member since 2007 • 906 Posts

For those who keep saying a PS3 is too expensive and will only buy one if it is 300 dollars... I mean come on, give Sony a break! Its a blu-ray player and the functions and stuff is way more complex than a Xbox 360! Just think, a normal blu-ray player at Best Buy is going to cost you like 1000 dollars! Sony is basically losing about 200+ dollars for every system they sell! I know PS3's games aren't that strong compared to a 360, but one of the reason is because the system is too high tech that it is harder to make games for a PS3 than a 360. Well we will just have to see if PS3 can pick it up with even higher quality games that the 360 can do in the next year or two before its too late.nc72689

I'm a PS3 fan but man that was a poor attempt at justifying it's price. And a BD player is not a $1000. They are between $300-$500 now and Sony has actually turned a profit on the PS3 already.

But for it's price the PS3 is a great machine yes! Anyone who sais otherwise is just a fanboy and nothing more!

You know what is expensive???? The Wii...for what it offers...that's a damn expensive machine!

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#20 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
The main reason i want a PS3 is for games. Paying $499 Canadian to play games is outragous.
Avatar image for RK-Mara
RK-Mara

11489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#21 RK-Mara
Member since 2006 • 11489 Posts
I rarely rent any movies, so I'm not really interested in the bluray capabilities of PS3. For now it would only be a gaming console for me.
Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#22 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts
I thought that $600 at first was too high. I think the price is fine now, and a price drop would be welcomed, but it's fine at it's current prices now
Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

The PS3 still got the highest starting price for a console.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

[QUOTE="CubanBlunt"]For what you get, the 360 Elite is too expensive.Meu2k7

now THAT is very true. I could get a Terebyte worth of HDD instead of that cruddy extra 100 GB on the Elite.

People dont realize that the Elite is $449, add yout Gold Live account fot a year ($50) equals $499, the same for the 360 pro ($349), the same prices as the PS3 $399 & $499

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

The PS3 still got the highest starting price for a console.

ReverseCycology

I guess you never heard of Neo Geo, $649 system, $200 for games.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_Geo_(console)

Avatar image for player_leo
player_leo

1483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 player_leo
Member since 2002 • 1483 Posts

The sad thing is, is that if Sony did price the PS3 for $300 or $400 dollars and sold millions on consoles, the system is still hard to program for hence they would still lose money on that end as well. It would be good for consumers but bad for game companies.

Avatar image for Hungry_Homer111
Hungry_Homer111

22479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#27 Hungry_Homer111
Member since 2005 • 22479 Posts

1. I don't give a **** about Blu-Ray.
2. I do have a couple games that I want for PS3, but not enough to spend that money on one.
3. I have a lot more games on the Wii and 360 (seperately, let alone put together) than I want to get than what I want to get on the PS3. I would much rather spend the money on those games than spend it on a PS3, and then have to get a couple games to go with it.

No thanks. :|

Avatar image for DeerhunterIA
DeerhunterIA

684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 DeerhunterIA
Member since 2006 • 684 Posts
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

The PS3 still got the highest starting price for a console.

CubanBlunt

I guess you never heard of Neo Geo, $649 system, $200 for games.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_Geo_(console)

The Neo Geo. A fantastic concept that failed miserably. Keep in mind that it was that expensive YEARS ago. That has to be closer to $1000 of today's dollars.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

The sad thing is, is that if Sony did price the PS3 for $300 or $400 dollars and sold millions on consoles, the system is still hard to program for hence they would still lose money on that end as well. It would be good for consumers but bad for game companies.

player_leo

The PS2 was the same way, hard to program for in the begaining, did Sony lose money on the PS2?

Avatar image for Shensolidus
Shensolidus

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Shensolidus
Member since 2003 • 931 Posts

On the programming end, not necessarily. The old programming difficulty on the PS3 have been mostly alleviated. There are publishers who are still having trouble with the system (EA). However, the solution to this problem seems to be to make the PS3 the lead platform. Most multi-plat game companies have admitted this. It is significantly easier to make a multi-plat title with the PS3 as the lead than vice-versa. Need an example? Burnout Paradise.

As for exclusive on the system. It has been rewarding enough for developers to make their own proprietery engines for the PS3. Look at Naughty Dog and Insomniac respectively. ND is working on and will probably have another game for the system out within 10-18 months while Insomniac is hard at work on their next big game for the PS3, their 3rd one in fact. This is all in the span of 1- 1 and a half years. It is for all purposes a console whose purpose is to stay long in the console market. As developers learn more, we are going to see more come out of the system and faster.

Avatar image for Shenmue_Jehuty
Shenmue_Jehuty

5211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 Shenmue_Jehuty
Member since 2007 • 5211 Posts
It is too expensive. If I wanted a blu-ray player I'd buy one, but I want a good game console. For $400 the console better be good, for $500 it better be outstanding, both of which the Ps3 is niether. The PS3 is a mediocre console that desrves a price tage of $300 or less because of its craptacular lineup of exclusives. PS3 I'll pass until you get a decent number of good games or your price drops to $300.
Avatar image for QuasidodoJr
QuasidodoJr

474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 QuasidodoJr
Member since 2004 • 474 Posts

Edit: I will add I have been somewhat put off the HD movie formats due to motion jitter on non 24fps sets :? does the PS3 share this problem?

csliney
I've had no jitter on either of my sets. I have a 56" Samsung LCD that's 1080p24, and one 37" Olevia that's 720p/1080i in my bedroom. I have a PS3 hooked up to both, and have not had any motion jitter problems, at all. The movies still look great in 1080i. There's minimal difference between 1080p and 1080i, but the upgrade over standard DVD in texture, detail, color vibrancy and shadowing is still very noticable on a 1080i set.
Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts
[QUOTE="CubanBlunt"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

The PS3 still got the highest starting price for a console.

DeerhunterIA

I guess you never heard of Neo Geo, $649 system, $200 for games.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_Geo_(console)

The Neo Geo. A fantastic concept that failed miserably. Keep in mind that it was that expensive YEARS ago. That has to be closer to $1000 of today's dollars.

I dont know if you remember, but Neo Geo Gold was $1000

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18277 Posts

one thing to take into accoutn TC, what if people want to play there fav games on playstation, but arent interested in the slightest in a blu-ray player or any other stuff? like me. all they want is a games console.

value is a subjective thing. many might think "ooo a blu-ray player included....thats a fair deal since i want one of those". other might think "a blu-ray player? i dont want that...i want a games console. and there charging how much? pffft to hell with that". personally i would be furious if i payed 600 for a console that was basically the same as the 360 in terms of performance, because it had a load of useless tat in it (from my point of view of course, one mans tat is another mans treasure and all that).

of course i payed alot less than 600 for my PS3 so im happy with my purchase. basically sony paid for the blu ray drive completly as far as im concerned.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45749 Posts

The PS3 is too expensive. :P

Seriously though it is to those such as myself thus far who have no to little use for the B.R. ( Digital DL is here & now & future ) and the games library has yet to improve that much.

Sure, sure the 2008 supposed line up should help but the here & now leaves little reason to snap up a PS3 in the immediate future. IMHO

Avatar image for mtron32
mtron32

4450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 mtron32
Member since 2006 • 4450 Posts

For those who keep saying a PS3 is too expensive and will only buy one if it is 300 dollars... I mean come on, give Sony a break! Its a blu-ray player and the functions and stuff is way more complex than a Xbox 360! Just think, a normal blu-ray player at Best Buy is going to cost you like 1000 dollars! Sony is basically losing about 200+ dollars for every system they sell! I know PS3's games aren't that strong compared to a 360, but one of the reason is because the system is too high tech that it is harder to make games for a PS3 than a 360. Well we will just have to see if PS3 can pick it up with even higher quality games that the 360 can do in the next year or two before its too late.nc72689

I already have a 360 and a HD DVD player, I'm not really busting my balls to get a PS3 at the moment because 400 bucks is a lot of money. There are other things I could spend that money on like food and electricity. The fact that I already have a system means I can play most of the games that are coming out, so why do I need a PS3 right now?

And how rich are you that 400 dollars won't be missed? Man I make 92K a year and 400 dollars will ALWAYS be missed.

Avatar image for obsolete2k1
obsolete2k1

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 obsolete2k1
Member since 2007 • 990 Posts
I can't justify paying over $400 for a dvd player. I'll pretend I'm a cow and I'll "just wait" until a price drop.
Avatar image for shaggygrosser
shaggygrosser

5871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 shaggygrosser
Member since 2003 • 5871 Posts
As a PS3 owner, I'll admit that the PS3's expensive.
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#39 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

For those who keep saying a PS3 is too expensive and will only buy one if it is 300 dollars... I mean come on, give Sony a break! Its a blu-ray player and the functions and stuff is way more complex than a Xbox 360! Just think, a normal blu-ray player at Best Buy is going to cost you like 1000 dollars! Sony is basically losing about 200+ dollars for every system they sell! I know PS3's games aren't that strong compared to a 360, but one of the reason is because the system is too high tech that it is harder to make games for a PS3 than a 360. Well we will just have to see if PS3 can pick it up with even higher quality games that the 360 can do in the next year or two before its too late.nc72689

it is too expensive. giving me examples of other things more expensive doesn't make it less so. it's just rationalizing the purchase. (keep in mind that expensive doesn't mean i can't afford it.)

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

[QUOTE="nc72689"]For those who keep saying a PS3 is too expensive and will only buy one if it is 300 dollars... I mean come on, give Sony a break! Its a blu-ray player and the functions and stuff is way more complex than a Xbox 360! Just think, a normal blu-ray player at Best Buy is going to cost you like 1000 dollars! Sony is basically losing about 200+ dollars for every system they sell! I know PS3's games aren't that strong compared to a 360, but one of the reason is because the system is too high tech that it is harder to make games for a PS3 than a 360. Well we will just have to see if PS3 can pick it up with even higher quality games that the 360 can do in the next year or two before its too late.mtron32

I already have a 360 and a HD DVD player, I'm not really busting my balls to get a PS3 at the moment because 400 bucks is a lot of money. There are other things I could spend that money on like food and electricity. The fact that I already have a system means I can play most of the games that are coming out, so why do I need a PS3 right now?

And how rich are you that 400 dollars won't be missed? Man I make 92K a year and 400 dollars will ALWAYS be missed.

You are funny, to expensive......how? Let take your 360 as a example, $349 + $50 for live is $399. HD Drive $199.....get real with yourself. You just paid more for your 360.

Avatar image for QuasidodoJr
QuasidodoJr

474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 QuasidodoJr
Member since 2004 • 474 Posts

Seriously though it is to those such as myself thus far who have no to little use for the B.R. ( Digital DL is here & now & future ) and the games library has yet to improve that much.

SecretPolice
You must be living in FutureWorld if you consider digital downloads in the here and now. Digital downloads in 1080p high-definition are still years away from now. The only reason music is flourishing with download services is because the files are really small, the devices are portable and people don't mind the downgrade in audio quality as much. Even compressed movie files that look like garbage push a GB or 2. The fact of the matter is until retail markets completely die out (which isn't happening ANYTIME soon, because even with as popular as iTunes and the Zune service are, CDs still sell by the truckloads) digital downloads will not take over.
Avatar image for bcrich959
bcrich959

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 bcrich959
Member since 2004 • 242 Posts

I paid the same price for both my Wii and 360 as what the PS3 cost, well at 600 bucks. Put's up flaim sheild and runs. :lol:

For the record I will be getting a PS3 when it gets some more games that I want for it. The price right now isn't really a factor for me on buying it. I'm just waiting for some more games to come out. Also at the moment I don't own an HDTV and standard DVD's are fine for me at the moment so Blue-Ray isn't even a selling point for me.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

so its expensive and your answer is....well the 360 but but but but....that doesn't make me think its not expensive like been said before.

I own an 360, an ps3, and an wii, I purchased both the 360 and wii and would have NEVER purchased the ps3 till it dropped to atleast 250 bux because it wasn't giving me what i want where as the wii and 360 did but i happend to win it in a contest so thats a good thing but it still reinforces the idea that it doesn't give me what i want, there have been no games so far that i want to play but i have played some and i dont want blu ray, or most of its other functions. and those functions just dont jusitify a 400-500 dollar price tag let alone an 600 dollar one which was the price when i won this ps3.

I play games, i want a game machine, if i wanted an hd format player i would have purchased one, till this day i've yet to purchase an blu ray movie cause i've seen the public displays in stores and they gave me no reason to upgrade all they gave was stuff i could not take advantage of my TV is only 30 inchs and can only do 720p-1080i, my sound system has no support for hdmi and it only supports DTS 6.1, and Dolby 5.1 so blu ray offers me nothing.

Avatar image for jimm895
jimm895

7703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 jimm895
Member since 2007 • 7703 Posts

I paid full retail shortly before the price drop on my 60 gig system and never have thought about it even after the price drop.

As for a poster above saying they couldn't understand why someone would want to pay good money to a multi-billion dollar company. I wonder the same thing when a muti-billion dollar company charges well over double the value of a piece of hardware add-on and the pay to play on there system after purchasing there product. This doesn't even count the high failure rate and the number of times they added hardware built into the system within the past year. And people still blindly buy the thing.

Avatar image for ThisCurse
ThisCurse

1258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 ThisCurse
Member since 2007 • 1258 Posts

My friend bought the

Xbox360 for $399

HD-DVD drive for $160

Wireless setup for $100

Totaling $659

When you can go out and get a PS3 for $399 with double the Harddrive space, built-in Bluray and wireless. you save $259 plus you dont have a bunch of ugly wires all over the place. And should I mention the ripoff that is Xbox Live? Or the fact that he goes through dozens of AA batteries?

$399 is super cheap for a new generation sysytem and if you cant afford that then dont complain about Sony. Maybe get a job?

Avatar image for Vectah_Sigma
Vectah_Sigma

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 Vectah_Sigma
Member since 2007 • 1104 Posts

so its expensive and your answer is....well the 360 but but but but....that doesn't make me think its not expensive like been said before.

I own an 360, an ps3, and an wii, I purchased both the 360 and wii and would have NEVER purchased the ps3 till it dropped to atleast 250 bux because it wasn't giving me what i want where as the wii and 360 did but i happend to win it in a contest so thats a good thing but it still reinforces the idea that it doesn't give me what i want, there have been no games so far that i want to play but i have played some and i dont want blu ray, or most of its other functions. and those functions just dont jusitify a 400-500 dollar price tag let alone an 600 dollar one which was the price when i won this ps3.

I play games, i want a game machine, if i wanted an hd format player i would have purchased one, till this day i've yet to purchase an blu ray movie cause i've seen the public displays in stores and they gave me no reason to upgrade all they gave was stuff i could not take advantage of my TV is only 30 inchs and can only do 720p-1080i, my sound system has no support for hdmi and it only supports DTS 6.1, and Dolby 5.1 so blu ray offers me nothing.

WilliamRLBaker

lol....this is funny. you said that the ps3 doesnt give you what you want, lol....but you bought a wii?

Avatar image for Nedemis
Nedemis

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 Nedemis
Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts
It doesn't matter. I don't have even $300. I can't buy any of the consoles. Anything over $100 is expensive for me.Wasdie
looking at your PC setup proves otherwise.
Avatar image for QuasidodoJr
QuasidodoJr

474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 QuasidodoJr
Member since 2004 • 474 Posts
The original 8-bit NES used to cost $249. Not to mention the Sega Saturn cost $399 when it launched - and that was over 12 years ago.
Avatar image for Udsen
Udsen

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 Udsen
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

I love Blu-Ray, and 400 dollars is a bargain for an awesome Game console, Blu-Ray player, DVD upscaler, CD player, Storage system, USB/SD/MS Pro capable machine, not to mention an upgradable hard drive...But what I love most about PS3 is the standard hardware, no propriatory stuff, really.

Plus amazing games already out and coming very soon. MGS4? Yes please. LBP? Yes, please.