it appears to casualsamourkiss588
Does that mean only casuals can see it? :P
This topic is locked from further discussion.
We did this in my Bio class back when I was in grade 11. Me (at the time 17, 6'1 and 205lbs and in damn good shape) came out at a 26 or 27 (overweight) and my teacher, at around 35 6' and 180 (can't remember exactly but it was around those numbers) was well into the 30's, which is considered obese, and the guy was anything but. The BMI scale is broken.[QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]What? No. BMI measures how healthy the weight is for someone of a certain height and weight. If you just measure their weight without looking at them, you could still imagine them being fat rather than muscular. I don't see your point.Firelore29
Again it doesn't really matter what the number is it's how it changes. If you get a 50 bmi the first time and then over the next 6 weeks you take it down to a 30 then you have done some real improvement. Similarly if you get a 30 and you take it down to a 20 then you have probably done just as good. The actual BMI number you get isn't as important as tracking the change.
But the 30-20 is where it breaks down. For someone my size I will never, ever be able to get down to a "healthy" rating on the BMI scale because of my size, I will get down to a mid-high 20 while Iwork off fatand then it'll go back up as I build more muscle. Literally the harder I work and the better shape I'm in the higher my BMI goes, and thats the problem. The only effective measure of a persons fitness level is a full physical including a body fat measurement.To MikeE21286: Although a body fat measurement would be better, the sensors still aren't accurate because theway they measure body fat (by sending an electrical pulse through your body and measuring the time it takes to travel from one point to another)doesn't take into account factors like a persons salinity (how much saltsin your body for those who don't know) which throws off the measurement. The only 100% accurate measure is to bust out the calipers and getpinching.
[QUOTE="Overthrow"][QUOTE="tidus222"][QUOTE="Overthrow"][QUOTE="CyanX73"]America is in a health craze. This is a game that capitalizes off of that. I wonder what's next for Wii: maybe a cooking game? Oh wai...nvmtidus222
Maybe a recycling game? Everyone's obsessed with saving the environment all of a sudden.
@tidus: BMI is used in any kind of fitness training. There's a big difference between 6'0 200lbs and 5'0 200lbs.
by the BMI scale bodybuilders like arnold swarchenegger, ronnie coleman, and jay cutler are all considered obese
as well as many people with more muscle than a typical guy their height
BMI = failure just like nintendo = FAILURE
What? No. BMI measures how healthy the weight is for someone of a certain height and weight. If you just measure their weight without looking at them, you could still imagine them being fat rather than muscular. I don't see your point.
have you ever heard of body fat percentage???
a 5'9 180 pound guy at 10% bodyfat is alot more healthy than 1 5'9 180 pound guy with 18% BF
BMI would group them the same and that is why it fails
Exaclty, bodyfat percentege is the only important factor. Muscles weight more than fat, much more. Look at a wrestler, weight more htan an elephant, but I doubt it's just some random obese dude..
Apparently there is a skiing game as part of Wii Fit - with the balance board I think that will be good fun. The bits of video I've seen of Wii Fit have me interested in trying it.
I'm hopeful some other games will also support the balance board in the long run.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment