[QUOTE="i_am_interested"][QUOTE="T-Aldous"]It means that graphically, it should not even be a debate. GT5 given the time and budget that it has should be obviously better than FM3 in every way. That fact that it is not it just well....sad.MC3887
twice the cars on track? check actual modeled interiors? check? physics based damage on panels as opposed to pre-damaged models? check minor detail such as active aero? check hell what about 3d? checkBoth have modeled interiors lol
Both are 3D
Active aero is still calculated in physics
The panels stink and many have complaned I think both are pretty much pre-damage models.
Twice the cars, yes, with inferior A.I, and worse physics.
they both have modeled interiors? is that why im seeing all these tinted windows on CPU-opponents that dont appear during the cockpit view?
both are stereoscopic 3d? so forza 3 lets you run it at 120fps?
youve proven nothing about forza's active aero or turn 10s "maybe they wont notice" approach - maybe if we dont model the aero, they wont expect the correlating physical downforce
forget the many, i see through forza predamaged model system unlike the rest, nevermind how forza lacks physics based doors, hoods, trunks, and bumpers
Log in to comment