Funny..."hardcores" think graphics is what makes a system yet the Wii

  • 104 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
[QUOTE="Ibacai"]No, mrjarantilla. The Wiimote has proved nothing of the sort. It's innovative and different but that doesn't make it better in an overall experience.mjarantilla
Explain Madden 07 and Godfather getting the highest scores of the Wii, then. Not saying it AUTOMATICALLY upgrades a game's gameplay quality. Just saying, if properly implemented, a game can be made more fun.

The Wiimote was used better in those two games, good work. What about all of the others? I'm not saying the Wiimote makes any game worse (That's up to the developers) but like genre it's a personal preference.
Avatar image for iwo4life
iwo4life

1155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 iwo4life
Member since 2004 • 1155 Posts
[QUOTE="iwo4life"][QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

VideoGameGuy

There are plenty of cheap people sitting in front of SDTVs right now playing thier cheap Wii and PS2s. When HDTV is less expensive and both the 360 and PS3 pricedrop you wont' see the mad rush to buy a Wii. In a few years both the 360 and the PS3 will outsell the Wii by a wide margin. The 130 Million people that bought XBOXs and PS2s wont' want to make a lateral move to a Wii with marginally better GFX. I personally can't figure out how Nintendo convinced GC owners to make essentially a lateral move to a new console just for the controller at 2.5 the price. Plus gouge them on a million accessories.

I own a TV that costs many times the amount of all 3 of these systems combined. Do you think I might choose a system that will take advantage of that?

Funny....My Wii looks great on a HUGE expensive HDTV...seems to me that the Wii taking advantage of my TV just fine..

You must have a special Wii that displays natively in at least 720p.  Good luck with that....Goes to play GeoW and Oblivon.

Avatar image for JB730
JB730

3375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 JB730
Member since 2004 • 3375 Posts

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

IronMaidenLives

you are making a lot of fanboys MAD as hell with this powerfull post

but you are 100% right

before the release of the wii, the experts here at system wars would laugh at the wii's chances of succes - they would claim that nobody would want such an underpowerd console, they would laugh at nintendo's seemingly idiotic approach

but then the wii went on to outsell/outperform every console in the market

good thing the experts here at system wars don't run nintendo

and really, the failure of the ps3 and the succes of the wii wasn't all too hard to predict - just looking at console history, graphic powerhouse consoles NEVER win. the PSP vs DS battle forshadowed the fact that the sony's approach with the PS3 just DOES NOT WORK - while nintendo's approach with the Wii/DS seems to lead to overwhelming success.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
I'm pretty sure that its games that make a console, dude.  Not a controller.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#55 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I am a hardcore gamer and I own a Wii... teh paradoxz!
Avatar image for VideoGameGuy
VideoGameGuy

7695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 VideoGameGuy
Member since 2002 • 7695 Posts
[QUOTE="VideoGameGuy"][QUOTE="iwo4life"][QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

iwo4life

There are plenty of cheap people sitting in front of SDTVs right now playing thier cheap Wii and PS2s. When HDTV is less expensive and both the 360 and PS3 pricedrop you wont' see the mad rush to buy a Wii. In a few years both the 360 and the PS3 will outsell the Wii by a wide margin. The 130 Million people that bought XBOXs and PS2s wont' want to make a lateral move to a Wii with marginally better GFX. I personally can't figure out how Nintendo convinced GC owners to make essentially a lateral move to a new console just for the controller at 2.5 the price. Plus gouge them on a million accessories.

I own a TV that costs many times the amount of all 3 of these systems combined. Do you think I might choose a system that will take advantage of that?

Funny....My Wii looks great on a HUGE expensive HDTV...seems to me that the Wii taking advantage of my TV just fine..

You must have a special Wii that displays natively in at least 720p.  Good luck with that....Goes to play GeoW and Oblivon.

You see all i did was buy some cables....hook it up to my TV and started playing! Do you think the Wii is incompatible with HDTVs or something?
Avatar image for lagreendown
lagreendown

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 lagreendown
Member since 2006 • 1612 Posts

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

IronMaidenLives
lol the reason i didn't get a wii cause it had horrible graphics and i wont be getting up to play video games in that case i would be going outside but i got a ps3 and 360
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#59 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
[QUOTE="heretrix"]

I don't think the Wii has proven that gameplay trumps graphics. a bunch of mini games do not constitute great gameplay. So far the best things about the Wii have been 2 upgraded gamecube titles, a tech demo and a title consisting of nothing but minigames...

The Wii is fun and simple to use at a cheap pricepoint.. THAT is why it is successful. It has nothing to do with superior gameplay because at this moment most of the Wii titles are subpar 3rd party shovelware.

Fun trumps everything. It's the K.I.S.S (keep it simple stupid) factor at it's best at work here.

wavebrid

no ps1 and ps2 did and wii going to be the same :

what mim games? :|  wii sports (not mim game) rayman is (on all console) waire ware (has mini games still tehcially not called mimi game)  wii play (still not mim games)

so what mim games are you getting it ?

 

Dude, Wii sports is a tech demo. It is comprised of 5 sports minigames...I love Wii bowling, but it is nowhere near a full game. Baseball isn't 3 innings last time I checked, You play more holes in golf..etc

Warioware is a collection of minigames. It's always been that way. That's what it is and it's incredibly fun. But it's a bunch of mini games connected by little cute stories, which is ok, just don't try and make it more than that.

Wii play see above examples...What's funny is I enjoy all of these games, but lets not try and make them out to be more than they are: A bunch of games that you can pickup and play then put them away without any problem. I own a Wii and I have all 3 games, They are fun but shallow games. And I refuse to by a Wii 3rd party game until they decide to:

A.Stop making ports of games I played last year. Yes, the control scheme is new, but I basically played the same content already, no thanks

B. Stop with the goddamn shovelware.

This is tough love coming from me. I'm happy that the Wii is doing well, but even with the novel controls there are more compelling gaming experiences elsewhere.....They need quality software. (aside fron Ninty titles)

Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="Ibacai"]No, mrjarantilla. The Wiimote has proved nothing of the sort. It's innovative and different but that doesn't make it better in an overall experience.Ibacai
Explain Madden 07 and Godfather getting the highest scores of the Wii, then. Not saying it AUTOMATICALLY upgrades a game's gameplay quality. Just saying, if properly implemented, a game can be made more fun.

The Wiimote was used better in those two games, good work. What about all of the others? I'm not saying the Wiimote makes any game worse (That's up to the developers) but like genre it's a personal preference.

Read my last sentence in that post, please. Hell, read my first sentence in my original post: "but it's demonstrated that more traditional games CAN be more fun with the Wiimote" "Can" being the key word here.
Avatar image for miss_kitt3n
miss_kitt3n

2717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 miss_kitt3n
Member since 2006 • 2717 Posts
[QUOTE="thejakel11225"][QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

IronMaidenLives

Wasn't this the same dude that said people were jealous of a console :lol:

Yes, cows are jealous their precious powerhouse is being stomped by the Wii.

 

Do you honestly think the Wii will be like the PS2?  :lol:

 

The PS2 had something that the Wii does not: Games for everyone, not just pointless minigames and last-gen ports.

 

If anything the 360 will be the new PS2. 

Avatar image for DXGreat1_HGL
DXGreat1_HGL

7543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 DXGreat1_HGL
Member since 2003 • 7543 Posts
[QUOTE="Nteks"]

I don't care the Wii still has subpar graphics. Therefore I'm not buying it.

 

 

Tylendal

Obviously you've never owned a PS2, X-Box, PS1, Snes, Nes, Gameboy, or D.S., because they all had superior competition, graphically.

 Which system was graphiclly superier to SNES? As I remember, when Rare discovered how to use Mode 7 to render graphics, it pretty much put the rest of the competition out of business...

Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="Nteks"]

I don't care the Wii still has subpar graphics. Therefore I'm not buying it.

DXGreat1_HGL

Obviously you've never owned a PS2, X-Box, PS1, Snes, Nes, Gameboy, or D.S., because they all had superior competition, graphically.

Which system was graphiclly superier to SNES? As I remember, when Rare discovered how to use Mode 7 to render graphics, it pretty much put the rest of the competition out of business...

SNES was in the same generation as the Jaguar.
Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="Ibacai"]No, mrjarantilla. The Wiimote has proved nothing of the sort. It's innovative and different but that doesn't make it better in an overall experience.mjarantilla
Explain Madden 07 and Godfather getting the highest scores of the Wii, then. Not saying it AUTOMATICALLY upgrades a game's gameplay quality. Just saying, if properly implemented, a game can be made more fun.

The Wiimote was used better in those two games, good work. What about all of the others? I'm not saying the Wiimote makes any game worse (That's up to the developers) but like genre it's a personal preference.

Read my last sentence in that post, please. Hell, read my first sentence in my original post: "but it's demonstrated that more traditional games CAN be more fun with the Wiimote" "Can" being the key word here.

I can say the same for a traditional controller. There is a possibility for either to be better in the gameplay area. It just depends on how the developer works on a game. I read your post, you need to read mine because it looks like we're back in that loop again.
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
[QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"][QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="Nteks"]

I don't care the Wii still has subpar graphics. Therefore I'm not buying it.

 

 

mjarantilla

Obviously you've never owned a PS2, X-Box, PS1, Snes, Nes, Gameboy, or D.S., because they all had superior competition, graphically.

Which system was graphiclly superier to SNES? As I remember, when Rare discovered how to use Mode 7 to render graphics, it pretty much put the rest of the competition out of business...

SNES was in the same generation as the Jaguar.

No it wasn't...Jaguar was part of the 32-bit gen. 

There's never been a mainstream console that was so far behind the tech curve  as the Wii, that's just how it is.

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="Ibacai"]No, mrjarantilla. The Wiimote has proved nothing of the sort. It's innovative and different but that doesn't make it better in an overall experience.mjarantilla
Explain Madden 07 and Godfather getting the highest scores of the Wii, then. Not saying it AUTOMATICALLY upgrades a game's gameplay quality. Just saying, if properly implemented, a game can be made more fun.

The Wiimote was used better in those two games, good work. What about all of the others? I'm not saying the Wiimote makes any game worse (That's up to the developers) but like genre it's a personal preference.

Read my last sentence in that post, please. Hell, read my first sentence in my original post: "but it's demonstrated that more traditional games CAN be more fun with the Wiimote" "Can" being the key word here.

I can say the same for a traditional controller. There is a possibility for either to be better in the gameplay area. It just depends on how the developer works on a game. I read your post, you need to read mine because it looks like we're back in that loop again.

Oh God, don't do this again. Don't be a bloody idiot again. Two games with highly traditional gameplay are better on the Wii than on regular consoles. That PROVES that the Wiimote DOES have the potential to make games better, because the Wiimote is the ONLY wildcard in the equation when you compare Godfather and Madden with their traditional counterparts. Therefore, it's the only discernible factor that could've contributed to the Wii versions' greater critical acclaim. Therefore, the Wii DID make these games better. However, as with everything else, it is only POTENTIAL. Developers still have to produce quality code, and designers still have to produce competent gameplay concepts. But while the potential of the traditional gamepad has been maxed out, the potential for the Wiimote is just starting to emerge, as Godfather and Madden 07 (and Trauma Center) demonstrate.

Excuse me but that's not needed. I'm not calling you names even though you are clearly wrong on a few points. 1. The Wii edition of the Godfather is not the best by review standards. So what are you basing your "better on the Wii" part on? You can personally feel that it's better but that's an opinion. Something you like to throw around as fact. 2. The traditional gamepad has been maxed out? Sorry but that's just not true. Just look at the tighter controls used by Resistance, God of War 2 (Which is actually much more responsive then the first), and Gears of War. 3. You say the Wiimote has potential, I agree with this. But what if someone doesn't want to swing a controller or make a flik of the wrist? It's a personal preference. What is objective is response, layout, and precision.
Avatar image for bomberkid100
bomberkid100

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 bomberkid100
Member since 2004 • 841 Posts
[QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"][QUOTE="MikeE21286"]

Last time I checked sales don't prove anything....

So by your logic.... since Simpsons Hit N Run sold more copies than Devil May Cry 1 your telling me Simpsons Hit N Run is a better game.....:|

MikeE21286

Isn't a console war about what sells more? Not what it better?

Retort failed. Try again.

Silly me.  I thought it was whatever console had the best games on it........

I don't play "sales" I play games.

may i claim ownage on ironmaidan
Avatar image for milsvaard
milsvaard

1928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#69 milsvaard
Member since 2003 • 1928 Posts
[QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

Gameplay trumps graphics.Cookiegut

 

Or cheap trumps expensive.

 

Correct, but for those crappy graphics I'd rather buy a PS2. 

Avatar image for dubvisions
dubvisions

1815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 dubvisions
Member since 2006 • 1815 Posts

According to your reasoning Nsync is better than Jimmy Hendrix.  

ramey70

 

That is hilarious!!!!  So true.  Look at who wins awards, rarely the best artists.

Avatar image for usule
usule

1734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 usule
Member since 2003 • 1734 Posts
Yeah the wii is not interesting, the games are way too childish, and comon'!! they could have done better with the graphics...I'd rather have a ps3 than the wii ( and not crazy by ps3 by the way)lol
Avatar image for IronMaidenLives
IronMaidenLives

703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 IronMaidenLives
Member since 2007 • 703 Posts
[QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"][QUOTE="thejakel11225"][QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"][QUOTE="thejakel11225"][QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

thejakel11225

Wasn't this the same dude that said people were jealous of a console :lol:

Yes, cows are jealous their precious powerhouse is being stomped by the Wii.

If i liked the Wii i would've bought it, no reason to get jealous of a machine, Sheep logic gets worse by every post..

I own zero current-gen systems. I am not a sheep. Generalization failed. Retort irrelevant. Post discarded.

pritty obvious you're a Wii fan, which makes you a sheep, your logic fails, post discarded.

 

How can I be a Wii fan if I don't own one?

It's prEtty obvious you don't know what you are talking about.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d560a230ad3c
deactivated-5d560a230ad3c

1546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#73 deactivated-5d560a230ad3c
Member since 2004 • 1546 Posts
[QUOTE="MikeE21286"]

Last time I checked sales don't prove anything....

So by your logic.... since Simpsons Hit N Run sold more copies than Devil May Cry 1 your telling me Simpsons Hit N Run is a better game.....:|

IronMaidenLives

Isn't a console war about what sells more? Not what it better?

Retort failed. Try again.

I don't think a console war is exclusively about sales.  Many people come here to argue about which system is "better", in his opinion.  Personally, I'm not a group-think kind of person and tend to make choices about products because of what they'll do for me, not what is popular. 

With respect to the Wii, I'm not impressed by its graphics, AI capabilities, or even its controller at this point.  I'll buy one when I'm convinced it's for real.

Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

IronMaidenLives

1) Wii's graphics are terrible for this gen.  and so far the games are barely even comparable to Gamecube graphics.  Even with Iwata saying "2 to 3 times better graphics" (not exact quote but along the same lines), Wii is STILL not even up to that low standard.  I realize Wii has graphics worse than 360 and PS3, but supposedly the Wii hardware can render much better graphics than what has been shown.  It has been 5 months.  Wii needs to showcase some better graphics.  Remember the flack Xbox 360 got when it debuted about its "subpar" graphics. Then Fight Night Round 3, Oblivion, and GRAW released and shut up the haters about that (accept for the dillusional people who still made fun of the 360s graphics).  Those games came out within 4 months of the 360's life cycle and showcased some great graphics.  Wii isn't even close to showcasing its graphics hardware even though it is "subpar".  That is just downright pathetic. 

2) Wii is ONLY SELLING BETTER THAN PS3 because of the price and the novelty of the controller. Of course a $250 system that comes with a "free" game is going to sell better than a $600 system with no free game.  Wii is much cheaper than the other 2 competitors this gen.  If Xbox 360 and PS3 were $300 just like last gen...then Wii would be dead in the water....innovative controller or not.  

Avatar image for MTBare
MTBare

5176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 MTBare
Member since 2006 • 5176 Posts
Console fanboys really shouldn't argue about graphics.. You want graphics? Buy a PC and stfu.
Avatar image for fatzombiepigeon
fatzombiepigeon

8199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#76 fatzombiepigeon
Member since 2005 • 8199 Posts

Graphics are icing on the cake to what highly advanced hardware can do.

Picture your moving through a shockingly realistic forest. As you crawl through shrubbery you hear two guys speaking in a different language you don't understand. You move closer, and, suddenly, because of advanced AI only capable with powerful hardware, they hear you and immediately shout for backup, blindfire, and jump for cover. Working together like real people, they bark orders and flank your now discovered postion. Bullets tear holes in trees, bushes, and ground as they bombard your postion. Working together, they are far more dangerous and intelligent than any enemy in any other, older game you've ever experienced.

Picture you're moving down a dirt road when a humvee rips through the road and narrowly misses slamming into you. You turn and shoot out the tires and the car skids across the road and comes to a stop.

I care about advanced hardware because it helps improve gameplay. Graphics are just icing on the cake. The fact that the majority of people don't agree with me doesn't mean I'm wrong.

Avatar image for MikeE21286
MikeE21286

10405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 MikeE21286
Member since 2003 • 10405 Posts
[QUOTE="iwo4life"][QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

VideoGameGuy

There are plenty of cheap people sitting in front of SDTVs right now playing thier cheap Wii and PS2s.  When HDTV is less expensive and both the 360 and PS3 pricedrop you wont' see the mad rush to buy a Wii.  In a few years both the 360 and the PS3 will outsell the Wii by a wide margin.  The 130 Million people that bought XBOXs and PS2s wont' want to make a lateral move to a Wii with marginally better GFX.  I personally can't figure out how Nintendo convinced GC owners to make essentially a lateral move to a new console just for the controller at 2.5 the price.  Plus gouge them on a million accessories.

I own a TV that costs many times the amount of all 3 of these systems combined.  Do you think I might choose a system that will take advantage of that? 

Funny....My Wii looks great on a HUGE expensive HDTV...seems to me that the Wii taking advantage of my TV just fine

Yeah to bad your HDTV is a waste in terms of WIi usage, you might as well play it on an SDTV.

Avatar image for Skippyj9
Skippyj9

2825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#78 Skippyj9
Member since 2004 • 2825 Posts

I dislike the Wii because

 

1. It's $250 yet does little more than introduce a new controller and the Wii Channels.

2. The graphics are no where near that of the PC, PS3, or 360 and some Xbox games look better than any Wii game.

3. The games aren't all that good. They're the worst reviewed overall of all 3 consoles. 

Avatar image for mighty_shark
mighty_shark

1822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#79 mighty_shark
Member since 2005 • 1822 Posts
[QUOTE="VideoGameGuy"][QUOTE="iwo4life"][QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

MikeE21286

There are plenty of cheap people sitting in front of SDTVs right now playing thier cheap Wii and PS2s.  When HDTV is less expensive and both the 360 and PS3 pricedrop you wont' see the mad rush to buy a Wii.  In a few years both the 360 and the PS3 will outsell the Wii by a wide margin.  The 130 Million people that bought XBOXs and PS2s wont' want to make a lateral move to a Wii with marginally better GFX.  I personally can't figure out how Nintendo convinced GC owners to make essentially a lateral move to a new console just for the controller at 2.5 the price.  Plus gouge them on a million accessories.

I own a TV that costs many times the amount of all 3 of these systems combined.  Do you think I might choose a system that will take advantage of that? 

Funny....My Wii looks great on a HUGE expensive HDTV...seems to me that the Wii taking advantage of my TV just fine

Yeah to bad your HDTV is a waste in terms of WIi usage, you might as well play it on an SDTV.

Not true. The component cables really do improve the quality of the picture. Yes, I know that 480p isn't "true" HD but it is still pretty good
Avatar image for GrlGmr
GrlGmr

4179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#80 GrlGmr
Member since 2003 • 4179 Posts
[QUOTE="VideoGameGuy"][QUOTE="iwo4life"]There are plenty of cheap people sitting in front of SDTVs right now playing thier cheap Wii and PS2s. When HDTV is less expensive and both the 360 and PS3 pricedrop you wont' see the mad rush to buy a Wii. In a few years both the 360 and the PS3 will outsell the Wii by a wide margin. The 130 Million people that bought XBOXs and PS2s wont' want to make a lateral move to a Wii with marginally better GFX. I personally can't figure out how Nintendo convinced GC owners to make essentially a lateral move to a new console just for the controller at 2.5 the price. Plus gouge them on a million accessories.

I own a TV that costs many times the amount of all 3 of these systems combined. Do you think I might choose a system that will take advantage of that?

iwo4life

Funny....My Wii looks great on a HUGE expensive HDTV...seems to me that the Wii taking advantage of my TV just fine..

You must have a special Wii that displays natively in at least 720p.  Good luck with that....Goes to play GeoW and Oblivon.

Looks fine to me too.

Avatar image for StrikerGold
StrikerGold

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#81 StrikerGold
Member since 2002 • 395 Posts
[QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

I don't think the Wii has proven that gameplay trumps graphics. a bunch of mini games do not constitute great gameplay. So far the best things about the Wii have been 2 upgraded gamecube titles, a tech demo and a title consisting of nothing but minigames...

The Wii is fun and simple to use at a cheap pricepoint.. THAT is why it is successful. It has nothing to do with superior gameplay because at this moment most of the Wii titles are subpar 3rd party shovelware.

Fun trumps everything. It's the K.I.S.S (keep it simple stupid) factor at it's best at work here.

heretrix

no ps1 and ps2 did and wii going to be the same :

what mim games? :| wii sports (not mim game) rayman is (on all console) waire ware (has mini games still tehcially not called mimi game) wii play (still not mim games)

so what mim games are you getting it ?

 

Dude, Wii sports is a tech demo. It is comprised of 5 sports minigames...I love Wii bowling, but it is nowhere near a full game. Baseball isn't 3 innings last time I checked, You play more holes in golf..etc

Warioware is a collection of minigames. It's always been that way. That's what it is and it's incredibly fun. But it's a bunch of mini games connected by little cute stories, which is ok, just don't try and make it more than that.

Wii play see above examples...What's funny is I enjoy all of these games, but lets not try and make them out to be more than they are: A bunch of games that you can pickup and play then put them away without any problem. I own a Wii and I have all 3 games, They are fun but shallow games. And I refuse to by a Wii 3rd party game until they decide to:

A.Stop making ports of games I played last year. Yes, the control scheme is new, but I basically played the same content already, no thanks

B. Stop with the goddamn shovelware.

This is tough love coming from me. I'm happy that the Wii is doing well, but even with the novel controls there are more compelling gaming experiences elsewhere.....They need quality software. (aside fron Ninty titles)

You're actually quite right about games like Wii Sports... good thing most people didn't have to actually buy it separately.  Which makes the fun I have with Sports infinitely satisfying.  

 As for the 3rd party games, most developers got caught with their pants down and ended up putting together half-assed ports.  And those that didn't really think the Wii would do well, i.e. most of the people on this board, are now scrambling to cash in on its success, which means that some of the games are going to suck because they rushed them.  The Wii's success that has come with only a handful of superb titles like Zelda, Trauma Center and WarioWare, and a bunch of others that are more subpar, but still are selling.  I'm very interested in seeing what some of the more creative developers put together, which could lead to even more success and sales from the "hardcore" crowd.

Avatar image for eddy_of_york
eddy_of_york

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#82 eddy_of_york
Member since 2005 • 1676 Posts
A lot of hardcores do think graphics matter...but the majority of console owners aren't hardcore....thats why we make the distinction
Avatar image for Watch_Me_Xplode
Watch_Me_Xplode

8049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#83 Watch_Me_Xplode
Member since 2005 • 8049 Posts
The Wii might have sold more than the PS3, but that doesn't mean I'm going to like it more. :? Sales mean little.
Avatar image for GrlGmr
GrlGmr

4179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#84 GrlGmr
Member since 2003 • 4179 Posts

The Wii might have sold more than the PS3, but that doesn't mean I'm going to like it more. :? Sales mean little.Watch_Me_Xplode

Peole who say sales don't matter are either fooling themselves or have no idea how the market works.

Sales mean everything. Everything. More sales means a larger potential audience, which means that 3rd parties will direct more of their resources into making games to take advantage of that audience. Sales are the reason the PS2 won the last generation. It wasn't the most powerful console, or the cheapest console, but it was the console with the largest potential audience, and thus it was the console with the most games.

At a certain point, the cycle snowballs upon itself as more games means more console buyers, which makes the audience even larger, which makes it more attractive to 3rd parties who release more games, and so on and so on. Where this point is, that's up for debate. But there's no question that both the Wii and 360 are closer to that point than the PS3 at this time.

Avatar image for StrikerGold
StrikerGold

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#85 StrikerGold
Member since 2002 • 395 Posts

A lot of hardcores do think graphics matter...but the majority of console owners aren't hardcore....thats why we make the distinctioneddy_of_york

That's why I do find it amusing that the "hardcores" need to slam the Wii.  Because if they really cared about graphics all this time, they would have purchased a gaming PC.  All this talk about HDTV and consoles, and I've been gaming in Hi-def for years now.  If I wanted to play Oblivion, I've got the PC, same for a multitude of good FPS, strategy, sims, etc.  But if I want to play something unique like Trauma Center, or have fun with friends, you know, in the same room, I gotta go to the Wii.   I'll play a good JRPG on a console like the PS2, since I've been doing that since my NES days, but other than that, most of the next gen system games don't offer me anything new or interesting yet.  Maybe I'll get a 360 for Blue Dragon or Mass Effect, otherwise... meh. 

Avatar image for Elementguy13
Elementguy13

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#87 Elementguy13
Member since 2005 • 2950 Posts
TEH GAMEPLAY.
Avatar image for afdevil24
afdevil24

1590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 afdevil24
Member since 2006 • 1590 Posts

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

IronMaidenLives

ha sheep. a superb game requires Graphics and Gameplay. look at the gamespot rating system.

Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts
The Wii is selling because it's new and interesting...... which won't continue for very long. PS3 isn't selling because it's expensive and has few games yet..... which will change in the years to come. And really the Wii selling well to casuals right now benifits the PS3.. no one is deciding whether they want a Wii or PS3. So instead of maybe getting a 360 because it's cheaper, PS3 now has time to get the games and price drops that make it the best choice once casuals are looking for a next gen system with next-gen visuals.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#90 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
[QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

I don't think the Wii has proven that gameplay trumps graphics. a bunch of mini games do not constitute great gameplay. So far the best things about the Wii have been 2 upgraded gamecube titles, a tech demo and a title consisting of nothing but minigames...

The Wii is fun and simple to use at a cheap pricepoint.. THAT is why it is successful. It has nothing to do with superior gameplay because at this moment most of the Wii titles are subpar 3rd party shovelware.

Fun trumps everything. It's the K.I.S.S (keep it simple stupid) factor at it's best at work here.

StrikerGold

no ps1 and ps2 did and wii going to be the same :

what mim games? :| wii sports (not mim game) rayman is (on all console) waire ware (has mini games still tehcially not called mimi game) wii play (still not mim games)

so what mim games are you getting it ?

 

Dude, Wii sports is a tech demo. It is comprised of 5 sports minigames...I love Wii bowling, but it is nowhere near a full game. Baseball isn't 3 innings last time I checked, You play more holes in golf..etc

Warioware is a collection of minigames. It's always been that way. That's what it is and it's incredibly fun. But it's a bunch of mini games connected by little cute stories, which is ok, just don't try and make it more than that.

Wii play see above examples...What's funny is I enjoy all of these games, but lets not try and make them out to be more than they are: A bunch of games that you can pickup and play then put them away without any problem. I own a Wii and I have all 3 games, They are fun but shallow games. And I refuse to by a Wii 3rd party game until they decide to:

A.Stop making ports of games I played last year. Yes, the control scheme is new, but I basically played the same content already, no thanks

B. Stop with the goddamn shovelware.

This is tough love coming from me. I'm happy that the Wii is doing well, but even with the novel controls there are more compelling gaming experiences elsewhere.....They need quality software. (aside fron Ninty titles)

You're actually quite right about games like Wii Sports... good thing most people didn't have to actually buy it separately.  Which makes the fun I have with Sports infinitely satisfying.  

 As for the 3rd party games, most developers got caught with their pants down and ended up putting together half-assed ports.  And those that didn't really think the Wii would do well, i.e. most of the people on this board, are now scrambling to cash in on its success, which means that some of the games are going to suck because they rushed them.  The Wii's success that has come with only a handful of superb titles like Zelda, Trauma Center and WarioWare, and a bunch of others that are more subpar, but still are selling.  I'm very interested in seeing what some of the more creative developers put together, which could lead to even more success and sales from the "hardcore" crowd.

I sort of agree with what you say, but I have one problem with it: When have you ever seen a company that knows it doesn't have to do better actually do better for it's customers? Why would developers take the time to make better games when rushed garbage sells? This is what I am worried about the most when people trumpet EA and others "finally" discovering the Wii..I hope I am wrong, but all signs say I'm right and I blame Ubisoft, who recently has become just as bad as EA with their portware addiction..
Avatar image for Michael85
Michael85

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Michael85
Member since 2005 • 3971 Posts
[QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

ramey70

 

According to your reasoning Nsync is better than Jimmy Hendrix.

Somehow, I don't think Nsync's music cost hundreds more than Jimmy Hendrix. 

Avatar image for purplemidgets
purplemidgets

3103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#92 purplemidgets
Member since 2002 • 3103 Posts
The Wii's graphics isn't the only reason why it's not a good console.
Avatar image for Japanese_Monk
Japanese_Monk

1412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Japanese_Monk
Member since 2006 • 1412 Posts
[QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

ramey70

 

According to your reasoning Nsync is better than Jimmy Hendrix.

So we all agree that the Xbox and GC were both better than ps2 right? 

Avatar image for Leejjohno
Leejjohno

13897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 Leejjohno
Member since 2005 • 13897 Posts

I find it quite ironic that something with such good gameplay instead of graphics (obviously a console pro :roll: ) fell short of it's hype, I mean, I was here when people hyped Red Steel to be the best FPS ever because of a remote, and LoZ:TP got 10. Ohh wait, thats not irony.

Avatar image for DoctorBunny
DoctorBunny

2660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 DoctorBunny
Member since 2005 • 2660 Posts

Seriously I don't see the big deal yet. I have been a gamer since 86 and this console is just boring to me. Even got Wii Play which people raved about.

 

It's boring as hell. Whats so fun about just waving your arm, i see why it is fun for those of lower intelligence and children, but whats challenging. Heck, they even autorun to the ball in tennis for you, guess they know the players of these games can't comprehend both waving one arm and moving the player with the other.

 

So far the only people I know who love it are children who come in to buy thier games or college students who ONLY play it when they are drunk.

Avatar image for Michael85
Michael85

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Michael85
Member since 2005 • 3971 Posts

Hehe, every day I see a new excuse.  Today, the excuse is "bu bu teh wii doesn't count 'cuz it's not teh competing!!!"

Haters are scared crapless that the Wii's going to overtake their console.

Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#97 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts
[QUOTE="MikeE21286"]

Last time I checked sales don't prove anything....

So by your logic.... since Simpsons Hit N Run sold more copies than Devil May Cry 1 your telling me Simpsons Hit N Run is a better game.....:|

IronMaidenLives

Isn't a console war about what sells more? Not what it better?

Retort failed. Try again.

 

Why do you even care which one sells more? Do you stand to make a profit off of every Wii sold?....I thought not. Anyway, the ONLY reason that the Wii is outselling the PS3 is simply because it is $250.00, and it's marketing target is the casuals, and non-gamer market. Parents would also rather buy their kids a $250.00 game console with more "kid friendly" games as well, and that also contributes to the Wii's success.

The Wii is simply aimed a completely different gaming market completely. As anyone who wants to mainly play games like Gears of War, Lair, Halo 3, Resistance, MGS4 and Oblivion, ect., are simply not going to buy a Wii, unless they just decide to pick one up because it is CHEAP. As for some, it might make a nice addition to their MAIN consoles, which of course would be either a 360, a PS3....or BOTH.

Anyway, I have seen several different threads created by you, constantly trying to claim that 360/PS3 owners are some how jealous of the Wii, lol. If someone can afford to buy a $600.00 or a $400.00 console, or in some cases, like with myself, can afford to buy both....do you not think that it would be rather easy to pick up a $250.00 as well if we wanted one so bad? Did it ever occur to you that just maybe some PS3/360 owners just do not find the Wii appealing?;) So why do you persist? 

Regardless, in the end the sales figures are not going to effect us gamers either way, because neither the PS3, 360, or the Wii is going to "die" this generation, and each will have plenty of games that will appeal to their respective audience. So, while you are busy bashing the PS3 because the CHEAPER Wii is out selling it for the time being, others will be enjoying the great catalog of games that are due out for both the PS3, and the 360.

I must confess though, "teh innovationz" of games like 'Cooking Mama' completely makes waiting for games like Lair, Heavenly Sword, MGS4, Elveon, Assassin's Creed, Dark Sector, Resident Evil 5, Harker, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, Ratchet and Clank: Tools of Destruction, Turok, Wardevil, GOW 3, ect., ect., ect. just seem utterly and completely pointless.

Why oh why do I even bother waiting for such an inferior gaming experience, when I could just sell both my 360, and my PS3, and just stick with "teh innovationz" of the almighty Wii, enjoying watered down ports of PS2 games? Let us not forget the redundant, and tired ole' Mario games....how could I forget? 

Thanks, but no thanks....and good luck with the sales figures by the way, lol. Meanwhile, I will be more concerned with what GAMES that I will be able to play.;) 

   

 

 

Avatar image for iwo4life
iwo4life

1155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 iwo4life
Member since 2004 • 1155 Posts
[QUOTE="iwo4life"][QUOTE="VideoGameGuy"][QUOTE="iwo4life"][QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]

I find it quite ironic that the Wii's graphics are the target for ridicule when the PS3 is selling nowhere near what the Wii is. If graphics are so important, how does a logical person explain this?

It is simple, the majority has spoken with their wallets. Gameplay trumps graphics. I have ow concluded that the PS3 will not win the "console war". However, the Wii possibly can. The 360? When most games available on the PS3 are available on the cheaper console, it is only logical to conclude that the 360 wins.

The PS2 destroyed the competition. The PS3 will not.

VideoGameGuy

There are plenty of cheap people sitting in front of SDTVs right now playing thier cheap Wii and PS2s. When HDTV is less expensive and both the 360 and PS3 pricedrop you wont' see the mad rush to buy a Wii. In a few years both the 360 and the PS3 will outsell the Wii by a wide margin. The 130 Million people that bought XBOXs and PS2s wont' want to make a lateral move to a Wii with marginally better GFX. I personally can't figure out how Nintendo convinced GC owners to make essentially a lateral move to a new console just for the controller at 2.5 the price. Plus gouge them on a million accessories.

I own a TV that costs many times the amount of all 3 of these systems combined. Do you think I might choose a system that will take advantage of that?

Funny....My Wii looks great on a HUGE expensive HDTV...seems to me that the Wii taking advantage of my TV just fine..

You must have a special Wii that displays natively in at least 720p. Good luck with that....Goes to play GeoW and Oblivon.

You see all i did was buy some cables....hook it up to my TV and started playing! Do you think the Wii is incompatible with HDTVs or something?

 It doesn't take full advantage of a HDTV.  If you think it does then good luck to you.  

Avatar image for IPwnsJ00
IPwnsJ00

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 IPwnsJ00
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
there go the  sheep, clinging to sales not games.
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

The Wii's graphics isn't the only reason why it's not a good console.purplemidgets

Bingo.  It's just the most readily apparent reason.