Fury X Gaming GPU was 2015's World's Most Powerful Computer Chip!

First of all it has caught up to the 980 Ti at 1440P. Yes, I did reference TechAvenue but I also referenced Hardware.fr and other sites. And what do you mean by "proper benchmark"? More like "useless" benchmark. While it has some good information, it doesn't show Crossfire vs SLI benchmarks of the Fury X vs the 980 Ti SLI vs Titan X SLI at 4K. You are too stupid to realize that at the high resolutions and AA settings that they are using the FPS drops below 30 FPS in both the 980 Ti and Fury X at 4K. Why do you think I have been posting CF Fury X vs 980 Ti/Titan X SLI benchmark dummy? Because a single GPU wouldn't be enough at 4K. While it may be good in some older games, maybe like BF3. It's going to be piss poor at 4K in newer games especially with the high AA and advanced AA settings that they are using.

Where did I talk about minimum frame rates in my OP. I was talking about Raw compute power. And depends on the minimum frame rates. If go from 60 fps to 50 fps that's not going to bad as opposed to 55 FPS and 45 FPS. It all depends on how low the minimum framerates.

Well no duh it doesn't matter to the end user. And no I didn't say it was 8X better than the competition I said it has 8X larger bus (don't put words in m mouth because you clearly lack the reading comprehension level of a two year old). Where exactly does it imply that it was better 8X better? Only in your deluded mind.

And no I never said anything about having a 7000 mhz HBM. What are you smoking? I said what would be the consequence if I were to have a 500 Mhz 4096 bit using GDDR5 instead of suing HBM?

I'm still waiting on the new benchmarks you are supposed to provide that actually utilize the new Crimson drivers. Your 6+ month old benchmarks are pointless. Both sides have improved drivers. Both sides have games that work better on their own cards. Stop cherry picking images to use.

Show us maxed, 4K benchmarks with current drivers. No medium settings. No posts about how Nvidia "stutters" and show videos or blog posts from 6+ months back. Do not post the image of someone posting in a youtube blog claiming the "magic" number for OC'ing the Fury X is 1200/600 and you gain a shit ton of performance - provide actual, current (current meaning - post Crimson driver release) proof. OC that Fury X of yours and benchmark for us - stop wasting time in here trying to defend your side until you do this.

I personal have no qualms about which is better, Fury X or 980Ti/Titan X - I just want to see current proof instead of you throwing out claims and posting data from 6+ months back where both sides are using old drivers or games tested are done on medium settings. Why would a site bench high-end enthusiast cards on medium settings? I've been searching for benchmark results for the Fury X since the Crimson release and all I come across are general data points indicating that at most, some games have increased performance by 3-4%. Overall, nothing has changed performance wise since the driver update prior to Crimson's release.

Did we need another thread about the Fury X that's full of misinformation and cherry picking? How much do you get paid?

Ron crushed the thread in short order. The chip will be a flop and everyone should stay away from it.

I was going to post some benchmarks from my Zotac 980Ti AMP Extreme but I didn't want to make the TC cry.

lol your the one with delusions, igoring facts and claiming half truths. lol claiming Crossfire is faster with a single synthetic benchmark which does not reflect real world results.... Both Crossfire & SLI trade blows and both have issues.

Every time your claims are picked apart you move to something else with more one sided crap.

@GarGx1: That would of been good. :D

It may take 14 nm or 16 nm flagship GPU generation.

@Xtasy26 said:

@sSubZerOo said:

.... Seriously I had to check the time this was posted because we have had reviews about this card for months.. And it was seen as widely a disappointment in offering anything ground breaking.. Furthermore those are cherry picked benches, not to mention crossfire/sli comparison.. A comparison that is literally only going to concern a very very few people who find the need to have a SLI set up ranging 1200+ dollars.. Meanwhile the 980 TI overclocked handedly beats the fury in every real world test, much has to do with the fact that the fury is a poor overclocker.. The Fury X is by no means a bad card, but stop trying to make it out that it stomps the competition.. It doesn't, it lags behind the 980 ti most of the time.. I would have strongly considered one my self if it weren't for the poor overclocking compared to the 900 series of nivdia cards currently.

I could give you average benchmarks of a whole hosts of games and not just certain games. Even then it has pulled away from the 980 Ti at 4K since it's launch and has gotten better at 1440P.

As AMD's drivers get better and better expect it to pull further away. Same thing happened with the 780 Ti vs R9 290X it was behind when it launched and the R9 290X is ahead of the 780 Ti on average. The only difference is that the Fury X did it in 4 - 5 months.

NVIDIA Keplers are in NVIDIA's legacy support status i.e. aging GPU design.