Ok, I'm the TC, some responses
I do have broadband, its not the fastest, its only 2MB, but that doesn't matter anyway, go do some downloading, and see what actual transfer rates you get ;) There is quite a bit more involved in download speeds than your home connection guys..... Seriously....you remind me of the guys online that blame lag on "a guy with a cheap assconnection". N00bs. According to your theories, with my 2mb connection, I should of been able to download the 700mb mag update/patch in just under 6 minutes. It actually took over an hour.
I will concede the point about "hours". It was misleading. I should have worded it as"over an hour". To the person that posted saying Iclaimed "7 hours"....I didn't. It does say "can take"- as in not every update takes this long. However, my main point is the difference between XBL updates and PSN updates.
My gripe is this - as I said, I don't get much time to game, its why i've always been a console gamer. Pick up and play has always been console gamings main benefit for me . But now I have a PS3, I stick my new game in (uncharted/Mag/etc) and i'm confronted with an update. Even the smaller updates seem to take a good 20 minutes, buy the time its downloaded, then done its install etc.
It just seems a complete joke when compared to the xbox. Xbox patch their games too, but they take seconds.
As for running them in the background, so far I've not had one thats let me do that? Although with uncharted 2, I got annoyed, it was getting late, needed to go to bed, so hit cancel,and it let me play the game anyway. Which is strange, as the warning that came up when I first went to play the game basically said I "needed" to do the update.
So yeah, PSN updates are a bit of a joke, and I wonder what PSN is doing soo differently.
I'm fairly sure its got NOTHING to do with connection speed to servers. The XBL updates download way too fast, they are obviously tiny. So it seems to me, xbox games are somehow more efficient to patch.
Log in to comment