[QUOTE="ninboxstation"][QUOTE="null_is_zero"] How does a score makes a game better than the other one? They rate games for what they offer.
I prefer MGS4 over Halo 3.Though they're different in terms of genre, Halo 3 is an FPS and to be honest there are TOOOOOOOO many FPSs out there whereas there aren't many stealth story driven games which makes the Metal Gear saga kinda one of a kind. Splinter Cell isn't half as good as MGS3 to begin with. MGS4 is unique.
1) give Splinter Cell the cinematics of a MGS, and it would blow it on the moon..... 2) give MGS the gameplay of a Splinter Cell, and it would blow it on the moon....
3) FPS or not, Halo not only hat an epic singleplayer, it also has the better Multiplayer
4) MGS4 is just like Halo3, looks great, plays like a old-generation Game (jsut like GTA4...)
5) Halo3, MGS4 and GTA4 (and Zelda TP i'm afraid) all play like old-generation games, but Zelda TP (Wii) has at least one element, that could not of been done on the last gen....
6) Gears of War is the real thing, it's nothing like anything from the last generation .
...if GOW2 doesn't win the GOTY, then why dont we just go back to playing MGS1 on the PS1 and watch some cool animé movies, because that's what it's like....
(if somebody doesnt know Metal Gear Solid, then that somebody would never say MGS4 is game of the year...... he'd say "it has cool cinematics, but Splinter Cell playes better".)
Have you even played MGS4, dude? You'll see the gameplay is probably 10x better than before, and you run n' gun fans are now able to do just that. Gunplay was upped so much... Play MGS4, then play MGS3... if you can still say what you just said about playing like an old gen game, I will cancel my account.
Log in to comment