even by today's standards?
I can think of: Starcraft, Fallout, Heroes of M&M 3
Geez, I admire the effort people put in to make things beautiful in 2D era.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
even by today's standards?
I can think of: Starcraft, Fallout, Heroes of M&M 3
Geez, I admire the effort people put in to make things beautiful in 2D era.
Reaching 2 generations back is a little bit of a far stretch. I don't think by today's standards that any games from back then look good.
full throttle
Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island (still the best mario ever)
Neverhood (I really liked this game.)
Honestly it's not that games age badly, it's more that people become accustomed to the newer graphical effects seen in each new generation. Are you willing to remind yourself that these games are over 10 years old and might still contain replay value?
I can go back to NES, SNES, Sega Genesis and find games that are exactly the same as when I played them the first time, and it seems most 2D games age better than 3D. if you want specific 3D-based games that still look polished, you'll have a hard time really finding any, other than those games given extra credit due to nostalgia.
Zelda: Link to the Past, Ocarina and Majora, Super Mario 64, Super Metroid, Age of Empires, Super Mario Bros games, Final Fantasy VI.charizard1605
all 3 of those games aged horridly :?
also my own chime in:
Pokmeon Stadium/stadium 2:
1080 snowboarding
and pretty much any game that used pixels and not polys.
Its a bit blocky but other then that it still looks great
I still love Grim Fandango's graphics, but you wouldn't confuse them with new graphics.
hellhund
Star Fox 64/Lylat Wars (1997)
A bit blocky, but still looks very good.
Tekken 3 (1998 )
Still plays very fluid.
I'm currently playing Outcast from 1999 thanks to GOG.com and I marvel at the tech they had over ten years ago.
Nothing from then looks graphically appealing or polished by todays standards.
i"d say Starcraft comes closest, as RTS's have never been about graphics (except maybe some Total War games which get a lot of fame from the massive battles you watch). Basically, when you play SC, you don't notice the graphics much, so in that way I think it holds up moderately well to today's standards.
I'm currently playing Outcast from 1999 thanks to GOG.com and I marvel at the tech they had over ten years ago.
theSADmafioso
you got me all excited man I thought that site was one of those freeware sites where the devs put out there old hits for free, sorta like what happened with the first 2 elder scroll games.
i was thinking that as well. a little pixelated due to using the voxel engine (and thus didnt use the GPU) but just a great looking game at its release and was well ahead of its time.I'm currently playing Outcast from 1999 thanks to GOG.com and I marvel at the tech they had over ten years ago.
theSADmafioso
Total Annihilation, 1997:
Simply a beautiful game for it's time, and still one of the best RTS games I've had the pleasure of gaming through.
It had hundreds and hundreds of full 3D models clashing together and 3D interactive terrain instead of layers (starcraft). In it's release, your average gamer back then simply didn't have the hardware to run this game on the lowest setting.
I remember Free Space 2 looked great for it's time. I know the spaceship models must look terrible now, but I remember the colorful nebulas that really made the vacuum of space come to life. Age of Empires 2 looked great (and still does) but that was released in 2000.
i was thinking that as well. a little pixelated due to using the voxel engine (and thus didnt use the GPU) but just a great looking game at its release and was well ahead of its time.Outcast is one of the best action-adventure games I've ever played! The graphics were amazing back in 1999, and the soundtrack, gameplay and story are really, really great. I think I'll reinstall this game right now. :D[QUOTE="theSADmafioso"]
I'm currently playing Outcast from 1999 thanks to GOG.com and I marvel at the tech they had over ten years ago.
osan0
BTW, Quake looks better than most today's games:
Banjo, Spyro, Crash & Sonic Adventure still look playable.
Yes! Neverhood! That was one of the first games I'd ever played! It still has amazing graphics for it's time.Neverhood (I really liked this game.)
frankeyser
at the time of release Gamespot hailed Heretic 2 as one of the most beautifull games ever.
So as far as technical graphics go for pre-1999 games it isn't going to get any better than this:
As far as consoles are concerned,a ton of games from the SNES/Genesis era look great while pretty much everything from the PS1/Saturn/N64 era is now a hot mess visually speaking.
GreySeal9
agreed. graphics-wise the pinnacle of the 2d era > the start of the 3d era.
from the pics so far in this thread the curse of monkey island is the best looking game for me
that's due to low resolutions and no filtering to speak off if you play with emu's you can run them in 1080p with lotso f AA and AF filtering and they look great unless your a graphcis whore. I'm not one but i do like clean visuals probably why the so called HD consoles don't look that good to me visually only 720p and in several cases below that combined with little AA and AF especially for that relatively low resolution.As far as consoles are concerned,a ton of games from the SNES/Genesis era look great while pretty much everything from the PS1/Saturn/N64 era is now a hot mess visually speaking.
GreySeal9
And my vote would go to unreal. altough there is no real 3D game that looks graphically appealing in this day and age from that long ago visually its another story. 2D games rely on visuals not graphical tech so you can't apply them to topics soley around graphics.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment