the only aclaimed game never getting a sequel or even a spiritual sucessor is SOTC, wake up developers!!!!!!
Games that you think deserve a 10/10 POLL !!!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
@thehig1 said:
@commander: there's more to football games than graphics and physics.
Iss had better AI and a controls, it just played better.
One thing Iss had over Fifa was player physics, you could really tell the difference in players of difference size and artitrubes.
I noticed a lot of his picks are "for their time" type picks. I enjoyed most of the games he listed in the OP, but most of them wouldn't get more than a 5/10 from me now.
Resident Evil 4 a 10/10? Maybe a 9/10 if it were unrelated to Resident Evil, but as a Resident Evil game it's a 6/10 tops...
The fact that this game is in first place just goes to show how new people are around here, post Resident Evil 0 adopters are a cancer to this franchise...
For me personally, Final Fantasy X, Final Fantasy XII, and Half Life 2 are the ones I'd give 10s to.
@ConanTheStoner said:
@thehig1 said:
@commander: there's more to football games than graphics and physics.
Iss had better AI and a controls, it just played better.
One thing Iss had over Fifa was player physics, you could really tell the difference in players of difference size and artitrubes.
I noticed a lot of his picks are "for their time" type picks. I enjoyed most of the games he listed in the OP, but most of them wouldn't get more than a 5/10 from me now.
Well of course, i really wouldn't give any game a 10 right now besides worms 4, fight night champion and abe's oddworld. It's very hard to make a game that can stand the test of time, especially when 3d has still so many flaws (and it shouldn't , not with the tech that's available the last 5 years)
MAybe a hd version of dragon's dogma would still get a 10 but skyrim is already dated, so is dark souls.
Fallout 4 may be a candidate but that dog won't last long lol
@nyadc said:
Resident Evil 4 a 10/10? Maybe a 9/10 if it were unrelated to Resident Evil, but as a Resident Evil game it's a 6/10 tops...
The fact that this game is in first place just goes to show how new people are around here, post Resident Evil 0 adopters are a cancer to this franchise...
33 here, been playing RE since the original.
I just like good games. Jump scares, Fisher Price puzzles and tank controls can only work for so long. Expert level design, encounter design and pacing, all layered under some very satisfying combat just does more for me as a gamer.
@ConanTheStoner said:
@nyadc said:
Resident Evil 4 a 10/10? Maybe a 9/10 if it were unrelated to Resident Evil, but as a Resident Evil game it's a 6/10 tops...
The fact that this game is in first place just goes to show how new people are around here, post Resident Evil 0 adopters are a cancer to this franchise...
33 here, been playing RE since the original.
I just like good games. Jump scares, Fisher Price puzzles and tank controls can only work for so long. Expert level design, encounter design and pacing, all layered under some very satisfying combat just does more for me as a gamer.
I'm just saying man, it was a good game, but if you changed like three things it would literally have nothing to do with Resident Evil. It should have been the start of a new IP, not the cause for the inevitable downfall of the franchise.
@nyadc said:
Resident Evil 4 a 10/10? Maybe a 9/10 if it were unrelated to Resident Evil, but as a Resident Evil game it's a 6/10 tops...
The fact that this game is in first place just goes to show how new people are around here, post Resident Evil 0 adopters are a cancer to this franchise...
I Cant agree more
Big ROFLCOPTER whoever voted for RE4 as a 10 , the start of downfall for RE franchise and the main reason why RE series became a chore
@nyadc said:
I'm just saying man, it was a good game, but if you changed like three things it would literally have nothing to do with Resident Evil. It should have been the start of a new IP, not the cause for the inevitable downfall of the franchise.
Oh, it most definitely could've been a new IP. It should've been a new IP, I won't argue that at all. But it's still a great game.
Causing the franchise downfall? Disagree. RE was already on its way out. RE4 was an attempt to breathe new life into the franchise commercially, and it did exactly that. It's the poor bastards who attempted replicating RE4 without understanding RE4 that brought the franchise down.
Anyways. We can both agree that RE is in the shitter now. Regardless of the direction they choose from here, hopefully the series can return to something of quality.
@ConanTheStoner said:
@nyadc said:
I'm just saying man, it was a good game, but if you changed like three things it would literally have nothing to do with Resident Evil. It should have been the start of a new IP, not the cause for the inevitable downfall of the franchise.
Oh, it most definitely could've been a new IP. It should've been a new IP, I won't argue that at all. But it's still a great game.
Causing the franchise downfall? Disagree. RE was already on its way out. RE4 was an attempt to breathe new life into the franchise commercially, and it did exactly that. It's the poor bastards who attempted replicating RE4 without understanding RE4 that brought the franchise down.
Anyways. We can both agree that RE is in the shitter now. Regardless of the direction they choose from here, hopefully the series can return to something of quality.
true allthough i have to say i quite liked raccoon city, but it was way too short.
NEver played re6 but because of the bad reviews and because of how bad re5 was.
@AzatiS said:
@nyadc said:
Resident Evil 4 a 10/10? Maybe a 9/10 if it were unrelated to Resident Evil, but as a Resident Evil game it's a 6/10 tops...
The fact that this game is in first place just goes to show how new people are around here, post Resident Evil 0 adopters are a cancer to this franchise...
I Cant agree more
Big ROFLCOPTER whoever voted for RE4 as a 10 , the start of downfall for RE franchise and the main reason why RE series became a chore
You couldn't be more wrong, on the other hand, you can't argue about preference. But re 3 that resident evil needed to grow up, the 2.5 dimensional mechanic was a good mechanic, for the mid nineties.
Resident evil 4 translated the game into a new era, something a lot of franchises cannot do, like alone in the dark for instance. But then they screwed it up after that, it's really a shame because resident evil 4 was a masterpiece.
Allthough i gotta say that raccoon city had a nice thing going but it was way way too short. Can't judge re6 though , still gotta play that one, don't know if I will, the mixed reviews kind of threw me off, maybe i'll catch it on a steam sale.
@commander said:
@AzatiS said:
@nyadc said:
Resident Evil 4 a 10/10? Maybe a 9/10 if it were unrelated to Resident Evil, but as a Resident Evil game it's a 6/10 tops...
The fact that this game is in first place just goes to show how new people are around here, post Resident Evil 0 adopters are a cancer to this franchise...
I Cant agree more
Big ROFLCOPTER whoever voted for RE4 as a 10 , the start of downfall for RE franchise and the main reason why RE series became a chore
You couldn't be more wrong, on the other hand, you can't argue about preference. But re 3 that resident evil needed to grow up, the 2.5 dimensional mechanic was a good mechanic, for the mid nineties.
Resident evil 4 translated the game into a new era, something a lot of franchises cannot do, like alone in the dark for instance. But then they screwed it up after that, it's really a shame because resident evil 4 was a masterpiece.
Allthough i gotta say that raccoon city had a nice thing going but it was way way too short. Can't judge re6 though , still gotta play that one, don't know if I will, the mixed reviews kind of threw me off, maybe i'll catch it on a steam sale.
RE ended up being what it is today because of RE4. Theres nothing about preference or not here. Its damn fact. I saw thousands of people fire on RE5 ... Why so ? It was based 99% on RE4 formula with different settings etc ! Then RE6 , again based on RE4 formula, was even worse.
So how you calling a screw up the next installments when they offered what RE4 did with different settings ? Specially RE5. Because RE4 wasnt a great game to begin with. I can point out myriad of flaws if you want me to do so and you wont be able to deny them because they are facts.
Re4 excelled on level desing and graphics for its time on technical level etc .. Agreed. On that it was a great game ... But on everything else ?Oh boy , what a disaster ... It was the very first RE ( and i played ALL of RE games before that DAY 1 ) i didnt want to replay , it was the first RE that after last boss it felt like " WTF was that shit " and it was the first RE it didnt get me uneasy because there was literally ZERO survival elements to it , the main reason why RE franchise became so popular.
Guess what happened with RE5 , i couldnt bare to pass chapter 3 . I couldnt stand this "RE4" style of gameplay and same flaws all over again. Majority didnt. It scored high , yet majority didnt like it including RE4 fans. So scores/sales numbers mean shit imho. Yes , it was that bad. I wont even touch RE6. All this mess started with RE4, you like it or not and the next installments based on that very same formula everyone used to praise ... failed.... Go figure why ...
If you honestly want to talk about RE4 mega flaws for you to understand that RE4 is far from a 10 , no its far from its initial score in metacritic as well , tell me so and lets do it.
@AzatiS said:
@commander said:
@AzatiS said:
I Cant agree more
Big ROFLCOPTER whoever voted for RE4 as a 10 , the start of downfall for RE franchise and the main reason why RE series became a chore
You couldn't be more wrong, on the other hand, you can't argue about preference. But re 3 that resident evil needed to grow up, the 2.5 dimensional mechanic was a good mechanic, for the mid nineties.
Resident evil 4 translated the game into a new era, something a lot of franchises cannot do, like alone in the dark for instance. But then they screwed it up after that, it's really a shame because resident evil 4 was a masterpiece.
Allthough i gotta say that raccoon city had a nice thing going but it was way way too short. Can't judge re6 though , still gotta play that one, don't know if I will, the mixed reviews kind of threw me off, maybe i'll catch it on a steam sale.
RE ended up being what it is today because of RE4. Theres nothing about preference or not here. Its damn fact. I saw thousands of people fire on RE5 ... Why so ? It was based 99% on RE4 formula with different settings etc ! Then RE6 , again based on RE4 formula, was even worse.
So how you calling a screw up the next installments when they offered what RE4 did with different settings ? Specially RE5. Because RE4 wasnt a great game to begin with. I can point out myriad of flaws if you want me to do so and you wont be able to deny them because they are facts.
Re4 excelled on level desing and graphics for its time on technical level etc .. Agreed. On that it was a great game ... But on everything else ?Oh boy , what a disaster ... It was the very first RE ( and i played ALL of RE games before that DAY 1 ) i didnt want to replay , it was the first RE that after last boss it felt like " WTF was that shit " and it was the first RE it didnt get me uneasy because there was literally ZERO survival elements to it , the main reason why RE franchise became so popular.
Guess what happened with RE5 , i couldnt bare to pass chapter 3 . I couldnt stand this "RE4" style of gameplay all over again. Majority didnt. It scored high , yet majority didnt like it including RE4 fans. So scores mean shit imho. Yes , it was that bad. I wont even touch RE6. All this mess started with RE4, you like it or not and the next installments based on that very same formula everyone used to praise ... failed.... Go figure why ...
If you honestly want to talk about RE4 mega flaws for you to understand that RE4 is far from a 10 , no its far from its initial score in metacritic as well , tell me so and lets do it.
How can you say that re5 became what it was because of re4, that's like saying that gta vice city is bad because of gta 3. gta vice city wasn't bad though but i'm sure you get my point. Re4 just brought the series to the 3D era.
RE5 was nothing like re 4, for starters the co op. Co op and survival horror doesn't work very well, dead space tried it too and we all know how that turned out, on the other hand dead space 3 does a lot of things good though if you change the difficulty setting to hard but imo survival horror shouldn't have difficulty settings.
The gameplay and artstyle was different too. Resident evil 5 played and looked more like a difficult action game and that's kind of missing the point. It was way better implemented with raccoon city, where they went full action. It wasn't loyal to the resident evil survival horror, but it was a nice idea, the fact that you had three different characters in co op made the game really stand out, but then in the end it was totally nerfed because it was so so short but it was still way better than resident evil 5. I tried to play re 5 for numerous times but quit after a halfhour, the game is just boring.
REsident evil 6 get's mixed reviews, the more i talk about it the more i realize i gotta test this game, because i've always been an resident evil fan, but i wanted to spare me from further dissapointment.
I know that resident evil 4 got it's flaws but you have to realize that this game was released in beginning 2005 and brought survival horror to the 3d era, imo (and a lot of others) it did it extremely well and that's why i think this game is 10/10 worthy. I can try to understand why you think the game isn't 10/10, but it is going to be hard because when I finished the game, I replayed it immediately.
@nyadc said:
I'm just saying man, it was a good game, but if you changed like three things it would literally have nothing to do with Resident Evil. It should have been the start of a new IP, not the cause for the inevitable downfall of the franchise.
Resident Evil was already in freefall after 3rd iteration. Which is why RE4 has gone through 6 years long development hell.
Despite that fact, RE4 was a breath of fresh air and a masterfully constructed game too. It gave the series much needed CPR, which kept it going for a bit longer.
@ConanTheStoner said:
Oh, it most definitely could've been a new IP. It should've been a new IP, I won't argue that at all. But it's still a great game.
They've already created a new IP out of brainstorming a new Resident Evil vision. i don't think they could afford this trick again.
@commander said:
Can't judge re6 though , still gotta play that one, don't know if I will, the mixed reviews kind of threw me off, maybe i'll catch it on a steam sale.
Looking at reviews i expected worst from RE6.
But having played it a year ago with a friend, it's a pretty decent game.
It's basically a Call Of Duty with zombies at this point, but it's way better at what it does than actual Call Of Duty. Not to mention it's like 4 times longer.
And the new mobility system is a legit step forward from 4-5. Instead of hitting QTEs for dodges, ducks, rolls etc, you have direct control of everything and it's satisfying to do.
If only the game as whole was more inspired.
@nyadc said:
Resident Evil 4 a 10/10? Maybe a 9/10 if it were unrelated to Resident Evil, but as a Resident Evil game it's a 6/10 tops...
The fact that this game is in first place just goes to show how new people are around here, post Resident Evil 0 adopters are a cancer to this franchise...
Everything you are is wrong.
Damn I forgot Valkyria Chronicles and Deus Ex, both of those are pure perfection,
@commander said:
@AzatiS said:
@commander said:
@AzatiS said:
I Cant agree more
Big ROFLCOPTER whoever voted for RE4 as a 10 , the start of downfall for RE franchise and the main reason why RE series became a chore
You couldn't be more wrong, on the other hand, you can't argue about preference. But re 3 that resident evil needed to grow up, the 2.5 dimensional mechanic was a good mechanic, for the mid nineties.
Resident evil 4 translated the game into a new era, something a lot of franchises cannot do, like alone in the dark for instance. But then they screwed it up after that, it's really a shame because resident evil 4 was a masterpiece.
Allthough i gotta say that raccoon city had a nice thing going but it was way way too short. Can't judge re6 though , still gotta play that one, don't know if I will, the mixed reviews kind of threw me off, maybe i'll catch it on a steam sale.
RE ended up being what it is today because of RE4. Theres nothing about preference or not here. Its damn fact. I saw thousands of people fire on RE5 ... Why so ? It was based 99% on RE4 formula with different settings etc ! Then RE6 , again based on RE4 formula, was even worse.
So how you calling a screw up the next installments when they offered what RE4 did with different settings ? Specially RE5. Because RE4 wasnt a great game to begin with. I can point out myriad of flaws if you want me to do so and you wont be able to deny them because they are facts.
Re4 excelled on level desing and graphics for its time on technical level etc .. Agreed. On that it was a great game ... But on everything else ?Oh boy , what a disaster ... It was the very first RE ( and i played ALL of RE games before that DAY 1 ) i didnt want to replay , it was the first RE that after last boss it felt like " WTF was that shit " and it was the first RE it didnt get me uneasy because there was literally ZERO survival elements to it , the main reason why RE franchise became so popular.
Guess what happened with RE5 , i couldnt bare to pass chapter 3 . I couldnt stand this "RE4" style of gameplay all over again. Majority didnt. It scored high , yet majority didnt like it including RE4 fans. So scores mean shit imho. Yes , it was that bad. I wont even touch RE6. All this mess started with RE4, you like it or not and the next installments based on that very same formula everyone used to praise ... failed.... Go figure why ...
If you honestly want to talk about RE4 mega flaws for you to understand that RE4 is far from a 10 , no its far from its initial score in metacritic as well , tell me so and lets do it.
1) How can you say that re5 became what it was because of re4, that's like saying that gta vice city is bad because of gta 3. gta vice city wasn't bad though but i'm sure you get my point. Re4 just brought the series to the 3D era.
2) RE5 was nothing like re 4, for starters the co op. Co op and survival horror doesn't work very well, dead space tried it too and we all know how that turned out, on the other hand dead space 3 does a lot of things good though if you change the difficulty setting to hard but imo survival horror shouldn't have difficulty settings.
3) The gameplay and artstyle was different too. Resident evil 5 played and looked more like a difficult action game and that's kind of missing the point. It was way better implemented with raccoon city, where they went full action. It wasn't loyal to the resident evil survival horror, but it was a nice idea, the fact that you had three different characters in co op made the game really stand out, but then in the end it was totally nerfed because it was so so short but it was still way better than resident evil 5. I tried to play re 5 for numerous times but quit after a halfhour, the game is just boring.
REsident evil 6 get's mixed reviews, the more i talk about it the more i realize i gotta test this game, because i've always been an resident evil fan, but i wanted to spare me from further dissapointment.
I know that resident evil 4 got it's flaws but you have to realize that this game was released in beginning 2005 and brought survival horror to the 3d era, imo (and a lot of others) it did it extremely well and that's why i think this game is 10/10 worthy. I can try to understand why you think the game isn't 10/10, but it is going to be hard because when I finished the game, I replayed it immediately.
1) Because the formula is the same , the settings changed and some attributes here and there... You have the same idiotic lore which make no sense at all , alienated creatures , mediocre shooting once again , stupid AI and more ...The whole RE4s design is up there with RE5 , the good and bads. So how is possible to not see that. So how is possible for all those RE4 fans to dissing RE5 ? Thats what you should think.
2) There was NOTHING , literally nothing as survival in RE4 ... Why you think RE4 as survival horror a god knows !? What exactly was about survival in RE4 to begin with ....Literally nothing. If you want me to further explain you why it wasnt , let me know.
3) How on earth RE4 was loyal to RE survival horror elements , how it was remotely loyal to RE roots and lore ? It wasnt .. RE series begin as survival/horror apocalyptic zombie games and ended up being BAD action shooters with some horror here and there based on ... alien like parasite that transforming humans to whatever !!! Way , wayyyy off than what RE games used to be. A whole different genre if you ask me. From survival/horror action with some minor adventure paints here and there to straight Action shooter with some horror elements .
4) I havent nor i ever be bothered with RE6 . Im not wasting no more money of this franchise. I own every single RE game up ti now with the exceptions of RE zero and RE6 . I played every RE i own on day 1 of their release .. not years after.
@AzatiS said:
@commander said:
1) How can you say that re5 became what it was because of re4, that's like saying that gta vice city is bad because of gta 3. gta vice city wasn't bad though but i'm sure you get my point. Re4 just brought the series to the 3D era.
2) RE5 was nothing like re 4, for starters the co op. Co op and survival horror doesn't work very well, dead space tried it too and we all know how that turned out, on the other hand dead space 3 does a lot of things good though if you change the difficulty setting to hard but imo survival horror shouldn't have difficulty settings.
3) The gameplay and artstyle was different too. Resident evil 5 played and looked more like a difficult action game and that's kind of missing the point. It was way better implemented with raccoon city, where they went full action. It wasn't loyal to the resident evil survival horror, but it was a nice idea, the fact that you had three different characters in co op made the game really stand out, but then in the end it was totally nerfed because it was so so short but it was still way better than resident evil 5. I tried to play re 5 for numerous times but quit after a halfhour, the game is just boring.
REsident evil 6 get's mixed reviews, the more i talk about it the more i realize i gotta test this game, because i've always been an resident evil fan, but i wanted to spare me from further dissapointment.
I know that resident evil 4 got it's flaws but you have to realize that this game was released in beginning 2005 and brought survival horror to the 3d era, imo (and a lot of others) it did it extremely well and that's why i think this game is 10/10 worthy. I can try to understand why you think the game isn't 10/10, but it is going to be hard because when I finished the game, I replayed it immediately.
1) Because the formula is the same , the settings changed and some attributes here and there... You have the same idiotic lore which make no sense at all , alienated creatures , mediocre shooting once again , stupid AI and more ...The whole RE4s design is up there with RE5 , the good and bads. So how is possible to not see that. So how is possible for all those RE4 fans to dissing RE5 ? Thats what you should think.
2) There was NOTHING , literally nothing as survival in RE4 ... Why you think RE4 as survival horror a god knows !? What exactly was about survival in RE4 to begin with ....Literally nothing. If you want me to further explain you why it wasnt , let me know.
3) How on earth RE4 was loyal to RE survival horror elements , how it was remotely loyal to RE roots and lore ? It wasnt .. RE series begin as survival/horror apocalyptic zombie games and ended up being BAD action shooters with some horror here and there based on ... alien like parasite that transforming humans to whatever !!! Way , wayyyy off than what RE games used to be. A whole different genre if you ask me. From survival/horror action with some minor adventure paints here and there to straight Action shooter with some horror elements .
4) I havent nor i ever be bothered with RE6 . Im not wasting no more money of this franchise. I own every single RE game up ti now with the exceptions of RE zero and RE6 . I played every RE i own on day 1 of their release .. not years after.
1) Not really re5 was less realistic , in the sense that you had zombies on motorcyclces , stuff like that and again it was co-op oriented.
2) stil felt like survival to me, sites and reviewers classify it as survival. IT was easier than the previous versions though, but still not a walk in the park. Maybe you didn't have those jump of your seat scenes, but that doesn't mean it isn't horor. Or
3) I know, but you know still zombies...
And it was indeed more action than the previous versions and less survival horror but still a 10/10 in my book
@commander said:
1) Not really re5 was less realistic , in the sense that you had zombies on motorcyclces , stuff like that and again it was co-op oriented.
2) stil felt like survival to me, sites and reviewers classify it as survival. IT was easier than the previous versions though, but still not a walk in the park. Maybe you didn't have those jump of your seat scenes, but that doesn't mean it isn't horor. Or
3) I know, but you know still zombies...
And it was indeed more action than the previous versions and less survival horror but still a 10/10 in my book
1) I understand what you saying and im with you. But the same "logic" was behind the RE4 . Human like parasitic people that getting controlled from mama parasite ... make them clever enough to chase , communicate , turn on a big chainsaw , throw you stuff ... then staring you with slow moves like they are traditional zombies ... That idiotic AI formula was in RE5 all over , even worse than before for the reason you mentioning , but all begun with RE4.
2) I totally disagree with RE4 being a survival game. I can talk all day why i say so. I dont remember sites and reviewers classify it as survival/horror but maybe i dont remember well. It never felt to me a survival game .. i never run out of ammunition , i never felt like im in danger and even if i did ... that merchant spawns out of nowhere selling weapons ... the most idiotic , anticlimatic , anti-survival thing they could ever think. RE4 to me was an action horror shooter . I agree with you being a horror game , it had its moments.
3) Again , i get what you mean but think about it ... Zombies made RE popular ... and survival/horror made it a success. Both were missing from RE4. It never felt a RE to me . I played literally all REs up till RE4 release and i finished all except Zero. I had a blast every single time ( though as i said i played them day 1 of their release and that matters alot imho in order to be fair to each one of them ). Resident evil supposed to be the holy grail of survival/horror video games not just an alienated action/shooter horror game. Also the whole lore was all about zombies and viruses ...Then it jumped to parasites and alien like transforming guys ? That was too much imho ...
What i mean by that ... RE4 could have been easily a SIDE game and not one of the main series. I wouldnt mind at all a RE4 like side game for the fans of action horror shooters. But keep the main series real to what they were .
Lore was way off , story was a nonsense ( not that previously RE games had strong stories but they had coherence between each title ) , shooting was utter crap , survival element non existant , AI was funny rather scary , settings were creepy yet boring after a while ( even if technical graphics were terrific back then and design ) ... I can continue forever !
Well 10/10 for you but you know what bro , with all the respect ...i really think you started these series with .. RE4 ! Thats why :)
Bloodborne, and TLoU.
@AzatiS said:
@commander said:
1) Not really re5 was less realistic , in the sense that you had zombies on motorcyclces , stuff like that and again it was co-op oriented.
2) stil felt like survival to me, sites and reviewers classify it as survival. IT was easier than the previous versions though, but still not a walk in the park. Maybe you didn't have those jump of your seat scenes, but that doesn't mean it isn't horor. Or
3) I know, but you know still zombies...
And it was indeed more action than the previous versions and less survival horror but still a 10/10 in my book
1) I understand what you saying and im with you. But the same "logic" was behind the RE4 . Human like parasitic people that getting controlled from mama parasite ... make them clever enough to chase , communicate , turn on a big chainsaw , throw you stuff ... then staring you with slow moves like they are traditional zombies ... That idiotic AI formula was in RE5 all over , even worse than before for the reason you mentioning , but all begun with RE4.
2) I totally disagree with RE4 being a survival game. I can talk all day why i say so. I dont remember sites and reviewers classify it as survival/horror but maybe i dont remember well. It never felt to me a survival game .. i never run out of ammunition , i never felt like im in danger and even if i did ... that merchant spawns out of nowhere selling weapons ... the most idiotic , anticlimatic , anti-survival thing they could ever think. RE4 to me was an action horror shooter . I agree with you being a horror game , it had its moments.
3) Again , i get what you mean but think about it ... Zombies made RE popular ... and survival/horror made it a success. Both were missing from RE4. It never felt a RE to me . I played literally all REs up till RE4 release and i finished all except Zero. I had a blast every single time ( though as i said i played them day 1 of their release and that matters alot imho in order to be fair to each one of them ). Resident evil supposed to be the holy grail of survival/horror video games not just an alienated action/shooter horror game. Also the whole lore was all about zombies and viruses ...Then it jumped to parasites and alien like transforming guys ? That was too much imho ...
What i mean by that ... RE4 could have been easily a SIDE game and not one of the main series. I wouldnt mind at all a RE4 like side game for the fans of action horror shooters. But keep the main series real to what they were .
Lore was way off , story was a nonsense ( not that previously RE games had strong stories but they had coherence between each title ) , shooting was utter crap , survival element non existant , AI was funny rather scary , settings were creepy yet boring after a while ( even if technical graphics were terrific back then and design ) ... I can continue forever !
yWell 10/10 for you but you know what bro , with all the respect ...i really think you started these series with .. RE4 ! Thats why :)
1) Yeah of course, but re4 was like a magical place, resident evil 5 not. Re 4 was like a village of the dead with evil magical creatures. Re5, i don't even know what it was about, i didn't care.
As for the AI, the aI in the first 3 games wasn't all that good either, zombies are after all zombies.
2) Well it was less survival that the previous iterations but still you could die fast if you weren't carefull. That was the survival part for me.
3) Well re 4 wasn't per se zombies, but it's kind of the same mechanic. I can understand you that they went sideways with the lore though, in the end it wasn't really resident evil anymore. The creators probably took the name to be more successfull. It may be bad that resident evil 4 didn't follow that lore, that doesn't make or break the game. It's sad for the resident evil lore, but this game is still a 10/10 to me
4) I played RE 1-3 before i played 4. I really like the first 2, 3 was a bit too much of the same for me. It's also the reason I don't mind that re4 choose another story and lore, of course that's 10 years ago, maybe i should really try 6 and see what it is about.
Can't think of any, I'm very critical towards games.
Super Smash Bros 64
Super Smash Bros Melee
Super Smash Bros Brawl
Super Smash Bros for 3DS
Super Smash Bros for Wii U
- Starcraft 2
- Max Payne 2
- Warcraft 3
- Mass Effect 2
- Dragon Age: Origins
- Freelancer
- Diabo 2
- Half Life 2
- Thief: The Dark Project
- Deus Ex
- Divinity: Original Sin
- Bioshock
- Metal Gear Solid 3 (any version that has the fixed camera,I enjoy the 3DS one most)
- Red Dead Redemption
- Resident Evil 4
- Halo 3
- Morrowind
- Mario Kart 8
- Super Metroid
- Metroid Prime
- Fallout 3
- Super Smash Bros Wii U
- Luigi's Mansion
- Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
- Super Mario World
- Call of Duty: Black Ops (Probably gonna get flamed for this one)
Just off the top of my head, and there are loads more games that hit close to the mark. An honorable mentions list of 9/10's would go on forever:P
@Bardock47 said:
- Bioshock
- Metal Gear Solid 3 (any version that has the fixed camera,I enjoy the 3DS one most)
- Red Dead Redemption
- Resident Evil 4
- Halo 3
- Morrowind
- Mario Kart 8
- Super Metroid
- Metroid Prime
- Fallout 3
- Super Smash Bros Wii U
- Luigi's Mansion
- Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
- Super Mario World
- Call of Duty: Black Ops (Probably gonna get flamed for this one)
Just off the top of my head, and there are loads more games that hit close to the mark. An honorable mentions list of 9/10's would go on forever:P
you mixed up the top 5 hehe
I should have mentioned fallout 3 as well, but i forgot, i'm not going to add now or they will think i'm trying to rig the results (not that it would matter for fallout 3 at this time, this is the first vote that it gets, which is a damn shame really)
As for black ops, I gave the game at 9.5 on this very site, even wrote a review
@commander said:
@Bardock47 said:
- Bioshock
- Metal Gear Solid 3 (any version that has the fixed camera,I enjoy the 3DS one most)
- Red Dead Redemption
- Resident Evil 4
- Halo 3
- Morrowind
- Mario Kart 8
- Super Metroid
- Metroid Prime
- Fallout 3
- Super Smash Bros Wii U
- Luigi's Mansion
- Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
- Super Mario World
- Call of Duty: Black Ops (Probably gonna get flamed for this one)
Just off the top of my head, and there are loads more games that hit close to the mark. An honorable mentions list of 9/10's would go on forever:P
you mixed up the top 5 hehe
Oh jeez, that is quite the shake up XD
@Bardock47 said:
@commander said:
@Bardock47 said:
- Bioshock
- Metal Gear Solid 3 (any version that has the fixed camera,I enjoy the 3DS one most)
- Red Dead Redemption
- Resident Evil 4
- Halo 3
- Morrowind
- Mario Kart 8
- Super Metroid
- Metroid Prime
- Fallout 3
- Super Smash Bros Wii U
- Luigi's Mansion
- Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
- Super Mario World
- Call of Duty: Black Ops (Probably gonna get flamed for this one)
Just off the top of my head, and there are loads more games that hit close to the mark. An honorable mentions list of 9/10's would go on forever:P
you mixed up the top 5 hehe
Oh jeez, that is quite the shake up XD
you ninja quoted me lol, i updated the results, it is indeed quite the shakeup, you made halo, bioshock and metroid prime pop up in the list and re 4 is back at first place together with TLOU
The only game I could consider perfect is RE4 and here is why:
Gameplay was innovative and fun. Never get tired of actually playing the game.
Graphics were cutting edge.
Sound design is unmatched.
Story may not be novel worthy, but it fits the game's summer blockbuster feel perfectly.
Memorable moments galore.
Excellent replayability.
I seriously look at people differently if I find out that they did not like the game.
@senses_fail_06 said:
The only game I could consider perfect is RE4 and here is why:
Gameplay was innovative and fun. Never get tired of actually playing the game.
Graphics were cutting edge.
Sound design is unmatched.
Story may not be novel worthy, but it fits the game's summer blockbuster feel perfectly.
Memorable moments galore.
Excellent replayability.
I seriously look at people differently if I find out that they did not like the game.
Well with that comment you brought back re 4 on the top spot and I completely agree with that.
@charizard1605 said:
@Suppaman100: No it doesn't, especially in the real world. Does a five star hotel mean it is perfect? Does a four star movie mean it is perfect? No, don't be ridiculous, it just means that they are the best in their class, which is a subjective criteria, rather than 'perfection,' which is an abstract objective quantity.
The same holds true for games.
Nothing made by mankind is or will ever be perfect. Totally agree.
10/10 means, best game in the genre where minor flaws can be ignored easily.
@nyadc said:
@ConanTheStoner said:
@nyadc said:
Resident Evil 4 a 10/10? Maybe a 9/10 if it were unrelated to Resident Evil, but as a Resident Evil game it's a 6/10 tops...
The fact that this game is in first place just goes to show how new people are around here, post Resident Evil 0 adopters are a cancer to this franchise...
33 here, been playing RE since the original.
I just like good games. Jump scares, Fisher Price puzzles and tank controls can only work for so long. Expert level design, encounter design and pacing, all layered under some very satisfying combat just does more for me as a gamer.
I'm just saying man, it was a good game, but if you changed like three things it would literally have nothing to do with Resident Evil. It should have been the start of a new IP, not the cause for the inevitable downfall of the franchise.
Well it seem like it's going to be the best game ever, allthough the last of us is nipping re4 heels lately
@princessgomez92 said:
Resident Evil 4
Resident Evil Remake
Metroid Prime
The Last of Us
Lollipop Chainsaw
Beyond: Two Souls
Heavy Rain
Onechanbara Z2 Chaos
Resident Evil Revelations 2
Ninja Gaiden Sigma 1 and 2
Tomb Raider Anniversary
Tomb Raider 2013
And many more, I love lots of games.
Hello could you tell me if resident evil revelations 2 is campaign co op, i kinda stumbled on this game because of you, and i'm thinking of playing it
@commander said:
@princessgomez92 said:
Resident Evil 4
Resident Evil Remake
Metroid Prime
The Last of Us
Lollipop Chainsaw
Beyond: Two Souls
Heavy Rain
Onechanbara Z2 Chaos
Resident Evil Revelations 2
Ninja Gaiden Sigma 1 and 2
Tomb Raider Anniversary
Tomb Raider 2013
And many more, I love lots of games.
Hello could you tell me if resident evil revelations 2 is campaign co op, i kinda stumbled on this game because of you, and i'm thinking of playing it
Yeah, the campaign is co-op. Only Claire and Barry use guns in the campaign though, the other two characters are more or less support.
@princessgomez92 said:
@commander said:
@princessgomez92 said:
Resident Evil 4
Resident Evil Remake
Metroid Prime
The Last of Us
Lollipop Chainsaw
Beyond: Two Souls
Heavy Rain
Onechanbara Z2 Chaos
Resident Evil Revelations 2
Ninja Gaiden Sigma 1 and 2
Tomb Raider Anniversary
Tomb Raider 2013
And many more, I love lots of games.
Hello could you tell me if resident evil revelations 2 is campaign co op, i kinda stumbled on this game because of you, and i'm thinking of playing it
Yeah, the campaign is co-op. Only Claire and Barry use guns in the campaign though, the other two characters are more or less support.
Oh thanks for the quick reply, but i've read on numerous sites that it is only local co op , not online, is this correct? (online is with friends over the internet, local is with 2 people on the same console)
@commander said:
@princessgomez92 said:
@commander said:
@princessgomez92 said:
Resident Evil 4
Resident Evil Remake
Metroid Prime
The Last of Us
Lollipop Chainsaw
Beyond: Two Souls
Heavy Rain
Onechanbara Z2 Chaos
Resident Evil Revelations 2
Ninja Gaiden Sigma 1 and 2
Tomb Raider Anniversary
Tomb Raider 2013
And many more, I love lots of games.
Hello could you tell me if resident evil revelations 2 is campaign co op, i kinda stumbled on this game because of you, and i'm thinking of playing it
Yeah, the campaign is co-op. Only Claire and Barry use guns in the campaign though, the other two characters are more or less support.
Oh thanks for the quick reply, but i've read on numerous sites that it is only local co op , not online, is this correct? (online is with friends over the internet, local is with 2 people on the same console)
I've heard it is local only too, although I've never tried it.
@princessgomez92 said:
@commander said:
@princessgomez92 said:
@commander said:
@princessgomez92 said:
Resident Evil 4
Resident Evil Remake
Metroid Prime
The Last of Us
Lollipop Chainsaw
Beyond: Two Souls
Heavy Rain
Onechanbara Z2 Chaos
Resident Evil Revelations 2
Ninja Gaiden Sigma 1 and 2
Tomb Raider Anniversary
Tomb Raider 2013
And many more, I love lots of games.
Hello could you tell me if resident evil revelations 2 is campaign co op, i kinda stumbled on this game because of you, and i'm thinking of playing it
Yeah, the campaign is co-op. Only Claire and Barry use guns in the campaign though, the other two characters are more or less support.
Oh thanks for the quick reply, but i've read on numerous sites that it is only local co op , not online, is this correct? (online is with friends over the internet, local is with 2 people on the same console)
I've heard it is local only too, although I've never tried it.
yeah i don't think it's going to work.
Why do you think re revelations 2 deserves a 10, is it similar like re 4?
- xcom - ufo defense
- tlou
- mafia 2
- ME 2
- Age of Empires (original)
There might be a couple I missed, but it's a short list of game that are a perfect 10.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment