Games with color this gen!

We all know the staple of this gen has been black brown and grey. and maybe some beige but what are some games with color this gen.

black and grey are colours too, every game has colour

Every Rare game(Kameo, Viva Pinata 1&2, Banjo, PDZ).

Every RARE game

Every Rare game(Kameo, Viva Pinata 1&2, Banjo, PDZ).

mitu123

Some of my favorities are TF2, Ratchet and Clank, Flower, and Uncharted. TF2 is the best though, such a great color pallete and art style.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Every Rare game(Kameo, Viva Pinata 1&2, Banjo, PDZ).

bingbaocao

Every Nintendo game except maybe 1 or 2 games.

Also to the person that said those are also colors aswell. I think he ment a game that isn't Monochromatic (I think that is the word I'm thinking of) The word I'm thinking of is using one color but different shades of the same color.

Prince of Persia, Uncharted, Heavenly Sword and Conan.

Games this gen lack colour, it's one of the reasons I really like owning a Wii.

[QUOTE="bingbaocao"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Every Rare game(Kameo, Viva Pinata 1&2, Banjo, PDZ).

mitu123

now that i think about, EVERY rare game does have coulour, even the ZX spectrum ones

heck, even the ones full of blood and gore have lots of colour

LittleBigPlanet :D

All very beautiful:)

Tales of Vesperia

MadWorld and Killzone 2TheOldOlder

I find it kind of funny how people complain that past generations were more graphically interesting than this current one. I would argue that we have seen far more creativity in THIS generation than any before. You heard right, more visual creativity today than in the genration of PS2, GC, or any previous.

The common complaint is that in the drive to achieve realism, all we've gotten is brown and gray. But if you look around enough, you'll see this gen has accomplished far more than that.

In a comprison between this one and, I'll go with the 16bit era as an example, we've seen more range in art styIe today than back then. Sure the games were very colorful, but they were also very monotone. The color pallettes were flat for the most part. Today's technology on the other hand, has made possible a variety of texture qualities, and a wider range of visual styIes. From calligraphy, to painted brush strokes in motion, to cel shading, to hybrids of TV cartoons and paintings, to replications of photo realistic textures in a cartoon context, to the subtle misty ambience created by particle effects, and what modern lighting has made possible.... and it continues to expand and evolve.

While the games of old may have been colorful, they were no where as creatively varied as games today. Sure we have some games of gritty metals and earth tones, but that all depends on the art direction of the story. People complaining about the visuals today don't understand the difference between color pallette, and visual creativity and the role art direction plays in that. Plus I would say that people complaining haven't really been gaming that long and don't know how good we have it today from what we used to have.

The variety IS out there, in more creative presentations than was possible years ago. You just gotta open your eyes :)

I find it kind of funny how people complain that past generations were more graphically interesting than this current one. I would argue that we have seen far more creativity in THIS generation than any before. You heard right, more visual creativity today than in the genration of PS2, GC, or any previous.

The common complaint is that in the drive to achieve realism, all we've gotten is brown and gray. But if you look around enough, you'll see this gen has accomplished far more than that.

In a comprison between this one and, I'll go with the 16bit era as an example, we've seen more range in art styIe today than back then. Sure the games were very colorful, but they were also very monotone. The color pallettes were flat for the most part. Today's technology on the other hand, has made possible a variety of texture qualities, and a wider range of visual styIes. From calligraphy, to painted brush strokes in motion, to cel shading, to hybrids of TV cartoons and paintings, to replications of photo realistic textures in a cartoon context, to the subtle misty ambience created by particle effects, and what modern lighting has made possible.... and it continues to expand and evolve.

While the games of old may have been colorful, they were no where as creatively varied as games today. Sure we have some games of gritty metals and earth tones, but that all depends on the art direction of the story. People complaining about the visuals today don't understand the difference between color pallette, and visual creativity and the role art direction plays in that. Plus I would say that people complaining haven't really been gaming that long and don't know how good we have it today from what we used to have.

The variety IS out there, in more creative presentations than was possible years ago. You just gotta open your eyes :)

AdobeArtist

Pretty Colours :P

Color is overrated.

Echochrome

Pretty Colours :P

Timbury

I find it kind of funny how people complain that past generations were more graphically interesting than this current one. I would argue that we have seen far more creativity in THIS generation than any before. You heard right, more visual creativity today than in the genration of PS2, GC, or any previous.

The common complaint is that in the drive to achieve realism, all we've gotten is brown and gray. But if you look around enough, you'll see this gen has accomplished far more than that.

In a comprison between this one and, I'll go with the 16bit era as an example, we've seen more range in art styIe today than back then. Sure the games were very colorful, but they were also very monotone. The color pallettes were flat for the most part. Today's technology on the other hand, has made possible a variety of texture qualities, and a wider range of visual styIes. From calligraphy, to painted brush strokes in motion, to cel shading, to hybrids of TV cartoons and paintings, to replications of photo realistic textures in a cartoon context, to the subtle misty ambience created by particle effects, and what modern lighting has made possible.... and it continues to expand and evolve.

While the games of old may have been colorful, they were no where as creatively varied as games today. Sure we have some games of gritty metals and earth tones, but that all depends on the art direction of the story. People complaining about the visuals today don't understand the difference between color pallette, and visual creativity and the role art direction plays in that. Plus I would say that people complaining haven't really been gaming that long and don't know how good we have it today from what we used to have.

The variety IS out there, in more creative presentations than was possible years ago. You just gotta open your eyes :)

I don't even know what anyone is talking about when they talk about "games lacking color this generation." What, because Gears of War, Fallout 3, Killzone 2, and maybe a few others lack color, they all do? This is complete bullcrap, and the vast majority of games this generation do have lots of color. It's just that you play a lot of crappy shooters.DeathScape666

No, we play alot of shooters that are not on the Wii, ergo they are crappy to you.

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

I find it kind of funny how people complain that past generations were more graphically interesting than this current one. I would argue that we have seen far more creativity in THIS generation than any before. You heard right, more visual creativity today than in the genration of PS2, GC, or any previous.

The common complaint is that in the drive to achieve realism, all we've gotten is brown and gray. But if you look around enough, you'll see this gen has accomplished far more than that.

In a comprison between this one and, I'll go with the 16bit era as an example, we've seen more range in art styIe today than back then. Sure the games were very colorful, but they were also very monotone. The color pallettes were flat for the most part. Today's technology on the other hand, has made possible a variety of texture qualities, and a wider range of visual styIes. From calligraphy, to painted brush strokes in motion, to cel shading, to hybrids of TV cartoons and paintings, to replications of photo realistic textures in a cartoon context, to the subtle misty ambience created by particle effects, and what modern lighting has made possible.... and it continues to expand and evolve.

While the games of old may have been colorful, they were no where as creatively varied as games today. Sure we have some games of gritty metals and earth tones, but that all depends on the art direction of the story. People complaining about the visuals today don't understand the difference between color pallette, and visual creativity and the role art direction plays in that. Plus I would say that people complaining haven't really been gaming that long and don't know how good we have it today from what we used to have.

The variety IS out there, in more creative presentations than was possible years ago. You just gotta open your eyes :)

DeathScape666

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

I find it kind of funny how people complain that past generations were more graphically interesting than this current one. I would argue that we have seen far more creativity in THIS generation than any before. You heard right, more visual creativity today than in the genration of PS2, GC, or any previous.

The common complaint is that in the drive to achieve realism, all we've gotten is brown and gray. But if you look around enough, you'll see this gen has accomplished far more than that.

In a comprison between this one and, I'll go with the 16bit era as an example, we've seen more range in art styIe today than back then. Sure the games were very colorful, but they were also very monotone. The color pallettes were flat for the most part. Today's technology on the other hand, has made possible a variety of texture qualities, and a wider range of visual styIes. From calligraphy, to painted brush strokes in motion, to cel shading, to hybrids of TV cartoons and paintings, to replications of photo realistic textures in a cartoon context, to the subtle misty ambience created by particle effects, and what modern lighting has made possible.... and it continues to expand and evolve.

While the games of old may have been colorful, they were no where as creatively varied as games today. Sure we have some games of gritty metals and earth tones, but that all depends on the art direction of the story. People complaining about the visuals today don't understand the difference between color pallette, and visual creativity and the role art direction plays in that. Plus I would say that people complaining haven't really been gaming that long and don't know how good we have it today from what we used to have.

The variety IS out there, in more creative presentations than was possible years ago. You just gotta open your eyes :)

DeathScape666

You may love me all you like. But my sig is spoken for, so keep your hands off :P:P ;)

[QUOTE="DeathScape666"]I don't even know what anyone is talking about when they talk about "games lacking color this generation." What, because Gears of War, Fallout 3, Killzone 2, and maybe a few others lack color, they all do? This is complete bullcrap, and the vast majority of games this generation do have lots of color. It's just that you play a lot of crappy shooters.BoloTheGreat

No, we play alot of shooters that are not on the Wii, ergo they are crappy to you.

black and grey are colours too, every game has colour

sikanderahmed

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"]

[QUOTE="DeathScape666"]I don't even know what anyone is talking about when they talk about "games lacking color this generation." What, because Gears of War, Fallout 3, Killzone 2, and maybe a few others lack color, they all do? This is complete bullcrap, and the vast majority of games this generation do have lots of color. It's just that you play a lot of crappy shooters.DeathScape666

No, we play alot of shooters that are not on the Wii, ergo they are crappy to you.

[QUOTE="DeathScape666"][QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"]

No, we play alot of shooters that are not on the Wii, ergo they are crappy to you.

BoloTheGreat

I will say that Wii is my favorite platform of this generation, and while I do find the other ones to be all overrated, they are still fun. I have a PS3 and a decent gaming PC (sort of), and I enjoy them, but Nintendo and ToonTown are so far ahead and beyond everything else either system can ever offer me. Rare games and ToonTown are the only games that even come close to touching Nintendo.

There was a thread asking who the best developer this generation was. Nintendo only got about 25 percent, while Naughty Dog got 36 percent! They made one game, and that was Uncharted! I can think of at least ten Nintendo games alone this generation that are better than it, and the fact that people think that Uncharted alone is better than EVERYTHING else Nintendo has to offer this generation is mind-boggling. Nintendo deserves a lot more respect, but I am very happy to see a lot of Sheep showing appreciations towards games that need more appreciating! Sorry for the long rant.

Edit: GameSpot hates paragraphs.

Well if you think you can't do horror, post apoc and atmostphere without colour think again (Stock SoC)

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"][QUOTE="DeathScape666"] I don't play shooters on the Wii, and it's really only a few shooters that lack color, but everyone here pays attention to them most. Why must you make baseless assumptions? Especially after I told you yesterday that Valve shooters are the only ones I really play.DeathScape666

What?! Nobody posts a Crysis pic?

[QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

black and grey are colours too, every game has colour

toast_burner

You good sir, are very correct :)

Here we go!

[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

black and grey are colours too, every game has colour

AdobeArtist

You good sir, are very correct :)

I'm going to admit right now that "crappy" would be an overstatement. I just don't think they are the Holy Grail like some people do. The only reason I appear Sheepish is because most games (Metal Gear Solid 4, Uncharted, Valkria Chronicles, basically every PS3 exclusive, Gears of War, Halo 3, STALKER, Half-Life 2, and many more) all seem to get more praise than I feel they deserve. You know what the only games are that don't get as much praise as they deserve? Basically every freaking Nintendo game and ToonTown. Yes, maybe it is just my opinion, but I feel like a lot of their games get too much for "using the same old characters," and because they are on the Wii.

I will say that Wii is my favorite platform of this generation, and while I do find the other ones to be all overrated, they are still fun. I have a PS3 and a decent gaming PC (sort of), and I enjoy them, but Nintendo and ToonTown are so far ahead and beyond everything else either system can ever offer me. Rare games and ToonTown are the only games that even come close to touching Nintendo.

There was a thread asking who the best developer this generation was. Nintendo only got about 25 percent, while Naughty Dog got 36 percent! They made one game, and that was Uncharted! I can think of at least ten Nintendo games alone this generation that are better than it, and the fact that people think that Uncharted alone is better than EVERYTHING else Nintendo has to offer this generation is mind-boggling. Nintendo deserves a lot more respect, but I am very happy to see a lot of Sheep showing appreciations towards games that need more appreciating! Sorry for the long rant.

Edit: GameSpot hates paragraphs.

DeathScape666

Leave. now.

how could anyone forget about this

black and grey are colours too, every game has colour

sikanderahmed

Not really.

absolute Black is the absence of color (R,G, & B are at 0), so it's not a color.

Grey happens much is when the R,G, and B channels are equal (but not 0 or 255) and no color has any superiority over the others, so that too technically isn't a color.

I find it kind of funny how people complain that past generations were more graphically interesting than this current one. I would argue that we have seen far more creativity in THIS generation than any before. You heard right, more visual creativity today than in the genration of PS2, GC, or any previous.

The common complaint is that in the drive to achieve realism, all we've gotten is brown and gray. But if you look around enough, you'll see this gen has accomplished far more than that.

In a comprison between this one and, I'll go with the 16bit era as an example, we've seen more range in art styIe today than back then. Sure the games were very colorful, but they were also very monotone. The color pallettes were flat for the most part. Today's technology on the other hand, has made possible a variety of texture qualities, and a wider range of visual styIes. From calligraphy, to painted brush strokes in motion, to cel shading, to hybrids of TV cartoons and paintings, to replications of photo realistic textures in a cartoon context, to the subtle misty ambience created by particle effects, and what modern lighting has made possible.... and it continues to expand and evolve.

While the games of old may have been colorful, they were no where as creatively varied as games today. Sure we have some games of gritty metals and earth tones, but that all depends on the art direction of the story. People complaining about the visuals today don't understand the difference between color pallette, and visual creativity and the role art direction plays in that. Plus I would say that people complaining haven't really been gaming that long and don't know how good we have it today from what we used to have.

The variety IS out there, in more creative presentations than was possible years ago. You just gotta open your eyes :)

You can never have too much of this game.