Leisure Suit Larry.
such an inspiring complaint...
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I would of loved to have seen an 16/8 Bit era system wars. Where ports were vastly different from one system to another, sometimes completely swapping out sounds, sprites, colour or missing out entire features.
Sometimes, just sometimes, a system gets a worse version of a game. Thats what happens when different machines use varying hardware and architecture. I know; its crazy!!!
theres actually legit reasons for lower scores on those gmaes mainly due to poor coding, not up to standard and to tell the consumer its not as good dont buy it aswell.
Of course you could just read the reviews and see why they have lower scores instead of whining and with a name like that and a topic like this trying to say your not a fanboy is pretty funny.
I said i'm not a fanboy because people accuse people for being fanboys for topics like this, I have read the reviews and played most of the games, and the compaints are BULLSH*Ttheres actually legit reasons for lower scores on those gmaes mainly due to poor coding, not up to standard and to tell the consumer its not as good dont buy it aswell.
Of course you could just read the reviews and see why they have lower scores instead of whining and with a name like that and a topic like this trying to say your not a fanboy is pretty funny.
razgriz_101
[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]I said i'm not a fanboy because people accuse people for being fanboys for topics like this, I have read the reviews and played most of the games, and the compaints are BULLSH*Ttheres actually legit reasons for lower scores on those gmaes mainly due to poor coding, not up to standard and to tell the consumer its not as good dont buy it aswell.
Of course you could just read the reviews and see why they have lower scores instead of whining and with a name like that and a topic like this trying to say your not a fanboy is pretty funny.
ps3gameplayer
you do know games tend to be reviewed in launch state right?
oh yeah skate had some pretty bad frame rate issues in the res.
I would of loved to have seen an 16/8 Bit era system wars. Where ports were vastly different from one system to another, sometimes completely swapping out sounds, sprites, colour or missing out entire features.
Sometimes, just sometimes, a system gets a worse version of a game. Thats what happens when different machines use varying hardware and architecture. I know; its crazy!!!
D1zzyCriminal
I bet this place was the best during the N64 / PS1 era, where everything was exclusive and the graphics were so different.
I said i'm not a fanboy because people accuse people for being fanboys for topics like this, I have read the reviews and played most of the games, and the compaints are BULLSH*T[QUOTE="ps3gameplayer"][QUOTE="razgriz_101"]
theres actually legit reasons for lower scores on those gmaes mainly due to poor coding, not up to standard and to tell the consumer its not as good dont buy it aswell.
Of course you could just read the reviews and see why they have lower scores instead of whining and with a name like that and a topic like this trying to say your not a fanboy is pretty funny.
razgriz_101
you do know games tend to be reviewed in launch state right?
oh yeah skate had some pretty bad frame rate issues in the res.
Well it all ran smooth for me, in fact all my ps3 games do except for dead rising 2, that game has some frame rate issuesThis is right.It's a well known fact that PS3 multiplats were markedly inferior early on.
Assassin_87
so i guess they didn't give the ps3 version of dead space 2 a higher score?dvalo9I never noticed that as I never played any of the Dead Space games, I have to admit when I made this thread, I should not have mentioned the games I hadn't played, just the ones I have played. And for anyone still wondering, I don't play Leisure Suit Larry, the box art was enough to turn me off on that game. Also, I did run into frame rate problems with GTA IV on 360 that people are arguing against on this thread. I actually hope this thread gets deleted.
[QUOTE="razgriz_101"][QUOTE="ps3gameplayer"] I said i'm not a fanboy because people accuse people for being fanboys for topics like this, I have read the reviews and played most of the games, and the compaints are BULLSH*Tps3gameplayer
you do know games tend to be reviewed in launch state right?
oh yeah skate had some pretty bad frame rate issues in the res.
Well it all ran smooth for me, in fact all my ps3 games do except for dead rising 2, that game has some frame rate issuesoh yeah and borderlands, gearbox didnt even fix the nerfed voice chat, and the save glitch which corrupted your file aswell......those definately deserve point docking imo.
I dont think they hate the PS3. I do want to comment on the borderlands score. I have a plat on the PS3 version and am now playing it on 360 since i was given a copy and it looks worse and runs worse on 360. I have no idea how the 360 version out scored the PS3.djsifer01Perhaps when they released the PS3 version was markedly worse?
[QUOTE="Advid-Gamer"]
or it could be that ps3 ports suck, I personally found the ps3 to be crap, I have owned one since the beginning of this gen. Honestly I hate it
ShadowMoses900
That's your opinion, I personally found the PS3 to be the best system ever made. Aside from a couple rare cases, most PS3 multiplatform games look and play just like the 360 version, aside from very minimal differences that only stupid fanboys pretend to notice.
I´ll presume you find 360 to be the second best system ever made! Well, since 'most multiplats on the best system ever made look and play just like the 360 versions'. Am i right?
I have borderlands on 360, and platinum it on ps3. and actualy i thought the ps3 version to be better and smoother.dvalo9
The reason the PS3 version scored lower was because it had some issues with co-op on it's launch, which was fixed like a week or two later, so the review kind of became irrelevant for that one...
Most reviewers here are 360 fanboys, if you compare the scores here with Metacritic, the average 360 score is above Metacritic's and the average PS3 score is below Metacritic's. The only PS3 fanboy reviewer here is Kevin V., of course he's also the best one.kuraimen
Exactly. I think that is the most damning thing as far as the bias goes. If the games have legit differences, I actually think they shouild give a .5 difference to them (or more difference if it's REALLY significant).
Most reviewers here are 360 fanboys, if you compare the scores here with Metacritic, the average 360 score is above Metacritic's and the average PS3 score is below Metacritic's. The only PS3 fanboy reviewer here is Kevin V., of course he's also the best one.kuraimen
360 - Halo Wars, Shadow Complex, Mass Effect 360, Left 4 Dead 360, Forza 4....
PS3 - MGS 4, Resistance 2, MAG, Demons Souls, Killzone 3, Twisted Metal...
No go compare the scores here with metacritic ones and your conspiracy theory is dead.
Edit: Lets not forget they gave Skyrim the same score on 360 and PS3 :o :P
As for 360, I played GTA IV on the 360 and it had serious frame rate problems, and both versions got a 10 there.
ps3gameplayer
and yet the ps3 version is in sub-HD !!!
[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]
Also, you're an idiot. GTA IV does NOT have "serious" frame rate problems on the 360. PS3, on the other hand...
SPYDER0416
They're pretty much exactly the same,
and I wish everyone would stop complaining. 0.5 is barely anything, and like I said, it goes both ways guys. Come on TC, do we really need to hear complaints about older games that got a slight score change due to slightly noticeable differences that in the reviewer's opinion were worth measuring?
You pretty much have no clue what you're talking about.[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Most reviewers here are 360 fanboys, if you compare the scores here with Metacritic, the average 360 score is above Metacritic's and the average PS3 score is below Metacritic's. The only PS3 fanboy reviewer here is Kevin V., of course he's also the best one.PAL360
360 - Halo Wars, Shadow Complex, Mass Effect 360, Left 4 Dead 360, Forza 4....
PS3 - MGS 4, Resistance 2, MAG, Demons Souls, Killzone 3, Twisted Metal...
No go compare the scores here with metacritic ones and your conspiracy theory is dead :(
Except if you compare ALL games which is the best way to get averages. A tendency can have exceptions.Most reviewers here are 360 fanboys, if you compare the scores here with Metacritic, the average 360 score is above Metacritic's and the average PS3 score is below Metacritic's. The only PS3 fanboy reviewer here is Kevin V., of course he's also the best one.kuraimen
Cry some moar the tears are delicious.
Most reviewers here are 360 fanboys, if you compare the scores here with Metacritic, the average 360 score is above Metacritic's and the average PS3 score is below Metacritic's. The only PS3 fanboy reviewer here is Kevin V., of course he's also the best one.kuraimenThe only reason you're calling him a great reviewer is because he hasn't flopped a PS3 exclusive lately. :lol:
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]
Except if you compare ALL games which is the best way to get averages. A tendency can have exceptions.PAL360
I picked a good amount of PS3 exclusives with better score on gs than metacritic! I wouldnt call those an exception.
They are a few of games of the whole lot so they are exceptions.[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]
Except if you compare ALL games which is the best way to get averages. A tendency can have exceptions.kuraimen
I picked a good amount of PS3 exclusives with better score on gs than metacritic! I wouldnt call those an exception.
They are a few of games of the whole lot so they are exceptions.can you actually prove beyond any reasonable doubt that GS is biased against the Ps3 or 360? no, of course you can't, all you can do is speculate amd throw out score numbers that can be interpreted in many different ways,give it a rest dude.Most reviewers here are 360 fanboys, if you compare the scores here with Metacritic, the average 360 score is above Metacritic's and the average PS3 score is below Metacritic's. The only PS3 fanboy reviewer here is Kevin V., of course he's also the best one.kuraimen
Tom McShea (God McPerfect) is the better reviewer. He single handedly just pissed off all the cows and sheep with his reviews.
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Most reviewers here are 360 fanboys, if you compare the scores here with Metacritic, the average 360 score is above Metacritic's and the average PS3 score is below Metacritic's. The only PS3 fanboy reviewer here is Kevin V., of course he's also the best one.PAL360
360 - Halo Wars, Shadow Complex, Mass Effect 360, Left 4 Dead 360, Forza 4....
PS3 - MGS 4, Resistance 2, Resistance 3, MAG, Demons Souls, Killzone 3, Twisted Metal...
No go compare the scores here with metacritic ones and your conspiracy theory is dead.
Edit: Lets not forget they gave Skyrim the same score on 360 and PS3 :o :P
Pretty much says it all.
I would just say Gamespot is horrible at reviewing games. Some games I think are awesome have been rated very low, Halo Wars being one of them. And some games I thought were terrible were rated high. I am not saying that every review should agree with me but like already said, looking at Metacritic something isn't adding up.
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]
Except if you compare ALL games which is the best way to get averages. A tendency can have exceptions.kuraimen
I picked a good amount of PS3 exclusives with better score on gs than metacritic! I wouldnt call those an exception.
They are a few of games of the whole lot so they are exceptions.I could add more:
SOCOM US Nave Seals Confrontation, SOCOM 4, InFamous1, Resistance 3....
You seriously have no argument :P
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment