Gamespot Kane and Lynch 2 Review

  • 59 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TacticalDesire
TacticalDesire

10713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 TacticalDesire
Member since 2010 • 10713 Posts

I agree with the length issue,but it seems different for some. IGN took 7 hours. The werid thing is arent games like AW,SC:C and MW2 SP really really short too yet they get no flack for it.

finalfantasy94

Well MW2 is basically based around multi-player...and SC:C has an excellent co-op system. AW and GOW3 are definitely both guilty of short single-player campaigns though. However both of them are so high in quality I guess no-one realyl cares.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="Slashkice"]

Not surprised, the game looked like crap.

Ultrabeatdown55

How does 6.5 equal crap? It doesn't.

If its not 8-10 some people tend to think game is crap without playing it. Now and days people dont play games anymore it seems people play numbers. People dont think a game can be a 6 or even 7 and still be good. Which is just dam sad.

Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

I really was expecting more. It's a shame that it's mostly the amount of content that let it down rather than the game itself

Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

Who's getting fired this time? :P

Avatar image for Postal_Guy
Postal_Guy

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Postal_Guy
Member since 2006 • 2643 Posts

Demo was crap anyway so...

still its lolz how only MW2 can get away with short campaign (some1 had to say it)

Avatar image for Ultrabeatdown55
Ultrabeatdown55

15314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Ultrabeatdown55
Member since 2008 • 15314 Posts

[QUOTE="Ultrabeatdown55"][QUOTE="Slashkice"]

Not surprised, the game looked like crap.

finalfantasy94

How does 6.5 equal crap? It doesn't.

If its not 8-10 some people tend to think game is crap without playing it. Now and days people dont play games anymore it seems people play numbers. People dont think a game can be a 6 or even 7 and still be good. Which is just dam sad.

It is sad indeed.
Avatar image for Sp4rtan_3
Sp4rtan_3

3495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Sp4rtan_3
Member since 2010 • 3495 Posts
I thought from the demo it would get a 7 :( It was a competent shooter Ill give it that.
Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

Demo was crap anyway so...

still its lolz how only MW2 can get away with short campaign (some1 had to say it)

Postal_Guy

Um but MW2 had more content for multi-player, and it's spec ops added more life. Plus it's general quiality is better according to the review

Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#59 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

it sucked exactly like i thought it was going to suck, why release a sequel if its going to be as bad as the first one??