GameSpot overrates achievements

  • 102 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mgszelda1
mgszelda1

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#51 mgszelda1
Member since 2004 • 7286 Posts

[QUOTE="mgszelda1"]To me achievements r pointless. All it does is say look I have less of a life. Dont take that in a wrong way but I just dont get the point in bragging about it Gamer556

Please, don't start with the "I have a life" crap. You're posting on a video game forum. Brag about your social qualities somewhere else.

There is a huge difference when I go on MGS3 S and look at my online stats and see I have around 250 hrs over a yr and first has over 1600. And I have been playin since launch
Avatar image for MADVLAD123
MADVLAD123

6053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#52 MADVLAD123
Member since 2005 • 6053 Posts
[QUOTE="MADVLAD123"][QUOTE="sdifjds"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]

[QUOTE="sdifjds"]For something that has absolutely no impact on quality of Game, GameSpot sure seems to mention achievements in reviews a whole lot. Look what they said about Ninja Turtles The Good: Online co-op play for up to four players that's legitimately fun; all the original music and voice effects are here; solid achievements list; it's only $5. Solid achievement list? I believe that is code for, "Easy Gamerscore boost" Who cares? Honestly? We all know Gertsmann is in love with his Gamerscore to the point which he files a points report every week. Achievements aren't important to me GameSpot.RichieRich555

Well, it is to them, so they're going to write about it.

Not only do they write about it, but it obviously factors into their scoring of a game.

of course. It adds to the value of the game.

No it doesnt..... What do the points even do? My friend told me they were just there to be there i told them that would be to retarded....They're not just there to be there are they?

you play more to get them. You play more=replay value.

Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#53 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
Achievements are cool, if there done right. I think multiplayer ones are even better, but I wouldnt say achievements are selling points, and since they dont hurt the score, why should they help it? Kind of unfair... Whats next, raising a PS3 game because it has a cool looking trophy?
Avatar image for sdifjds
sdifjds

1088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 sdifjds
Member since 2003 • 1088 Posts
Achievements are cool, if there done right. I think multiplayer ones are even better, but I wouldnt say achievements are selling points, and since they dont hurt the score, why should they help it? Kind of unfair... Whats next, raising a PS3 game because it has a cool looking trophy? coolguy1111
That could happen, but honestly, I doubt GameSpot will ever view PS3 trophies the same way they do Gamerscores.
Avatar image for LEGEND_C4A
LEGEND_C4A

3186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 LEGEND_C4A
Member since 2003 • 3186 Posts

To me achievements r pointless. All it does is say look I have less of a life. Dont take that in a wrong way but I just dont get the point in bragging about it mgszelda1

we sit for hours playing video games, running around with master chief killing aliens, running around with mario collecting coins, playing games like GTA and having fake sex with hookers in cars, and you want to come in here and say that liking achievements means you have no life?

something there doesnt make sense....

Avatar image for Brooklyn2700
Brooklyn2700

245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Brooklyn2700
Member since 2006 • 245 Posts

[QUOTE="MADVLAD123"]achievements add replay value and extend the life of the game. nuff said.sdifjds
That's really subjective. Achievements being factored into reviews should be a huge NO-NO for GameSpot. Factoring achievements into replay value is almost an artificial way of increasing scores. Replay value shouldn't be increased because, "Well I played through it a couple times, not because I actually wanted to, but because I wanted more points" Again, achievement points SHOULD NOT be factored into reviews.

I think they are a factor in replay value. No amount of points will make me play pd0. I put that game in and promptly took it out. Tried to play it later and still couldnt take it. Want another example? I bought oblivion. Played it a little and now its collecting dust. Not to say I wont go back and play, I'm just not in a rush.

Avatar image for fixer293
fixer293

4770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#57 fixer293
Member since 2003 • 4770 Posts
Achievments add replay value, nuff said.
Avatar image for killtactics
killtactics

5957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 killtactics
Member since 2004 • 5957 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="CelineDion"]

Achievements should not be considered in review scores.

sdifjds

Why not? They had longevity to a game and make players go that extra step to truly beat a game. What's wrong with that? It's not like they're giving games AAA scores based off achievements points, is it? I dont see the problem with them simply mentioning how fun/varied/challenging a game's achievements are.

It only extends the life of the game for people who actually give a damn about playing through a game more than once for more points (minority). If the game is only worth playing through once because it's not really a compelling game, the review should reflect this. Not because well, you can get an extra 500 points added to your gamerscore if you play it twice.

if a game is compelling enough that gamers will want to do the achivements then the GS score should reflect this...

Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#59 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
[QUOTE="coolguy1111"]Achievements are cool, if there done right. I think multiplayer ones are even better, but I wouldnt say achievements are selling points, and since they dont hurt the score, why should they help it? Kind of unfair... Whats next, raising a PS3 game because it has a cool looking trophy? sdifjds
That could happen, but honestly, I doubt GameSpot will ever view PS3 trophies the same way they do Gamerscores.

And i thikn that would be stupid, achievements are great and all, but i mean, who honestly would play a game just for achievements? Kinda takes the fun out of it, if you can
Avatar image for Radeon_X1950XTX
Radeon_X1950XTX

1055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Radeon_X1950XTX
Member since 2006 • 1055 Posts
i thought achievents were so stupid on microsofts part, but when i got a 360 and started to get some achievements i sarted to really love it. i can obviously tell SDIFJDS does not have a 360, so hes b!tching about it... o well
Avatar image for LEGEND_C4A
LEGEND_C4A

3186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 LEGEND_C4A
Member since 2003 • 3186 Posts

Everyone gives too much praise to achievements. But still, it's a pretty good feature. I like it most, because I can see what games other people play and to what degree do they play them. My only complaint is that some people focus too much on achievements. For example, one of my friends asks me to play every mode with him on R6V just to get an achievement. It's sort of annoying when people go out of their way just for points. But, on the other hand it does give a bit more value to the game you've purchased.
BillGreen68

so your friend asking you to play a game is annoying. your friend actually wants to play the game, he will experience everything the game has to offer and he can thank achievements for that.

now I understand if he wanted to do cheap things to get them, lets say for example, if he asked you to let him kill you ten times in a row to get an achievement, then yes you have a complaint. but to actually play the game and enjoy it the way it was meant to be is nothing to complain about.

my friend wanted to play Gears of War and wanted me to serve so he could get the Dominic achivement, for those who don't know. its helping someone else finish the game with one of the AI characters. How could I possibly complain about that?

Avatar image for sdifjds
sdifjds

1088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 sdifjds
Member since 2003 • 1088 Posts
[QUOTE="sdifjds"][QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="CelineDion"]

Achievements should not be considered in review scores.

killtactics

Why not? They had longevity to a game and make players go that extra step to truly beat a game. What's wrong with that? It's not like they're giving games AAA scores based off achievements points, is it? I dont see the problem with them simply mentioning how fun/varied/challenging a game's achievements are.

It only extends the life of the game for people who actually give a damn about playing through a game more than once for more points (minority). If the game is only worth playing through once because it's not really a compelling game, the review should reflect this. Not because well, you can get an extra 500 points added to your gamerscore if you play it twice.

if a game is compelling enough that gamers will want to do the achivements then the GS score should reflect this...

That is a minority based view that a game you normally wouldn't play through twice due to quality of game, is suddenly worth playing through twice solely because of extra achievement points.
Avatar image for TheJustin
TheJustin

2197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#63 TheJustin
Member since 2006 • 2197 Posts
ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users:                 1,032,532
Gamerscore:       3,335,937,818
Achievements:     116,669,143               All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think  gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
Avatar image for fixer293
fixer293

4770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#64 fixer293
Member since 2003 • 4770 Posts
Yes, the achievments are worth it. I would rather get replay value, than saying "well beat this game I payed $60 bucks for, what now?" with the achievments, it is like a game within a game.
Avatar image for LEGEND_C4A
LEGEND_C4A

3186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 LEGEND_C4A
Member since 2003 • 3186 Posts
[QUOTE="Brooklyn2700"][QUOTE="CelineDion"]

Achievements should not be considered in review scores.

sdifjds

Why not? Its part of the game. It extends the life of some games. Gives some people goals beyond beating the game. Everytime I play gears someone is talking about getting an achievement.

It only extends the life of the game for people who actually give a damn about playing through a game more than once for more points (believe me, it's minority). If the game is only worth playing through once because it's not really a compelling game, the review should reflect this. Not because well, you can get an extra 500 points added to your gamerscore if you play it twice.

can you please show me a review that says a game is terrible but worth playing multiple times because of the Achievements.

not trying to start anything, just curious if there has been a review that says so.

Avatar image for mgszelda1
mgszelda1

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#66 mgszelda1
Member since 2004 • 7286 Posts

[QUOTE="mgszelda1"]To me achievements r pointless. All it does is say look I have less of a life. Dont take that in a wrong way but I just dont get the point in bragging about it LEGEND_C4A

we sit for hours playing video games, running around with master chief killing aliens, running around with mario collecting coins, playing games like GTA and having fake sex with hookers in cars, and you want to come in here and say that liking achievements means you have no life?

something there doesnt make sense....

I am talkin about how ppl spend so much time on just one game. And they dont reflect how good u really r. To me it`s just like getting a gold star in pre-k. Big deal everyone has one kind of thing.
Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#67 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users: 1,032,532
Gamerscore: 3,335,937,818
Achievements: 116,669,143 All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
TheJustin
The averages persons gamerscore is i see around here is like 2000. And plus, how many of them are cheaters trying to get into the top10 spots?
Avatar image for mgszelda1
mgszelda1

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#68 mgszelda1
Member since 2004 • 7286 Posts
Here`s a good idea instead of getting a stupid achievement point for 100 headshots why not give me a new weapon or character
Avatar image for TheJustin
TheJustin

2197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#69 TheJustin
Member since 2006 • 2197 Posts
[QUOTE="TheJustin"]ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users: 1,032,532
Gamerscore: 3,335,937,818
Achievements: 116,669,143 All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
coolguy1111
The averages persons gamerscore is i see around here is like 2000. And plus, how many of them are cheaters trying to get into the top10 spots?



Doesn't matter how they get them. What matters is they are getting them. If people go as far as to cheat to get these then obviously achievements mean more to some people as the topic creater is letting on.
Avatar image for akif22
akif22

16012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#70 akif22
Member since 2003 • 16012 Posts
if if matters to the reviewer than it's fine if they mention it .. it is part of 360 games, so why wouldn't they?
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

From my experience, the people who complain about Achievments are usually the one's who dont have them or an Xbox 360. 

Achievments are fun to get, if you don't lke them don't go for them.  But a unified Achievment list for games is innovative and fun for many.

Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#72 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"]ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users: 1,032,532
Gamerscore: 3,335,937,818
Achievements: 116,669,143 All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
TheJustin
The averages persons gamerscore is i see around here is like 2000. And plus, how many of them are cheaters trying to get into the top10 spots?



Doesn't matter how they get them. What matters is they are getting them. If people go as far as to cheat to get these then obviously achievements mean more to some people as the topic creater is letting on.

So if they totally cheat its ok? Plus, them cheating to get the points doesnt mean they have/own/play the game.
Avatar image for -=XBoXDemon=-
-=XBoXDemon=-

3296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 -=XBoXDemon=-
Member since 2003 • 3296 Posts
Here`s a good idea instead of getting a stupid achievement point for 100 headshots why not give me a new weapon or charactermgszelda1


Thats called downloadable content we have that too. Crackdown had new characters to download on day 1 with new vehicles coming soon.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#74 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

Achievement points are ok IMO, but I hate when they add the achievement play some many online Matches I played Tony Hawk Project 8 and one of the achievements was to play 100 online Matches I didn't even play one match because everyone playing that game online were annoying and I left before I started because I had to wait a long time in the Pre game lobby and I couldn't stand the other players.

Avatar image for skixwolf
skixwolf

4013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 skixwolf
Member since 2004 • 4013 Posts
Achievements are an added bonus, hence the "good" about it
Avatar image for -=XBoXDemon=-
-=XBoXDemon=-

3296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 -=XBoXDemon=-
Member since 2003 • 3296 Posts

Achievement points are ok IMO, but I hate when they add the achievement play some many online Matches I played Tony Hawk Project 8 and one of the achievements was to play 100 online Matches I didn't even play one match because everyone playing that game online were annoying and I left before I started because I had to wait a long time in the Pre game lobby and I couldn't stand the other players.

Nintendo_Ownes7


Um....I dont see how the achievement affected you running into annoying people there....grasping for straws?
Avatar image for TheJustin
TheJustin

2197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#77 TheJustin
Member since 2006 • 2197 Posts
[QUOTE="TheJustin"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"]ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users: 1,032,532
Gamerscore: 3,335,937,818
Achievements: 116,669,143 All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
coolguy1111
The averages persons gamerscore is i see around here is like 2000. And plus, how many of them are cheaters trying to get into the top10 spots?



Doesn't matter how they get them. What matters is they are getting them. If people go as far as to cheat to get these then obviously achievements mean more to some people as the topic creater is letting on.

So if they totally cheat its ok? Plus, them cheating to get the points doesnt mean they have/own/play the game.



This thread/convorsation isn't about the morality of cheating. It's about the use of achievement points by more than just a minority. And whether or not they are important enough to be included into a review. I think you are kind of straying off of the subject a little.
Avatar image for coolguy1111
coolguy1111

3991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#78 coolguy1111
Member since 2005 • 3991 Posts
[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"]ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users: 1,032,532
Gamerscore: 3,335,937,818
Achievements: 116,669,143 All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
TheJustin
The averages persons gamerscore is i see around here is like 2000. And plus, how many of them are cheaters trying to get into the top10 spots?



Doesn't matter how they get them. What matters is they are getting them. If people go as far as to cheat to get these then obviously achievements mean more to some people as the topic creater is letting on.

So if they totally cheat its ok? Plus, them cheating to get the points doesnt mean they have/own/play the game.



This thread/convorsation is about the morality of cheating. It's about the use of achievement points by more than just a minority. And whether or not they are important enough to be included into a review. I think you are kind of straying off of the subject a little.

No its totally related, you said it should be counted because there popular, and listed a lot of achievements, however, if theres a large chunk of people cheating, adn getting like 100,000, 50,000, even like 20,000-30,000, thats alot, and they cheated, showing that those achievements arnt a big selling point to the majority of the gamers.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#79 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"]

Achievement points are ok IMO, but I hate when they add the achievement play some many online Matches I played Tony Hawk Project 8 and one of the achievements was to play 100 online Matches I didn't even play one match because everyone playing that game online were annoying and I left before I started because I had to wait a long time in the Pre game lobby and I couldn't stand the other players.

-=XBoXDemon=-


Um....I dont see how the achievement affected you running into annoying people there....grasping for straws?

I just don't like when the achievements are to play online because I want to get all the achievements but I hate playing online, so I think they should make the achievements not having to go online to play a few matches online.
Avatar image for -=XBoXDemon=-
-=XBoXDemon=-

3296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 -=XBoXDemon=-
Member since 2003 • 3296 Posts
[QUOTE="TheJustin"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"]ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users: 1,032,532
Gamerscore: 3,335,937,818
Achievements: 116,669,143 All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
coolguy1111
The averages persons gamerscore is i see around here is like 2000. And plus, how many of them are cheaters trying to get into the top10 spots?



Doesn't matter how they get them. What matters is they are getting them. If people go as far as to cheat to get these then obviously achievements mean more to some people as the topic creater is letting on.

So if they totally cheat its ok? Plus, them cheating to get the points doesnt mean they have/own/play the game.



This thread/convorsation is about the morality of cheating. It's about the use of achievement points by more than just a minority. And whether or not they are important enough to be included into a review. I think you are kind of straying off of the subject a little.

No its totally related, you said it should be counted because there popular, and listed a lot of achievements, however, if theres a large chunk of people cheating, adn getting like 100,000, 50,000, even like 20,000-30,000, thats alot, and they cheated, showing that those achievements arnt a big selling point to the majority of the gamers.



Actually it shows just the opposite if they took the time to look up online for cheats just to unlock achievements then they must be a selling point otherwise they wouldnt bother.
Avatar image for -=XBoXDemon=-
-=XBoXDemon=-

3296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 -=XBoXDemon=-
Member since 2003 • 3296 Posts
[QUOTE="-=XBoXDemon=-"][QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"]

Achievement points are ok IMO, but I hate when they add the achievement play some many online Matches I played Tony Hawk Project 8 and one of the achievements was to play 100 online Matches I didn't even play one match because everyone playing that game online were annoying and I left before I started because I had to wait a long time in the Pre game lobby and I couldn't stand the other players.

Nintendo_Ownes7


Um....I dont see how the achievement affected you running into annoying people there....grasping for straws?

I just don't like when the achievements are to play online because I want to get all the achievements but I hate playing online, so I think they should make the achievements not having to go online to play a few matches online.



Ahh I get you now.
Avatar image for TheJustin
TheJustin

2197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#82 TheJustin
Member since 2006 • 2197 Posts
[QUOTE="TheJustin"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"]ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users: 1,032,532
Gamerscore: 3,335,937,818
Achievements: 116,669,143 All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
coolguy1111
The averages persons gamerscore is i see around here is like 2000. And plus, how many of them are cheaters trying to get into the top10 spots?



Doesn't matter how they get them. What matters is they are getting them. If people go as far as to cheat to get these then obviously achievements mean more to some people as the topic creater is letting on.

So if they totally cheat its ok? Plus, them cheating to get the points doesnt mean they have/own/play the game.



This thread/convorsation is about the morality of cheating. It's about the use of achievement points by more than just a minority. And whether or not they are important enough to be included into a review. I think you are kind of straying off of the subject a little.

No its totally related, you said it should be counted because there popular, and listed a lot of achievements, however, if theres a large chunk of people cheating, adn getting like 100,000, 50,000, even like 20,000-30,000, thats alot, and they cheated, showing that those achievements arnt a big selling point to the majority of the gamers.



Do you know for a fact a "large" number are cheating? What about all of those people who are earning things legit? I'm going by the numbers givin. There is no definative proof that one cheated or not to get the points. The only proof is the points have been recieved.
Avatar image for SwedBear
SwedBear

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 SwedBear
Member since 2003 • 84 Posts

A good set of achievements definitely can add to the enjoyment you get out of a game. Good achievements become mini-goals that you try to achieve while playing the game. To say that it is only for people finishing games or the hardcore gamers are quite frankly stupid. I rarely finish any games and i still think it is quite fun to try to get some of the more corny achievements some games have. Crackdown ahve some really funny ones. And one I still seem never to be able to get is the Pacifier achievement in Geometry wars.

You can view achievements in many ways. As I mentioned above as mini-goals but also in some ways "bragging-rights". getting a hard-to-achieve achievement to me gives me a feeling of accomplishing something even though I know I never will finish the game.

That doesn't mean that everyone will care about them but just because you don't doesn't mean no-one else does. So yes, I think a good set of achievements definitely could tilt the score a bit higher just as crappy achievements might tilt it negatively.

As for GameSpot and Throphys. If it is similar I see no reason why they should not value them as well.

Avatar image for frankeyser
frankeyser

5667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#84 frankeyser
Member since 2004 • 5667 Posts

achievements add replay value and extend the life of the game. nuff said.MADVLAD123

achievement points are a waste of time only sought out by those with no life and a low self esteem.. much like the kids how tried to catch all the pokemon.

Avatar image for Narroo
Narroo

2165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 Narroo
Member since 2006 • 2165 Posts
achievements add replay value and extend the life of the game. nuff said.MADVLAD123
But the achievements do nothing. You could do the achievements even if they didn't exist. Look at the FAQ page for FFVII. Look at all the special conditions they've made to play the game. You don't need a score to do something just for the fun of it.
Avatar image for TheJustin
TheJustin

2197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#86 TheJustin
Member since 2006 • 2197 Posts
[QUOTE="MADVLAD123"]achievements add replay value and extend the life of the game. nuff said.Narroo
But the achievements do nothing. You could do the achievements even if they didn't exist. Look at the FAQ page for FFVII. Look at all the special conditions they've made to play the game. You don't need a score to do something just for the fun of it.



They do now with the xbox live rewards program. And depending on how well that does "which I belive it's doing pretty well so far" there will be more challenges/rewards.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
For something that has absolutely no impact on quality of Game, GameSpot sure seems to mention achievements in reviews a whole lot. Look what they said about Ninja Turtles The Good: Online co-op play for up to four players that's legitimately fun; all the original music and voice effects are here; solid achievements list; it's only $5. Solid achievement list? I believe that is code for, "Easy Gamerscore boost" Who cares? Honestly? We all know Gertsmann is in love with his Gamerscore to the point which he files a points report every week. Achievements aren't important to me GameSpot. and do not affect the game in any way. They should not be factored into your reviews.sdifjds
Me and the thousands of other people that got a free copy of Fusion Frenzy 2 say you do not know what you are talking about. Sure Fusion Frenzy may not have been that great but I'm not one to turn up my nose at a free game.
Avatar image for Grive
Grive

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Grive
Member since 2006 • 2971 Posts

achievement points are a waste of time only sought out by those with no life and a low self esteem.. much like the kids how tried to catch all the pokemon.

frankeyser


Why?

There is a legitimate argument that you're trying to evade with flaming. Why not add an actual response, if they're so useless.


BTW, it's hard to take seriously someone who mocks people's gaming habits when he has a blog that claims Sears is the cause of WWII and has 862 games in his collection, isn't it?
Avatar image for PS3_3DO
PS3_3DO

10976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 PS3_3DO
Member since 2006 • 10976 Posts

Sounds like Sour Grapes! :lol:

Achievement Unlocked!

Avatar image for Stabby2486
Stabby2486

6688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Stabby2486
Member since 2006 • 6688 Posts
They give you ideas of what to do, without any reason to.
Avatar image for deactivated-600fd0017f1ba
deactivated-600fd0017f1ba

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#91 deactivated-600fd0017f1ba
Member since 2005 • 808 Posts
I enjoy achievements when they're done right, some are pointless, but others show off your mastery of a game, I like them, because they are a way to advertise your skill, and some are hilarious, but then again I'll reiterate some are pointless ways to boost your gamerscore.
Avatar image for JC02
JC02

1668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 JC02
Member since 2003 • 1668 Posts

I love achievements  because they add to the game and it makes you work little harder then you would without them.

Avatar image for LEGEND_C4A
LEGEND_C4A

3186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 LEGEND_C4A
Member since 2003 • 3186 Posts
[QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"]

[QUOTE="mgszelda1"]To me achievements r pointless. All it does is say look I have less of a life. Dont take that in a wrong way but I just dont get the point in bragging about it mgszelda1

we sit for hours playing video games, running around with master chief killing aliens, running around with mario collecting coins, playing games like GTA and having fake sex with hookers in cars, and you want to come in here and say that liking achievements means you have no life?

something there doesnt make sense....

I am talkin about how ppl spend so much time on just one game. And they dont reflect how good u really r. To me it`s just like getting a gold star in pre-k. Big deal everyone has one kind of thing.

ok you are right, playing a game a lot and getting all the achievements doesn't mean you are good at it, but since when do we have to prove how good we are, just like someone said before, we pay 60 bucks for these games, you can play a game and get achievements with out even trying, just play the game, but when you are done with the game, you can always go back and try to get achievements you didn't get before. a game within a game. anything that adds replay value to a game should be talked about in reviews.

Avatar image for LEGEND_C4A
LEGEND_C4A

3186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 LEGEND_C4A
Member since 2003 • 3186 Posts

[QUOTE="TheJustin"]ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users: 1,032,532
Gamerscore: 3,335,937,818
Achievements: 116,669,143 All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
coolguy1111
The averages persons gamerscore is i see around here is like 2000. And plus, how many of them are cheaters trying to get into the top10 spots?

achievements and rankings are two different things, you don't get into the to 10 in anything becuase you have all the achivements, unless you are talking about the top ten in achievement points. and if thats what you are talking about, then whats wrong with that, 300-400 bucks on systems, 60 bucks on games, let people spend there time going for achievements if they feel like it.

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#95 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts

[QUOTE="sdifjds"]For something that has absolutely no impact on quality of Game, GameSpot sure seems to mention achievements in reviews a whole lot. Look what they said about Ninja Turtles The Good: Online co-op play for up to four players that's legitimately fun; all the original music and voice effects are here; solid achievements list; it's only $5. Solid achievement list? I believe that is code for, "Easy Gamerscore boost" Who cares? Honestly? We all know Gertsmann is in love with his Gamerscore to the point which he files a points report every week. Achievements aren't important to me GameSpot.Gamer556

Well, it is to them, so they're going to write about it.

What he said.
Avatar image for Berserker_2
Berserker_2

5948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Berserker_2
Member since 2006 • 5948 Posts
[QUOTE="sdifjds"]For something that has absolutely no impact on quality of Game, GameSpot sure seems to mention achievements in reviews a whole lot. Look what they said about Ninja Turtles The Good: Online co-op play for up to four players that's legitimately fun; all the original music and voice effects are here; solid achievements list; it's only $5. Solid achievement list? I believe that is code for, "Easy Gamerscore boost" Who cares? Honestly? We all know Gertsmann is in love with his Gamerscore to the point which he files a points report every week. Achievements aren't important to me GameSpot. and do not affect the game in any way. They should not be factored into your reviews.

Everyone that has heard of Achievements, yet never experienced them, thinks they are superficial. You have to play a game and then get an Achievement to understand the value of them. People can see your Gamerscore. Also, when you get a tough Achiement, like the "Saint" in Dead Rising, it is something to show off.
Avatar image for LEGEND_C4A
LEGEND_C4A

3186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 LEGEND_C4A
Member since 2003 • 3186 Posts

Achievement points are ok IMO, but I hate when they add the achievement play some many online Matches I played Tony Hawk Project 8 and one of the achievements was to play 100 online Matches I didn't even play one match because everyone playing that game online were annoying and I left before I started because I had to wait a long time in the Pre game lobby and I couldn't stand the other players.

Nintendo_Ownes7

here is a simple solution and I have no idea why I have to keep telling people this, if it bothers you waiting for people to start a game or people just simply annoy you, just serve your own game. pretty simple if you ask me, serve 100 games yourself, invite your friends which I assume you have, or weed out the people you don't want. there are thousands of jerks online no doubt, but there are more that are not. build a good friends list and you shouldn't have problems, so do that and Join me and others in gaming bliss.

Avatar image for LEGEND_C4A
LEGEND_C4A

3186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 LEGEND_C4A
Member since 2003 • 3186 Posts

[QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"][QUOTE="coolguy1111"][QUOTE="TheJustin"]ok. If you go to mygamercard.net then go to leaderboards. There is a gamertag card there. With all the stats of everyone's achievements. Let's look shall we? http://www.mygamercard.net/leaderboard.php

Users: 1,032,532
Gamerscore: 3,335,937,818
Achievements: 116,669,143 All these numbers are still growing.

I think it's safe at this point to say that though achievements mean nothing to you. They do to other people. So I think gamespot is actually pretty right to comment on achievements. I do not think the total would be over 3 billion if only a minor amount of people cared.
-=XBoXDemon=-
The averages persons gamerscore is i see around here is like 2000. And plus, how many of them are cheaters trying to get into the top10 spots?



Doesn't matter how they get them. What matters is they are getting them. If people go as far as to cheat to get these then obviously achievements mean more to some people as the topic creater is letting on.

So if they totally cheat its ok? Plus, them cheating to get the points doesnt mean they have/own/play the game.



This thread/convorsation is about the morality of cheating. It's about the use of achievement points by more than just a minority. And whether or not they are important enough to be included into a review. I think you are kind of straying off of the subject a little.

No its totally related, you said it should be counted because there popular, and listed a lot of achievements, however, if theres a large chunk of people cheating, adn getting like 100,000, 50,000, even like 20,000-30,000, thats alot, and they cheated, showing that those achievements arnt a big selling point to the majority of the gamers.



Actually it shows just the opposite if they took the time to look up online for cheats just to unlock achievements then they must be a selling point otherwise they wouldnt bother.

exactly!

Avatar image for LEGEND_C4A
LEGEND_C4A

3186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 LEGEND_C4A
Member since 2003 • 3186 Posts

[QUOTE="MADVLAD123"]achievements add replay value and extend the life of the game. nuff said.frankeyser

achievement points are a waste of time only sought out by those with no life and a low self esteem.. much like the kids how tried to catch all the pokemon.

you have big Ba*** to talk like that about people who play video games, when you are a video gamer as well. the point of pokemon is to catch all of them.

Avatar image for blacktorn
blacktorn

8299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#100 blacktorn
Member since 2004 • 8299 Posts
Ok and could you please Link a review that states achievemetns make the game better or it is factored into the review at all?

...oh what there isn't one? Surprize...:roll: /thread