MS was the clear winner? I'm stunned.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Natal will fail. I'm not convinced Alan Wake is EVER coming out until I can actually hold it in my hands. Crackdown 1 was lame and I'm sick of Splinter Cell and Forza. Pass.savebatterymarked for future ownage.
Yeah it was pretty clear MS won it. They did an awesome job.
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Exclusives like Alan Wake and Splinter Cell conviction?Puckhog04
And then they lost credible PC reviews when Jason Ocampo left. :(
Man, if only the GS forums weren't so good. GS has gone downhill so much.
Yes, when Greg Kasavin was the head of Gamespot, Gamespot was the most reliable and credible site for gaming. However, that changed when Jeff G. became head and started preaching his Xbox Fanboyism instead of being a professional gaming editor. Jason Ocampo, as far as I know is a loyal follower of Jeff G., but not as bias and fanboyish as Jeff, as Jason Ocampo was guided by the principles of Greg K., unlike Jeff G.. So I still find Jason as the one of the last best gamespot editor so far.Yeah it was pretty clear MS won it. They did an awesome job.
Gamespot is owned by CNET, which is owned by Microsoft so what did you expect?
It's already been proven Gamespot is MS bias.
Everyone knows that when it comes to the games and exclusives PS3 won E3.
PCGamer248
Silly, CNet is a publicly held company. You're just beign a silly fanboy now.
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-4_102-0.html?threadID=259347
[QUOTE="789shadow"]the glow sticks are an almost exact copy of wii motion+*sigh*Natal is fatally flawed without buttons. The Glow Sticks won the war for Sony.
hy4k
Big deal. The 360 camera is a copy of the ps eye toy... All companies copy each other, now stop mentioning it...
[QUOTE="PCGamer248"]
Gamespot is owned by CNET, which is owned by Microsoft so what did you expect?
It's already been proven Gamespot is MS bias.
Everyone knows that when it comes to the games and exclusives PS3 won E3.
Silly, CNet is a publicly held company. You're just beign a silly fanboy now.
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-4_102-0.html?threadID=259347
Still does not mean that GS is not bias in favor of Microsoft. Jeff G. is one big evidence of that.What are they smoking, if there were any losers Microsoft was the one. Though it could be because I don't consider L4D2, Alan Wake or SCC "exclusives".ManicAce
been spending too much time in SW i guess. in the real world they are console exclusives. the console and PC markets are very different beasts in terms of investors and business models. so i'd hazard to guess the real-world definition, and what real people outside SW use in their day-to-day lives, might trump what you've grown accustomed to in System Wars.
when people talk exclusives in the real world they generally, almost all the time in fact, are refering to 'console exclusive' as they are speaking about the console gaming industry.
it's really silly that SW isn't up to date with this stuff - they even refer to things as being console exclusive in GS articles these days. just a few posters in SW that would rather keep it the old way to try to win some stupid exclusivity count war - which is a stupid meta-game people play around here imho.
[QUOTE="Ambli"][QUOTE="PCGamer248"]
Gamespot is owned by CNET, which is owned by Microsoft so what did you expect?
It's already been proven Gamespot is MS bias.
Everyone knows that when it comes to the games and exclusives PS3 won E3.
Zaistev_basic
Silly, CNet is a publicly held company. You're just beign a silly fanboy now.
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-4_102-0.html?threadID=259347
Still does not mean that GS is not bias in favor of Microsoft. Jeff G. is one big evidence of that.You do know the PS3 has two 10s, right?
Still does not mean that GS is not bias in favor of Microsoft. Jeff G. is one big evidence of that.[QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"][QUOTE="Ambli"]
Silly, CNet is a publicly held company. You're just beign a silly fanboy now.
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-4_102-0.html?threadID=259347
Silverbond
You do know the PS3 has two 10s, right?
You look at few score for Sony compare to various AAA game rating of X360 from GS during his time, and his preffered kind of games (FPS).Also, Jeff G's always use poor choice of word on reviewing which lead to his firing.
There are ways to make a negative review but not to the point when you act fanboyish and bashing the game itself, which is very unprofessional.
It tells you how he is easily distinguished differently from a consistent, credible, andprofessional reviewer like Greg K..
[QUOTE="789shadow"]They are both at the same level of quality. However, M+ is in final form, which means it cannot improve. The Glow Sticks are prototypes, which means they can and will.hy4kthey cant improve motion control. 1:1 is as good as it gets they can only improve the other aspects such as the body recognition. either way nintendo will be way ahead of them in this area, same as always microsoft had one of the most impressive demo's i've ever seen though
I don't believe 1:1 can't be improved. The improvement might be miniscule, but we will notice.
Sony and Microsoft both did an amazing job. It showed me that both of these companies are in this for the win. At times while I was watching the Sony and Microsoft press briefings it was almost overwhelming. So many great games were demonstrated and/or announced.
Most places have been saying that, although they kind of took it as a whole package thing, not focusing as much on exclusives, still most sources agree Microsoft won.
Just for some reason System Wars is different, whether it's cow central, or because our rules somehow dictate what we think, that's just how it is here. Logic does not work here... But of course everyone argues that we are the logical ones...
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Exclusives like Alan Wake and Splinter Cell conviction?3picuri3I don't think GS uses the concept "system wars" but "console wars". they differentiate between console exclusive and system exclusive (or just pure exclusive in other words) - seems stupid we wouldn't do the same in SW.
you're absolutly right.
everything the GS staff writes is sacred. they are to SW as muhhommed is to muslims. even if what they write makes absolutly no sense, and they constantly contridict themselves.
I don't believe 1:1 can't be improved. The improvement might be miniscule, but we will notice.-Melix-
1:1 = 1:1. perfect motion control
the technology that the wii and ps3 wand use is pretty much the same and even if it wasn't you cant improve on perfect motion control. the only thing you can improve is the software
iirc the wii motion plus updates at 200hz. the ps3 wand faster than even that. both update faster than the human eye can see
[QUOTE="-Melix-"]I don't believe 1:1 can't be improved. The improvement might be miniscule, but we will notice.
hy4k
1:1 = 1:1. perfect motion control
the technology that the wii and ps3 wand use is pretty much the same and even if it wasn't you cant improve on perfect motion control. the only thing you can improve is the software
iirc the wii motion plus updates at 200hz. the ps3 wand faster than even that. both update faster than the human eye can see
They say M+ is 1:1, but to be honest, where is there 1:1 control to compare it to? And why did you change my username?>_>
[QUOTE="edo-tensei"][QUOTE="Truth_Hurts_U"]how can gamespot forget to mention uc2, god of war 3, gt5, ff14, mgspsp for sony... lame oh and mass effect 2 from ms since they already mentioned multis like L4D2Yeah it was pretty clear MS won it. They did an awesome job.
edo-tensei
Only mentioning new titles, and new features obviously...
not this agen :P
nintendos e3 pritty much showed the wiimote+ 1:1 and it looked very very much like sonys.
the archry looked way better, the nunchuck > 2 remotes
the sword fighting looked better
hmm why didnt they count left 4 dead 2 as exclusive then too? but yeah microsfot had a good conference, but i guess it all goes down to what each person was expecting to see. people saying sony won because they showed more games, people say microsoft won becuase they had a better presentation and showed off natal, so really it can go both ways depending on who you are.
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Exclusives like Alan Wake and Splinter Cell conviction?IronBass
I think GS does not use the concept "system wars" but "console wars".
well given that the whole disscussion is based around what will MS, sony and nintendo bring to their platform that the other 2 won't, the term "exclusive" does kinda make sense in this context.
I hope next year the PCGA makes a conference of their own, but that probaly won't happen^^
Microsoft had the most entertaining show, I thought. But Sony and Nintendo both had way more in terms of games.
[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]or sounds like somebody only has one system, and it isn't a 360. Sounds to me like he's just being a negative nancy.It sounds like you just don't like this hobby anymore, no offense.
Screamteam411
My turn
Well it sounds to me like somebody only likes AAAA games
I agree. However, Microsoft and Sony were equally awesome; so I'd also agree with the latter winning E3 in the eyes of Gamespot.ToScA-
Both MS and Sony showed off alot of great stuff, but with for Microsoft it was alittle more entertaning and seems to be better flowing than the other two, that is why MS 'won' it in my eyes.
But the real winner is the gamers.
MS had the better presentation but that's a lame thing to argue in my opinion because I'm in it for the games and Sony delivered and showed off some amazing titles; many of them only on PS3.
Unlike the bs MS pulled where they decided to pretend that they were the only platform in the world and say it's exclusive because of that. :roll:
In the end I don't care who won E3, because amazing games were shown for all platforms and I'm going to enjoy my future gaming. =)
If you put Bias aside and look at the facts, Sony had the better lineup of exclusive games shown and more games.
Gamespot is owned by CNET, which is owned by Microsoft so what did you expect?
It's already been proven Gamespot is MS bias.
Everyone knows that when it comes to the games and exclusives PS3 won E3.
PCGamer248
hmm funny when HW got 6.5 sony fanboys were quite fats to point out the imense credibility of gamespot over any other review site, what happened from then to now with GS any change in ownership I missed?
Good one. :roll:First time GS has ever got anything right. MS>Nintendo>Sony. Without a doubt.
CreepyBacon
[QUOTE="CreepyBacon"]Good one. :roll: I debate over whether Microsoft or Sony had a better E3, but in my eyes, Nintendo was only stepping up from their E3 2008 failure, giving us a "I guess it was 'aight" impression over its past. Sony, on the other hand, had a truly impressive show, especially from last year's E3 flop, and Microsoft put up a very good show altogether.First time GS has ever got anything right. MS>Nintendo>Sony. Without a doubt.
GodofBigMacs
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="DonPerian"]Yes, in the real world, those games are considered exclusive to some degree. It's not just black and white.Javy03But in System Wars it must be!!!! :cry: So many people on here get furious when the "real world" doesn't act like SW or obey its rules. LOL..the problem is in the "real world" there are no solid set of rules. Like for instance DonPerian claims in the real world those games would be considered exlcusive but that's not necessarily true. In the real world if I have the appropriate PC I could walk to Best Buy and pick up those games for my PC and play them without a 360. So how is that "exclusive". Now of course if I was dead set on never playing games on my PC but wanted to play Alan Wake the 360 would be my only option. That doesnt make it exclsuive that means I limited my options and made a decision based on my own limitation. People say Sony fans hide behind the PC but the truth is select fanboys wanna pretend it doesnt exist selectively. In the real world, without any PERSONAL limitations I could play Alan Wake on TWO different systems. Sounds like its multiplat with real world rules as well. But of course in the real world nobody even thinks about these kind of things they just buy whatever they want for whatever reasons and can own more then one system if they so chose. The thing about the real world is no matter how you look at it games found on either PC/360 or PS3/PC and of course PS3/360/PC sales 4-to-1 on the consoles almost all the time.... This is why you won't be seeing GEow2 on PC. The only reason we're not calling PC/360 games "console exclusive" is to give reason for bashing the 360. Reguardless, I'm sure you arlready know this....
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Exclusives like Alan Wake and Splinter Cell conviction?DarkerKamikaze
Alan Wake and Splinter Cell Conviction are both "Microsoft" exculsive I think I'm not sure though.
Here in this Bizarro world we call system wars, if it's on more than 1 platform it's multiplat. Those games are on PC therefore not exclusive. Out in the world people spend money in and where console makers war with each other and don't see the PC as direct competition, it's exclusive in regards to console game libraries. It's weird, but it works for SW.If winning E3 is determined by how much publicity and media hype you recieve then yes, Microsoft won. Natal is a big deal no matter how you look at it. And a good few games were announced as well.
Microsoft still have a long ways before they have a lineup as strong as Sony's though.
That's pretty much how I feel.
While I wouldn't say MS was the clear winner of E3, their showing impressed me the most this year.
They say M+ is 1:1, but to be honest, where is there 1:1 control to compare it to? And why did you change my username?>_>
789shadow
there isn't 1:1 to compare it to. nintendo are the first to implement it. but if it can track every movement and it updates faster than the human eye can see then it is 1:1. like i explained in the other thread the PS3 wand is also 1:1 but it uses a different method. both methods have their ups and downs
dont know what happened with the username, sorry
yes because halo wars getting a 6.5 and infamous getting a 9.0 shows how that they're nothing more then hardcore lemmings :roll:Gamespot has already proven before that they're Microsoft fanboys, so this doesn't come as a surprise.
Brawl578
[QUOTE="789shadow"]
They say M+ is 1:1, but to be honest, where is there 1:1 control to compare it to? And why did you change my username?>_>
hy4k
there isn't 1:1 to compare it to. nintendo are the first to implement it. but if it can track every movement and it updates faster than the human eye can see then it is 1:1. like i explained in the other thread the PS3 wand is also 1:1 but it uses a different method. both methods have their ups and downs
dont know what happened with the username, sorry
If there is no 1:1 to compare it to, how do we know it's true 1:1?M+ could be nowhere near 1:1, but we won't know since there's no comparison.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment